تخمین عمق، مکان و هندسه بی‌هنجاری‌های مغناطیسی به روش عددموج محلی بهبودیافته

Agarwal, B. N. P. and Lal, T., 1972a, A generalized method of computing second derivative of gravity field, Geophysical Prospecting, 20, 385-394.

Agarwal, B. N. P. and Lal, T., 1972b, Calculation of the vertical gradient of the gravity field using the Fourier transform, Geophysical Prospecting, 20, 448-458.

Ansari, A., H. and Alamdar, K., 2010, 3-D depth and susceptibility estimation of magnetic anomalies using Local Wavenumber (LW) method, Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, 34(B5), 567-575.

Bulent, O., Ertan, P. and Serafeddin, C., 2010, Interpretation of magnetic anomaly in the south of lake Sapanca using an Enhanced Local Wave number method, Journal of Engineering Science and Design, 1(2), 87-90.

Golub, G., 1965, Numerical methods for solving linear least squares  problems, Numerische Mathematik, 7, 206-216.

Keating, P. and Pilkington, M., 2004, Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation, Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 165-182.

Ku, C. C. and Sharp, J. A., 1983, Werner method for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt inverse modeling, Geophysics, 48, 754-774.

Ma, G. Q., 2013, Improved local wavenumber methods in the interpretation of potential field data, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170, 633-643.

MA, G. Q., DU, X. J. and LI, L. L., 2012, Interpretation of potential field tensor data using the tensor local wavenumber method and comparison with the conventional local wavenumber method, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(4), 380-393.

Murthy, K. S. R. and Mishra, D. C., 1980, Fourier transform of the general expression for the magnetic anomaly due to a long horizontal cylinder, Geophysics, 45, 1091-1093.

Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.

Naudy, H., 1971, Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profile, Geophysics, 36, 717-722.

Peters, L. J., 1949, The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application, Geophysics, 14, 290-320.

Reford, M. S., 1964, Magnetic anomalies over thin sheets, Geophysics, 29, 532-536.

Ridsdill-Smith, T. A. and Dentith, M. C., 1999, The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing, Geophysics, 64, 1003-1013.

Salem, A., Ravat, D., Smith, S. and Ushijima, K., 2005, Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wave number (ELW) method, Geophysics, 70, L7-L12.

Smith, R. S., Thurston, J. B., Dai, T. F. and Macleod, I. N., 1998, iSPI the improved source parameter imaging method, Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 141-151.

Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH—a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, 31-37.

Thurston, J. B. and Smith, R. S., 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI method, Geophysics, 62, 807-813.

Thurston, J. B., Smith, R. S. and Guillon, J. C., 2002, A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data, Geophysics, 67, 555-561.