میز خدمت الکترونیک
دوره ویراستاری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات127
تعداد شماره‌ها7,196
تعداد مقالات77,227
تعداد مشاهده مقاله157,208,878
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله118,400,372
Izadi, Foad, Jamshidi, Aydin. (1405). Persuading Under Uncertainty: A Comparative Analysis of Bush and Obama’s Rhetorical Strategies in Intelligence Challenges. , (), -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2026.402528.1554
Foad Izadi; Aydin Jamshidi. "Persuading Under Uncertainty: A Comparative Analysis of Bush and Obama’s Rhetorical Strategies in Intelligence Challenges". , , , 1405, -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2026.402528.1554
Izadi, Foad, Jamshidi, Aydin. (1405). 'Persuading Under Uncertainty: A Comparative Analysis of Bush and Obama’s Rhetorical Strategies in Intelligence Challenges', , (), pp. -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2026.402528.1554
Izadi, Foad, Jamshidi, Aydin. Persuading Under Uncertainty: A Comparative Analysis of Bush and Obama’s Rhetorical Strategies in Intelligence Challenges. , 1405; (): -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2026.402528.1554

Persuading Under Uncertainty: A Comparative Analysis of Bush and Obama’s Rhetorical Strategies in Intelligence Challenges

Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 23 خرداد 1405
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/wsps.2026.402528.1554
نویسندگان
Foad Izadi* 1؛ Aydin Jamshidi2
1North American Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran
2University of Tehran
چکیده
Intelligence challenges such as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), terrorism, and cyber threats create uncertainty and incomplete information for the decision makers and people. This uncertainty could manage by the president through persuasive communication. This article examines how Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama employed rhetorical strategies to persuade domestic and international audiences in the face of intelligence-related matters. The study draws on a qualitative content analysis of presidential speeches. The study apply a new seven-category persuasion framework consisting of 25 subcategories that expands the traditional Aristotelian modes of ethos, pathos, and logos. This framework offers a more systematic framework for capturing the complexity of presidential persuasion strategy. The analysis revealed clear differences in presidential styles: Bush consistently relied on pathos, using fear appeals, urgency, and moral clarity to justify preemptive actions related to WMD and rally public support, whereas Obama focused on logos and ethos, appealing to reason, institutional trust, and credibility while framing responses as collaborative and strategic in cases involving technological intelligence activities.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Persuasive Speech؛ Strategic Persuasion؛ Intelligence؛ Weapons of Mass Destruction؛ Surveillance؛ Drones
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 19





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب