پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,238 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,638 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 161,149,379 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 120,806,633 |
Identity Discourse Analysis in Foreign Policy: A Comparative Study of Iran, Turkey, and Egypt in the Yemen Crisis | ||
| Journal of Iran and Regional Studies | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 26456060، اسفند 2025، صفحه 93-110 اصل مقاله (806.94 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jices.2026.407459.1104 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Ashraf Nazari* 1؛ Parham Pouramezan2 | ||
| 1Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The Yemen crisis, as one of the most complex conflicts in West Asia (or the Middle East) in the past decade, has involved numerous actors. One of the less explored dimensions of this conflict is the role of identity representation and the discursive patterns adopted by the states engaged in it. Islamic Republic of Iran, Turkey (also Turkiye), and Egypt each approach the Yemen conflict through their own identity-based narratives and have consequently pursued distinct foreign policy strategies. Accordingly, the central question of this study is: Why have these three countries, when faced with the same crisis, adopted such divergent—and at times contradictory—approaches?The aim of this research is to analyze and compare the identity discourses of Iran, Turkey, and Egypt regarding the Yemen crisis and to examine how these discourses shape their foreign policy behavior. The study assumes that Iran, relying on a “resistance” discourse and supporting aligned groups, seeks to strengthen an anti-hegemonic axis; Turkey, by reviving a “Neo-Ottoman” discourse, aims to redefine itself as a soft power and active mediator in the region; and Egypt, emphasizing “national security and regional stability,” seeks to contain threats and preserve order in its surrounding environment. Based on the qualitative analysis of the study’s data, the findings indicate that the foreign policies of Iran, Turkey, and Egypt toward Yemen are shaped less by purely geopolitical necessities and more by the reproduction of their respective identity discourses. Iran positions itself as the heart of regional resistance; Turkey pursues the revival of its civilizational–historical role as a supra-regional power; and Egypt places primary emphasis on maintaining national stability and safeguarding its peripheral security. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Iran؛ Identity؛ Yemen؛ Egypt؛ Foreign Policy؛ Turkey | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 117 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 31 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب