پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,165 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,022 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 155,686,883 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 117,277,926 |
Simulation of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit for Optimum Production of Gasoline Using Aspen HYSYS | ||
| Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 59، شماره 2، اسفند 2025، صفحه 225-236 اصل مقاله (334.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jchpe.2025.375055.1506 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| KENNETH Kekpugile DAGDE* ؛ Isaac Tamunoboma Ayotamuno؛ Darlington Bon Nwokoma | ||
| Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study presents the steady-state behavior of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking of Vacuum Gas Oil in an existing industrial Unit. The riser and regenerator reactors, coupled with the main fractionator, were simulated using Aspen HYSYS software with a 21-lump kinetic model that accounts for catalytic cracking kinetics and heat balance within the unit. Model predictions for the product species showed good agreement with the industrial plant data at the same operating conditions, with a percentage deviation ranging from 1.13% to 16.85%. Simulation results indicate that the Riser Outlet Temperature (ROT) and feed flow rate have significant effects on the performance of the riser and regenerator reactors. Sensitivity analysis performed on the reactor gave the following optimum values: To increase the total yield of Gasoline and Diesel, an ROT within the interval of 510-515°C should be selected; for an increase in the total yield of Gasoline and LPG, an ROT in the range 524-535°C is recommended; An ROT of 530°C should be used when increasing unit throughput to maximize gasoline output. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| 21 lump Kinetic Model؛ Aspen HYSYS؛ FCCU؛ Regenerator؛ Riser؛ Simulation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Sadeghbeigi R. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook: Design, Operation, Troubleshooting of FCC Facilities. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-88415-289-7.X5000-8
[2] Radu S, Ciuparu D. Modelling and Simulation of an Industrial Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit. 2014. https://bch.ro/pdfRC/RADU%20S.pdf%201%2014.pdf
[3] Ogbuigwe A. Refining in Nigeria: history, challenges and prospects. Applied Petrochemical Research. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13203-018-0211-z
[4] Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Fossil fuel demand to continue expanding this decade.
[5] Ogunro J. Nigeria's population time bomb. The Cable. 2023. https://www.thecable.ng/nigerias-population-time-bomb/
[6] Nigeria's refining revolution. PWC Nigeria. Insights and Publications. 2017. https://www.pwc.com/ng/en/assets/pdf/nigerias-refining-revolution.pdf
[7] Yadav P, Garg RK. Modeling and Simulation of Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Riser Reactor Using Pseudo Reaction Kinetics: A Review. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i3/170903017
[8] Kumar S, Chadha A, Gupta R, Sharma R. CATCRAK: A Process Simulator for an Integrated FCC-Regenerator System. 1995; 3737–3748. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00038a009
[9] McFarlane R, Reineman R, Bartee J, Georgakis C. Dynamic Simulator for a Model IV Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit. Computers Chem.Eng, 1993; 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80021-E
[10] Arbel A, Huang Z, Rinard IH. Dynamic and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 1. Modeling of the Current Generation of FCC’s. 1996; 1228–1243. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00043a027
[11] Jacob S M, Gross B, Voltz S, Weekman V. A Lumping and Reaction Scheme for Catalytic Cracking. AlChE, 1976; 701. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220412
[12] Fernandes JL, Pinheiro CIC, Oliveira NMC, Ramo F. Model Development and Validation of an Industrial UOP Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit with a High-Efficiency Regenerator. 2008; 850–866. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071035b
[13] Dagde KK, Puyate YT. Modelling And Simulation of Industrial FCC Unit: Analysis Based on Five-Lump Kinetic Scheme for Gas-Oil Cracking. Ijera, 2012; 2(5), 698–714.
[14] Dasila PK, Choudhury I, Saraf D, Chopra S. Dalai A. Parametric Sensitivity Studies in a Commercial FCC Unit. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2012; 02(01), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2012.21017
[15] Comerint. (1987). NPHRC, "New Port Harcourt Refinery Training Project: Specific for Junior Staff, Area 3, Process Description". https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2016.1.5.189
[16] Bhutani N, Ray AK, Rangaiah GP. Modeling, simulation, and multi-objective optimization of an industrial hydrocracking unit. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006; 45(4), 1354–1372. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050423f
[17] Aspen FCC 2006.5. (2007). User's guide, Aspen Technology. Burlington, USA. https://jchpe.ut.ac.ir/article_101533_2f5c4a636c049b37f73fa0e45a271465.pdf
[18] Hsu C, Robinson P. Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing: 2006; Volume 1 and 2. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-25789-1
[19] Speight J. The Refinery of the Future. Elsevier Inc. 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/monograph/9780128169940/the-refinery-of-the-future | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 471 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 806 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب