سازگاری مونیسم معرفتی و نسبی‌گرایی معرفتی

Ashton N A (2020). Scientific Perspectives, Feminist Standpoints, and Non-Silly Relativism. In: Crețu, AM., Massimi, M. (eds) Knowledge from a Human Point of View. Synthese Library, vol 416. Springer, Cham.

Ayars A & Nichols S (2020). Rational learners and metaethics: Universalism, relativism, and evidence from consensus. Mind Lang. 35: 67–89.

Barnes B & Bloor D (1982). Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 21–47). Oxford: Blackwell.

Bloor D (2007). Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise. Common Knowledge. 13(2–3): 250–280.

Boghossian P (2006). Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chang H (2012). Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Springer.

Chang H (2020). Relativism, Perspectivism and Pluralism. In M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 398–406). Routledge.

Coliva A )2015(. Extended rationality: A hinge epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cook R T (2010). Let a thousand flowers bloom: A tour of logical pluralism. Philosophy Compass, 5(6), 492-504.

Cushing JT (1994). Quantum Mechanics. Historical Contingency and Copenhagen Hegemony. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

Galison P (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hacking, I. (2007). Finding out: Prolegomena to a theory of truthfulness and reasoning in the sciences. Unpublished manuscript.

Kinzel K (2015). State of the field: Are the results of science contingent or inevitable?. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 52, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.013

Kinzel K & Kusch M (2018). De-idealizing disagreement, rethinking relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26(1):40-71.

Kellert S H, Longino H E, & Waters C K (Eds.) (2006). Scientific pluralism (Vol. 19). U of Minnesota Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Kusch, M. (2010). Hacking's historical epistemology: A critique of styles of reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(2), 158–173.

Kusch M (2016). Relativism in Feyerabend's later writings. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 57:106-113.

Kusch M (2017a). Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism. Synthese 194, 4687–4703 

Kusch M (2017b). Epistemic relativism and pluralism. In A. Coliva & N. J. L. L. Pedersen (Eds.), Epistemic pluralism (pp. 203–227). Palgrave Macmillan. 

Kusch M (2020). INTRODUCTION: A primer on relativism. In M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 1-7). Routledge.

Kusch M (2021). Relativism in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979504

Kusch M & McKenna R (2026). Kornblith, naturalism, relativism. In J. DiPaolo & L. R. G. Oliveira (Eds.), Kornblith and his critics (pp. 57–74). Wiley Blackwell.

Perović S (2023). The Counterfactual Paths and Their Convergence in the History of Physics, Science, and the World. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 53–58.

Sankey H (2010). Witchcraft, relativism and the problem of the criterion. Erkenntnis. 72(1):1-16.

Seidel M )2014(. Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Seidel, M. (2021). Portraying the relativist spectrum: Martin Kusch: Relativism in the philosophy of science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 30: 357-360

Shahryari S )2023(. Absolutism, Relativism, and Pragmatic Fallibilism: A Reply to Stump. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 54 (3): 331–338.

Soler L (2025). Contingency is here to stay—in science as in any other human enterprise. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 1-126. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-a8c

Stump D J (2022). Fallibilism versus relativism in the philosophy of science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 53:187-199.

Stump D J (2024). Pragmatism versus social construction: A reply to Shahryari. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 55(1):153-157.

Stump D J (Forthcoming). Lessons from Pragmatism for Philosophers of Science: Nine Teachings and a Cautionary Tale,

Veigl S J (2021). Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances. Synthese 199, 3485–3503 

Veigl S J (2025). A common denominator? Epistemic systems bridge Epistemic Relativism and Epistemic Oppression. Hypatia, 40(1), 125-143.