|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||104,957,879|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||82,031,245|
A Comparative Study between a Pseudo-Forward Equation (PFE) and Intelligence Methods for the Characterization of the North Sea Reservoir
|International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering|
|مقاله 6، دوره 48، شماره 2، اسفند 2014، صفحه 173-190 اصل مقاله (1.22 M)|
|نوع مقاله: Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijmge.2014.53105|
|Saeed Mojeddifar 1؛ Gholamreza Kamali1؛ Hojjatolah Ranjbar1؛ Babak Salehipour Bavarsad2|
|1Department of Mining Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran|
|2Geopardazesh Petroleum Exploration Services, Ahvaz, Iran|
|This paper presents a comparative study between three versions of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) algorithms and a pseudo-forward equation (PFE) to characterize the North Sea reservoir (F3 block) based on seismic data. According to the statistical studies, four attributes (energy, envelope, spectral decomposition and similarity) are known to be useful as fundamental attributes in porosity estimation. Different ANFIS models were constructed using three clustering methods of grid partitioning (GP), subtractive clustering method (SCM) and fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM). An experimental equation, called PFE and based on similarity attributes, was also proposed to estimate porosity values of the reservoir. When the validation set derived from training wells was used, the R-square coefficient between two variables (actual and predicted values) was obtained as 0.7935 and 0.7404 for the ANFIS algorithm and the PFE model, respectively. But when the testing set derived from testing wells was used, the same coefficients decreased to 0.252 and 0.5133 for the ANFIS algorithm and the PFE model, respectively. According to these results, and the geological characteristics observed in the F3 block, it seems that the ANFIS algorithms cannot estimate the porosity acceptably. By contrast, in the outputs of PFE, the ability to detect geological structures such as faults (gas chimney), folds (salt dome), and bright spots, alongside the porosity estimation of sandstone reservoirs, could help in determining the drilling target locations. Finally, this work proposes that the developed PFE could be a good technique for characterizing the reservoir of the F3 block.|
|ANFIS؛ clustering algorithms؛ experimental equation؛ Porosity؛ seismic attributes|
 Bhatt, A., Helle, H.B. (2002). Committee neural networks for porosity and permeability prediction from well logs, Geophysical Prospecting. 50, pp. 645–660.
 Anderson, J.K. (1996). Limitations of seismic inversion for porosity and pore fluid: Lessons from chalk reservoir characterization exploration, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, pp. 309-312.
 Schultz, P. S., Ronen, S., Hattori, M., Corbett, C. (1994). Seismic-guided estimation of log properties (Part 1: A data-driven interpretation
methodology). The Leading Edge, 13, pp. 305-310.
 Lim, J.S. (2005). Reservoir properties determination using fuzzy logic and neural networks from well data in offshore Korea, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 49, pp. 182-192.
 Singh, V., Painuly, P. K., Srivastava, A. K., Tiwary, D. N., Chandra, M. (2007). Neural networks and their applications in lithostratigraphic interpretation of seismic data for reservoir characterization, 19th World Petroleum Congress, Madrid, Spain. pp. 1244-1260.
 Walls, J.D., et al., (2000). Seismic reservoir characterization of a U.S. Midcontinent fluvial system using rock physics, poststack seismic attributes, and neural networks, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, pp. 428-436.
 Calderon, J. E., Castagna, J. (2007). Porosity and lithologic estimation using rock physics and multi-attribute transforms in Balcon Field, Colombia, The Leading Edge, 26(2), pp. 142-150.
 Joel, D. W., et al., (2002). Interpreter's Corner---Seismic reservoir characterization of a U.S. Midcontinent fluvial system using rock physics, poststack seismic attributes and neural networks, The Leading Edge, 21, pp. 428-436.
 Zhengping, L., Jiaqi, L.. (1998). Seismic-controlled nonlinear extrapolation of well parameters using neural networks, Geophysics, 63(6), pp. 2035-2041.
 Tonn, R. (2002). Neural network seismic reservoir characterization in a heavy oil reservoir, The Leading Edge, 21(3), pp. 309-312.
 Banchs, R. E., Michelena, R. J. (2002). From 3D seismic atrributes to pseudo-well-log volumes using neural networks: Practical considerations, The Leading Edge, 21(10), pp. 996-1001.
 Rafael, E. B., Reinaldo, J. M. (2002). From 3D seismic atrributes to pseudo-well-log volumes using neural networks: Practical considerations, The Leading Edge, 21(10), pp.996-1001.
 Helle, H. B., Bhatt, A., Ursin, B. (2001). Porosity and permeability prediction from wireline logs using artificial neural networks: a North Sea case study ,Geophysical Prospecting, 49, pp. 431-444.
 Pramanik, A. G., et al. (2004). Estimation of effective porosity using geostatistics and multiattribute transforms: A case study, Geophysics, 69(2), pp. 352-372.
 Daniel, P. H., James, S. S., John, A. Q. (2001). Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data, Geophysics, 66(1), pp. 220-236.
 Kevin, P. D., Curtis, A. L. (2004). Genetic-algorithm/neural-network approach to seismic attribute selection for well-log prediction. Geophysics, 69(1), pp. 212-221.
 Leiphart, D. J., Hart, B. S. (2001). Comparison of linear regression and a probabilistic neural network to predict porosity from 3-D seismic attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon channeled sandstones, southeast New Mexico, Geophysics, 66(5), pp.1349-1358.
 Russell, B., Hampson, D., Schuelke, J., Quirein, J. (1997). Multiattribute Seismic Analysis, The Leading Edge, 16, pp. 1439-1443.
 Adekanle, A., Enikanselu, P. A. (2013). Porosity Prediction from Seismic Inversion Properties over ‘XLD’ Field, Niger Delta, American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 4(1), pp. 31-35.
 Lei, L., Wei, X., Shifan, Z., Zhonghong, W. (2011). Reservoir property prediction using the dynamic radial basis function network, Society of Exploration Geophysicists ,SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting, pp. 1754-1758.
 Eftekharifar, M., Han, D. H. (2011). 3D Petrophysical modeling using complex seismic attributes and limited well log data, Society of Exploration Geophysicists,SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting, pp. 1887-1891.
 Hosseini, A., Ziaii, M., Kamkar Rouhani, A., Roshandel, A., Gholami, R., Hanachi, J. (2011). Artificial Intelligence for prediction of porosity from Seismic Attributes: Case study in the Persian Gulf, Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences, 3, pp.168-174.
 Basu, P., Verma, R. (2013). Multi attribute transform and Probabilistic neural network in effective porosity estimation-A case study from Nardipur Low area, Cambay Basin, India., 10th Biennial International Conference & Exposition, India, pp.131-139.
 Valenti, J. C. A. F., (2009). Porosity prediction from seismic data using multiattribute transformations, N Sand, Auger field, Gulf of Mexico, Ms.c Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School.
 Joonaki, E., Ghanaatian, SH., Zargar, GH. (2013). An Intelligence Approach for Porosity and Permeability Prediction of Oil Reservoirs using Seismic Data, International Journal of Computer Applications, 80(8), pp. 19-26.
 Ziegler, P. A. (1990). Geological atlas of western and central Europe. Amsterdam: Elsevierfor Shell Internationale Petroleum Maatschappij, B.V.
 Van Boogaert, H. A. A., Kouwe, W. F. P. (1993). Nomenclature of the Tertiary of the Netherlands. RGD & NOGEPA. 50, The Netherlands, 2nd edition.
 Kay, C. (1993). The growth and gross morphology of Quaternary deltas in the southern North Sea. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinborough.
 Steeghs, P., Overeem, I., Tigrek, S. (2000). Seismic volume attribute analysis of the Cenozoic succession in the L08 block (Southern North Sea): Global and Planetary Change, 27, pp. 245–262.
 Gregersen, U. (1997). Sequence stratigraphic analysis of Upper Cenozoic deposits in the North Sea based on conventional and 3-D seismic data and well-logs: Ph.D. thesis, University of Aarhus.
 Aminzadeh, F., & Groot, P.D. (2006). Neural networks and other soft computing techniques with applications in the oil industry: EAGE.
 Tetyukhina, D., Luthi, S. M., Van Vliet, L. J., Wapenaar, K. (2008). High-resolution reservoir characterization by 2-D model-driven seismic Bayesian inversion: an example from a Tertiary deltaic clinoform system in the North Sea, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG Las Vegas 2008 Annual Meeting, pp. 1880-1884.
 Luthi, S.M. (2001). Geological well logs: Their use in reservoir modeling: Springer-Verlag.
 Brown, A.R. (1999). Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data, 5th edition: AAPG Memoir 42, SEG Investigations in Geophysics 9, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 514 p.
 Jang. J.R.S. (1999). ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybernet, 23(3), pp. 665–85.
 Gustafson, D., Kessel, W. (1979). Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix, In: Proceedings of the IEEE CDC, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 761–766.
 Hoppner, F., Klawonn, F., Kruse, R., Runkler, T. (1999). Fuzzy Cluster Analysis, Wiley, New York. 361p.
 Gath, I., Geva, A. (1989). Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11, pp. 773–781.
 Abonyi, J., Babuška, R., Szeifert, F. (2002). Modified Gath–Geva fuzzy clustering for identification of Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B Cybern, 32, pp. 612–621.
 Chiu, S. L. (1994). Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. Journal of Intelligent And Fuzzy Systems, 2, pp. 267–278.
 Jin, S., Beydoun, W., Madariaga, R. (1993). A stable elastic inversion for marine data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, pp. 665-668.
 Sheriff, R.E. (1991). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, 4th Ed (Geophysical References).
 Lay, D.C. (1996). Linear algebra and its applications, 2nd ed, Addison-Wesley.
 Menke, W. (1989). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory (Revised Edition), Academic Press.
 Løseth, H., Wensaas. L., Arntsen. B., Gading, M. (2008). Gas chimneys and other hydrocarbon leakage anomalies interpreted on seismic data, Internationa geological congress Oslo(Norway) 2008, August 6-14.
 Chopra, S., Marfurt, K.J. (2007). “Seismic attributes for prospect identification and reservoir characterization” Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, 456 p.
 Lin, C. T., Lee, C. S. G. (1991). Neural-network-based fuzzy logic control and decision system. IEEE Trans Comput, 40(12), pp. 1320–36.
 Zhou, Q., Purvis, M., Kasabov, N. (1997). A membership function selection method for fuzzy neural networks. In: Proc ICONIP, pp. 785–88.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,605
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,024