پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,693 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,239 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,228,626 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,060,281 |
Cultural Critique and Authority in the Digital Media Era: A Rhetorical Analysis of Instagram Vernacular Film Reviewers | ||
| Journal of Cyberspace Studies | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 1، فروردین 2025، صفحه 107-125 اصل مقاله (374.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcss.2025.387749.1121 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Saied Reza Ameli* ؛ Farzaneh Farzaneh Siasi rad | ||
| Department of Communications and New Media Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The emergence of amateur critics and vernacular reviewers as non-institutional cultural voices is one of the consequences of social media's development and widespread use. Aims: This study aims to better understand reviewers and their types by examining how they establish critical authority in comparison to institutional critics and their potential influence on cultural valuation. Methodology: This subject is explored through the rhetorical analysis of their linguistic strategies. The research draws theoretically on existing literature regarding cultural criticism and review in social media. Methodologically, it combines qualitative content analysis and rhetorical analysis, emphasizing identifying Aristotelian persuasive elements within the data, including ethos, pathos, and logos. The study sample consists of 350 Instagram posts gathered from 30 film review pages. Findings: The findings indicate that most reviewers adopt a consumer-oriented perspective, distancing themselves from institutional critics. They have also emphasized using Instagram's affordances, particularly its interactive and participatory features, to construct their cultural authority. Furthermore, they have employed rational and emotional appeals in alignment with presenting "summaries and supplementary movie information" and expressing "emotional appeal and affective experience of consumption". These strategies, along with the reviewers' focus on "addressing the audience's emotional needs", "personal growth and self-improvement", and "less dependence on institutional critics", reflect their disinterest in delving into deeper levels of critical evaluation and rhetorical directness in constructing their authority. In the final section of the article, the impact of reviewers on cultural valuation is further discussed, distinguishing three types: "film-style bloggers", "cinema influencers", and "critical reviewers". Conclusions: Based on the results, the first two types of reviewers demonstrate how Instagram’s platform-specific features primarily shape critical authority. While diverse reviewers enhance access to information, they often marginalize critical evaluation and cultural value in favor of consumerism and commercial competition. Only "Critical Reviewers" have successfully integrated critical evaluation with Instagram’s affordances through distinct rhetorical strategies, emphasizing the need to increase their numbers in the era of digital media. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| critical authority؛ cultural criticism؛ Instagram؛ rhetorical analysis؛ vernacular reviewers | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aczél, P. (2016). “Virtual rhetoric; A theoretical approach”. Res Rhetorica. 3(4): 2-15. https://doi.org/10.17380/rr.2016.4.1.
Ameli, S.R. (2013). Research Methods in Cultural Studies and Media. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
--------------. (2009). Virtual Text. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [in Persian]
Blank, G. (2007). Critics, Ratings, and Society: The Sociology of Reviews. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Burgess, J.E. (2006). “Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling”. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 20(2): 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310600641737.
Chen, S.; Xiao, L. & Mao, J. (2021). “Persuasion strategies of misinformation-containing posts in the social media”. Information Processing & Management. 58(5): 102665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102665.
DataReportal. (2023). “Digital 2023: Iran”. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-iran. (Accessed on: February 13, 2023)
de Jong, I.K. & Burgers, C. (2013). “Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews”. Discourse, Context & Media. 2(2): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.03.001.
Debenedetti, S. (2006). “The role of media critics in the cultural industries”. International Journal of Arts Management. 8(3): 30-42.
Eyman, D. (2015). Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. University of Michigan Press.
From, U. (2019). “Criticism and Reviews”. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. 1-8.
Ge, J. & Gretzel, U. (2018). “Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective”. Journal of Marketing Management. 34(15-16): 1272-1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960.
Gibbs, M.; Meese, J.; Arnold, M.; Nansen, B. & Carter, M. (2015). “#Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular”. Information, Communication & Society. 18(3): 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152.
Gillespie, R. (2012). “The art of criticism in the age of interactive technology: Critics, participatory culture, and the avant-garde”. International Journal of Communication. 6: 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/936.
Hallinan, B. (2023). “No judgment: value optimization and the reinvention of reviewing on YouTube”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 28(5): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad034.
Hartelius, E.J. & Browning, L.D. (2008). “The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: A literature review”. Management Communication Quarterly. 22(1): 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908318513.
Higgins, C. & Walker, R. (2012). “Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports”. Accounting Forum. 36: 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.02.003.
Holt, R. & Macpherson, A. (2010). “Sensemaking, rhetoric and the socially competent entrepreneur”. International Small Business Journal. 28(1): 20-42.
Irajzad, F.; Kafi, M. & Shahriari, H. (2017). “A rhetorical analysis of English and Persian online comments on the news articles related to Iran's nuclear issue”. Observatorio (OBS*): 11(1). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1102017882.
Jaakkola, M. (2022). Reviewing culture online: Post-institutional Cultural Critique across Platforms. Palgrave Macmillan.
---------------. (2021). “Young voices, new qualities? Children reviewers as vernacular reviewers of cultural products”. In N. Kristensen, U. From & H. K. Haastrup (Eds). Rethinking Cultural Criticism (pp. 185–208). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7474-0_9.
---------------. (2020). “Useful creativity: Vernacular reviewing on the video-sharing platform Vimeo”. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research. 12(2): 373-392. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.20200420a.
---------------. (2019). “From re-viewers to me-viewers: The# Bookstagram review sphere on Instagram and the uses of the perceived platform and genre affordances”. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture. 10(1-2): 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.10.1-2.91_1.
---------------. (2018). “Vernacular reviews as a form of co-consumption: The user-generated review videos on YouTube”. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research. 34(65): 10-30. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104485.
Jenkins, H. (2012). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Routledge.
---------------. (2006). Convergence Culture; Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
Kammer, A. (2015). “Post-industrial cultural criticism: The and the online cultural public sphere”. Journalism Practice. 9(6): 872-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1051371.
Koreman, R.; Verboord, M. & Janssen, S. (2024). “Constructing authority in the digital age: Comparing book reviews of professional and amateur critics”. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 27(4): 736-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549423118747.
Kristensen, N.N. & From, U. (2015). “From ivory tower to cross-media personas: The heterogeneous cultural critic in the media”. Journalism Practice. 9(6): 853-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1051370.
Kristensen, N.N.; From, U. & Haastrup, H.K. (2021). “Introduction: Rethinking cultural criticism—new voices in the digital age”. In N. Kristensen, U. From & H. K. Haastrup (Eds). Rethinking Cultural Criticism (pp. 1-15). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7474-0_1.
Lanham, R.A. (1993). “Digital Rhetoric and the digital arts”. The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. (pp. 29-52). University of Chicago Press.
Marshall, P.D. (2021). “The dual strategic persona: Emotional connection, algorithms and the transformation of contemporary online reviewers”. In N. Kristensen, U. From & H.K. Haastrup (Eds). Rethinking Cultural Criticism (pp. 113–135). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7474-0_1.
Mayring, P. (2015). “Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures”. In Bikner-Ahsbahs, A.; Knipping, C.; Presmeg, N. (Eds). Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp.365-380). Springer, Dordrecht. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13.
Orlik, P.B. (2016). Media criticism in a digital age: Professional and consumer considerations. Routledge.
Pang, N. & Law, P.W. (2017). “Retweeting# WorldEnvironmentDay: A study of content features and visual rhetoric in an environmental movement”. Computers in Human Behavior. 69: 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.003.
Panigyrakis, G.; Panopoulos, A. & Koronaki, E. (2020). “All we have is words: applying rhetoric to examine how social media marketing activities strengthen the connection between the brand and the self”. International Journal of Advertising. 39(5): 699-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1663029.
Steiner, A. (2010). “Personal readings and public texts: Book blogs and online writing about literature”. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research. 2(2): 471-494. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.10228471.
--------------. (2008). “Private criticism in the public space: Personal writing on literature in readers’ reviews on Amazon”. Participations. 5(2): 1-14. https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1288297.
van Belle, H.; Gillaerts, P.; van Gorp, B.; van de Mieroop, D. & Rutten, K. (2013). Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World. Vol. 2. Leiden University Press.
Verboord, M. (2014). “The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews”. New media & Society. 16(6): 921-940. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481349516.
---------------. (2010). “The legitimacy of book critics in the age of the Internet and omnivorousness: Expert critics, Internet critics and peer critics in Flanders and the Netherlands”. European Sociological Review. 26(6): 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp039.
Zappen, J.P. (2005). “Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 14(3): 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10.
Zhang, J. & Ding, H. (2014). “Constructing HIV/AIDS on the internet: A comparative rhetorical analysis of online narratives in the United States and in China”. International Journal of Communication. 8: 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2509. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 213 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 151 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب