پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 163 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,762 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,839 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 131,889,090 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 103,544,498 |
Study of Methods for Documenting Product Features and Evaluating Their Quality in Industrial Design Theses | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 113-128 اصل مقاله (666.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2025.391955.1149 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad-Ali Haddadian* 1؛ Narges Adabi2 | ||
| 1Faculty of Arts and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In recent years, the intense competition across various industries has significantly increased companies’ focus on product design and development. Researchers and designers have increasingly recognized the importance of adopting efficient design and development processes, as highlighted by various studies and training programs. Identifying the exact characteristics of a product based on users’ real needs forms the foundation of the research and development process, preceding production discussions. Clear and accurate articulation of product specifications is crucial for effective communication between design and production teams, as well as decision-makers. This research has been conducted to clarify efficient and effective ways of extracting product specifications in order to reach a common language between designers, engineers and production agents. For this purpose, by reviewing the studies, the requirements raised in this regard were discussed and the necessary parameters were extracted regarding the correct way of expressing the product specifications. These parameters included five instructions regarding the writing of specifications and the necessity of determining the measurement index and ideal and marginal values in each specification. In the following, by examining several industrial design bachelor’s theses, the degree of conformity of the specifications expressed by the designers and the parameters extracted from the research was measured. The findings indicate that the most prevalent inconsistency in product specification documentation (observed in 59.9% of the analyzed theses) stems from inadequate consideration of user needs’ granularity when articulating design criteria. Also, some designers face a challenge in determining the index to measure some specifications, which requires the need to acquire more knowledge and experience in this field. It is suggested that the necessity of using these components in expressing product specifications and accuracy in determining indexes should be taken into consideration by designers and trainers in this field. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Product Design and Development؛ Industrial Product Specifications؛ Design Evaluation Methods؛ User Needs | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ågren, S. M., Knauss, E., Heldal, R., Pelliccione, P., Malmqvist, G., & Bodén, J. (2019). The impact of requirements on systems development speed: A multiple-case study in automotive. Requirements Engineering, 24, p. 315-340.
Anderson, A., McAllister, C., & Harris, E. (2024). Product development and management body of knowledge: A guidebook for product innovation training and certification. Wiley.
Bhise, V. D. (2023). Designing complex products with systems engineering processes and techniques. CRC Press.
Blessing, L. T., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM: A design research methodology. Springer London, p. 13-42.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Collins Business.
Candlot, A., Perry, N., Bernard, A., & Ammar-Khodja, S. (2008). Case study, Usiquick project: Methods to capitalize and reuse knowledge in process planning. In: Bernard A, Tichkiewitch S, Editors. Methods and Tools for Effective Knowledge Life-Cycle-Management.
Chandrasegaran, S. K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R. F., & Gao, W. (2013). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design, 45(2), p. 204-228.
Chen, F., & Terken, J. (2023). Automotive interaction design. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3448-3_10
Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. Springer, London.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg Publishers.
Daly, S., McKilligan, S., Studer, J., Murray, J., & Seifert, C. (2018). Innovative solutions through innovated problems. Berg Publishers.
Davari, A. A., Jafari, S. M., Asadi Taheri, M., & Mahdavi, A. H. (2021). The process of vehicle engine development at IPCO. The Journal of Engine Research, 64, p. 3-11. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1049460/en
Dieter, G. (1991). Engineering design: A materials and approach. Mcgraw-Hill College.
Edinger‐Schons, L. M., Lengler‐Graiff, L., Scheidler, S., Mende, G., & Wieseke, J. (2020). Listen to the voice of the customer—First steps towards stakeholder democracy. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(3), p. 510-527.
Eisenmann, M., Grauberger, P., Üreten, S., Krause, D., & Matthiesen, S. (2021). Design method validation–an investigation of the current practice in design research. Journal of Engineering Design, 32(11), p. 621-645.
Elgh, F., & Cederfeldt, M. (2010). Documentation and management of product knowledge in a system for automated variant design: A case study. In New World Situation: New Directions in Concurrent Engineering: Proceedings of the 17th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering. Springer London. p. 237-245.
Feng, Y., Zhao, Y., Zheng, H., Li, Z., & Tan, J. (2020). Data-driven product design toward intelligent manufacturing: A review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 17(2), 1729881420911257.
Freddi, A., Salmon, M., Freddi, A., & Salmon, M. (2019). Engineering design and industrial design. Design Principles and Methodologies: From Conceptualization to First Prototyping with Examples and Case Studies, p. 3-20.
Garvey, P. (2011). Unpacking IKEA, Swedish design for the purchasing masses. Routlegde.
Ginting, R., Ishak, A., Malik, A. F., & Satrio, M. R. (2020). Product development with quality function deployment (QFD): A literature review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 1003(1), 012022.
Goffin, K., Lemke, F., Koners, U. (2010). Introduction to customers’ hidden needs. Identifying Hidden Needs: Creating Breakthrough Products, p. 3-26.
Hesse, T. M., Kuehlwein, A., & Roehm, T. (2016). Decdoc: A tool for documenting design decisions collaboratively and incrementally. In 2016 1st International Workshop on Decision Making in Software Architecture (MARCH) IEEE. p. 30-37.
IDSA. (2009). Definition of industrial design. http://www.idsa.org/education/what-isindustrial-design
Kim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). Causal design knowledge: Alternative representation method for product development knowledge management. Computer-Aided Design, 43(9), p. 1137-1153.
Kim, K., & Lee, K. P. (2014). Industrial designers and engineering designers; causes of conflicts, resolving strategies, and perceived image of each other. Conference: DRS2014.
Kleinsmann, M., Deken, F., Dong, A., & Lauche, K. (2012). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), p. 485-506.
Knauss, E. (2021). Constructive master’s thesis work in industry: Guidelines for applying design science research. In 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training, IEEE, p. 110-121.
Kolko, J. (2014). Well-designed: how to use empathy to create products people love. In Well Designed. Harvard Business Review Press.
Madzík, P., Shahin, A., Zimon, D., & Yadav, N. (2024). Requirements classification in Kano Model–from strict categories to satisfaction and dissatisfaction potential. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, p. 1-21.
McMahon, C. (2011). The future of design research: consolidation, collaboration and inter-disciplinary learning? The Future of Design Methodology, London: Springer London. p. 275-284.
Micheli, P., Jaina, J., Goffin, K., Lemke, F., & Verganti, R. (2012). Perceptions of industrial design: The “means” and the “ends”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), p. 687-704.
Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. (2020). Overview of design rationale. Design Rationale. CRC Press, p. 1-19.
Murray, J. K., Studer, J. A., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2019). Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), p. 248-275.
Owen, R., & Horváth, I. (2002). Towards product-related knowledge asset warehousing in enterprises. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on tools and methods of competitive engineering, TMCE, p. 155–70.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Park, S., & Sekerinski, E. (2018). A notebook format for the holistic design of embedded systems (tool paper). arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10820.
Riesener, M., Doelle, C., Perau, S., Lossie, P., & Schuh, G. (2021). Methodology for iterative system modeling in agile product development. Procedia CIRP, 100, p. 439-444.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), p. 155–169.
Saffer, D. (2010). Designing for interaction: Creating innovative applications and devices. New Riders.
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2019). Interaction design—beyond human-computer interaction (5th ed.). Wiley.
Smulders, F., & Dunne, D. (2017). Disciplina: A missing link for cross-disciplinary integration. In Analysing design thinking: Studies of cross-cultural co-creation, CRC Press. p. 137-152.
Sojka, V., & Lepšík, P. (2020). Use of triz, and triz with other tools for process improvement: A literature review. Emerging Science Journal, 4(5), p. 319-335.
Tahanpour, S., Araei, V., Azimzadeh Irani, M., & Pourezat, A. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence and knowledge management in improving corporate governance a case study of mapna company. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(4), p. 141-163. https://10.47176/smok.2024.1813
Tsang, Y. P., Lee, C. K. M., Chong, W. W., & Au, Y. S. (2022). Prioritising product features to refine new product development process: A case study of smart glass. In Advances in Decision Science and Management: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Decision Science and Management (ICDSM 2021) Springer Singapore, p. 613-619.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2016). Product design and development. McGraw-hill.
Wiley, J., & Baxter, M. (2018). Product Design. CRC press.
Wu, Z., Liu, W., & Nie, W. (2021). Literature review and prospect of the development and application of FMEA in manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 112, p. 1409-1436. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 82 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 69 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب