پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,227 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 157,217,983 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 118,403,667 |
Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills of Middle Stage Students through Design Thinking Interventions: Evidence from an Empirical Study | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| دوره 7، شماره 1، شهریور 2026، صفحه 13-33 اصل مقاله (741.54 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2026.412698.1192 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Monkia Rai* ؛ Navdeep Kaur | ||
| Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present study examines the effectiveness of Design Thinking interventions in enhancing the Problem-Solving ability of middle-stage students in science. In the context of contemporary educational reforms emphasizing competency-based learning and 21st-century skills, the study explores the impact of an innovative, learner-centred teaching approach on students’ cognitive development. It further investigates the influence of gender and type of school, along with their interaction effects, on problem-solving ability. An experimental research design with a pre-test–post-test control group was employed. The sample consisted of 200 eighth-grade students selected randomly from government and private schools of Amritsar. The experimental group was taught using the Design Thinking framework, incorporating stages such as empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected through a self-constructed Problem-Solving Ability Test and analysed using mean, standard deviation, t-test, and two-way ANOVA. The findings revealed that students exposed to Design Thinking demonstrated significantly higher problem-solving ability compared to those taught through traditional methods. Significant differences were also found with respect to gender and type of school. Additionally, the interaction effects between treatment and gender, and treatment and type of school, were statistically significant, indicating that the effectiveness of the intervention varies across different learner groups and educational contexts. The study concludes that Design Thinking is an effective pedagogical approach for developing problem-solving skills among middle-stage learners. It highlights the need for integrating innovative, activity-based teaching strategies into school education to foster critical thinking, creativity, and meaningful learning experiences. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Design Thinking؛ Problem-Solving Ability؛ Middle-stage Students؛ National Education Policy (2020) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alvarado, L. F. (2025). Design thinking as an active teaching methodology in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1462938. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1462938.
Appakarat, C., & Chumsukon, M. (2025). The development of creative problem-solving ability using design thinking with visual thinking techniques in the S22101 social studies of grade 8 students at Satri Rachinuthit School. Journal of Graduate MCU KhonKaen Campus, 12(3), 100–111. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jg-mcukk/article/view/277820.
Baricevic, M., & Luic, L. (2023). From active learning to innovative thinking: The influence of learning the design thinking process among students. Education Sciences, 13(5), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050455.
Barana, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2024). Design thinking in teacher education: Morphing preservice teachers' mindsets and conceptualizations. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(5), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2170932.
Bender-Salazar, R. (2023). Design thinking as an effective method for problem-setting and need finding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(24). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00291-2.
Berglund, A. (2024). Design thinking: Catalysing change in the educational ecosystem. Design Science. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/design-science/article/design-thinking-catalysing-change-in-the-educational-ecosystem-a-framework-for-future-challenges.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. Retrieved from s11092-008-9068-5.pdf.
Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination, and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53. Retrieved from Destination, Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom - Carroll - 2010 - International Journal of Art & Design Education - Wiley Online Library.
Cavus, E., Idil, S., & Donmez, I. (2026). Effects of design-based research on students’ problem-solving skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09876-x. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘Design Thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.
Efeoglu, A., & Moller, C. (2025). Solving strategic management challenges with Design Thinking: Examining the suitability and effectiveness as a management method. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(61). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00469-w.
Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., & Chiluiza, K. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: A multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Retrieved from Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity | International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Springer Nature Link.
Government of India. (2020). National education policy 2020. Ministry of Education. Retrieved from NEP_Final_English 0.pdf.
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001.
Hu, X. (2024). Gender differences in computational thinking and problem-solving skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240670.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. Retrieved from An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning - David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, 2009.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Wong, B. (2024). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 194, Retrieved from 104713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104713.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kongnisai, P., Sittiwong, T., & Phumphuang, K. (2024). The development of learning activities by using design thinking with gamification to promote problem solving thinking ability for vocational certificate students. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 8(10), 1–14. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSC/article/view/277058.
Li, T., & Zhan, Z. (2022). A systematic review on design thinking integrated learning in K–12 education. Applied Sciences, 12(16), 8077. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168077.
Liu, W., Huang, R., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ohashi, T., Li, B., Liu, Y., Qiu, D., Yu, R., Zhang, J., & Al Mahmud, A. (2024). Empathy design thinking: Cultivating creative minds in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1376305. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376305.
Luka, I. (2023). Design thinking as a pedagogical approach for enhancing students’ problem-solving skills. Education Sciences, 13(4), 412. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040412.
McLaughlin, J. E., Wolcott, M. D., Hubbard, D., Umstead, K., & Rider, T. R. (2019). A Qualitative Review of the design thinking framework in Health Professions Education. BMC Medical Education, 19, 98. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8. McLaughlin, J. E., Lake, D., Chen, E., Guo, W., Knock, M., & Knotek, S. (2023). Faculty experiences and motivations in design thinking teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1172814. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1172814.
Moffett, J., Little, R., Illing, J., de Carvalho Filho, M. A., & Bok, H. (2024). Establishing psychological safety in online design-thinking education: A qualitative study. Learning Environments Research, 27(1), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w.
NCERT. (2023). National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023. national council of educational research and training. Retrieved from ncert.nic.in/pdf/NCF_for_School_Education_2023.pdf? utm_source.
Patel, N. S., Puah, S., & Kok, X. F. (2024). Shaping future-ready graduates with mindset shifts: Integrating critical and design thinking. Frontiers in Education, 9. Retrieved from Frontiers | Design thinking as an active teaching methodology in higher education: a systematic review.
Phothong, W., Wannapiroon, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). The effects of design-based learning on students’ problem-solving ability and learning achievement with respect to gender differences. Journal of Technology Education, 34(2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.1.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press. Retrieved from Science of education and the psychology of the child: Piaget, Jean, 1896-1980: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming: Internet Archive.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1966).
Razali, N. H., Ali, N. N. N., Safiyuddin, S. K., & Khalid, F. (2022). Design thinking approaches in education and their challenges: A systematic literature review. Creative Education. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.138090.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking, and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. Retrieved from What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? - Rim Razzouk, Valerie Shute, 2012.
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes:
Vygotsky, L. S. (Lev Semenovich), 1896-1934: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming: Internet Archive.
Yu, Q., Yu, K., & Lin, R. (2024). A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 742. Retrieved from A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2026). The effect of design thinking on creativity and innovation: An empirical study. Thinking Skills and Creativity (Article in Press). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.xxxxxx. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 42 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 34 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب