اصلاح ژنتیک انسان از منظر عقل‌گرایی کانت

1. کین، برایان (1385). جنبه‌های حقوقی فناوری ژن. ترجمۀ رضا نخجوانی، محمدعلی نوری، تهران: گنج دانش.
2. بزمی، شبنم و علی متولی‌زاده اردکانی (1387). «ژن‌درمانی و اخلاق پزشکی». اخلاق پزشکی، ش 4، ص 189-199.

5. ACOG Committee opinion (2021). Informed consent and shared decision making in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 137, pp. 34-41.

6. Berg, Jessica W., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2001). Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

7. Bonnicksen, A.L. (1998). “Transplanting nuclei between human eggs: implications for germ-line genetics”. Politics and the Life Sciences 17, pp. 3-10. DOI: 10.1017/S073093840002520X

8. Booth, S. (2002). “A philosophical analysis of informed consent, nursing standard”. Nursing Standard, Vol.16, Issue 39, pp. 43-46. DOI: 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.39.43.c3211  

9. Carmen, M. G del, Steven J.. (2005). “Informed Consent for Medical Treatment and Research: A Review”. The Oncologist, pp. 636-641. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-636

10. Committee on Human Gene Editing: Scientific, Medical, and Ethical Considerations; National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance, The National.

11.Cummiskey, D. ( 2000). “Kantian Consequentialism”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 315-339.DOI:10.1080/00455091.2000.10717535

12. Cureton, A., Hill, Jr., & Thomas E. (2017). “Kant on Virtue: Seeking the Ideal in Human Conditions”. The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, pp. 1-23. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199385195.013.13

13. Delk, E. (2013). “A Kantian Ethical Analysis of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis”. CedarEthic, pp 1-10. DOI: 10.15385/jce.2013.12.2.1

14. Dumisic, S. (2016). “The Choice of Pre-Birth Genetic Modification Through Kant’s Ethics in the 21st Century”. University of Umeå, pp. 1-22. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:943528/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

15. Ebbesen, M., Sundby, A., Pedersen FS Andersen S. (2015). “A Philosophical Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing in Biobank Research by use of Beauchamp and Childress’ Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics”. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000244

16. Evitt, N., Shamik, M., & Russ B A. (2015). Human Germline CRISPR-Cas Modification: Toward a Regulatory Framework, 15 AM. J. BIOETHICS 25, pp.25-29. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1214308.

17. Fletcher, G. P. (1987). “Law and Morality: A Kantian Perspective”. Columbia Law School. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1071 (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

18. Mazur, Grzegorz, O.P., (2012). Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics. Springer.

19. Gunderson, M. (2007). “Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, pp. 87-102. DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4

20. Gunderson, M. (2008). “Genetic Engineering and the Consent of Future Persons”. 18 J. EVOLUTION & TECH, pp. 86-93. https://jetpress.org/v18/gunderson2.htm (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

21. Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. trans., Cambridge: Polity Press.

22. Hill, Gerald N. and Hill Kathleen Thompson, (2009). Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary, 1st edition.

23. Hoehner, Paul J., MD; FAHA MA, (2003). “Ethical Aspects of Informed Consent in Obstetric Anesthesia—New Challenges and Solutions”. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, pp. 587-600. 6. DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00505-6

24. Hopton, terry, (1982). “Kant's two theories of law” History of Political Thought”. Imprint Academic Ltd, pp. 51-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26212252 (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

25. Ishii, T, (2014). “Potential impact of human mitochondrial replacement on global policy regarding germline gene modification”. Reprod Biomed Online, pp. 150-155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.04.001

26. Kant, Immanuel, (1887). The Philosophy of Law: An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence As the Science of Right.

27. Kant, I. (1991). the Metaphysics of Morals.cambrige university press.

28. Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. Yale University Press.

29. Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. trans. and ed. Robert B. Louden, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

30. Kant, I. (1965). Metaphysical elements of justice: part I of The metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

31. Koller, P. (2020). On the Connection between Law and Morality: “Some Doubts about Robert Alexy’s View”, Ratio juris, Vol. 33, pp.24-34. DOI:10.1111/raju.12272

32. Leo, R. J. (1999). “Competency and the Capacity to Make Treatment Decisions: A Primer for Primary Care Physicians”. Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, pp 131–141. DOI:10.4088/PCC.V01N0501

33. Manninen, B. A., (2008). “Are human embryos Kantian persons?: Kantian considerations in favor of embryonic stem cell research”. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-4

34. Marshall, T., & Neumann, C. (2000). “The Ambiguity of Kant’s Concept of Happiness”. Reason Papers, Vol. 26, pp. 21-28. https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/26/rp_26_2.pdf (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

35. Mc Cormick S.J & Richard, A. (1974). “Proxy Consent in the Experimentation Situation”.Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 2-20. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.1974.0001

36. McCarty, R. (1991). “Moral Conflicts in Kantian Ethics”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 65-79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27743963 (Accessed 4 janury 2023)

37. Mintz, Rachel L., John D Loike., & Fischbach Ruth L., (2018). “Will CRISPR Close the Door to an Open Future?”. Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1409-1423. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0069-6.

38. National Bioethics Advisory Committee (1998). “National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Guidelines for Research Involving Cognitively Impaired Subjects” Washington.

39. Norman, G. V. (2012). “Informed Consent: Respecting Patient Autonomy”. CSA Bulletin, pp.213-221. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511841361.003

40. Pavlova, T., Zarutska, E.; Roman, P.; Kolomoichenko, O (2019). “Ethics and law in Kant’s views: the principle of complementarity”. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 651-664. DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-04-2019-0080

41. Prainsack, B. (2017). Personalized Medicine Empowered Patients in the 21st Century?. New York University.

42. Prainsack, B. (2019). “The “We” in the “Me”: Solidarity and health care in the era of personalized medicine”. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 43, pp. 21–44. DOI:10.1177/0162243917736139

43. Ramsey, P. (2002). The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics (2^nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

44. Research, T. (2010). “Understanding Consent in Research Involving Children: The ethical Issues”. A Handbook for Human Research Ethics Committees and Researchers.

45. Ross, D. W. (2007). The Right and the Good, Clarendon press, OXFORD.

46. Savulescu, J. (2001). “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children”, Bioethics, Volume 15.

47. Schmidt, Elke Elisabeth,(2022). “Kant on Trolleys and Autonomous Driving”, Kant and Artificial Intelligence, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

48. Shah, P., Imani Thornton, I.;Turrin, D.;Hipskind, J. E.(2021). Informed Consent, Treasure Island, StatPearls.

49. Sotrup, M. (2011). “Viewpoint, how to avoid a dichotomy between autonomy and beneficence: from liberalism to communitarianism and beyond”. Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 269, pp. 375-379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02349_2.x

50. Stoljar, Mackenzie, C, N., (2000). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

51. Turner, R. C. (2008). Design and Destiny. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

52. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, (2014). Informed Consent Information Sheet Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors, DRAFT GUIDANCE.

53. Waldron, J. (1996). “Kant's Legal Positivism”. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 109, No. 7 pp. 1535-1566. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342024 .

54. Wert, Guido De, (2018). “Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing: Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE”. European Journal of Human Genetics, pp. 450-470. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0077-z

55. WOOD, ALLEN W., (2008). Kantian Ethics. Stanford University.