سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,230
تعداد مقالات67,766
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,221,289
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,968,475
اکبری, وحید, جلیلی مرندی, رسول, خارا, جلیل, فرخزاد, علیرضا. (1394). ‌پاسخ دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به تیمار سایکوسل تحت شرایط تنش خشکی. , 46(2), 213-223. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2015.54617
وحید اکبری; رسول جلیلی مرندی; جلیل خارا; علیرضا فرخزاد. "‌پاسخ دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به تیمار سایکوسل تحت شرایط تنش خشکی". , 46, 2, 1394, 213-223. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2015.54617
اکبری, وحید, جلیلی مرندی, رسول, خارا, جلیل, فرخزاد, علیرضا. (1394). '‌پاسخ دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به تیمار سایکوسل تحت شرایط تنش خشکی', , 46(2), pp. 213-223. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2015.54617
اکبری, وحید, جلیلی مرندی, رسول, خارا, جلیل, فرخزاد, علیرضا. ‌پاسخ دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به تیمار سایکوسل تحت شرایط تنش خشکی. , 1394; 46(2): 213-223. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2015.54617

‌پاسخ دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به تیمار سایکوسل تحت شرایط تنش خشکی

علوم باغبانی ایران
مقاله 4، دوره 46، شماره 2، مرداد 1394، صفحه 213-223    اصل مقاله (531.96 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijhs.2015.54617
نویسندگان
وحید اکبری* 1؛ رسول جلیلی مرندی1؛ جلیل خارا2؛ علیرضا فرخزاد1
1دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد، دانشیار و استادیار، گروه علوم باغبانی، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه
2دانشیار گروه زیست‏شناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه
چکیده
به‌منظور بررسی اثر سایکوسل بر جنبه‏های مختلف رشد دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) در شرایط تنش خشکی، آزمایش گلخانه‏ای با سه فاکتور شامل سه سطح سایکوسل (0، 500 و 1000 میلی‏گرم در لیتر)، سه سطح تنش خشکی (آبیاری نهال‏ها با فواصل 5، 10 و 15 روز یک‌بار) و دو رقم زیتون (ماری و میشن) به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و در مدت چهار ماه انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای سایکوسل موجب کاهش سطح برگ، افزایش ضخامت برگ، میزان کلروفیل و قندهای محلول در مقایسه با شاهد شدند‌ اما تأثیر معنا‏داری بر دمای برگ نداشتند. تیمار بالای سایکوسل (1000 میلی‌گرم در لیتر) موجب افزایش میزان پرولین و محتوای نسبی آب‌ برگ (RWC) نسبت به دیگر تیمارها شد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که افزایش سطوح خشکی موجب کاهش سطح برگ،RWC ، افزایش ضخامت برگ، دمای برگ، میزان کلروفیل، پرولین و قند‌های محلول در هر دو رقم شد. از نظر صفات مطالعه‌شده، رقم میشن نسبت به رقم ماری مقاومت بیشتری به خشکی داشت. نتایج نشان داد که سایکوسل می‏تواند اثر منفی ناشی از تنش خشکی در ارقام ماری و میشن زیتون را تعدیل کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پرولین؛ دمای برگ؛ سطح برگ؛ قندهای محلول‌؛ محتوای نسبی آب برگ (RWC)‌
عنوان مقاله [English]
Response of tow olive cultivars (Mary and Mission) to exogenous cycocel treatments under drought stress
نویسندگان [English]
Vahid Akbari1؛ Rasool Jalilimarandi1؛ Jalil Khara2؛ Alireza Farokhzad1
1. Former M. Sc. Student, Associate and Assistant Professor, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2. Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده [English]
In order to investigate the effect of cycocel on different growth aspects of two olive cultivars (Mary and Mission), a greenhouse experiment was conducted taking into account three factors of: cycocel at three levels (0, 500 and 1000 mg L-1), drought stress of three levels (irrigated at 5, 10 and 15 days intervals) and two olive cultivars (Mary and Mission) in a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design of three replicates during four months. The results showed that both cycocel treatments decreased leaf area, increased leaf thickness, chlorophyll content and soluble sugars, but no significant difference in leaf temperature was observed compared with the control. High cycocel treatments (1000 mg L-1) increased proline and relative water content (RWC) compared with the other treatments. Also, results showed that increased periods of drought reduced leaf area, RWC, but increased leaf thickness, leaf temperature, chlorophyll content, proline and soluble sugars in both cultivars. In above-mentioned parameters, 'Mission' showed higher resistance to drought stress than 'Mary'. Results suggested that cycocel treatment can neutralize some negative effects of drought stress in 'Mary' and 'Mission' of olive trees.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Leaf area, relative water content (RWC), soluble sugars, proline, leaf temperature
مراجع
 

  1. Abd El-Rhman, I.E. (2010). A study on some treatments which mitigate drought effects on Barrani grapevines cv. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 6(6), 704-711.
  2. Amri, E. & Shahsavar, A.R. (2010). Response of Lime seedlings (Citrus aurantifolia L.) to exogenous spermidine treatments under drought stress. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(9), 4483-4489.
  3. Arji, A. & Arzani, K. (2003a). Evaluation of growth response and proline accumulation in three native Iranian olive cultivars to drought. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 10(2), 101-91.(In Farsi).
  4. Arji, A., Arzani, K., & Ebrahim-Zadeh, M.H.(2003b). Quantitative study of proline and soluble carbohydrates in five olive cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Biology, 16(4), 59-47.(In Farsi).
  5. Arteka, R.N. (1995). Plant growth substances: principles and applications. Chapman & Hall, New York, 332 p.
  6. Bacelar, E.A., Moutinho-Pereira, J.M., Gonçalves, B.C., Lopes, J.I. & Correia, C.M. )2009(. Physiological responses of different olive genotypes to drought conditions. Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 31, 611-621.
  7. Bagdi, D.L., Afria, B.S. & Naagar, K.C. (2003). Influence of salinity stress and cycocel on chlorophyll content and yield attributes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agricultural Science Digest, 23(2), 98-100.
  8. Bosabalidis, A.M. & Kofidis, G. (2002). Comparative effects of drought on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 163, 375-379.
  9. Carceller, M., Prystupa, P. & Lemcoff, J.H. (1999). Remobilization of proline and other nitrogen compounds from senescing leaves of maize under water stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences, 183, 61-66.
  10. Chartzoulakis, K., Patakas, A. & Bosabalidis, A. M. (1999). Change in water relations, photosynthesis and leaf anatomy induced by intermittent drought in tow olive cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 42, 113-120.
  11. Connor, D.J. (2005(. Adaptation of olive (Olea europaea L.) to water limited environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 1181–1189.
  12. Dichio, B., Romano, M., Nuzzu, V. & Xiloyannis, C. (2002). Soil water availability and relationship between canopy and roots in young olive trees cv. Coratana. Acta Horticulturae, 586, 419-422.
  13. Ennajeh, M., Vadel, A.M., Cochard, H. & Khemira, H. (2010). Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 85(4), 289–294.
  14. Farooq, U. & Bano, A. (2006). Effect of abscisic acid and cholorocholine chloride on nodulation and biochemical content of Vigna radiata L. under water stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38(5), 1511-1518.
  15. Fututoku, Y. & Yamada, Y. (1981).Diurnal changes in water-stressed and non-stressed soybean plants. Soil Sciences, 27, 195-204.
  16. Germmana, C. (1997). Experiences on the response of almond plants (Amygdalus Communis L.) to water stress. Acta Horticulturae, 449, 497-504.
  17. Gopi, R., Sridharon, R., Somasundaram, R., Alagulakshmanan, G.M. & Panneerselvam, R. (2005). Growth and photosynthetic characteristics as affected by triazols in Amorphophallus campanulatus. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 31, 171-180.
  18. Harper, F.R. & Berkenkamp, B. (1975). Revised growth-stage key for Brassicacampestris and Brassica napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 55, 657- 658.
  19. Irigoyen, J.J., Emerich, D.W. & Sanchez-Diaz, M. (1992). Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Plant Physiology, 84, 55-60.
  20. Jaana, L., Rikala, R. & Aphalo, P.J. (2002). Effect of CCC and daminozide on growth of silver birch container seedlings during three years after spraying. New Forests, 23, 71-80.
  21. Jalili Marandi, R. (2010). Growing of tropical and subtropical zone fruits. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi. 438 p. Urmia. (In Farsi).
  22. Jalili Marandi, R., Hassani, A., Dowlety Baneh, H., Azizi, H. & Hajitaghiloo, R. (2011). Effect of different levels of siol moisture on morphological and physiological characteristics of three grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 42(1), 31-40.
  23. Kameli, A. & Losel, D.M. (1996). Growth and sugar accumulation in durum wheat plants under water stress. New Phytologist, 132, 57-62.
  24. Kumari, S.,Bharti, S. & Khan, M. I. (1990). Effect of Cycocel on growth and metabolism of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 24(2), 87-93.
  25. Latimar J.G. (1991). Growth retardants effect landscape performance of zinnia, impatiens, and marigold. HortScience, 26,557-560.
  26. Laurer, J. (2003). What happens within the corn plant when drought occurs? Wisconsin Crop Manager, 22, 153-155.
  27. Levitt, J. (1980). Responses of plants to environmental stresses. II. Water, radiation, salt, and other stresses. Academic Press, New York. PP: 3-53.
  28. Leydovski, S.Y. (1974). The effect of C.C.C. on changes in photosynthesis and productivity of tomatoes. Plant physiology, 50, 271-274.
  29. Malash, N.M.A.R. & Flowers, T.J. (1984). The effect of phenylmercuric acetate on salt tolerance in wheat. Plant and Soil, 81, 269-279.
  30. Mannini, P. & Anconeli, S. (2002). Leaf temperature and water stress in strawberry. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53, 138-143.
  31. Memari, H.R., Tafazoli, E., Kamgar-Haghighi, A., Hassanpour, A. & Yarami, N. (2011). Effects of water stress and cycocel as a growth retardant on growth of two olive cultivars. Journal of Science and Technology and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science, 15(55), 1-11. (In Farsi).
  32. Mian, M.A.R., Nafziger, E.D., Kolb, F.L. & Teyker, R.H. (1994). Root size and distribution of field grown wheat genotypes. Crop Science, 34, 810-812.
  33. Movahhedi Dehnavi, M., Ranjbar, M., Yadavi, A.R. &Kavusi, B. (2010). Effect of cycocel on proline, soluble sugar, protein, oil and fatty acids of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) plants under drought stress in a pot trial. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 3(2), 129-138. (In Farsi).
  34. Nautiyal, P.C., Rachaputi, N.R. & Joshi, Y.C. (2002). Moisture-deficit-induced changes in leaf water content, leaf carbon exchange rate and biomass production in groundnut cultivars differing in specific leaf area. Field Crop Research, 74, 67-79.
  35. Nazanardin, M.R.A., Fauzi, R.M. & Tsan, F.Y. (2007). Effects of paclobutrazol on the growth and anatomy of stems and leaves of Syzygium campanulatum. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 19, 86-91.
  36. Nejadsahebi, M., Moallemi, N. & Landi, A. (2010). Effects of cycocel and irrigation regimes on some physiological parameters of three olive cultivars. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4), 459-465.
  37. Newton, R.J., Bhaskaran, S., Puryear, J. & Smith, R.H. (1986). Physiological changes in cultured sorghum cells in response to induced water-stress. II Soluble carbohydrates and organic acids. Plant Physiology, 81, 626-629.
  38. Nonami, H., Wu, Y. & Matthewse, M.A. (1997). Decreased growth-induced water potential a primary cause of growth inhibition at low water potentials. Plant Physiology, 114, 501-509.
  39. Ommen, O.E. & Donnelly, A. (1999). Chlorophyll content of spring wheat flag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and other environmental stresses within the ‛ESPACE-wheat’ project. European Journal of Agronomy, 10, 197-203.
  40. Pagter, M., Bragato, C. & Brix, H. (2005). Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. Aquatic Botany, 81, 285-299.
  41. Paquin, R. & Lechasseur, P. (1979). Observations sur une methode de dosage de la proline libre dans les extraits de plantes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57, 1851-1854.
  42. Pessarakli, M. (1993). Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, Inc, PP: 693.
  43. Rademacher, W., Temple-smit, K.E., Griggs, D.L. & Hedden, P. (2000). Growth retardants: Effect on gibberellins biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 51, 501-531.
  44. Samandari Gikloo, T. & Elhami, B. (2012). Physiological and morphological responses of two almond cultivars to drought stress and cycocel. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3(5), 1000-1004.
  45. Shellie, K. & Glenn, D.M. (2008). Wine grape responses to kaoline practice film under deficit and well-watered conditions. Acta Horticulturae, 792, 587-591.
  46. Safo, A., Dichio, B., Xiloyannis, C. & Masia, A. (2004). Effects of different irradiance levels on some antioxidant enzymes and on malondialdehyde content during rewatering in olive tree. Plant Science, 166, 293-302.
  47. Turner, N.C. (1981). Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil, 58, 339-366.
  48. Vamerali, T., Saccomani, M., Bons, S., Mosca, G., Guarise, M. & Ganis, M. (2003). A comparision of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids. Plant and Soil, 255, 157-167.
  49. Zarrabi, M.M., Talaai, A., Soleimani, A. & Haddad, R. (2011). Physiological characteristic and biochemical changes six olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Horticulture Science, 24(2),234-244.
 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,186
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,272


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب