| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,236 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,613 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 161,068,596 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 120,778,962 |
حکمرانی پایدار تالابها از طریق همبست نظامهای اجتماعی و اکولوژیک: ارائه الگوی گذار به معیشتهای سازگار (مورد مطالعه: دریاچه ارومیه) | ||
| حکمرانی منابع طبیعی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 2، تیر 1405، صفحه 58-77 اصل مقاله (1013.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jnrg.2026.411124.1095 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| لیلا صفا؛ روح اله رضایی* ؛ رامش مهربان؛ زینب نعمتی | ||
| گروه ترویج، ارتباطات و توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ناپایداری طرحهای حفاظت از تالابها و تعارض منافع میان جوامع محلی و محیطزیست، از چالشهای اصلی حکمرانی منابع طبیعی در کشور است که اثربخشی سیاستهای مبتنی بر رویکردهای دستوری و صرفاً حفاظتی را محدود کرده است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد نظامهای اجتماعی - اکولوژیک، به تبیین سازوکارهای گذار به معیشتهای سازگار و ارائه الگوی عملیاتی برای همسوسازی منافع اقتصادی با اهداف حفاظتی در حوزه آبریز دریاچه ارومیه پرداخت. این پژوهش از نظر ماهیت، کیفی و با روش «تحلیل محتوای کیفی استقرایی» انجام شد. مشارکتکنندگان در پژوهش شامل 21 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی، مدیران اجرایی و نمایندگان جوامع محلی بودند که با استفاده از روشهای نمونهگیری هدفمند و گلولهبرفی تا حد اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری دادهها، مصاحبههای عمیق نیمهساختارمند بود که روایی و اعتبار آن از طریق تکنیکهای سهسویهسازی و بازبینی مشارکتکنندگان تأیید شد. تحلیل دادهها در نرمافزار MAXQDA 24 نشان داد الگوی حکمرانی معیشتهای تالابی در دریاچه ارومیه بر پنج پیشران اصلی و 22 نشانه کلیدی استوار است. بر اساس نتایج، مقوله «تقویت ظرفیتهای نهادی و ساختاری» بالاترین اولویت و پس از آن، مقولههای «سرمایه اجتماعی و مشروعیتبخشی»، «انسجام سیاستی و شبکه ذینفعان»، «سازوکارهای تأمین مالی پایدار و اقتصاد سبز» و «آموزش و آگاهیسازی» قرار گرفتند. درمجموع یافتهها نشان میدهد پایداری بلندمدت تالابها در گرو «تابآوری معیشتی» جوامع محلی است؛ بدین معنا که هرگاه معیشت ساکنان از ظرفیت کافی برای مقاومت در برابر شوکهای اقتصادی - اکولوژیک و تطبیق با شرایط جدید برخوردار باشد، وابستگی آنان به بهرهبرداری مستقیم از منابع محدود تالابی کاهش مییابد و انگیزههای حفاظت از اکوسیستم در منطق اقتصادی آنان درونی میشود. این یافته دلالتهای مهمی برای نظام حکمرانی در بر داشته و بر این نکته تأکید دارد که فراتر از حصارکشی فیزیکی، سیاستهای اثربخش باید بر اصلاح ساختارهای نهادی، تسهیلگری اقتصادی و بازسازی سرمایه اجتماعی برای خروج از «تله معیشتی» تمرکز کنند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحلیل محتوا؛ حکمرانی مشارکتی؛ دریاچه ارومیه؛ معیشتهای سازگار؛ نظام اجتماعی - اکولوژیک | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedi, T., & Jensi, Z. (2020). Investigating the factors influencing wetland degradation according to CIPA decision support criteria by fuzzy Delphi approach (Case study: Amir Kalayeh Wetland, Guilan Province). Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 5, 2589–2596. Ahmadi, S. (2024). Investigating the causes and consequences of the drying of Lake Urmia. Scientific Quarterly of Economic Security, 12(2), 43–50. Amighpey, M., Arabi, S., Ghoraiyan, F., & Molayi, A. (2023). Investigating the land subsidence around Urmia Lake using geodetic observations. Iran-Water Resources Research, 19(2), 196–206. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17352347.1402.19.2.11.8 Bainbridge, V., Foerster, S., Pasteur, K., Pimbert, M., Pratt, G., & Arroyo, I. Y. (2002). Transforming bureaucracies: Institutionalising participation and people-centred processes in natural resource management: An annotated bibliography. International Institute for Environment and Development & Institute of Development Studies. Bennett, N. J., Alava, J. J., Ferguson, C. E., Blythe, J., Morgera, E., Boyd, D., & Côté, I. M. (2023). Environmental (in)justice in the Anthropocene ocean. Marine Policy, 147, 105383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105383 Bera, M., & Nag, P. K. (2025). Integrated natural resource management and sustainable livelihoods: A review of ecosystem-based approaches for sustainability and community resilience. Agricultural & Rural Studies, 3(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03030017 Canning, A. D., Jarvis, D., Costanza, R., Hasan, S., Smart, J. C., Finisdore, J., ... & Waltham, N. J. (2021). Financial incentives for large-scale wetland restoration: Beyond markets to common asset trusts. One Earth, 4(7), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.006 Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 Convention on Wetlands. (2025). Global wetland outlook 2025: Valuing, conserving, restoring and financing wetlands (N. Dudley, Ed.). Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands. https://doi.org/10.69556/GWO-2025-eng Convention on Wetlands Secretariat. (2025). Ramsar Site Information Service (RSIS): Online reporting system. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Denscombe, M. (2017). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (6th ed.). Open University Press. Díaz-Pinzón, L., Sierra, L., Trillas, F., & Verd, J. M. (2024). The social-ecological system framework of urban wetlands. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1399 Ekpe, E. K., Hinkle, C. R., Quigley, M. F., & Owusu, E. H. (2014). Natural resource and biodiversity conservation in Ghana: The use of livelihoods support activities to achieve conservation objectives. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 10(4), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.971056 Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x EPA. (2024). How wetlands are defined and identified under CWA Section 404. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Esmailzadeh, S., Parvareshrizi, A., & Mianabadi, H. (2021). The problem recognition and policy evaluation of the Urmia Lake restoration program. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 11(38), 38–58. Gokce, D. (2019). Introductory chapter: Wetland importance and management. In Wetlands Management: Assessing Risk and Sustainable Solutions (pp. 1–10). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82456 Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.12.001 Guan, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, S., Fan, M., Ding, Y., & Yuan, X. (2025). A comprehensive review of climate warming and carbon dynamics in wetland ecosystems. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01579-x Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. Hes, E. M., Yatoi, R., Laisser, S. L., Feyissa, A. K., Irvine, K., Kipkemboi, J., & van Dam, A. A. (2021). The effect of seasonal flooding and livelihood activities on retention of nitrogen and phosphorus in Cyperus papyrus wetlands: The role of aboveground biomass. Hydrobiologia, 848(17), 4135–4152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04629-3 Huq, N., Pedroso, R., Bruns, A., Ribbe, L., & Huq, S. (2020). Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: An assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105855 Imdad, K., Sahana, M., Gautam, O., Chaudhary, A., Misra, S., Dwivedi, S., & Ahmed, R. (2025). Anthropogenic and hydroclimatic drivers of livelihood vulnerability in wetland communities: A geospatial and pragmatic assessment. Water Resources Management, 39(6), 2503–2525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-04075-5 Jafariazar, S., Sabzeghabaei, G. R., Tavakoly, M., & Dashti, S. (2019). Assessment and prioritization of environmental risks in the Gaz and Hara Rivers Estuary International Wetland. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 6(3), 71–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijae.6.3.71 Kleindl, W. J., Church, S. P., Rains, M. C., & Ulrich, R. (2024). Choosing the right tool: A comparative study of wetland assessment approaches. Wetlands, 44(5), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01798-4 Kunev, G., Kostadinov, I., & Karakasheva, D. (2024). Dipsacus gmelinii (Caprifoliaceae), a wetland species new to the Bulgarian flora. Hacquetia, 23(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2023-0007 Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 Löhr, K., Aruqaj, B., Baumert, D., Bonatti, M., Brüntrup, M., Bunn, C., ... & Weinhardt, M. (2021). Social cohesion as the missing link between natural resource management and peacebuilding: Lessons from cocoa production in Côte d'Ivoire and Colombia. Sustainability, 13(23), 13002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313002 Mishra, D., Kumar, N. N., Singh, S., & Goyal, M. K. (2026). The future of global Ramsar wetlands under intensifying precipitation extremes: Arid regions as emerging hotspots. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 118, 108275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108275 Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2015). Wetlands (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Mohebbi, F., Dadashpour, B., & Mohebbirad, H. (2020). Exploring the causes and consequences of Lake Urmia environmental disaster. Water Resources Ecology Journal, 3(2), 49–61. Mojtahedi, S. M., Tahmasebi, A., Shobeiri, S. M., Alavitabar, A. R., & Zandi, B. (2023). The role of key stakeholders in the management of Urmia Lake southern satellite wetlands. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 9(4), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v9i4.2206.1159 Montaseri, M., Nourjou, A., Behmanesh, J., & Akbari, M. (2018). Investigation of hydrological drought in southern basins of Urmia Lake (Case study: Zarrineh Rud and Simineh Rud). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 5(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJE.2018.245903.781 Nasution, M. S., Rusli, Z., Heriyanto, M., Zulkarnaini, Syahza, A., Adianto, ... & Ismandianto. (2025). Green governance and institutional resilience: Strengthening environmental policies for a low-carbon economy in mangrove ecosystems. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1631249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1631249 Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 Pishdad, L., & Ghaderzadeh, H. (2025). Exploring stakeholders' willingness to engage in wetland management and conservation: A contingent valuation study of the Zeribar peri-urban wetland in western Iran. Journal for Nature Conservation, 88, 127057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127057 Prell, C., Reed, M., & Hubacek, K. (2011). Social network analysis for stakeholder selection and the links to social learning and adaptive co-management. In Ö. Bodin & C. Prell (Eds.), Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance (pp. 95–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894985.006 Przesdzink, F., Herzog, L. M., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022). Combining stakeholder and social network analysis to improve regional nature conservation: A case study from Osnabrück, Germany. Environmental Management, 69(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01564-w Rasheed, A. R., Macreadie, P. I., Rowland, P. I., & Wartman, M. (2025). What drives landholders to engage in coastal wetland programs? A synthesis of current knowledge and opportunities for future research. Conservation Science and Practice, 7(5), e70030. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70030 Reed, M. S., Podesta, G., Fazey, I., Geeson, N., Hessel, R., Hubacek, K., ... & Thomas, A. D. (2013). Combining analytical frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptation options. Ecological Economics, 94, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.007 Reyers, B., Folke, C., Moore, M. L., Biggs, R., & Galaz, V. (2018). Social-ecological systems insights for navigating the dynamics of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085349 Robinson, A. E., Scaini, A., Pena, F. J., Hambäck, P. A., Humborg, C., & Jaramillo, F. (2025). The hydrological archetypes of wetlands. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29, 5975–6001. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5975-2025 Sele, J. P., & Mukundi, M. B. (2024). Community-based approaches to environmental conservation: Empowering local initiatives. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2024.2.122024211 Shen, L. (2025). Biodiversity conservation and challenges in wetland ecosystems. Theoretical and Natural Science, 93(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.22947 Shokri, S., Hemami, M. R., Ahmadi, M., Pourmanafi, S., Bhagwat, T., Kamp, J., Waltert, M., & Soofi, M. (2026). Ecological drivers of change in waterbird communities of Iranian wetlands. Journal for Nature Conservation, 89, 127150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127150 Terrisse, A., Karner, M., Kaufmann, J., & Ernoul, L. (2025). Characterizing governance models for upscaling wetland restoration. Environmental Management, 75(5), 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02132-2 Torabian, A., Hashemi, S. A., & Sadeghi, S. H. (2014). Analysis of the environmental consequences of the Urmia Lake water level decline. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 21(6), 149–164. United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Becoming #GenerationRestoration: Ecosystem restoration for people, nature and climate. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/ecosystem-restoration-people-nature-climate United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). How wetlands are defined and identified under CWA Section 404. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/how-wetlands-are-defined-and-identified-under-cwa-section-404 Vallino, E., Cilluffo, G., Crosetto, M., & Rolando, A. (2025). Nature-based solutions for wetland restoration: Governance challenges and policy implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 375, 124194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124194 van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., & Gruezmacher, M. (2020). Rethinking strategy in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1798753 Verhoeven, J. T. A., Beltman, B., Bobbink, R., & Whigham, D. F. (Eds.). (2006). Wetlands and natural resource management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33189-6 Wang, X., Li, F., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2025). Wetland ecological restoration and sustainable governance: A global review. Ecological Indicators, 170, 113017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113017 Xu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, H., & Zhao, L. (2025). Adaptive governance for wetland conservation under climate change: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Management, 378, 124596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124596 Yang, H., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., & Sun, Q. (2024). Community participation and collaborative governance in wetland ecosystem restoration. Land Use Policy, 145, 107321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107321 Yu, H., Chen, X., Li, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). Stakeholder collaboration and ecological governance in wetland restoration: A bibliometric and systematic review. Science of the Total Environment, 959, 178012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178012 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 206 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 31 |
||