تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,473 |
تعداد مقالات | 69,967 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,724,166 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 95,878,165 |
Optimum Parameters for Tuned Mass Damper Using Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) Algorithm | ||
Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 48، شماره 1، شهریور 2015، صفحه 83-100 اصل مقاله (1.09 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Papers | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.007 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Hessamoddin Meshkat Razavi* 1؛ Hashem Shariatmadar2 | ||
1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
2Associated Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This study is investigated the optimum parameters for a tuned mass damper (TMD) under the seismic excitation. Shuffled complex evolution (SCE) is a meta-heuristic optimization method which is used to find the optimum damping and tuning frequency ratio for a TMD. The efficiency of the TMD is evaluated by decreasing the structural displacement dynamic magnification factor (DDMF) and acceleration dynamic magnification factor (ADMF) for a specific vibration mode of the structure. The optimum TMD parameters and the corresponding optimized DDMF and ADMF are achieved for two control levels (displacement control and acceleration control), different structural damping ratio and mass ratio of the TMD system. The optimum TMD parameters are checked for a 10-storey building under earthquake excitations. The maximum storey displacement and acceleration obtained by SCE method are compared with the results of other existing approaches. The results show that the peak building response decreased with decreases of about 20% for displacement and 30% for acceleration of the top floor. To show the efficiency of the adopted algorithm (SCE), a comparison is also made between SCE and other meta-heuristic optimization methods such as genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) method and harmony search (HS) algorithm in terms of success rate and computational processing time. The results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other meta-heuristic optimization methods. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Dynamic Magnification Factors؛ Earthquake excitation؛ Response Reduction؛ Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE)؛ Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) | ||
مراجع | ||
Bakre, S.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2007). “Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system”, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 14(3), 448-470. Bekdaş, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2011). “Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search”, Engineering Structures, 33(9), 2716-2723. Bekdaş, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2013). “Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings”, Smart Structures and Systems, 12(2), 137-155. Den Hartog, J.P. (1956). Mechanical vibrations, McGraw-Hill, New York. Dong, G.R. (1976). “Vibration-absorber effect under seismic excitation”, Structural Division, 102(10), 2021-2031. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V.K. (1994). “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models”, Hydrology, 158(3–4), 265-284. Eusuff, M. and Lansey, K. (2003). “Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm”, Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(3), 210-225. Falcon, K.C., Stone, B.J., Simcock, W.D. and Andrew, C. (1967). “Optimization of vibration absorbers: A graphical method for use on idealized systems with restricted damping”, Mechanical Engineering Science, 9(5), 374-381. Farshidianfar, A. and Soheili, S. (2013a). “Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil–structure interaction”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 14- 22. Farshidianfar, A. and Soheili, S. (2013b). “ABC optimization of TMD parameters for tall buildings with soil structure interaction”, Interaction and Multiscale Mechanics, 6(4), 339- 356. Frahm, H. (1909). “Device for damping vibrations of bodies”, US Patent, 958-989. Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H. and Loganathan, G.V. (2001). “A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony Search”, Simulation, 76(2), 60-68. Gupta, Y.P. and Chandrasekaran, A.R. (1969). “Absorber system for earthquake excitations”, Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Chile. Hadi, M.N.S. and Arfiadi, Y. (1998). “Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures”, Structural Engineering, 124(11), 1272-1280. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, Cambridge, MIT Press, MA, USA. Jagadish, K.S., Prasad, B.K.R. and Rao, P.V. (1979). “The inelastic vibration absorber subjected to earthquake ground motions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7(4), 317- 326. Kaynia, A.M., Bigges, J.M. and Veneziano, D. (1981). “Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers”, Structural Division, 107(8), 1468- 1484. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995). “Particle swarm optimization”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Nagoya, Japan. Lee, C.L., Chen, Y.T., Chung L.L. and Wang, Y.P. (2006). “Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers”, Engineering Structures, 28(1), 43-53. Leung, A.Y.T. and Zhang, H. (2009). “Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers”, Engineering Structures, 31(3), 715-728. Leung, A.Y.T., Zhang, H., Cheng, C.C. and Lee, Y.Y. (2008). “Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(9), 1223-1246. Li, C. (2002). “Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on DDMF and ADMF”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(4), 897-919. Liong, S.Y. and Atiquzzaman, M. (2004). “Optimal design of water distribution network using shuffled complex evolution”, Institution of Engineers, Singapore, 44(1), 93-107. Liu, M. Y., Chiang, W. L., Hwang, J. H. and Chu, C. R. (2008). “Wind-induced vibration of high-rise building with tuned mass damper including soil–structure interaction”, Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(6-7), 1092-1102. Luft, R.W. (1979). “Optimal tuned mass dampers for buildings”, Structural Division, 105(12), 2766-2772. McNamara, R.J. (1977). “Tuned mass dampers for buildings”, Structural Division, 103(9), 1785-1798. Mohebbi, M. and Joghataie, A. (2012). “Designing optimal tuned mass dampers for nonlinear frames by distributed genetic algorithms”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21(1), 57-76. Ormondoyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928). “The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber”, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 50(7), 9-22. Rana, R. and Soong, T.T. (1998). “Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers”, Engineering Structures, 20(3), 193-204. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor A.W. and Chung, R.M. (1997). “A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(6), 617-635. Sgobba, S. and Marano, G.C. (2010). “Optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for structures with nonlinear behaviour”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(6), 1739-1755. Sladek, J. and Klingner, R. (1983). “Effect of tuned‐mass dampers on seismic response”, Structural Engineering, 109(8), 2004-2009. Snowdon, J.C. (1959). “Steady-state behavior of the dynamic absorber”, Acoustical Society of America, 31(8), 1096-1103. Thompson, A.G. (1981). “Optimum tuning and damping of a dynamic vibration absorber applied to a force excited and damped primary system”, Sound and Vibration, 77(3), 403-415. Tsai, H.C. and Lin, G.C. (1993). “Optimum tuned-mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22(11), 957-973. Villaverde, R. (1985). “Reduction seismic response with heavily-damped vibration absorbers”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 13(1), 33-42. Villaverde, R. (1994). “Seismic control of structures with damped resonant appendages”, Proceedings of the First World Conference on Structural Control, Chicago. Villaverde, R. and Koyama, L.A. (1993). “Damped resonant appendages to increase inherent damping in buildings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22(6), 491-507. Villaverde, R. and Martin, S.C. (1995). “Passive seismic control of cable-stayed bridges with damped resonant appendages”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(2), 233-246. Warburton, G.B. and Ayorinde, E.O. (1980). “Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8(3), 197-217. Wirsching, P. H. and Campbell, G.W. (1973). “Minimal structural response under random excitation using the vibration absorber”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2(4), 303-312. Wirsching, P.H. and Yao, J.T.P. (1973). “Safety design concepts for seismic structures”, Computers and Structures, 3(4), 809-826. Wong, K. (2008). “Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with tuned mass dampers”, Engineering Mechanics, 134(2), 163-172. Wong, K. and Johnson, J. (2009). “Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with multiple tuned mass dampers”, Engineering Mechanics, 135(4), 265-275. Woo, S.S., Lee, S.H. and Chung L. (2011). “Seismic response control of elastic and inelastic structures by using passive and semi-active tuned mass dampers”, Smart Structures and Systems, 8(3), 239-252. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,947 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,787 |