سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,692
تعداد مقالات72,229
تعداد مشاهده مقاله129,181,326
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله102,010,108
Minadi, Sajad, Moshirzadeh, Homeira. (1403). Mythical Thought and the Constitution of Israeli Foreign Policy. , (), -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2025.386042.1478
Sajad Minadi; Homeira Moshirzadeh. "Mythical Thought and the Constitution of Israeli Foreign Policy". , , , 1403, -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2025.386042.1478
Minadi, Sajad, Moshirzadeh, Homeira. (1403). 'Mythical Thought and the Constitution of Israeli Foreign Policy', , (), pp. -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2025.386042.1478
Minadi, Sajad, Moshirzadeh, Homeira. Mythical Thought and the Constitution of Israeli Foreign Policy. , 1403; (): -. doi: 10.22059/wsps.2025.386042.1478

Mythical Thought and the Constitution of Israeli Foreign Policy

Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 15 اسفند 1403
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/wsps.2025.386042.1478
نویسندگان
Sajad Minadi* 1؛ Homeira Moshirzadeh2
1PhD in International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Professor of International Relations University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Israel’s foreign policy at times diverges from prevailing realist expectations, specifically rational considerations and prudence. This article argues that this is the result of what Ernst Cassirer calls mythical thought or what can be called a myth-based discourse that constructs the mindset of policy makers and has made the emergence of non-realist elements in Israel’s foreign policy possible. In this discourse, quantity, quality, similarity, space, and time acquire specific characteristics and, in the field of foreign policy, this primarily leads to maximalist aspirations, volunteerism, reactiveness, lack of proportionality between capabilities and actions, and at times refraining from diplomatic engagements. However, we encounter a state's identity as a modern ruling state which, to gain international recognition and acceptability, must abide by the norms and laws that define statehood. On the other hand, we face an identity stemming from a mythical discourse, encompassing non-modern, irrational elements and self-definitions based on rules that often contradict legal discourse. Relying on discourse analysis, the texts produced by Israeli foreign policymakers are analyzed to show how this specific way of thinking has made non-realist elements in Israeli foreign policy possible.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Discourse Analysis؛ Foreign Policy؛ Identity؛ Israel؛ Mythical Thought
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 71





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب