Increased Age Linked to Delayed Face Detection in Ambiguous Stimuli

Alghamdi, R. J., Murphy, M. J., Goharpey, N., & Crewther, S. G. (2021). The age-related changes in speed of visual perception, visual verbal and visuomotor performance, and nonverbal intelligence during early school years. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 667612.

Akbari, F., Asivandzadehchaharmahali, S., & Narmashiri, A. (2024). Paranormal believers are quicker but less accurate in rejecting the presence of the target in conjunction visual search compared to skeptics. bioRxiv, 2024.2004.2025.590450. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.25.590450

Marosi, C., Fodor, Z., & Csukly, G. (2019). From basic perception deficits to facial affect recognition impairments in schizophrenia. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8958. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45231-x

Bortolon, C., Capdevielle, D., & Raffard, S. (2015). Face recognition in schizophrenia disorder: A comprehensive review of behavioral, neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 53, 79-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.006

Narmashiri, A. , Sohrabi, A. and Hatami, J. (2018). Perceptual Processing in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study of Reaction Time and Bias. Social Cognition, 6(2), 113-124.

Narmashiri, A. , sohrabi, A. and Hatami, J. (2020). Brainwave Pattern in Paranormal Beliefs: An EEG-based study in Severe and Mild groups. Neuropsychology, 5(19), 89-98. doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2020.48062.1455

Narmashiri, A., Sohrabi, A., Hatami, J., Amirfakhraei, A., & Haghighat, S. (2019). Investigating the Role of Brain Lateralization and Gender in Paranormal Beliefs. BCN, 10(6), 589-596. https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.923.1

Sağdıç, M., Izgi, B., Yapici Eser, H., Ercis, M., Üçok, A., & Kuşçu, K. (2024). Face and emotion recognition in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, ultra-high risk for psychosis, unaffected siblings, and healthy controls in a sample from Turkey. Schizophr Res Cogn, 36, 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2024.100301

Betts, L. R., Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2007). The effects of aging on orientation discrimination. Vision research, 47(13), 1769-1780.

Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological review, 94(2), 115.

Boutet, I., & Faubert, J. (2006). Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults. Memory & cognition, 34, 854-864.

Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107.

Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological science, 11(2), 139-146.

Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598-601.

Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is" special" about face perception? Psychological review, 105(3), 482.

Fry, R., Tanaka, J. W., Cohan, S., Wilmer, J. B., Germine, L. T., & DeGutis, J. (2023). Effects of age on face perception: Reduced eye region discrimination ability but intact holistic processing. Psychology and aging.

Germine, L. T., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2011). Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition, 118(2), 201-210.

Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature reviews neuroscience, 13(7), 491-505.

Grady, C. L., Randy McIntosh, A., Horwitz, B., & Rapoport, S. I. (2000). Age-related changes in the neural correlates of degraded and nondegraded face processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1-3), 165-186.

Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological science, 16(2), 152-160.

Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., Bandettini, P. A., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Nature, 431(7010), 859-862.

Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(6), 255-260.

Narmashiri, A., Akbari, F., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2023). Conspiracy beliefs are associated with a reduction in frontal beta power and biases in categorizing ambiguous stimuli. Heliyon, 9(10), e20249.

Narmashiri, A., Tanha, A., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2025). How Do Belief Systems Influence the Categorization of Ambiguous Stimuli? Research Square, PREPRINT (Version 1).

Narmashiri, A., Javad, H., & and Khosrowabadi, R. (2024). The role of dual mechanism control in paranormal beliefs: Evidence from behavioral and electrical stimulation studies. Cogent Psychology, 11(1), 2316415.

Narmashiri, A., Hatami, J., Khosrowabadi, R., & Sohrabi, A. (2023). Paranormal believers show reduced resting EEG beta band oscillations and inhibitory control than skeptics. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 3258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30457-7

Narmashiri A, Hatami J, Khosrowabadi R, Sohrabi A. The Role of Cognitive Control in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study Based on Performance in Go/No-go Task. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023;14(3):411-417. doi:10.32598/bcn.2021.923.3

Narmashiri, A., Akbari, F., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2023). Conspiracy beliefs are associated with a reduction in frontal beta power and biases in categorizing ambiguous stimuli. Heliyon, 9(10), e20249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20249

Narmashiri, A., Hatami, J., Khosrowabadi, R., & Sohrabi, A. (2022). Resting-State Electroencephalogram (EEG) Coherence Over Frontal Regions in Paranormal Beliefs. BCN, 13(4), 573-584. https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2021.923.2

Park, D. C., Polk, T. A., Hebrank, A. C., & Jenkins, L. (2010). Age differences in default mode activity on easy and difficult spatial judgment tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1020.

Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological science, 22(4), 464-471.

Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non‐believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 150-155.

Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological review, 103(3), 403.

Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 22(4), 904.

Slessor, G., Riby, D. M., & Finnerty, A. N. (2013). Age-related differences in processing face configuration: The importance of the eye region. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 228-231.

Van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3), 1041-1046.

Van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & Van Harreveld, F. (2016). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 4-33.