ارزیابی روشهای شمارش گروه‌های سرگین برای برآورد فراوانی گوزن زرد ایرانی (مطالعه موردی: پناهگاه حیات وحش دشت ناز ساری)

Acevedo, O., Ferreres, J., Jaroso, R., Durn, M., Escuderoc, M.A., Marco, J., Gortzar, C., 2010. Estimating roe deer abundance from pellet group counts in Spain: An assessment of methods suitable for Mediterranean woodlands. Ecological Indicators 10, 1226–1230

Acevedo, P., Ruiz-Fons, F., Vicente, J., Reyes-Garcıa, A.R., Alzaga, V., Gortazar, C., 2008. Estimating red deer abundance in a wide range of management situations in Mediterranean habitats Journal of Zoology 276, 37–47.

Acevedo, P., Vicente, J., Höfle, U., Cassinello, J., Ruiz-Fons, F.,  Gortázar, C.  2007. Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiology and Infection, 135, 519-527.

Ali-Akbari, A., 2009. Assessing the pellet group count methods to estimate of Persian fallow deer (Dama dama mesopotamica) in Dashte-e-Naz wildlife refuge. MsC thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran, 235p (in Persian).

Alves, J., da Silva, A.A., Soares, A.M.V.M., Fonseca, C., 2013. Pellet group count methods to estimate red deer densities: precision, potential accuracy and efficiency', Mammalian Biology 78, 134-41.

Andersen, R., Hjeljord, O., Saether, B.E., 1992. Moose defecation rates in relation to habitat quality. Alces 28, 95–100.

Bailey, R.E., Putman, R., 1981. Estimation of fallow deer (Dama dama) populations from faecal accumulation. Journal of Applied Ecology 18, 697–702.

Barnes, R.F.W., 2002. The problem of precision and trend detection posed by small elephant populations in West Africa. African Journal of Ecology 40, 179– 185.

Barnes, R.F.W., Jensen, K.L., 1987. How to count elephants in forests. IUCN African Elephant and Rhino Specialist Group Technical Bulletin 1, 1-6.

Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. & Thomas, L. 2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Camargo-Sanabria, A.A., Mandujano, S., 2011. Comparison of pellet-group counting methods to estimate population density of white-tailed deer in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Tropical Conservation Science 4, 230-243.

Campbell, D., Swanson, G.M., Sales, J., 2004. Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 1185–1196.

Clutton-Brock, T.H., Guinness, F.E., Albon, S.D., 1982. Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Ellwood, S., 2000. Using a dung clearance plot method for estimating Fallow, Roe and Muntjac number in mixed deciduous woodland. Deer 8, 417-423.

Eycott, A., Daleszczyk, K., Drese, J., Cantero, A.S., Pèbre, J., Gladys, S., 2013. Defecation rate in captive European bison, Bison bonasus. Acta Theriologica 58, 387-390.

Focardi, S., Isotti, R., Tinelli, A., 2002. Line transect estimates of ungulate populations in a Mediterranean forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 48–58.

Ghahremani-Nezhad, F., Taghi-Nezhad, A.R., Bahari, H., Esmaeili, R., 2011. An introduction to flora, life form, and distribution of plants in two protected lowland forests, Semeskandeh and Dasht-e Naz, Mazandaran N. Iran. Taxonomy and Biosystematics  6, 53-71

Hemami, M.R., Dolman, P.M., 2005. The disappearance of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) pellet groups in a pine forest of lowland England. European  Journal of Wildlife Research 51,19–24.

Hemami, M.R., Watkinson, A.R., Dolman, P.M., 2005. Population densities and habitat associations of introduced muntjac Muntiacus reevesi and native roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a lowland pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 224–238.

Hemami, M.R., Rabiei, A., 2002. The conservation of Persian Fallow Deer (Dama dama mesopotamica). 5th International Deer Biology Congress. Conference Proceedings: 43.

Hemami, M.R., Watkinson, A.R., Gill, R.M.A., Dolman, P.M., 2007. Estimating abundance of introduced Chinese Muntiacus reevesi and native Roe Deer using portable thermal imaging equipment. Mammal Review 37: 246-254.

Jordan, P.A., Peterson, R.O., Campbell, P., Mclaren, B., 1993. Comparison of pellet-group counts and aerial counts for estimating density of moose at Isle Royale: a progress report. Alces 29, 267–278.

Laing, S.E., Buckland, S.T., Burn, R.W., Lambie, D., Amphlett, A., 2003. Dung and nest surveys: estimating decay rates. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 1102–1111.

Latham, J., Staines, B.W., Gorman, M.L., 1997. Correlations of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer densities in Scottish forests with environmental variables. Journal of Zoology 242, 681–704.

Mandujano, S., 2005. Calibration of tracks count to estimate population density of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in a Mexican tropical forest. Southwest Natural 50, 223-229.

Månsson, J., 2009. Environmental variation and moose Alces alces density as determinants of spatio-temporal heterogeneity in browsing. Ecography 32, 601–612.

Marques, F.F.C., Buckland, S.T., Goffin, D., Dixon, C.E., Borchers, D.L., Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., 2001. Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 349–363.

Massei, G., Bacon, P., Genov, P.V., 1998. Fallow deer and wild boar pellet group disappearance in a Mediterranean area. Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 1086–1094.

Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., Gill, R.M.A., 1999. How Many Deer? A Field Guide to Estimating Deer Population Size. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., Gill, R.M.A., 1999. How many deer? Forestry Commission, Edinburgh Pellet group count methods to estimate red deer densities: Precision, potential accuracy and efficiency. Mammalian Biology 78, 134–141.

McClanahan, T.R., 1986: Quick population survey method using faecal droppings and a steady state assumption. African Journal of Ecology 24, 37-39.

Neff, D.J., 1986. The pellet-group count technique for big game trends, census, and distribution: a Review. Journal of Wildlife Management 32, 597-614.

Plhal, R., Kamler, J., Homolka, M., 2014. Faecal pellet group counting as a promising method of wild boar population density estimation. Acta Theriologica 59, 561-569.

Putman, R.J., 1984. Facts from faeces. Mammal Review 14, 79–97.

Rollins, D., Bryant, F.C., Montandon, R., 1984. Fecal pH and defecation rates of eight ruminants fed known diets. Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 807-813.

Rönnegård, L., Sand, H., Andrén, H., Månsson, J., Pehrson, A., 2008. Evaluation of four methods used to estimate population density of moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biology 14, 358–371.

Skarin, A., 2008. Habitat use by semi-domesticated reindeer, estimated with pellet-group counts. Rangifer 27, 121-132.

Smart, J.C.R., Ward, A.I., White, P.C.L., 2004. Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: an imprecise science. Mammal Review 34, 99–114.

Staines, B.W., Ratcliffe, P.R., 1987. Estimating the abundance of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) and their current status in Great Britain. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 58, 131– 152.

Timmermann, H.R., 1974. Moose inventory methods: a review. Naturaliste Canadien 101, 615–629.

Tsaparis, D., Katsanevakis, S., Ntolka, E., Legakis, A., 2009. Estimating dung decay rates of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in different habitat types of a Mediterranean ecosystem: an information theory approach. European  Journal of Wildlife Research 55, 167–172.

van Etten, R.C., Bennett, C.L., 1965.Somesources of error in using pellet-group counts for censusing deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 29, 723–729.

Ward, A.I., White, P.C.L., Critchley, C.H., 2004. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus behaviour affects density estimates from distance sampling surveys. Mammal Review 34, 315–319.

Zannèse, A., Baïsse, A., Gaillard, J.M., Hewison, A.J.M., Saint-Hilaire, K., Toïgo, C., Van Laere, G., Morellet, N., 2006. Hind foot length: a new biological indicator for monitoring roe deer populations at a la ndscape scale. Wildlife Society Botulin 34, 351–358