سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات163
تعداد شماره‌ها6,788
تعداد مقالات73,126
تعداد مشاهده مقاله133,093,069
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله104,118,937
Asadi, Elnaz, Keramatzadeh, Ali, Eshraghi, Farshid. (1403). The Allocation of Groundwater Resources and Managing Conflict between Stakeholders: Evidence from Iran. , 29(1), 360-387. doi: 10.22059/ier.2025.348605.1007538
Elnaz Asadi; Ali Keramatzadeh; Farshid Eshraghi. "The Allocation of Groundwater Resources and Managing Conflict between Stakeholders: Evidence from Iran". , 29, 1, 1403, 360-387. doi: 10.22059/ier.2025.348605.1007538
Asadi, Elnaz, Keramatzadeh, Ali, Eshraghi, Farshid. (1403). 'The Allocation of Groundwater Resources and Managing Conflict between Stakeholders: Evidence from Iran', , 29(1), pp. 360-387. doi: 10.22059/ier.2025.348605.1007538
Asadi, Elnaz, Keramatzadeh, Ali, Eshraghi, Farshid. The Allocation of Groundwater Resources and Managing Conflict between Stakeholders: Evidence from Iran. , 1403; 29(1): 360-387. doi: 10.22059/ier.2025.348605.1007538

The Allocation of Groundwater Resources and Managing Conflict between Stakeholders: Evidence from Iran

Iranian Economic Review
دوره 29، شماره 1، خرداد 2025، صفحه 360-387    اصل مقاله (802.41 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2025.348605.1007538
نویسندگان
Elnaz Asadi؛ Ali Keramatzadeh* ؛ Farshid Eshraghi
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
چکیده
Scarce water resources often involve decision-makers with conflicting interests. Effective management requires balancing objectives and strategies of multiple stakeholders. The present study analyzes the potential compromise solutions between stakeholders, using a combination of game theory and a positive mathematical programming (PMP) model. The two key players are the government, which minimizes environmental impacts such as groundwater withdrawal, and local farmers, who maximize economic profit. We employ four conflict resolution methods to calculate the players’ payoffs. The results show that creating a transactional relationship between the stakeholders reduces groundwater extraction by 36% and 37%, while the farmers' net income only drops by 8% and 9%, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Conflict Resolution؛ Game Theory؛ Groundwater Resources؛ Multi-Objective Optimization؛ Positive Mathematical Programming
مراجع
Alizadeh, M. R., Nikoo, M. R., & Rakhshandehroo, G. R. (2017). Developing a Multi-Objective Conflict-Resolution Model for Optimal Groundwater Management Based on Fallback Bargaining Models and Social Choice Rules: A Case Study. Water Resources Management, 31, 1457-1472.

Anbarci, N. (1993). Noncooperative Foundations of the Area Monotonic Solution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 245-258.

Bazargan-Lari, M. R., Kerachian, R., & Mansoori, A. (2009). A Conflict-Resolution Model for the Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Resources that Considers Water-Quality Issues: A Case Study. Environmental Management, 43, 470-482.

Bočková, K. H., Sláviková, G., & Gabrhel, J. (2015). Game Theory as a Tool of Project Management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 709-715.

Chhipi-Shrestha, G., Rodriguez, M., & Sadiq, R. (2019). Selection of Sustainable Municipal Water Reuse Applications by Multi-Stakeholders Using Game Theory. Science of The Total Environment, 650, 2512-2526.

Chun, Y. (1988). The Equal-Loss Principle for Bargaining Problems. Economics Letters, 26(2), 103-106.

Cortignani, R., & Severini, S. (2011). An Extended PMP Model to Analyze Farmers’ Adoption of Deficit Irrigation under Environmental Payments. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(4), 1035-1046.

Darbandsari, P., Kerachian, R., Malakpour-Estalaki, S., & Khorasani, H. (2020). An Agent-Based Conflict Resolution Model for Urban Water Resources Management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102112.

Di, D., Wu, Z., Wang, H., & Huang, S. (2021). Multi-objective Optimization for Water Allocation of the Yellow River Basin Based on Fluid Mechanics, Emergy Theory, and Dynamic Differential Game. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127643.

Dillon, J. L. (1962). Applications of Game Theory in Agricultural Economics: Review And Requiem. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(2), 20-35.

Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Wang, L. (2002). Gisborne Water Export Conflict Study. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Water Resources Environment Research, 1, 432-436.

Harsanyi, J. C., & Selten, R. (1972). A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information. Management Science, 18(5-part-2), 80-106.

Howitt, R. E., & Msangi, S. (2014). Entropy Estimation of Disaggregate Production Functions: An Application to Northern Mexico. Entropy, 16(3), 1349-1364.

Howitt, R. E., Medellín-Azuara, J., MacEwan, D., & Lund, J. R. (2012). Calibrating Disaggregates Economic Models of Agricultural Production and Water Management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 38, 244-258.

Huang, Z., Liu, X., Sun, S., Tang, Y., Yuan, X., & Tang, Q. (2021). Global Assessment of Future Sectoral Water Scarcity under Adaptive Inner-Basin Water Allocation Measures. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 146973.

Iran Water Resources Management Company. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.wrm.ir.

Kalai, E., & Smorodinsky, M. (1975). Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 513-518.

Kanellopoulos, A., Berentsen, P., Heckelei, T., Van Ittersum, M., & Lansink, A. O. (2010). Assessing the Forecasting Performance of a Generic Bio‐Economic Farm Model Calibrated with Two Different PMP Variants. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 274-294.

Kicsiny, R., & Varga, Z. (2019). Differential Game Model with Discretized Solution for the Use of Limited Water Resources. Journal of Hydrology, 569, 637-646.

Kittikhoun, A., & Staubli, D. M. (2018). Water Diplomacy and Conflict Management in the Mekong: from Rivalries to Cooperation. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 654-667.

Kloezen, W. H., & Garces-Restrepo, C. (1998). Assessing Irrigation Performance With Comparative Indicators: The Case of the Alto Rio Lerma Irrigation District, Mexico (22). Colombo: IWMI.

Lee, C. S. (2012). Multi-Objective Game-Theory Models for Conflict Analysis in Reservoir Watershed Management. Chemosphere, 87(6), 608-613.

Lee, H., Eom, J., Cho, C., & Koo, Y. (2019). A Bottom-Up Model of Industrial Energy System with Positive Mathematical Programming. Energy, 173, 679-690.

Li, Y., Han, Y., Liu, B., Li, H., Du, X., Wang, Q., Wang, X., & Zhu, X. (2023). Construction and Application of a Refined Model for the Optimal Allocation of Water Resources-Taking Guantao County, China as an Example. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109929.

Madani, K. (2010). Game Theory and Water Resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381(3-4), 225-238.

Madani, K., & Dinar, A. (2012). Cooperative Institutions for Sustainable Common Pool Resource Management: Application To Groundwater. Water Resources Research, 48(9), 1-15.

Madani, K., & Hipel, K. W. (2011). Non-cooperative Stability Definitions for Strategic Analysis of Generic Water Resources Conflicts. Water Resources Management, 25, 1949-1977.

Madani, K., Darch, G., Parra, F., & Workman, M.  (2015). Using Game Theory to Address Modern Resource Management Problems. Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, 6(2).

Mason, M. (2020). Hydraulic Patronage: A Political Ecology of the Turkey-Northern Cyprus Water Pipeline. Political Geography, 76, 102086.

Naderi, L., Karamidehkordi, E., Badsar, M., & Moghadas, M. (2024). Impact of Climate Change on Water Crisis and Conflicts: Farmers’ Perceptions at the ZayandehRud Basin in Iran. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 54, 101878.

Naghdi, S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Khorsandi, M., & Chu, X. (2021). Multi-objective Optimization for Allocation of Surface Water and Groundwater Resources. Science of the Total Environment, 776, 146026.

Nandalal, K. D. W., & Simonovic, S. P. (2003). Resolving Conflicts in Water Sharing: A Systemic Approach. Water Resources Research, 39(12), 1-11.

Nash, J. F. (1950). The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155-162.

Nazari, S., Ahmadi, A., Rad, S. K., & Ebrahimi, B. (2020). Application of Non-Cooperative Dynamic Game Theory for Groundwater Conflict Resolution. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110889.

Oftadeh, E., Shourian, M., & Saghafian, B. (2017). An Ultimatum Game Theory-Based Approach for Basin Scale Water Allocation Conflict Resolution. Water Resources Management, 31, 4293-4308.

Paris, Q., & Howitt, R. E. (1998). An Analysis Of Ill‐Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 124-138.

Parsapour-Moghaddam, P., Abed-Elmdoust, A., & Kerachian, R. (2015). A Heuristic Evolutionary Game Theoretic Methodology for Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Resources. Water Resources Management, 29, 3905-3918.

Raquel, S., Ferenc, S., Emery Jr, C., & Abraham, R. (2007). Application of Game Theory for a Groundwater Conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4), 560-571.

Rezaei, F., Safavi, H. R., Mirchi, A., & Madani, K. (2017). f-MOPSO: An Alternative Multi-Objective PSO Algorithm for Conjunctive Water Use Management. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 14, 1-18.

Shapira, N., Housh, M., & Broitman, D. (2019). Decision-Makers Matter: An Operational Model for Environmental-Economic Conflict Resolution. Environmental Science & Policy, 98, 77-87.

Shirangi, E., Kerachian, R., & Bajestan, M. S. (2008). A Simplified Model for Reservoir Operation Considering the Water Quality Issues: Application of the Young Conflict Resolution Theory. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 146, 77-89.

Wang, L. Z., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (2003). Water Resources Allocation: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2(2), 11-22.

Wei, S. K., & Gnauck, A. (2007). Game Theoretic Approaches to Model Water Conflicts on a River Basin Scale. Modellierung und Simulation von Ökosystemen, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 22-40.

Wei, S., Yang, H., Abbaspour, K., Mousavi, J., & Gnauck, A. (2010). Game Theory-Based Models to Analyze Water Conflicts in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Water Research, 44(8), 2499-2516.

Zamani, O., Grundmann, P., Libra, J. A., & Nikouei, A. (2019b). Limiting and Timing Water Supply for Agricultural Production–The Case of the Zayandeh-Rud River Basin, Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 222, 322-335.

Zamani, O., Nader, H., Rashidghalam, M., & Ward, F. A. (2019a). Optimized Reservoir Management for Meeting Conflicting Stakeholder Preferences: Methodological Innovations with Evidence from Iran. Sustainable Agriculture and Agribusiness in Iran, 79-100.

Zanjanian, H., Abdolabadi, H., Niksokhan, M. H., & Sarang, A. (2018). Influential Third Party on Water Right Conflict: A Game Theory Approach to Achieve the Desired Equilibrium (Case Study: Ilam Dam, Iran). Journal of Environmental Management, 214, 283-294.

Zeng, Y., Li, J., Cai, Y., Tan, Q., & Dai, C. (2019). A Hybrid Game Theory And Mathematical Programming Model for Solving Trans-Boundary Water Conflicts. Journal of Hydrology, 570, 666-681.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 135
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 79





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب