- Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
- Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153-1189. https://doi.org/10.1086/260831
- Biotechnology Development Staff. (2021-2023). Annual reports. Vice Presidency for Science and Technology. [In Persian]
- Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). The inheritance of inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278797
- Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
- Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Polity Press.
- (1990). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. UK Parliament.
- Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton University Press.
- (2019-2023). Annual Reports. International Atomic Energy Agency.
- Jasanoff, S. (2019). Can science make sense of life? Polity.
- Kim, Y. B., Komor, A. C., Levy, J. M., et al. (2017). Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3803
- Lu, Y., Xue, J., Deng, T., et al. (2020). Safety and feasibility of CRISPR-edited T cells in patients with refractory non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature Medicine, 26, 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0840-5
- Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524
- Ministry of Health and Medical Education. (2022). Statistics of IVF and assisted reproduction centers in Iran. Office of Population, Family and School Health. [In Persian]
- Mousavi Meshkini, S. A. (2022). Jurisprudential issues of modern biotechnology. Qom University Press. [In Persian]
- NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2017). Human genome editing: Science, ethics, and governance. National Academies Press.
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2018). Genome editing and human reproduction: Social and ethical issues.
- Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
- Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
- Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042872
- Sadeghi, R. (2019). Bioethics and gene therapy from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence. Institute of Culture and Islamic Thought. [In Persian]
- Sandel, M. J. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Harvard University Press.
- Sparrow, R. (2019). Yesterday's child: How gene editing for enhancement will produce obsolescence—and why it matters. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(7), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1618943
- Stilgoe, J. (2020). Who's driving innovation? Technologies of the self in the age of automation. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zhou, C., Sun, Y., Yan, R., et al. (2019). Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature, 571, 275-278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0
|