پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,147 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,904 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 154,932,737 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,906,650 |
Performing the empowered self: Pseudoscience, individualism, and the Iranian self-development microcelebrities | ||
| Journal of Cyberspace Studies | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 1، فروردین 2026، صفحه 281-301 اصل مقاله (544.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcss.2025.406607.1204 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammadreza Gharghani؛ Ehsan Shahghasemi* | ||
| Department of Social Communication Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Self-development microcelebrities constitute a distinct and rapidly expanding subtype within the broader culture of fame. These figures primarily operate within the digital self-help domain, offering audiences simplified psychological and lifestyle concepts that promise personal transformation through adherence to their guidance. Contemporary self-help discourse is rooted in the positive psychology movement that gained traction in the United States during the late 20th century and is heavily influenced by neoliberal ideologies that emphasize individual agency and responsibility. Aims: In this research, Instagram pages of Iranian self-development microcelebrities were studied to understand what they share with their audience and the various methods they employ to engage with them. Methodology: This study analyzes the Instagram accounts of Iranian self-development microcelebrities with follower counts exceeding 300,000, using a thematic analysis approach. Initially, each account was analyzed individually, followed by a cross-case analysis to identify recurring thematic patterns. Findings: The analysis revealed three overarching themes—pseudoscience, the primacy of luck and the inner self, and self-made rules—comprising seven organizing themes and 31 basic themes. The findings indicate that these microcelebrities promote a form of hyper-individualism aligned with neoliberal values. Conclusion: This model of subjectivity emphasizes psychological self-regulation and inner transformation while detaching individuals from social and political engagement. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Instagram analysis؛ microcelebrities؛ neoliberalism؛ personal development؛ self-help discourse | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmed, S.K.; Mohammed, R.A.; Nashwan, A.J.; Ibrahim, R.H.; Abdalla, A.Q.; Ameen, B.M.M.; Khdhir R.M. (2025). “Using thematic analysis in qualitative research”. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 6: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198.
Asen, R. (2018). “Introduction: Neoliberalism and the public sphere”. Communication and the Public. 3(3): 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047318794687.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). “Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research”. Qualitative Research. 1(3): 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307.
Bengtsson, S. & Johansson, S. (2022). “The meanings of social media use in everyday life: Filling empty slots, everyday transformations, and mood management”. Social Media + Society. 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221130292.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Doing. London: SAGE Publication.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 77-101.
Cales, C. (2020). The Self-Help Culture within Society and the Publishing Industry. University of Limoges.
Chamberlain, K. & Lynch, M. (2022). “Designing qualitative research with Instagram”. In Flick, U. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design (pp. 924-937). California: SAGE Publications.
Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2017). “The continuing lure of the mediated centre in times of deep mediatization: Media Events and its enduring legacy”. Media, Culture & Society. 40(1): 114-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726009.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. California: SAGE Publication.
---------------. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. California: SAGE Publications.
Hines, T. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. NewYork: Prometheus Books.
Kaufman, A. & Kaufman, J. (2018). Pseudoscience The Conspiracy Against Science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
King, C. (1980). “The self-help/self-care concept”. Nurse Practitioner. 34-46.
Lombardo, G.; Mordonini, M. & Tomaiuolo, M. (2021). “Adoption of social media in socio‑technical systems: A survey”. Information. 12(3): 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12030132.
Martin, M. (1994). “Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education”. Science & Education. 357-371.
McGee, M. (2005). Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover Culture in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
McIntyre, L. (2019). The Scientific Attitude; Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. The MIT Press: Cambridge.
Moghaddam, H. & Shahghasemi E. (2025). “The art of communicating through images: A classification of persian memes”. International Journal of Humanities. 32(1): 34-61. https://doi.org/10.48311/eijh.2025.24137.
Pigliucci, M. (2010). Nonsense on Stilts; How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Rimke, H. (2020). “Self-help, therapeutic industries, and neoliberalism”. In Nehring, D.; Madsen, O.; Cabanas, E.; Mills, C. & Kerrigan, D. The Routledge International Handbook of Global Therapeutic Cultures (pp. 37-50). London: Routledge.
Rimke, H.M. (2000). “Governing citizens through self-help literature”. Cultural Studies. 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/095023800334986.
Sabbar, S. & Khiyaban, S.H.Z. (2023). “Algorithms of displacement: Emotional and rhetorical responses to ai-driven job loss in digital public discourse”. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. 3(4): 1324-1331. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2023.3.4.5012.
Salehi, K. & Habib Zadeh Khiyaban, S. (2025). “AI and crime prevention in the academic literature: An integrative review of AI applications in crime prevention”. Code, Cognition and Society. 1(1): 164-177. doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/ccsr.2025.546552.1016.
Salehi, K.; Habib Zadeh Khiyaban, S. & Sabbar, S. (2025). “Artificial intelligence and the future of international law and power”. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies. 9(4): 923-958. https://doi.org/10.22059/wsps.2025.401951.1552.
Salerno, S. (2005). How the Self-Help Movement Made America Helpless. NewYork: Three Rivers Press.
Shahghasemi, E.; Gholami, F. & Alikhani, Z. (2025). “Global patterns of social media use and political sentiment”. Discover Global Society. 3(1): 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00171-y.
Shahghasemi, E. (2025). “‘Woke’ in translation: Persian perspectives on Platform X”. Discover Global Society. 3(104). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00253-x.
Smith, J.C. (2010). Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal; A Critical Thinkers Toolkit. Blackwell.
Stear, J. (1985). “Self-help a paradigm of guided development”. Self & Society. 305-307.
Williams, M.H. (1990). “The self-help movement in head injury”. Rehabilitation Nursing. 311-315. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 246 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 181 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب