پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,913 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 154,945,432 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,918,954 |
Analyzing the Elderly Healthcare Ecosystem: A Hybrid Stakeholder Salience and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach | ||
| Industrial Management Journal | ||
| دوره 18، شماره 1، 2026، صفحه 250-278 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2026.409152.1008280 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Narjes Ghasemnia Arabi1؛ Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam* 2؛ Mohammad Valipour Khatir3؛ Mahsa Soltani Neshan4 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in Industrial Management, Production and Operation Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Prof., Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Industrial Management, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| 4Ph.D., Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective: The global increase in the elderly population has heightened the need for coordinated, tailored healthcare services that address the complex needs of older adults. This study aims to conceptualize the elderly healthcare ecosystem by identifying its key actors, classifying their roles, and examining the nature of their interactions. Methodology: A multi-stage methodological approach was employed. First, an extensive literature review—focusing on healthcare ecosystems and ageing studies—was conducted to develop an initial analytical framework. Based on this, ecosystem actors were identified and categorized using Mitchell et al.’s Stakeholder Salience Model. An expert panel was then consulted to validate actor attributes and refine classifications. To analyze interdependencies and determine influential actors, a Fuzzy Cognitive Map was constructed, enabling the assessment of causal relationships and the dynamic positioning of stakeholders within the ecosystem. Results: The analysis identified seven groups of actors within the healthcare ecosystem. FCM findings reveal that the elderly, families, and medical centers are the most influential actors. At the same time, the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, insurance and pension funds, and the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare emerge as the most influential and central stakeholders in advancing ecosystem objectives. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the elderly healthcare ecosystem is inherently dynamic, and stakeholder classifications should not be viewed as static. Attributes such as power, legitimacy, and urgency are fluid and context-dependent. The FCM results further highlight this dynamism by illustrating how shifts in causal relationships can reposition actors across stakeholder categories, underscoring the need for adaptive policymaking. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Ecosystem؛ elderly؛ healthcare؛ fuzzy cognitive map؛ stakeholder classification model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alizadeh, M., Fakhrzadeh, H., Sharifi, F., Mohamadiazar, M., & Nazari, N. (2014). Analytical performance of administrations in charge of ageing program in Iran [Review]. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Lipid Disorders, 13(1), 74–81. http://ijdld.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5094-fa.html
Azizi Zeinalhajlou, A., Amini, A., & Sadegh Tabrizi, J. (2015). Consequences of Population Aging in Iran with Emphasis on its Increasing Challenges on the Health System (Literature Review). Depiction of Health, 6(1), 54–64. https://doh.tbzmed.ac.ir/fa/Article/doh-117
Bahadorestani, A., Ghalehnovi, M., & Motahari Farimani, N. (2018). Designing a Model of key Stakeholders’ Expectations in the Subway Construction Projects: Studied in MUR Construction Project. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 50(1), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2016.11531.5030
Baldissera, T. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016). Services personalization approach for a collaborative care ecosystem. Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 443–456). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Baldissera, T. A., Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & De Faveri, C. (2017). Service personalization requirements for elderly care in a collaborative environment. Doctoral Conference on Computing. In Doctoral conference on computing, electrical and industrial systems (pp. 20–28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Basri, M. H., Farmaciawaty, D. A., Rachmania, I. N., Widjaja, F. B., & Wiyana, A. F. (2021). Healthcare Ecosystem Mapping in Primary Care: A Case Study in West Java, Indonesia. In International Conference on Business and Engineering Management (ICONBEM 2021) (pp. 184–190). Atlantis Press.
Bereczky, T. (2019). The healthcare ecosystem and stakeholder management. WECAN. https://wecanadvocate.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/0105-Bereczky-Healthcare-ecosystem-1.1.pdf
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public management review, 6(1), 21–53.
Chang, Y. T., Chen, M. K., & Kung, Y. C. (2022). Evaluating a Business Ecosystem of Open Data Services Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL-AHP Approach. Sustainability, 14(13), 1–21.
Christos, B., Vicky, M., & Constantinos, S. J. (2014). Supply chain management in the healthcare sector: a research agenda. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern conference on information systems (EMCIS).
Damani, S., Verma, V., Balgrosky, J., Harbour, R., Gross, J., Nigam, T., Lalwani, U., & Daniels, E. (2018). Aligning Stakeholders in a New Healthcare Ecosystem [Whitepaper].
Daraffshanian, M. (2018). pplications of the Internet of Things in patient care, Annual National Conference on Innovative Research Ideas in Engineering and Technology, Electrical and Computer Sciences, https://sid.ir/paper/897805/fa
Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making strategy: The journey of strategic management. Sage.
Fathi, E. (2020). The Phenomenon of Population Aging in Iran [Applicable]. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 30(2), 387–413. http://ijoss.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-351-fa.html
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337–359.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Academic.
He, J., & Zhu, J. (2022). Key Drivers of the Emergency Capabilities of Integrated Elderly Services Supply Chains. Information Resources Management Journal, 35(1), 1-20.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2002). Keystones and dominators: Framing the operational dynamics of business ecosystems. The operational dynamics of business ecosystems, 3–19.
Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16.
Kastalli, I. V., & Neely, A. (2013). Collaborate to innovate: how business ecosystems unleash business value—University of Cambridge.
Kazemi, F., Bahrami, A., & Sharif, J. A. (2020). Mineral processing plant site selection using integrated fuzzy cognitive map and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach: A case study of gilsonite mines in Iran. Minerals Engineering, 147, 106143.
Khodabakhshi Parizi, F., Farrokh, M., & Mehrabioun, M. (2025). A Sustainable Healthcare Supply Chain Model Based on Big Data Analytics, Lean Operations, and Integration. Industrial Management Journal, 17(3), 56–89. https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2025.388084.1008218
Khorshidzadeh, M., Dehghani, A.S., & Ghavi, S. (2021). Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in the Health Industry [Research]. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health, 16(3), 66–73. http://jps.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-274-fa.html
Kong, Y., Liu, X.-W., Cui, Q.-Q., Xu, H., & Ali, S. (2024). Resolving conflict and promoting coordination for an integrated old-age healthcare service system in China: GMCR-AHP-based decision analysis approach. Heliyon, 10(13).
Kousari, S., yari, a., & Saghafi, F. (2021). Value stream mapping network for localized Search engine business ecosystem actors based on stakeholders' analysis. INNOVATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 10(2), 97–125. https://www.nowavari.ir/article_134309_adb806b37b8b5e8ec2a607671015bbf7.pdf
Lee, I. (2019). The Internet of Things for enterprises: An ecosystem, architecture, and IoT service business model. Internet of Things, 7, 100078.
León, M. C., Nieto-Hipólito, J. I., Garibaldi-Beltrán, J., Amaya-Parra, G., Luque-Morales, P., Magaña-Espinoza, P., & Aguilar-Velazco, J. (2016). Designing a model of a digital ecosystem for healthcare and wellness using the business model canvas. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6), 144.
Li, J., & Carayon, P. (2021). Health Care 4.0: A vision for smart and connected health care. IISE transactions on healthcare systems engineering, 11(3), 171-180.
Liu, Y., & Tian, L. (2021). Evolution of MSCP‐Enabled Healthcare Ecosystem: A Case of China. Scanning, 2021(1), 1167221.
Ma, Y., Shen, Z., & Nguyen, D. T. (2016). Agent-based simulation to inform planning strategies for welfare facilities for the elderly: Day care center development in a Japanese city. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(4).
Marcos-Pablos, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Technological ecosystems in care and assistance: a systematic literature review. Sensors, 19(3), 708.
Marinescu, I. A., Rotaru, C.-M., Nicolau, D., & Krawiec, P. (2021). Challenges and perspectives for the development of a future ecosystem for elderly within pandemic. 2021 23rd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS),
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Mohrman, S. A., & Shani, A. B. R. (2014). Healthcare: An Ecosystem in Transition. In Reconfiguring the Ecosystem for Sustainable Healthcare (Vol. 4, pp. 1–29). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 323–338.
Moshabaki, A., Kord Naeij, A., Jahanizadeh, F., & Khodadad Hosseini, S. H. (2021). Explaining the Basic Principles of Business Ecosystem Approach. Management Research in Iran, 19(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2322200.1394.19.2.7.7
Peifer, J. L., & Newman, D. T. (2020). Making the business case for corporate social responsibility and perceived trustworthiness: A cross‐stakeholder analysis. Business and Society Review, 125(2), 161–181.
Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum.
Pereno, A., & Eriksson, D. (2020). A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures, 122, 102605.
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. L. (2007a). Modelling IT projects success with fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 543–559.
Rodríguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmerón, J. L. (2007b). Modelling IT projects success: Emerging methodologies reviewed. Technovation, 27(10), 582–594.
Sadeghi Moghadam, M., Safari, H., Mansouri, T., & Safari, A. (2019). Measuring and Scenario Planning for Business Process Management Maturity Developing Based on Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Technique. Industrial Management Journal, 11(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2019.274321.1007552
Saghafi, F., Abbbasi Shahkouh, K., & Keshtgari, E. (2014). Designing a framework for stakeholder identification and prioritization based on meta-synthesis method: A case study of Iran’s indigenous operating system. Future Management Journal, 39(13), 21–42.
Saghafi, F., Mazarei, S. H., Khansari, M., Mohammadi Kangarani, H., & Asadifard, R. (2019). Meta synthesis of factors influencing strengthening the relationships among the members of S&T collaborative networks from the perspective of social capital theory. INNOVATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 8(3), 23–52. https://sid.ir/paper/408494/en
Sarebanzadeh, K., Hasheminejad, N., Alimohammadlou, M., & Es'haghi, M. (2024). Using fuzzy cognitive map in bow tie method for dynamic risk assessment of spherical storage tanks: A case study. Heliyon, 10(5).
Scholes, K., Johnson, G., & Whittington, R. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy. Financial Times Prentice Hall Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Secundo, G., Shams, S. R., & Nucci, F. (2021). Digital technologies and collective intelligence for healthcare ecosystem: Optimizing Internet of Things adoption for pandemic management. Journal of Business Research, 131, 563–572.
Serbanati, L. D., Ricci, F. L., Mercurio, G., & Vasilateanu, A. (2011). Steps towards a digital health ecosystem. Journal of biomedical informatics, 44(4), 621–636.
Shaarbafchi Zadeh, N., Akbari, F., Khalili Khouzani, P., & Niaraees Zavare, A. S. (2020). Comparative study of elderly care services among Iran, United States of America, and Sweden [Original Research]. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, 25(5), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.52547/sjku.25.5.123
Shao, Q., Yuan, J., Ma, J., Ding, H., & Huang, W. (2020). Exploring the determinants of synergetic development of social organizations participating in home-based elderly care service: An SEM method. Plos one, 15(12), e0244880.
Shirali, E., & Shahbazi, M. (2020). Presenting Welfare Services to Elderly in Selected Country and Lessons for Iran. Journal of Social Security, 14(4), 191–209. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2104781
Shrivastava, S. R. B. L., Shrivastava, P. S., & Ramasamy, J. (2013). Health‑care of elderly: Determinants, needs and services. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1(1), 1224–1225.
Sun, M., Liu, L., Wang, J., Zhuansun, M., Xu, T., Qian, Y., & Dela Rosa, R. (2023). Facilitators and inhibitors in hospital-to-home transitional care for elderly patients with chronic diseases: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Frontiers in public health, 11, 1047723.
Suzman, R., & Beard, J. (2017). Global Health and Aging. https://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-06/global_health_aging.pdf
Tinetti, M. E., Bogardus Jr, S. T., & Agostini, J. V. (2004). Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. In (Vol. 351, pp. 2870-2874): Mass Medical Soc.
Viswanadham, N. (2021). Ecosystem model for healthcare platform. Sādhanā, 46(4), 188.
Wallin, J. (2012). Enhancing competencies in business ecosystems. In A focused issue on competence perspectives on new industry dynamics (pp. 83–116). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Wan, H., Daniel, G., & Paul, K. (2016). International population reports. US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf
Weber, M. L., & Hine, M. (2015). Who inhabits a business ecosystem? The technospecies as a unifying concept. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(5), 31–44.
WHO. (2015). World Report on Aging and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2015. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/en/
Wieringa, R. J., Engelsman, W., Gordijn, J., & Ionita, D. (2019). A business ecosystem architecture modeling framework. 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).
Wu, J., Wang, Y., Tao, L., & Peng, J. (2019). Stakeholders in the healthcare service ecosystem. Procedia CIRP, 83, 375–379.
Xiaoren, Z., Ling, D., & Xiangdong, C. (2014). Interaction of open innovation and business ecosystem. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, 7(1), 51–64.
Yuehong, Y., Zeng, Y., Chen, X., & Fan, Y. (2016). The internet of things in healthcare: An overview. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 1, 3-13.
Zhao, J. (2020). Coordination of elderly healthcare service supply chain with information asymmetry: Designs of option contracts under different demand distribution statuses. RAIRO-Operations Research, 54(5), 1291–1307.
Zhao, J. (2022). Will the community O2O service supply channel benefit the elderly healthcare service supply chain? Electronic Commerce Research, 22(4), 1617–1650. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 80 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 80 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب