سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,230
تعداد مقالات67,757
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,113,295
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,877,916
Hatefi, Mohammad Ali. (1395). Introducing an Applicable Technique for Ranking and Selecting Project Portfolio, based on Qualitative Risk Assessment. , 50(1), 133-145. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2016.59438
Mohammad Ali Hatefi. "Introducing an Applicable Technique for Ranking and Selecting Project Portfolio, based on Qualitative Risk Assessment". , 50, 1, 1395, 133-145. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2016.59438
Hatefi, Mohammad Ali. (1395). 'Introducing an Applicable Technique for Ranking and Selecting Project Portfolio, based on Qualitative Risk Assessment', , 50(1), pp. 133-145. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2016.59438
Hatefi, Mohammad Ali. Introducing an Applicable Technique for Ranking and Selecting Project Portfolio, based on Qualitative Risk Assessment. , 1395; 50(1): 133-145. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2016.59438

Introducing an Applicable Technique for Ranking and Selecting Project Portfolio, based on Qualitative Risk Assessment

Advances in Industrial Engineering
مقاله 11، دوره 50، شماره 1، تیر 2016، صفحه 133-145    اصل مقاله (412.68 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jieng.2016.59438
نویسنده
Mohammad Ali Hatefi*
Department of Energy Economics & Management, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Projects execution is an important way to implement organizational strategies, especially in the project-based organizations. In such organizations, the decision-makers usually encounter a problem of the project portfolio selection. Of course, regarding the decision-makers’ risk attitude, they tend to direct organizational resources toward projects with low threats and high opportunities. This paper introduces a new technique for ranking projects and selecting a project portfolio, taking into account the decision-makers’ risk attitudes. In this technique, for application easiness, experts’ judgments are received as qualitative estimations. Besides, the proposed technique includes a special way to calculate the total risk level so that it avoids the computational issues of the traditional methods. At the end of this paper, an application of the proposed technique in a real case extracted from steel structure industry is analyzed.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Project portfolio management؛ Project Portfolio Selection؛ Project qualitative risk analysis؛ Project ranking؛ Risk attitude
عنوان مقاله [English]
یک روش کاربردی برای رتبه‌بندی و انتخاب سبد پروژه‌ها بر مبنای ارزیابی کیفی ریسک
نویسندگان [English]
محمدعلی هاتفی
استادیار گروه اقتصاد و مدیریت انرژی، دانشگاه صنعت نفت
چکیده [English]
انجام‌دادن پروژه‌ها راهی اساسی برای اجرای راهبردهای سازمانی، به‌ویژه در سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور است. در این‌گونه سازمان‌ها، تصمیم‌گیرندگان همواره با مسئلة انتخاب سبد پروژه‌ها روبه‌رو هستند و البته تمایل دارند با توجه به درجة ریسک‌پذیری خود، منابع محدود سازمان را به سمت پروژه‌هایی هدایت کنند که کمترین تهدید و بیشترین فرصت را داشته باشند. پژوهش حاضر روشی جدید را برای رتبه‌بندی و انتخاب سبد پروژه‌ها با توجه به گرایش ریسک تصمیم‌گیرندگان ارائه می‌دهد. در این روش، به‌دلیل سهولت کاربرد، قضاوت خبرگان در قالب تخمین‌های کیفی ارائه می‌شود. همچنین، روش پیشنهادی شامل روش ویژه‌ای برای محاسبة سطح ریسک کل است که در آن از مشکلات محاسباتی روش‌های سنتی اجتناب می‌شود. در انتهای پژوهش، کاربرد روش پیشنهادی در نمونة واقعی مربوط به صنعت سازه‌های فولادی تحلیل می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
انتخاب سبد پروژه‌ها, تحلیل کیفی ریسک پروژه, رتبه‌بندی پروژه‌ها, گرایش ریسک, مدیریت سبد پروژه‌ها
مراجع
  1. Crittenden, V. and Crittenden, W. (2008). “Building a capable organization: the eight levers of strategy implementation.” Business Horizons, Vol. 51, 301-309.
  2. Jeffrey, K.P. (2010). Project management: achieving competitive advantage, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc.
  3. Cooper, D. and Chapman, C. (1987). Risk analysis for large projects - models, methods and cases, 1st Ed. Wiley, NY, USA.
  4. Ravanshadnia, M., Rajaie, H. and Abbasian H.R. (2011). “A comprehensive bid/no-bid decision making framework for construction companies.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, Vol. 35, No. C1, 95-103.
  5. Teller, J. and Kock, A. (2013). “An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, 817-829.
  6. Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments, 1st Ed., Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.
  7. Modarres, M. and Hassanzadeh, F. (2009). “A robust optimization approach to R&D project selection.” World Applied Science Journal, Vol. 7, No. 5, 582-592.
  8. Huang, X. (2008). “Risk curve and fuzzy portfolio selection.” Journal of Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 55, 1102-1112.
  9. Drake, A.R. and Kohlmeyer, J.M. (2010). “Risk-taking in new project selection: additive effects of bonus incentives and past performance history.” Advances in Accounting, Vol. 26, No. 2, 207-220.
  10. Golmohammadi, A. and Pajoutan, M. (2010). “Meta-heuristics for depended portfolio selection problem considering risk.” Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 5, 5642-5649.
  11. Ozkan, B, Wu, D., Linderoth, J.T. and Moore, J. (2010). “R&D project portfolio analysis for the semiconductor industry.” Operations Research, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1548-1563.
  12. Abbasi, M., Ashrafi, M., Kheirkhah, A., Bonyad, H. and Ghorbanzadeh Karimi, H. (2013). “R&D project selection using DEA and BSC.”Science & TechnologyPolicy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 67-84.
  13. Rashidi, A., Jazebi, F. and Brilakis, I. (2011). “Neuro-fuzzy genetic system for selection of construction project managers.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 1, 17-29.
  14. Torfi, F. and Rashidi, A. (2011). “Selection of project managers in construction firms using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study.” Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, Vol. 16, No. 1, 69-89.
  15. Taylan, O., Bafail, A.O., Abdulaal, R.M.S. and Kabli, M.R. (2014), “Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies.” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 17, 105-116.
  16. Padovani, M., DeCarvalho, M.M. and NamurMuscat, A.R. (2012). “Project portfolio adjustment and balance: a case study in the chemical sector.” Production, Vol. 22, No. 4, 674-694.
  17. Abbasianjahromi, H.R. and Rajaie, H. (2013). “Application of fuzzy CBR and MODM approaches in the project portfolio selection in construction companies.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 37, No. C1, 143-155.
  18. Souder, W.E. and Sherman, J.D. (1994). Managing new technology development, McGraw Hill, New York, USA.
  19. Williams, T.M. (1996). “The two-dimensionality of project risk.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, 185-186.
  20. Elmaghraby, S.E. (2005). “On the fallacy of averages in project risk management.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 165, 307-313.
  21. Miler, J. (2005). A method of software project risk identification and analysis, Ph.D. Dissertation, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Polish.
  22. Project Management Institute (PMI). (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK Guide), 5th Ed., Newtown Square, PA, USA.
  23. Arsanjani, M.A., Ershadi M., Ahmadvand A.M. and Ghazizadeh Fard S.Z. (2012). “Dynamic analysis of problems related to absence of project portfolio system in the project based organizations.” Iranian Journal of Management Science, Vol. 7, No. 27, 71-93.
  24. Kahkonen, K. and Artto, K.A. (1997). Managing risks in projects, 1st Ed., E & FN SPON, Helsinki, Finland.
  25. Flanagan, R. and Norman, G., (1993). Risk management and construction, 1st Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,857
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 937


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب