پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,913 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 154,945,432 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,918,953 |
Analyzing the Role of Funding Sources in Research and Development in Driving Global Innovation | ||
| Industrial Management Journal | ||
| دوره 18، شماره 1، 2026، صفحه 189-213 اصل مقاله (920.6 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2026.404515.1008267 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Alireza Ranjbar1؛ Sina Tarighi* 2؛ Negin Nateghipour3 | ||
| 1Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Department of Technology and Innovation Management, Faculty of Industrial Management and Technology, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3MSc., Department of Production and Operations Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective: This study examines how different research and development (R&D) funding sources—business enterprise R&D (BERD), higher education R&D (HERD), and government-financed R&D (GOVERD)—influence national innovation and competitiveness, measured by the Global Innovation Index (GII) and Global Competitiveness Index (GCI). This study addresses a critical gap by moving beyond aggregate R&D spending to examine how funding composition shapes innovation capacity. Methodology: Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis was conducted on a sample of 47 countries using data from OECD R&D Statistics, World Bank Development Indicators, and GII/GCI reports. Missing values (< 3%) were imputed using mean substitution. Diagnostic tests were applied to verify normality, minimal multicollinearity, and compliance with heteroscedasticity assumptions. Two models were subsequently estimated with GII and GCI as dependent variables. Results: For the GII model (R² = 0.601, F = 12.37, p < 0.001), overall GERD intensity was significantly positive (β = 10.54, p = 0.040), while disaggregated components (BERD, HERD, GOVERD) showed no individual significance due to multicollinearity. GDP per capita was robust (β = 8.78e-05, p = 0.019). For the GCI model (R² = 0.651, F = 15.31, p < 0.001), GERD was non-significant; GDP per capita remained the strongest predictor (β = 0.0003, p < 0.001). Regression assumptions were satisfied (Jarque-Bera p > 0.44; Durbin-Watson ≈ 2.1). Conclusion: Overall R&D intensity significantly influences innovation, but relationships with disaggregated sources are complex. The importance of GDP per capita shows that the quality of institutions and the ability to absorb new ideas are both important for turning R&D spending into innovation and competitiveness benefits. Policymakers should prioritize both R&D funding levels and the institutional environment enabling effective R&D utilization. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| R&D؛ innovation؛ global innovation index (GII)؛ global competitiveness index (GCI)؛ R&D investment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Antonoaie, C. (2024). CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVOLUTION OF GROSS DOMESTIC EXPENDITURE ON R&D (GERD) IN ROMANIA AND EU COUNTRIES. PART II – DYNAMIC RHYTHMS. Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM), 15(2), 212–225.
Baruk, J. (2020). The volume and dynamics of domestic expenditures on research and development in the European Union. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych, 4(38), 21–48.
Blanco, A., Delgado, J., & Presno, M. J. (2020). R&D expenditure in the EU: Convergence or divergence? Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1685–1710.
Cảnh, T. Q., & Hoài, P. T. Đ. (2022). Factors affecting GDP per capita: Applying Bayesian analysis. Economics–Law and Management, 6(2), 2862–2868.
Cornell University, INSEAD, & World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2019). Appendix I: The Global Innovation Index (GII) conceptual framework. In The Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating healthy lives – The future of medical innovation.
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes‑Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, 42(1), 76–89.
Dědeček, R., & Dudzich, V. (2022). Exploring the limitations of GDP per capita as an indicator of economic development: A cross‑country perspective. Review of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 193–217.
Dehmer, S. P., Pardey, P. G., Beddow, J. M., & Chai, Y. (2019). Reshuffling the global R&D deck, 1980–2050. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213801.
Firlej, K. A. (2019). Expenditure on research and development activities as a determinant of the innovativeness of the European Union’s economy. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 63(7), 35–46.
Gamba, F. J. (2025). R&D, Innovation and Competitiveness: Global Evidences on Conceptual and Practical Connectedness. African Journal of Management Research, 32(1).
Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of innovation and new technology, 12(3), 225-243.
Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2013). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 300–328.
Hamidi, S., & Berrado, A. (2018). Segmentation of innovation determinants: Case of the Global Innovation Index. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (pp. 1–8).
Hasan, Z., Alam, M. A., Kaur, H., Khan, I. R., & Alankar, B. (2023). Role of gross domestic expenditure on research and development (GERD) on economic GDP: A time series forecasting approach using ARIMA model. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3061301/v1
Leogrande, A. (2024). The percentage of gross domestic expenditure on research and development (GERD) financed by businesses globally. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13138698
Luna Cardozo, M., Guerrero‑Luzuriaga, A., Miranda, D. G., Prado López, H. R., Trujillo Pajuelo, M. L., & Arroyo Japura, G. (2021). Characterization of gross domestic expenditure on R&D in Latin American countries during 2008–2017. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 684–688. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.1469
Mohseni kiasari, M. , Soltanzadeh, . , Azizi Hasanabadi, A. and Talebi, H. (2024). Unveiling Hidden Aspects of Intermediary Organizations in Innovation: A Systematic Review through the Lens of Industry Taxonomy. Industrial Management Journal, 16(1 (شماره ویژه: مدیریت تکنولوژی)), 37-74. doi: 10.22059/imj.2024.365894.1008091
Nasir, M. H., & Zhang, S. (2024). Evaluating innovative factors of the Global Innovation Index: A panel data approach. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 100096.
Schwab, K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. World Economic Forum.
Shahriari, S. and Lahiji, S. (2017). Performance Evaluation of the National Innovation Systems by Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Industrial Management Journal, 9(3), 455-474. doi: 10.22059/imj.2018.234863.1007248
Strokatov, D. (2019). Innovations in the structure and methodology of calculation of the Global Competitiveness Index. International Trade and Trade Policy, 2019(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2019-1-45-59
Vītola, L., & Eriņa, J. (2015). R&D expenditures by higher education sector and analysis of performance indicators of Baltic states. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 223–228.
Walwyn, D. R. (2010). Determining research and development expenditure targets based on an affordability index. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 7(2), 183–19
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 586 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 256 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب