تدوین سازوکار تجربه‌ سکونت بر اساس قابلیت‌های فضاهای مرزی پیرامون خانه تحلیل تطبیقی دیدگاه خبرگان و تجربه‌ زیسته‌ ساکنان

Aboualy, S., Mansour, Y., & El-Fiki, S. (2023). Transformations and appropriations of the in-between spaces in Cairo. Open House International, 48(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0135

Aghalatifi, A., & Isa, H. (2018). Impression of meaning of home from physical transformation in Contemporary Era of Tehran [Barrasi-ye ta’sir-paziri-ye mafhum-e khane az tahavvolāt-e kalbodi-ye ān dar dourān-e mo‘āser dar shahr-e Tehran]. Journal of Fine Art: Architecture and Urban Planning, 23(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.219937.671690 (in Persian)

Alexander, Ch. (2014). A City is not a Tree [Shahr derakht nist]. (2ed). Tehran: Arman shahr. (in Persian)

Ali Niyaie Motlagh, A., Shakouri, R., & Einifar, A. R. (2020). Explanation of the Liminality Concept in the Inside-Outside Dialectic of Boundaries in Architecture [Tabyin-e mafhūm-e āsānegi dar bar-ham-konsh-e dorun va birun-e mahdudeh-hā dar me‘māri]. Journal of Fine Art: Architecture and Urban Planning, 25(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2020.304505.672477 (in Persian)

Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020). The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities, 101, 102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102687

Attar Abbasi, Z., Einifar, A. R., Foroutan, M., & Soroush, M. M. (2020). Investigating the mechanism of the void's physical-semantic effect on social interactions [Barrasi-ye sāz-o-kār-e asargozāri-ye vizhegi-hā-ye kalbodi–ma‘nāyi-ye tahi bar ta‘āmelāt-e ejtemā‘i]. Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 9(33), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.9.33.43 (in Persian)

Badiei, N. (2002). Facades: The Border of Connection [Jeddāreh-hā, harim-e vasl]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran]. Electronic Dissertations and Theses University of Tehran (ETDs). https://doi.org/ 10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.17426 Bonakdar, A., & Gharai, F. (2011). Paradigm shifts in urban design principles: From physical, social, and perceptual components toward a placemaking approach [Taghir-e paradigm-ha dar osul-e tarahi-ye shahri; az mo’allefeh-ha-ye kalbodi, ejtema‘i va edraki be rahyaft-e makan-saz]. Journal of Architecture and Urban planning, (6), 51–70. https://doi.org/ 10.30480/aup.2011.172 (in Persian)

Bemanian, M. R., Dehghan, N., Zare, Z., & Yeganeh, M. (2021). Investigating the Relationship between Legibility and the Rate of Territorial Behavior in Urban Parks [Tabyin-e rabete-ye khānāyi-ye fazā bā mizān-e raftār-e qalamro-pāyi-ye shahrvandān dar pārk-hā-ye shahri]. Hoviate Shahr, 15(48), 5-20. https://doi.org/ 10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.17426 (in Persian)

Browning, C. R., & Soller, B. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development, Cityscape (Washington, DC), 16(1), 165-196. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9416924 Brunec, I. K., Moscovitch, M., & Barense, M. D. (2018). Boundaries shape cognitive representations of spaces and events, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(7), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.013

Choolen,H., Meeters, J.(2012). Editorial special issue: house, home and dwelling. J Hous and the Built Environ 27,1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9247-4

Chiesi, L., & Costa, P. (2023). How Design Is Appropriated: Understanding Habitation through the Observation of Situated Behavior. Social Sciences, 12(6), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12060319

Einifar, A. R., & Aghalatifi, A. (2011). Concept of Territory in Residential Complexes: A Comparative Study of two High-rise and Low-rise Complexes in Tehran [Mafhūm-e qalamrow dar majmu‘eh-hā-ye maskuni; motāle‘eh-ye moghāyesé‘i-ye do majmu‘eh-ye maskuni dar sath va dar ertefā‘ dar Tehrān]. Journal of Fine Art: Architecture and Urban Planning, 47(3), 17-28. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.47.2.8 (in Persian)

Eslami Mojaveri, N. (2023). Study of environment-behavior in three types of the urban context of Tehran-Comparative analysis of the Chizar, Narmak, and Khazane neighborhoods’ context using survey and space syntax methods. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/N41XLO

Gharavi Alkhansari, M. (2017). Analysis of Potentials in Architectural Flexibility [Guneh-bandi va tahlil-e ghābeliyat-hā dar anvā‘-e ruykard-hā-ye en‘etāf-paziri]. Soffeh, 27(76), 37-54. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.1683870.1396.27.1.3.3 (in Persian) Hensel, M. U. (2011). Performance-oriented Architecture and the Spatial and Material Organisation Complex. Rethinking the Definition, Role and Performative Capacity of the Spatial and Material Boundaries of the Built Environment, FORMakademisk, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.125

Gharavi Alkhansari, M. (2011). The Interaction Between Stability and Dynamism for Develping an Architectural Flexibilty, With Analysis of Some Cases of Contemporary Flexible Housings [Ta‘āmol-e pāyāyi va puyāyi dar en‘etāf paziri ye asar e me‘māri, bā tahlil e nemuneh hāyi az maskan e en‘etāf pazir e mo‘āser]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran]. Electronic Dissertations and Theses University of Tehran (ETDs). (in Persian)

Groat, L., &Wang, D. (2011). Architectural research methods [Ravesh-hā-ye tahqiq dar me‘māri] (A. Einifar, Trans). (5ed). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (Original work published 2002) (in Persian)

İnan, F. S. (2019). In-between spaces: The METU Faculty of Architecture building complex ]Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University (Turkey)[. Electronic Dissertations and Theses Middle East Technical University (Turkey) (ETDs).

Jalili, M., Einifar, A. R., Madani, R., & Judd, B. (2020). Gated Communities Gated Communities: Genesis, Proliferation, Types and Consequences [Mahalleh-hā-ye mahsur: peydāyesh, gostarsh, gooneh-hā va payāmad-hā]. Journal of Iran Architecture and Urbanism (JIAU), 11(1), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.228678.1401 (in Persian)

Jalili, M., Einifar, A. R., Madani, R., & Judd, B. (2021). The Effects of Residential Communities’ Physical Boundaries on Residents’ Perception of Fear of Crime: A Comparison Between Gated, Perceived Gated, and Non-Gated Communities in Ekbatan Neighborhood, Tehran [Ta’sir-e mahdudeh-ye kalbodi-ye majmu‘eh-hā-ye maskuni bar tars az jorm-e sākenān: motāle‘eh-ye moredi; moghāyeseh-ye majmu‘eh-hā-ye maskuni-ye mahsur, mahsur-e nemādin va gheyr-e mahsur dar shahrak-e Ekbātān]. Journal of Iran Architecture and Urbanism (JIAU), 12(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.196767.1273 (in Persian)

Iossifova, D., & Kostenwein, D. (2024). Urban Borderlands: Difference, Inequality, and Spatio-Temporal In-Betweenness in Cities. Urban Planning, 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.8288

Keramati, G. (2008). Rereading the Coexistence of Soft Space and Hard Space in Iranian Architecture [Bāzkhāni-ye ham-neshini-ye narm-fazā va sakht-fazā dar me‘māri-ye irāni] [Doctoral dissertation, Islamic Azad University]. Electronic Dissertations and Theses Islamic Azad University (ETDs). (in Persian)

Kiaei, M., Soltanzadeh, H., & Heidari, A. A. (2019). Measure the flexibility of the spatial system using space syntax (Case Study: Houses in Qazvin) [Sanjesh-e en‘etāf-paziri-ye nezām-e fazāyi bā estefādeh az teknik-e chideman-e fazā (motāle‘eh-ye moredi: Khāneh-hā-ye shahr-e Qazvin)]. Bagh-e-Nazar, 16(71), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.86874 (in Persian)

Iturra Muñoz, L. (2015). The woven city: exploring the experience of time-space in residential habitats from a visual ethnographic approach. Man In India, 95 (1), 73-81. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134502

Lim, J. P. Ng, V. (2018). Tracing liminality: A multidisciplinary spatial construct. Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 6(1), 76–90. 10.15640/jea.v6n1a8

Mirshahzadeh, S., Eslami, S. G., & Einifar, A. R. (2011). The Role of the Boundary-Connecting Space in the Process of Meaning Creation: Assessing the Meaning-Making Potential of Space using a Semiotic Approach [Naghsh-e fazā-ye marzi–peyvandi dar farāyand-e āfarinesh-e ma‘nā (arzyābi-ye tavān-e ma‘nā-āfarini-ye fazā be komak-e ruykard-e neshāneh-shenāsi)]. Hoviate Shahr, 5(9), 5-16. (in Persian)

Moeini, M., & Einifar, A. (2012). Impact of In-between Spaces on Residential Environment Quality A Case Study on Public Housing in Kerman. Architecture and Urban Development, 1(3), 29-36. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22287396.2012.2.1.4.3 Mortazavi, H., Bemanian, M. R., & Ansari, M. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Semantic Values in Liminal Spaces of Traditional Houses (Case Study: Yazd Traditional Houses). READING, 2528, 9705. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijas.2019.5964 Mousavi, S. J., Hatami, S., & Talischi, G. (2012). Boundaries, Places [Marz-hā, makān-hā]. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Developmant, 11(25), 189-199. https://sid.ir/paper/202491/fa (in Persian)

Mousavi, S. J., Einifar, A. R., Partovi, P., & Habib, F. (2019). Dialogue of Inside and Outside in a Phenomenological Approach to PlaceDialectic between the Inside and the Outside: A phenomenological Approach to Place [Goft-o-guy-e dorun va borun dar negarshi-ye padidarshenāsāneh be makān]. Hoviate Shahr, 13(39), 35-46. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154558/fa (in Persian)

Ng, V ; Lim, JP.(2018). Tracing Liminality: A Multidisciplinary Spatial Construct. Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 6(1), 79-90. 10.15640/jea.v6n1a8

Nouri, E. (2021). Interconnection spaces, a solution to architectural sustainability [Fazā-hā-ye mafṣali, rāhkāri dar pāydāri-ye me‘māri]. Journal of Architectural Thought, (9), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.52547/jria.9.2.1 (in Persian)

Nouri, E., & Einifar, A. R. (2021). Analyzing the quality of in-between spaces of mosque and city: comparative study of entrances in regional (traditional and modern) contemporary mosque in Tehran [Tahlil-e keyfiyat-e fazā-ye mābeyn-e masjed va shahr; motāle‘eh-ye moghāyese‘i-ye vorudi-ye masājed-e manteqe‘i (sonnati va modern) mo‘āser-e Tehrān]. Journal of Reasearches in Islamic Architecture, (29), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.52547/jria.9.2.1 (in Persian)

Ramzi, M., Yeganeh, M., & Bamanian, M. R. (2021). Analyzing the Effect of Spatial Distinction on the level of Common Values between Citizens (Case Study: Selected Neighborhoods of Ahvaz) [Tahlil-e ta’sir-e tamāyoz-e makāni bar mizān-e arzesh-hā-ye moshtarak beyn-e shahrvandān (motāle‘eh-ye moredi: mahalleh-hā-ye montakhab-e Ahvāz)]. Urban Design Discourse, 2(3), 59-70. https://journals.modares.ac.ir/article_23196.html (in Persian)

Rezaei, N., Mohammadzadeh, R., & Omranipour, A. (2016). Social Quality Evaluation of Open and SemiOpen Circulation Routes at the University Campuses, Case Study: Campus of the University of Kashan [Arzyābi-ye keyfiyat-e ejtemā‘i-ye masir-hā-ye ertebāti-ye bāz va niméh-bāz-e pardis-hā-ye dāneshgāhi, motāle‘eh-ye moredi: pardis-e dāneshgāh-e Kāshān]. Journal of Architecture Studies, (10), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.63616/taj.v.01.i.02.02 (in Persian)

Riahi Fard, A. (2013). Survay on the appropriate distribution of open space in order to upgrandthe quality of modern urban residential areas in Tehran [Barrasi-ye nahve-ye tozi‘-e monāseb-e fazā-ye khāli dar bālātarin keyfiyat-e fazā-hā-ye sokunatgāhi-ye shahri-ye mo‘āser-e Tehrān]. Hoviate Shahr, 7(15), 71-82. https://sid.ir/paper/154757/fa (in Persian)

Satty, T. L. (2001). The analytic network process: decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA, US: RWS Publications.

Sfintes, A. (2016). Boundary-spaces in the architectural anthropology [Doctoral dissertation, Ion Mincu University]. Electronic Dissertations and Theses Ion Mincu University (ETDs). Shehab, N., & Salama, A. M. (2018). The spatiality of segregation: Narratives from the everyday urban environment of Gothenburg and Glasgow, ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(1),71–90. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1502

Sim, D. (2019). Soft city: building density for everyday life. Island Press.

van den Brink, M., van den Brink, A., & Bruns, D. (2022). Boundary thinking in landscape architecture and boundary-spanning roles of landscape architects. Landscape Research, 47(8),1087-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2022.2091121

Vis, B. N. (2018). Cities made of boundaries: mapping social life in urban form, UCL Press.

Vis, B. N. (2024). Boundaries of the built environment: defining the significance of the material presence of spatial morphology in social life. Open Research Europe, 3,184. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16591.2

Vis, B. N. (2013). Mapping the inhabited urban built environment. The socio-spatial significance of the material presence of boundaries through time [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds]. Electronic Dissertations and Theses University of Leeds (ETDs).

Yaghmaeian, Sh., Habib, F. (2019). Developing P.P.P Model of Place Attachment for Evaluating Residential Environment (Cases Study: Open Space of Iranzamin and Ekbatan Apartment Buildings). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 9(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36475.57126

Zerouati, W., & Bellal, T. (2020). Evaluating the impact of mass housings’ in-between spaces’ spatial configuration on users’ social interaction, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1),34–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.05.005 آقالطیفی، آزاده‏ و حجت، عیسی (1397). بررسی تأثیرپذیری مفهوم خانه از تحولات کالبدی آن در دوران معاصر در شهر تهران‏. نشریه‌ هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی، 23(4)، 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.219937.671690

https://doi.org/ 10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.17426 بنکدار، احمد و قرائی، فریبا (1390). تغییر پارادایم‌ها در اصول طراحی شهری؛ از مؤلفه‌های کالبدی و اجتماعی و ادراکی به رهیافت مکان‌سازی. نامه‌ی معماری و شهرسازی، (6)، 51-70.

https://doi.org/ 10.30480/aup.2011.172

https://sid.ir/paper/154757/fa

https://doi.org/10.29252/hafthesar.9.33.43

https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2020.304505.672477

https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.86874

https://www.sid.ir/paper/154558/fa

. https://doi.org/10.52547/jria.9.2.1

https://doi.org/10.52547/jria.9.2.1