پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,690 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,002,695 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,681,518 |
Experimental Studies on the Conical Cap tray Performance | ||
| Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 50، شماره 2، اردیبهشت 2017، صفحه 47-52 اصل مقاله (565.78 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jchpe.2017.60504 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Taleb Zarei* 1؛ Jamshid Khorshidi1؛ Rahbar Rahimi2؛ Ali Zarei3 | ||
| 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
| 3South Pars Gas Complex (SPGC), Assaluyeh, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In the present study, experimental investigations about the hydrodynamics of the conical cap tray (ConCap tray) have been carried out. The ConCap tray is an innovative and novel type of cap trays. The effect of the different weir height (2.5, 5 and 7 cm) on the weeping, entrainment and the total pressure drop for the ConCap tray was measured, compared and correlated. The hydraulic experiments were carried out in an industrial scale simulator rig with an inner diameter of 1.2 m which has two test trays (ConCap tray) and two chimney trays. It was found that the weir height affects only on the pressure drop. The recommended weir height for the ConCap tray must be 2.5 cm because of observed spray flow regime on the tray and experimental results in different weir height which shows no effect on the weeping and entrainment rates. Moreover, the hydraulic behavior of the tray in the lower operating limits was also investigated. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Conical gap tray؛ hydrodynamic؛ Weeping؛ Entrainment؛ Weir height | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] De Bruyn, G., Gangriwala, H.A., Nye, JO. ( 1992). “High capacity Nye(R) trays.” Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 1:A509- A17.
[2] Kunesh, J.G., Kister, H.Z., Lockett, M.J., Fair, J.R. ( 1995). “Distillation: still towering over other options”. Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 91, pp. 43-53.
[3] Bravo, J.L., Kusters, K.A. (2000). “Tray technology for the new millennium.” Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 96, pp. 33-7.
[4] Burcher, N., Wikstrom, E., Mosca, G., Hausman, A., Wilkinson, P.( 2007). “De-butanizer revamp at PreemRaff.” Proceedings of Topical Distillation Conference, AIChE, pp. 189-204.
[5] Summers, D.R., Bernard, A., Villiers, W.E.D. (2007). “High capacity tray revamp of a C2 splitter.” AIChE Proceedings of Topical Distillation Conference, pp. 189-204.
[6] Penciak, J., Nieuwoudt, I., Spencer, G.( 2006). “High-performance trays: Getting the best capacity and efficiency.” IChemE Symposium, Vol. 152, pp. 311-6.
[7] Wilkinson, P., Vos, E., Konijn, G., Kooijman, H., Mosca, G., Tonon, L. (2007). “Distillation trays that operate beyond the limits of gravity by using centrifugal separation.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 85, pp. 130-5.
[8] Fair, J.R., Trutna, W.R., Seibert, A.F. (1999). “A new, ultracapacity tray for distillation columns.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 77, pp. 619-26.
[9] Trutna, WR. (1997). Method and apparatus for producing co-current fluid contact. US Patent, 5695548.
[10] Xu, Z.P., Bielinski, D.H. (2004). Apparatus for cocurrent fractional distillation . US Patent, 6682633B1.
[11] Xu, P., Nowak, B., Richardson, K. (2007). “Simul-Flow device capacity beyond system limit.” AIChE Meeting, Spring.
[12] Olujić, Z., Jödecke, M., Shilkin, A., Schuch, G., 52 T. Zarei et al. / Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 50 (2), Feb. 2017 / 47-52 Kaibel, B. (2009). “Equipment improvement trends in distillation.” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification , Vol. 48, pp. 1089-104.
[13] Naziri, N., Zadghaffari, R., Naziri, H. (2012).”A study on chimney type centrifugal tray lower operating limit.” APCBEE Procedia, Vol. 3, pp. 182-7.
[14] Qian, J., Qi, R., Zhu, S. (2006). “High-powered adaptive valve tray: A new generation tray offers new advantages.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 84, pp. 155-8.
[15] Rahimi, R., Movahedi, Parizi, M. (2015). “Hydrodynamics of sieve tray distillation column using CFD simulation.” Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Vol. 49, pp. 119-29.
[16] Zarei, T., Rahimi, R., Zarei, A., Zivdar, M. (2013). “Hydrodynamic characteristic of Conical Captray: Experimental studies on dry and total pressure drop, weeping and entrainment.” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification , Vol. 64, pp. 17-23.
[17] Ostadzehi, R., Rahimi, R., Zarei, T., Zivdar, M. (2013). “CFD simulation of Concap tray hydrodynamics.” Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Vol. 47, pp. 39-50.
[18] Wijn, E.F. (1999). “Weir flow and liquid height on sieve and valve trays.” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 73, pp. 191-204.
[19] Zarei, T., Rahimi, R., Zivdar. (2009). “Computational fluid dynamic simulation of MVG tray hydraulics.” Korean journal of chemical Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 1213-1219.
[20] Lockett, M.J. (1986). Distillation tray fundamentals. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[21] Kister, H.Z. (1992). Distillation operation. McGraw Hill. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,448 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,271 |
||