بازخورد تصحیحی نوشتاری در مهارت نگارش زبان دوم: آیا شبه بازخورد کافیست؟

منابع

Amrhein H.R., & Nassaji H. (2010) Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied linguistics 13, 95-127.

Ancker, W. (2000). Errors and corrective feedback: Updated theory and classroom practice. English Teaching Forum, 38(4), 20-24.

Bitchener, J. (2008).  Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-211.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.

Brown, R. (1973). A first language; the early stages. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 136-140.

Bruton, A. (2010). Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics. System, 38, 491-498.

Chandler, J. (2004). A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345-348.

Chandler, J. (2009). Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 57-58.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008).  The  effects  of  focused  and  unfocused  written  corrective  feedback  in  an  English  as  a foreign  language context.  System, 36, 353-371.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-11.

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jean, G., & D. Simard (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students’ and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 44(4), 465-492.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1982).  Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1988). Teaching grammar: Why bother? California English, 3(3), 8.

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312.

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69-85.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413 – 468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186-214.

Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.

Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217-243.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37(4), 556-569.

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110.

Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471-484). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.

Truscott, J. (1999). The case for ‘‘the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes’’: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.

Truscott, J. (2004). Dialogue: Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343.

Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 59-60.

Truscott, J. (2010). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 329-335.

Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270-275.