Enhancing Porosity Prediction Accuracy in Oil Reservoirs: Evaluating Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches Integrating Well Log and Core Data

Mehrabi, Amir Reza; Bagheri, Majid; Nabi Bidhendi, Majid; Biniaz Delijani, Ebrahim; Behnood, Mohammad

doi:10.22059/jesphys.2025.377351.1007611

فهرست نشریات

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

فهرست مجلات علمی- پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران

نحوه ارسال مقاله برای مجله- ثبت نام در سامانه- فراموش کردن رمز عبور

تعداد نشریات	162
تعداد شماره‌ها	6,692
تعداد مقالات	72,232
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	129,200,292
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	102,030,025

	Enhancing Porosity Prediction Accuracy in Oil Reservoirs: Evaluating Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches Integrating Well Log and Core Data
فیزیک زمین و فضا
مقاله 8، دوره 50، شماره 4، اسفند 1403، صفحه 91-113 اصل مقاله (1.9 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jesphys.2025.377351.1007611
نویسندگان
Amir Reza Mehrabi¹؛ Majid Bagheri^* ²؛ Majid Nabi Bidhendi²؛ Ebrahim Biniaz Delijani¹؛ Mohammad Behnood¹
¹Department of Petroleum Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
²Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Accurate prediction of porosity holds significant importance across various domains within the oil and gas sector, encompassing activities such as reservoir delineation, well design, and production enhancement. However, conventional methodologies often encounter difficulties in capturing the intricate relationships among diverse data streams and porosity metrics. This study introduces a novel hybrid model framework aimed at refining the precision and resilience of porosity forecasts by integrating multiple machine learning methodologies and exploiting complementary data modalities. This hybrid architecture enables flexible and intricate integration of diverse models and data sources, potentially leading to enhanced overall porosity prediction accuracy. Notably, the proposed model incorporates several innovative elements, including the amalgamation of ensemble techniques and deep learning models tailored for sequential data, as well as the utilization of complementary data sources, such as well log and core data, to facilitate automatic feature learning and representation, thereby bolstering robustness and generalization capabilities. Experimental outcomes underscore the hybrid model's potential to achieve notable prediction accuracies, with R-squared values surpassing 0.93 on log data and 0.88 on core data sets, outperforming individual models. The model also exhibits commendable robustness and training efficiency, leveraging advanced methodologies such as ensemble techniques. In conclusion, this study underscores the promise of hybrid machine learning models as dependable tools for porosity prediction from core data. The insights gleaned from this research hold the potential to advance the understanding and optimization of porosity forecasting, thereby facilitating the formulation of more efficient reservoir management strategies.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Porosity؛ Log and core data؛ Hybrid model؛ Gradient Boosting Regression

مراجع
Abbas, M. A., Al-Mudhafar, W. J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). Improving permeability prediction in carbonate reservoirs through gradient boosting hyperparameter tuning. Earth Science Informatics, 16, 3417–3432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01099-0. Ahmadi, M. A., Ahmadi, M. R., Hosseini, S. M., & Ebadi, M. (2014). Connectionist model predicts the porosity and permeability of petroleum reservoirs by means of petro-physical logs: Application of artificial intelligence. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 123, 183–200. Alyaev, S., & Elsheikh, A. H. (2022). Direct multi-modal inversion of geophysical logs using deep learning. Earth and Space Science, 9, e2021EA002186. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002186. Al-Khafaji, H., Qingbang, M., Wahib, Y., Samer, W., Wakeel, H., Ahmed, K. A., Fayez, H., & Ghamdan A. (2024). Advanced porosity prediction in heterogeneous oil reservoirs: Using novel machine learning and deep learning techniques. In J. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2023. IFEDC 2023. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering (pp. 123-138). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0479-8_45. Al Shalabi, L., & Shaaban, Z. (Eds.). (2006). Normalization as a preprocessing engine for data mining and the approach of preference matrix. In 2006 International Conference on Dependability of Computer Systems. IEEE. Bittar, M., Wang, S., Wu, X., & Chen, J. (2021). Multiple Well-Log Depth Matching Using Deep Q-Learning. Petrophysics, 62, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV62N4-2021a1. Carey, C., Boucher, T., Mahadevan, S., Bartholomew, P., & Dyar, M. (2015). Machine learning tools for mineral recognition and classification from Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 46(10), 894–903. Dargi, M., Khamehchi, E., & Mahdavi, K. J. (2023). Optimizing acidizing design and effectiveness assessment with machine learning for predicting post-acidizing permeability. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38395-0. Esteghlal, S., Samadi, S. H., Hosseini, S. M. H., & Moosavi-Movahedi, A. A. (2023). Identification of machine learning neural-network techniques for prediction of interfacial tension reduction by zein based colloidal particles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 36, 106546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00956. Fernando, J. (2023, April 08). R-Squared. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/r-squared.asp. Fu, L.-Y. (2003). An Information Integrated Approach for Reservoir Characterization. In Reservoir Characterization (pp. 177-192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0271-3_11. Fu, L., Lin, T., Li, W., & Ma, S. (2022). Machine learning in petrophysics: Advantages and limitations. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 3, 157-161. Gamal, H., & Elkatatny, S. (2022). Prediction model based on an artificial neural network for rock porosity. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47(9), 11211-11221. Gupta, A., Pandey, A., Kesarwani, H., Sharma, S., & Saxena, A. (2022). Automated determination of interfacial tension and contact angle using computer vision for oil field applications. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 12(5), 1453-1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01313-0. Hadavimoghaddam, F., Ostadhassan, M., Sadri, M. A., Bondarenko, T., Chebyshev, I., & Semnani, A. (2021). Prediction of Water Saturation from Well Log Data by Machine Learning Algorithms: Boosting and Super Learner. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060666. Hassanzadeh, P., Hezarkhani, A., Rabbani, A. R., & Khajooie, S. (2019). Integrating geochemical and reservoir engineering approach to evaluate reservoir continuity: A case study from Foroozan field, Offshore Iran. Journal of Earth System Science, 128, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1105-x. Hussain, W., Miao. L., Muhammad. A., Syed. M. H., Sajid. A., Sartaj. H., Asim. F. N., & Saddam. H. (2023). Machine learning - a novel approach to predict the porosity curve using geophysical logs data: An example from the Lower Goru sand reservoir in the Southern Indus Basin, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 214, 105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105067. Hussain, W., Ehsan, M., Pan, L., Wang, X., Ali, M., Din, S. U., Hussain, H., Jawad, A., Chen, S., Liang, H., & Liang, L. (2023). Prospect evaluation of the Cretaceous Yageliemu clastic reservoir based on geophysical log data: A case study from the Yakela gas condensate field, Tarim Basin, China. Energies, 16(6), 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062721. Jo, H., Cho, Y., Pyrcz, M. J., Tang, H., & Fu, P. (2021). Machine learning-based porosity estimation from spectral decomposed seismic data. Jo, J.-M. (2019). Effectiveness of normalization pre-processing of big data to the machine learning performance. Journal of Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 14(3), 547–552. Kirch, A., Celaschi, Y. M., de Almeida, J. M., & Miranda, C. R. (2020). Brine–oil interfacial tension modeling: Assessment of machine learning techniques combined with molecular dynamics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(13), 15837-15843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02972. Li, Z., Xie, Y., Li, X., & Zhao, W. (2021). Prediction and application of porosity based on support vector regression model optimized by adaptive dragonfly algorithm. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 43(9), 1073-1086. Mahzad, M., & Bagheri, M. (2025). Predictive reconstruction of missing geological events and patterns in real-life 3D post-stack seismic images: A novel U-Net-based deep learning approach. Carbonates and Evaporites, 40(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-024-01050-4. Mahzad, M., & Riahi, M. A. (2024). Reservoir characterization reimagined: A hybrid neural network approach for direct three-dimensional petrophysical property characterization. Carbonates and Evaporites, 39(67). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-024-00975-0. Maniscalco, R., Fazio, E., Punturo, R., Cirrincione, R., Di Stefano, A., Distefano, S., Forzese, M., Lanzafame, G., Leonardi, G. S., Montalbano, S., Pellegrino, A. G., Raele, A., & Palmeri, G. (2022). The porosity in heterogeneous carbonate reservoir rocks: Tectonic versus diagenetic imprint—A multi-scale study from the Hyblean Plateau (SE Sicily, Italy). Geosciences, 12(4), 149. Moosavi, N., Bagheri, M., Nabi-Bidhendi, M., & Heidari, R. (2023). Porosity prediction using Fuzzy SVR and FCM SVR from well logs of an oil field in south of Iran. Acta Geophysica, 71(2), 769-782. Munir, M. N., Zafar, M., & Ehsan, M. (2023). Comparative and Statistical Analysis of Core-Calibrated Porosity with Log-Derived Porosity for Reservoir Parameters Estimation of the Zamzama GAS Field, Southern Indus Basin, Pakistan. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48, 7867–7882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07523-9. Nasseri, A., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2017). Evaluating distribution pattern of petrophysical properties and their monitoring under a hybrid intelligent-based method in southwest oil field of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2766-2. Pan, J., Zhuang, Y., & Fong, S. (Eds.). (2016). The impact of data normalization on stock market prediction: using SVM and technical indicators. In Soft Computing in Data Science: Second International Conference, SCDS 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 21–22, 2016, Proceedings 2. Springer. Shiri, Y., Moradzadeh, A., Shiri, A., & Chehrazi, A. (2011). Application of adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference system for prediction of porosity from seismic attributes; case study, Farour.A oil field, Persian Gulf, Iran. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 20, 177-192. Stanton, J. M. (2001). Galton, Pearson, and the Peas: A brief history of linear regression for statistics instructors. Journal of Statistics Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2001.1191053. Subasi, A., El-Amin, M. F., Darwich, T., & Mubarak. D. (2022). Permeability prediction of petroleum reservoirs using stochastic gradient boosting regression. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13, 3555–3564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01986-0. Sun, J., Zhang, R., Chen, M., Chen. B., Wang. X., Li. Q., & Ren. L. (2021). Identification of Porosity and Permeability While Drilling Based on Machine Learning. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46, 7031–7045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05432-x. Sun, Y., Pang, S., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Porosity prediction through well logging data: A combined approach of convolutional neural network and transformer model (CNN-transformer). Physics of Fluids, 36(2). Tam, T. N. T., & Thanh, D. H. T. (2023). Estimate Petrophysical Properties by Using Machine Learning Methods. In Vo, P. L., Tran, D. A., Pham, T. L., Le Thi Thu, H., & Nguyen Viet, N. (Eds.), Advances in Research on Water Resources and Environmental Systems. GTER 2022. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17808-5_29. Talebkeikhah, M., Sadeghtabaghi, Z., & Shabani, M. (2021). A comparison of machine learning approaches for prediction of permeability using well log data in the hydrocarbon reservoirs. Journal of Human Earth Future, 2(2), 82–99. Tiab, D., & Donaldson, E. C. (2016). Chapter 3 - Porosity and Permeability. In D. Tiab & E. C. Donaldson (Eds.), Petrophysics (4th ed., pp. 67-186). Gulf Professional Publishing. Wu, L., Dong, Z., Li, W., Jing, C., & Qu, B. (2021). Well-Logging Prediction Based on Hybrid Neural Network Model. Energies, 14, 8583. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248583. Yousefmarzi, F., Haratian, A., Mahdavi Kalatehno, J., & Keihani Kamal, M. (2024). Machine learning approaches for estimating interfacial tension between oil/gas and oil/water systems: a performance analysis. Scientific Reports, 14, 858. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51597-4. Yu, S., Zhu, K., & Diao, F. (2008). A dynamic all parameters adaptive BP neural networks model and its application on oil reservoir prediction. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.04.088. Zamani, M. G., Nikoo, M. R., Rastad, D., & Nematollahi, B. (2023). A comparative study of data-driven models for runoff, sediment, and nitrate forecasting. Journal of Environmental Management, 341, 118006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118006. Zou, Y., Chen, Y., & Deng, H. (2021). Gradient Boosting Decision Tree for Lithology Identification with Well Logs: A Case Study of Zhaoxian Gold Deposit, Shandong Peninsula, China. Natural Resources Research, 30, 3197–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09894-6.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 171 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 469

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

Enhancing Porosity Prediction Accuracy in Oil Reservoirs: Evaluating Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches Integrating Well Log and Core Data