سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات163
تعداد شماره‌ها6,762
تعداد مقالات72,839
تعداد مشاهده مقاله131,876,660
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله103,541,280
قدسی, پیمان, بدری, سیدعلی, سلمانی, محمد. (1404). روند جهانی پژوهش در حوزه توسعه پایدار روستایی: یک تحلیل علم‌سنجی. , 16(1), 1-20. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.374463.1930
پیمان قدسی; سیدعلی بدری; محمد سلمانی. "روند جهانی پژوهش در حوزه توسعه پایدار روستایی: یک تحلیل علم‌سنجی". , 16, 1, 1404, 1-20. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.374463.1930
قدسی, پیمان, بدری, سیدعلی, سلمانی, محمد. (1404). 'روند جهانی پژوهش در حوزه توسعه پایدار روستایی: یک تحلیل علم‌سنجی', , 16(1), pp. 1-20. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.374463.1930
قدسی, پیمان, بدری, سیدعلی, سلمانی, محمد. روند جهانی پژوهش در حوزه توسعه پایدار روستایی: یک تحلیل علم‌سنجی. , 1404; 16(1): 1-20. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.374463.1930

روند جهانی پژوهش در حوزه توسعه پایدار روستایی: یک تحلیل علم‌سنجی

پژوهش های روستائی
دوره 16، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 1404، صفحه 1-20    اصل مقاله (2.6 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2024.374463.1930
نویسندگان
پیمان قدسی1؛ سیدعلی بدری* 2؛ محمد سلمانی2
1گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2گروه جغرافیای انسانی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
طی چند دهه گذشته پرداختن به توسعه پایدار مناطق روستایی با تأکید بر موضوعاتی همچون اقتصاد سبز، کاهش فقر و ایجاد چارچوب بین‌المللی، موردتوجه بیشتری قرار گرفته است. بااین‌حال تاکنون در موضوع توسعه پایدار روستایی از منظر تحلیل علم‌سنجی، مطالعه‌ای صورت نگرفته است. ازاین‌رو مقاله حاضر در تلاش است تا تحلیلی از تحقیقات در مورد توسعه پایدار روستایی ارائه دهد. تحلیل ادبیات مرتبط با تحقیقات توسعه پایدار روستایی در پایگاه داده  WoS در یک بازه زمانی 53 ساله و در قالب تکنیک‌هایی مانند استناد، پیوند کتاب‌شناختی، هم نویسندگی، هم استنادی و هم‌زمانی ارائه شدند. درمجموع، 19480 نویسنده، 941 سازمان،290 نشریه و 95 کشور در انتشار 620 مقاله علمی مرتبط با تحقیقات توسعه پایدار روستایی مشارکت داشته‌اند. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق، چین، ایالات‌متحده آمریکا، اسپانیا، رومانی و انگلستان پنج کشور مولد و پیشرو در انتشار مقالات این حوزه می‌باشند. نتایج نشان داد که اکولوژی علوم محیطی با 44.8 درصد از حجم مقالات به‌عنوان تعیین‌کننده‌ترین حوزه پژوهشی بوده است. درعین‌حال، تجزیه‌وتحلیل تحقیقات توسعه پایدار روستایی نسبت به 36 سال قبل به‌طور قابل‌توجهی روند رو به افزایشی داشته و نتایج بر رشد قابل‌توجه تحقیقات توسعه پایدار روستایی در طول زمان تأکید می‌کند. درعین‌حال چشم‌انداز مطالعات آتی توسعه پایدار روستایی منتج از تحلیل همپوشانی کلیدواژه‌های نویسندگان و میانگین سال انتشار، نشان می‌دهد که مواردی همچون تجدید حیات روستایی، اهداف توسعه پایدار و کارآفرینی جدیدترین کلیدواژه‌هایی هستند که طی سال‌های اخیر، وارد مباحث مربوط به توسعه پایدار روستایی شده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
توسعه پایدار روستایی؛ روند پژوهش جهانی؛ پایگاه WoS؛ تحلیل علم‌سنجی؛ نرم‌افزار ویزویوور
مراجع
  1. بدری، سید علی؛ طهماسبی، سیامک و هاجری بهرام. (1400) رویکرد علم‌سنجی به مطالعات تاب‌آوری بلایا در ایران. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، ۸ (۳)، ۳۳-۵۲.
  2. حریری، نجلا و نیکزاد، مهسا. (1390). شبکه‌های هم تألیفی در مقالات ایرانی رشته‌های کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، روان‌شناسی، مدیریت و اقتصاد در پایگاه ISI بین سال‌های 2000 تا 2009. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 26(4)، 825-844.
  3. خدامرادپور، محمد و زنگنه، مریم. (1398). بررسی مؤلفه‌های توسعه پایدار روستایی: چالش‌ها و راهکارها. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 2(2), 186-199. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.2.12.2.
  4. دانیالی، سمیرا و نقشینه، نادر. (۱۳۹۳). ترسیم نقشه هم‌استنادی نویسندگان برجسته حوزه بازیابی تصویر. مجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین، ۱ (۲)، ۶۶-۷۳. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.1.2.66.
  5. سهیلی, فرامرز؛ عصاره، فریده و فرج‌پهلو، عبدالحسین. (1392). تحلیل ساختار شبکه‌های اجتماعی هم نویسندگی پژوهشگران علم اطلاعات. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 29 (1)، 210-191.  https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2013.008
  6. علی پور، امید؛ سهیلی، فرامرز؛ ضیایی، ثریا و خاصه، علی‌اکبر. (1400). روابط پیدا و پنهان پژوهش‌های سازمان‌دهی دانش در جهان: تحلیل هم‌استنادی. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 11(2)، 20-43. https://doi.org/10.22067/infosci.2021.24196.0.
  7. Abdullah, S. & Khan, M. N. (2021). Determining mobile payment adoption: A systematic literature search and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8, 1893245. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1893245.
  8. Adenidji, E. M. C., & Özçatalbaş, O. (2022). Rural Tourism and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Uluslararası Kırsal Turizm Ve Kalkınma Dergisi (IRTAD) E-ISSN: 2602-4462, 5(2). Retrieved from https://turizmvekalkinma.org/index.php/irtadjournal/article/view/498.
  9. Alipour, O., Soheili, F., Ziaei, S., & Khasseh, A. A. (2021). Known and Hidden Relationships of Knowledge Organization Research in the World: a Co-Citation Analysis. Library and Information Science Research, 11(2), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.22067/infosci.2021.24196.0 [In Persian].
  10. Ashley, C. & Maxwell, S. (2001). Rethinking Rural Development. Development Policy Review, 19: 395-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00141.
  11. Badri, S. A., Tahmasbi, S., & Hajari, B. (2021). Scientometrics Approach to Disaster Resilience Studies in Iran. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 8 (3), 33-52. doi: 10.52547/jsaeh.8.3.33 [In Persian].
  12. Bircan, T., & Salah, A. A. A. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences. Mathematics, 10(23), 4398. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234398.
  13. Brian, R., Keeble, B., & Mbbs, M. (1988). The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future’. Medicine and War, 4(1), 17-25, https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
  14. Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M., & Dabic, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053.
  15. Cazorla-Montero, A., & De los Ríos-Carmenado, I. (2023). From “Putting the Last First” to “Working with People” in Rural Development Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research. Sustainability, 15(13), 10117. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310117.
  16. Cisneros, L., Ibanescu, M., Keen, C. et al. (2018). Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: mapping and analyzing authors’ networks. Scientometrics, 117, 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2889-1.
  17. Cobo, M. J. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets’ theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5, 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002.
  18. Cobo, M. J. (2015). 25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis, Knowledge-based systems, 80, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035.
  19. Cristina, B. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of sustainable business performance: where are we going? A science map of the field. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 2137-2176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2096094.
  20. Danialy S, Naghshineh N. (2014). Co-citation map of outstanding authors in the field of image retrieval. CJS, 1 (2), 66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.1.2.66.
  21. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039.
  22. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
  23. Douk T., Maria E. & Falikhatun, H. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Rural Tourism and Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Pendidikan Ekonomi, 10(2), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.006.
  24. Esengulova, N., Carella, M. M., & Lopolito, A. (2023). Stakeholder Empowerment in Sustainable Rural Development Partnerships: Two Case Studies from Italy. Sustainability, 15(8), 6977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086977.
  25. Eyre-Walker, A., & Stoletzki, N. (2013). The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations. PLoS Biol 11(10): e1001675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675.
  26. Feng, J., Zhang, Y.Q. & Zhang, H. (2017). Improving the co-word analysis method based on semantic distance. Scientometrics, 111, 1521–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2286-1.
  27. Forkuor, D., Korah, A. (2023). NGOs and sustainable rural development: experience from Upper West Region of Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain, 25, 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02057-w.
  28. Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of informetrics, 4(4), 540-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003.
  29. Ge, B., Wang, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 15(6), 5082. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065082.
  30. Gibbens, M., & Cilliers, J. (2023). ECD centres as change catalysts in sustainable rural livelihood development: Griekwastad, South Africa, as case study. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 8857–8875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02333-3.
  31. Guo, X. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of child language during 1900–2021. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862042.
  32. Guo, X.-R., Li, X., & Guo, Y.-M. (2021). Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Smart Education Research. Sustainability, 13(23), 13234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313234.
  33. Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Reardon, T. (2010). The rural non-farm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development, 38(10), 1429-1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.008.
  34. Hariri, N., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Co-authorship networks in Iranian library and information science articles, psychology, management, and economics in the ISI database between 2000 and 2009. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(4), 825-844. [In Persian].
  35. Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organisation. Information processing & management, 49 (2), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001.
  36. Hong, R., Liu, H., & Xiang, C. (2020). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of oxidation studies of sulfide ores. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 27, 5809–5824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07226-z.
  37. Hossain, M., Park, S., & Shahid, S. (2023). Frugal innovation for sustainable rural development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122662.
  38. Huang, T., & Huang, Q. (2023). Research on Agricultural and Rural Public Governance and Sustainable Development: Evidence from 2350 Data. Sustainability, 15(10), 7876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107876.
  39. Ibănescu, B.-C., Stoleriu, O. M., Munteanu, A., & Iațu, C. (2018). The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania. Sustainability, 10(10), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103529.
  40. Izquierdo-Gascón, M., & Rubio-Gil, Á. (2023). A theoretical approach to Api-tourism routes as a paradigm of sustainable and regenerative rural development. Journal of Apicultural Research, 62(4), 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2079285.
  41. Jati, H. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Human Resource Management Research in the Field of Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2019-2023 Study. International Journal of Economics and Management Review, 1(3), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.58765/ijemr.v1i3.121
  42. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103.
  43. Khan, A. S., Ur Rehman, S., AlMaimouni, Y. K., Ahmad, S., Khan, M., & Ashiq, M. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published on Antibacterial Dental Adhesive from 1996–2020. Polymers, 12(12), 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122848.
  44. Khodamoradpour, M. and zanganeh, M. (2019). Investigating the Components of Rural Sustainable Development: Challenges and Solutions. Geography and Human Relationships, 2(2), 186-199.  [In Persian].
  45. Kim, H. J., Jeong, Y. K., & Song, M. (2016). Content-and proximity-based author co-citation analysis using citation sentences. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 954-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.007.
  46. Knapczyk, A., Francik, S., Pedryc, N., & Hebda, T. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of Research trends in Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava, 23, 700-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N389.
  47. Lee, Y. F., & Kind, M. (2021). Reducing poverty and inequality in rural areas: key to inclusive development. https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-106.
  48. Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing Participation for Sustainable Rural Development: Towards a Negotiation Approach. Development and Change, 31, 931-959. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00184.
  49. Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017). Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.012.
  50. Li, C., Ojeda-Thies, C., Renz, N., Margaryan, D., Perka, C., & Trampuz, A. (2020). The global state of clinical research and trends in periprosthetic joint infection: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 96, 696-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.014.
  51. Li, H., An, H., Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Gao, X. (2016). Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 450, 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.017.
  52. Li, X., Liu, J., Jia, J., & Yang, H. (2022). Relationship between multifunctionality and rural sustainable development: Insights from 129 counties of the Sichuan Province, China. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 20(3), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.09.010.
  53. Li, Y., Chen, N., Sullivan, A., Chen, S., & Qin, X. (2023). Changing collaborative networks and transitions in rural sustainable development: qualitative lessons from three villages in China. Ecology and Society, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14249-280402.
  54. Lima, C.O., & Bonetti, J. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events. Nat Hazards 102, 1589–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03974-1.
  55. Liu, L., Cao, C., & Song, W. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Progress and Prospects. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, No. 20, 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010823.
  56. Liu, C., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Fang, R., Li, F., & Zhang, J. (2020). A scientometric analysis and visualization of research on Parkinson’s disease associated with pesticide exposure. Front Public Health 8, 91. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00091.
  57. Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature 548, 275–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/548275a.
  58. Liu, Y., Mai, F. & MacDonald, C. (2019).A Big-Data Approach to Understanding the Thematic Landscape of the Field of Business Ethics, 1982–2016. J Bus Ethics 160, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3806-5.
  59. López-Bonilla, A. (2020). Golf tourism and sustainability: Content analysis and directions for future research. Sustainability, 12, 3616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093616.
  60. Lu, H., Zhang, W., & Diao, B. (2023). The progress and trend of pro-environmental behaviour research: a bibliometrics-based visualisation analysis. Curr Psychol 42, 6912–6932, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01809-1.
  61. Lu, Y. & Timo de Vries, W. (2021). A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Rural Development Research. Sustainability, 13, 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116136.
  62. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23970.
  63. Mollabagher, M., Hassanzadeh, A., Sepehri, M. M., Habib Elahi, A. & Sarabadani, A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of scientific research streams related to the development of the health care system in the PubMed citation database. Medicine and Purification, 33(1), 49-64. [In Persian].
  64. Muñoz, P., Janssen, F., Nicolopoulou, K. & Hockerts, K. (2018). Advancing sustainable entrepreneurship through substantive research, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24 (2), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-427.
  65. Nobakht, Y. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Studies in the Policy-Making Field of Facing the COVID-19 Crisis in Iran. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 3(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.22034/jkrs.2024.62284.1091[In Persian].
  66. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. J. Informetr, 1, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001.
  67. Pašakarnis, G., & Maliene, V. (2010). Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying land consolidation. Land use policy, 27(2), 545-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.008.
  68. Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483-509. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.483.
  69. Pugliese, P. (2001). Organic farming and sustainable rural development: A multifaceted and promising convergence. Sociologia ruralis, 41(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00172.
  70. Purvis, B., Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci, 14, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
  71. Qiang, Y., Tao, X., Gou, X., Lang, Z., & Liu, H. (2022). Towards a Bibliometric Mapping of Network Public Opinion Studies. Information, 13(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010017.
  72. Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A. & Singh, S.N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010). Scientometrics 102, 929–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1402-8.
  73. Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., & López-Cabarcos, M.Á. (2022). Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers. Rev Manag Sci, 16, 2381–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00491-8.
  74. Romo-Fernández, L.M., Guerrero-Bote, V.P. & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Co-word based thematic analysis of renewable energy (1990–2010). Scientometrics, 97, 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1009-5.
  75. Rossetto, D.E., Bernardes, R.C., & Borini, F.M. (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis. Scientometrics, 115, 1329–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7.
  76. Saputro, K. E. A., Hasim, Karlinasari, L., & Beik, I. S. (2023). Evaluation of Sustainable Rural Tourism Development with an Integrated Approach Using MDS and ANP Methods: Case Study in Ciamis, West Java, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(3), 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031835.
  77. Sattra M. P., Jirarat P. S., Pak W., Rung W., Panya, W. A. L., & Chonlathi P. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of Thai journals indexed in Scopus. Journal of the Library Association of Thailand, 67(1), 177-198. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tla_bulletin/article/view/260267.
  78. Serrano, L., Sianes, A., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2019). Using Bibliometric Methods to Shed Light on the Concept of Sustainable Tourism. Sustainability, 11(24), 6964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246964.
  79. Shahid, M. S., Hossain, M., Shahid, S., & Anwar, T. (2023). Frugal innovation as a source of sustainable entrepreneurship to tackle social and environmental challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, 137050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137050.
  80. Singh, S. and Bharti, N. (2023). Geographical Indication and Rural Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. AABFJ, 17(1), 32-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.03.
  81. Sivakumar, M. V. K., Gommes, R., & Baier, W. (2000). Agrometeorology and sustainable agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 103(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00115-5.
  82. Small, H. (1999) Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(9): 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9%3C799::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-G.
  83. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  84. Soheili, F., Osare, F. and Farajpahlou, A. (2013). Analysis of the structure of social networks co-authored by information science researchers. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 191-210. https://doi.org/ 10.35050/JIPM010.2013.008[In Persian].
  85. Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171.
  86. Suban, S.A. (2023), "Bibliometric analysis on wellness tourism – citation and co-citation analysis". International Hospitality Review, 37 (2), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-11-2021-0072.
  87. Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2011). Co-citation analysis: An overview. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anil-Sagar/publication/277119876.
  88. Tang, F., Dai, W.B., & Li, X.L. (2021). Publication trends and hot spots in femo-roacetabular impingement research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis. J. Arthroplasty, 36, 2698–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.019.
  89. Tomislav, K. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005.
  90. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2021). World Social Report Reconsidering Rural Development. New York, NY: United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/world-social-report/2021-2.html.
  91. Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
  92. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer programfor bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
  93. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualising bibliometric networks. In Ding Y., Rousseau R., Wolfram D. (Eds.), measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
  94. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., and van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421.
  95. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
  96. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J. Informet, 4, 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
  97. Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Yao, J.Y.; Ye, D.; Lang, Z.; Glowacz, A. (2021). Mapping the knowledge domains of new energy vehicle safety: Informetrics analysis-based studies. J. Energy Storage, 35, 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102275.
  98. Wang, J., & Liu, Z. (2014). A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines. Scientometrics, 101, 39–59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1388-2.
  99. Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5-6), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8.
  100. Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., Mahon, M., Kairyte, E., Nienaber, B., García, M. D. D., & Farrell, M. (2013). Arranging public support to unfold collaborative modes of governance in rural areas. Journal of rural studies, 32, 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.002.
  101. Widomski, M. K., & Musz-Pomorska, A. (2023). Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in Poland since 2004 in the Light of Sustainability Indicators. Land, 12(2), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020508.
  102. Xia, DM. Wang, XR. Zhou, PY. et al. (2021). Research progress of heat stroke during 1989–2019: a bibliometric analysis. Military Med Res, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-021-00300-z.
  103. Xia, Q.; Yan, S.; Li, H.; Duan, K.; Zhang, Y. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Knowledge-Hiding Research. Behav. Sci., 12, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050122.
  104. Yao H, Wan J, Wang C, Li L, Wang J, Li Y, Huang W, Zeng J, Wang Q, Yuan C. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of research on the role of intestinal microbiota in obesity. PeerJ 6: e5091 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5091.
  105. Yin, Y.C., Ahmed, J., Nee, A.Y.H. et al. (2023). The rural consumer adoption of sustainable energy: a PLS-SEM-ANN approach of conceptual model development and cross-country validation of Pakistan and Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 30, 5881–5902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22271-x.
  106. Yu, S., & Mu, Y. (2022). Sustainable Agricultural Development Assessment: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(19), 11824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911824.
  107. Yuan, B. Z., Bie, Z. L., & Sun, J. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) research publications from the horticulture category based on the Web of Science. HortScience, 56(11), 1304-1314. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16083-21.
  108. Yuheng Li, Hans W., & Liu, W. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others do not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135-143, ISSN 0743-0167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003.
  109. Zhang, X., Wang, C., & Zhao, H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) research from 2010 to 2019. Ann Palliat Med, 10(4), 3750-3762. http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-2050.
  110. Zhang, Y., Yao, J., & Li, W. (2023). Global research trends and hotspots in pharmaceutical care: a bibliometric analysis and visualisation using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003617.
  111. Zhang, C., Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Congshan, T. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Global Sustainable Livelihood Research. Sustainability, 11(4), 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041150.
  112. Zhang, Q., Kim, E., Yang, C. & Cao, F. (2023). Rural revitalization: a sustainable strategy for the development of the cultural landscape of traditional villages through optimized IPA approach", Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 13 (1), 66-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-09-2020-0130.
  113. Zhao, X. (2017). A scientometric review of global BIM research: analysis and visualization. Autom. Constr, 80, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002.
  114. Zupic I, Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 98
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 102





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب