| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,227 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 157,208,897 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 118,400,383 |
Risk Management Research- A Bibliometric Review and ADO–TCM Framework Analysis | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 09 خرداد 1405 | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijms.2026.403806.678110 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Vajihe Baghersad* 1؛ Morteza Akbari2؛ Pantea Foroudi3؛ Zahra Shahabaldiniparizi4؛ Mohana Shahmoradi5؛ Hamid Padash2؛ Maria Palazzo6 | ||
| 1Department of Management and Accounting, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, I.R. Iran | ||
| 3Brunel University, UK | ||
| 4Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management & Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 5Razi University, Kermanshah, I.R. Iran | ||
| 6Universitas Mercatorum, Italy | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Risk management is a cornerstone of organizational resilience in volatile environments, yet its scholarly development remains fragmented across theories, contexts, and methods. This study conducts a bibliometric review of 1,890 peer‑reviewed articles published between 1970 and 2024 in the Web of Science database, complemented by a structured conceptual synthesis of highly cited sources. It addresses gaps such as limited integration of behavioral and organizational learning dimensions, fragmented theorization, and weak translation of bibliometric insights into actionable design. Using co‑occurrence and co‑citation analyses integrated with the Antecedents–Decisions–Outcomes (ADO) and Theories–Contexts–Methods (TCM) frameworks, the study systematically maps antecedents, decisions, outcomes, theories, contexts, and methods, offering a unified lens for synthesizing quantitative and qualitative insights. The analysis identifies four dominant clusters: enterprise risk management, financial hedging strategies, supply chain resilience, and forecasting. Quantitative findings highlight their prominence, interlinkages, and temporal shifts, while qualitative synthesis reveals neglected intersections such as behavioral risk sensing and cross‑context validation. The study contributes to scholarship and practice by providing a replicable, theory‑driven framework for literature reviews, guiding adaptive risk management systems, and informing managerial and policy decision‑making. By integrating bibliometric mapping with conceptual synthesis, it advances resilience and strategic risk governance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Risk Management؛ Bibliometric Review؛ ADO–TCM Framework؛ Co-citation Analysis؛ Thematic Clusters | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 143 |
||