نقش آشنایی در روابط درون‌گروهی و رفتار کاوشگری کنه‌های شکارگر Amblyseius swirskii و Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

REFERENCES

Barnard, C. (1991). Kinship and social behavior: the trouble with relatives. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6(10), 310–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90035-v

Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., & Smith, R. J. F. (1995). Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas): implications for anti-predator behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 73, 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1139/z95-111

de Bruijn, P. J. A., Sabelis, M. W., & Egas, M. (2014). Effects of kinship or familiarity? Small thrips larvae experience lower predation risk only in groups of mixed-size siblings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68(6), 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1715-x

Earley, R. L., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2005). Fighting, mating and networking: Pillars of poeciliid sociality. In Animal Communication Networks (pp. 84-113). Cambridge University Press.

Fellowes, M.D.E. (1998). Do non‐social insects get the (kin) recognition they deserve? Ecological Entomology, 23(2), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00128.x

Gotoh, T., Tsuchiya, A., & Kitashima, Y. (2006). Influence of prey on performance developmental, reproduction and prey consumption of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 40(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-9032-3

Griffiths, S. W., Brockmark, S., Hojesjo, J., & Johnsson, J. I. (2004). Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proceedings Royal Society Biology, 271, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2648

Ibrahim, Y. B., & Abdul Rahman, R. B. (1997). Influence of prey density, species an developmental stages on the predatory behavior of Amblyseius longispinousus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 42(3), 319–327.

Jiang, L., Cheng, Y., Gao, S., Zhong, Y., Ma, C., Wang, T., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Emergence of social cluster by collective pairwise encounters in Drosophila. eLife, 9, e51921. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51921

Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 210 pp.

Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092

Mateo, J. M. (2004). Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 41, 729–745.

McMurtry, J. A., De Moraes, G. J., & Sourassou, N. Z. (2013). Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 18(4), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.4.1

Muleta, G., & Schausberger, P. (2013). Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity Animal Behaviour, 86(3), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.040

Nonacs, P. Blumstein, D. T (2010). Predation risk and behavioral life history. In: Westneat D, F, Fox C, W, editors. Evolutionary Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp 207-221).

Overmeer W. P. J. (1985). Rearing and handling. In: Sabelis MW (ed) Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 161-170.

Schausberger, P. (2005). The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis manipulates imprinting among offspring through egg placement. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0898-y

Schausberger, P., & Nguyen, T. H. (2024). Early social isolation disrupts adult personality expression in group‐living mites. Journal of Animal Ecology, 94(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0898-y

Schausberger, P., Gratzer, M., & Strodl, M. A. (2017). Early social isolation impairs development, mate choice and grouping behaviour of predatory mites. Animal Behaviour, 127, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.024

Schausberger, P., Yano, S., & Sato, Y. (2021). Cooperative Behaviors in Group-Living Spider Mites. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 745036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.745036

Sillen-Tullberg, B., & Leimar, O. (1988). The evolution of gregariousness in distasteful insects as a defense against predators. American Naturalist, 132, 723-734. https://doi.org/10.1086/284884

Simon, A. F., Chou, M. ‐T., Salazar, E. D., Nicholson, T., Saini, N., Metchev, S., & Krantz, D. E. (2011). A simple assay to study social behavior in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 11(2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183x.2011.00740.x

Strodl, M. A., & Schausberger, P. (2013). Social familiarity relaxes the constraints of limited attention and enhances reproduction of group‐living predatory mites. Oikos, 122(8), 1217-1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20833.x

Strodl, M.A., & Schausberger, P. (2012). Social familiarity reduces reaction Times and enhances survival of group-living predatory mites under the risk of predation. PLoS ONE 7(8), e43590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043590

Van Swinderen, B. (2007). Attention-like processes in Drosophila require short-term memory genes. Science, 315, 1590-1593. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137931

Walzer, A. Schausberger, P. (2011). Sex-specific developmental plasticity of generalist and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in response to food stress. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102: 650-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01593.x

Walzer, A., & Schausberger, P. (2014). Canalization of body size matters for lifetime reproductive success of male predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 111(4), 889-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12235

Xiao, Y., Osborne, S., Chen, J., & Mckenzi, L. (2013). Functional responses and prey-stage preferences of a predatory gall midge and two predacious mites with two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, as host. Journal of Insect Science, 13:8. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.0801

Zach, J., Peneder, S., Strodl, M. A., & Schausberger, P. (2012). Social familiarity governs prey patch exploitation, leaving and inter-patch distribution of the group living predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. PLoS ONE 7(8), e42889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042889

Zhang, K. & Zhang, A. Q. (2023). A thelytokous predatory mite is more cannibalistic towards distant kin. Current Zoology, 69 (5): 578- 584.