پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,759 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,128,558 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,895,992 |
شناسایی و اجرای آرای داوری کمیسیون داوری تجاری و اقتصادی بین‌المللی چین-سیتک | ||
| مطالعات حقوق خصوصی | ||
| دوره 52، شماره 3، آبان 1401، صفحه 579-600 اصل مقاله (327.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jlq.2022.333463.1007607 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیما علوی حجازی1؛ محمود جلالی* 2؛ مریم قربانی فر3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کمیسیون داوری تجاری و اقتصادی بین‌المللی چین-سیتک از نهادهای داوری در چین است. سهولت و اطمینان از شناسایی و اجرای آرای داخلی و خارجی این نهاد اهمیت ویژه‌ای دارد و موجب بسط و گسترش روابط تجاری بین‌الملل خواهد شد. سیتک مقرراتی را طبق اصول و قواعد نوین حاکم بر داوری پیش‌بینی کرده است. هرچند در مواردی از این اصول تخطی داشته است. در عرصة بین‌المللی نیز شناسایی و اجرای آرای خارجی سیتک طبق قواعد کنوانسیون نیویورک ۱۹۵۸ صورت می‌گیرد. در این مقاله این موضوع که آرای داوری سیتک چگونه شناسایی و اجرا می‌شوند، بررسی می‌شود. به این منظور شناسایی و اجرای آرای سیتک از منظر مقررات چین و کنوانسیون نیویورک، اصول، موانع، نحوة شناسایی و اجرای آرای داوری داخلی و خارجی سیتک به روش توصیفی تجزیه‌وتحلیل شده، در نهایت مشخص می‌شود آرای داخلی و خارجی صادره از سیتک در دادگاه محل اجرا، قابل‌شناسایی و اجراست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آرا؛ اجرا؛ بین‌المللی؛ تجاری؛ چین؛ داوری؛ سیتک؛ شناسایی. | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards of China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sima Alavihejazi1؛ Dr. Mahmoud Jalali2؛ Maryam Ghorbanifar3 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in Private Law, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Law, University of Isfahan | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC), is one of the leading arbitration bodies in East Asia, to which traders and investors from all over the world turn to resolve their disputes. Ease and confidence in identifying and enforcing domestic and foreign arbitral awards issued by this institution is of particular importance and can lead to the expansion and expansion of international trade relations. The People's Republic of China has provisions for the recognition and enforcement of internal arbitration in the Code of Civil Procedure, the Arbitration Law and the Code of Civil Procedure. China has tried to use the new principles and rules of arbitration as a criterion in formulating these rules. But in some cases it has violated these principles. In the international arena, the recognition and enforcement of Cietac's foreign arbitral awards is in accordance with the rules of the 1958 New York Convention. In this article, by reviewing the rules governing the recognition and enforcement of CIETAC arbitration awards from the perspective of China and the New York Convention, the principles, obstacles, and methods of identifying and enforcing CIETAC internal and external arbitration awards are examined. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| China, CIETAC Arbitration, Recognition of Award, Enforcement of Award, New York Convention | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
الف) فارسی
ب) خارجی
10. Collier, John & Vaughan, Lowe (1999). The Settlement of Disputes in 11. Chen, Hua (1991). " China and It's Arbitration System in foreing Treade", university of Detroit Law Review, Vol. 68, pp. 459-47. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage/? handle=hein.journals/udetmr68&div=29&id=&page= (Accessed 15 October 2022). 12. Chua Eu jin ) 2005). "Arbitration in China", Asian International Arbitration journal, Vol.1, No.1, pp.83-94. https://doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2005005 (Accessed 15 October 2022) 13. Cohen Stephanie (2008). 'The New York Convention at Age 50: A Primer on the International Regime for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Vol.1, No.1, pp.47-50. https://www.studymode.com/essays/The-New-York-Convention-At-Age-69163447.html (Accessed 15 October 2022) 14. Contini Paolo (1959). " International Commercial Arbitration: The United Nations Convention on The Recognition and for Enforcementof Foreign Arbitral Awards", The American journal Of Comparative Law, Vol.8, No.3, pp.283-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/837713(Accessed 16 October 2022) 15. Gray, Whitmore & Henry R., Zheng (1989). "Opinion of the Supreme People's Court on Questions Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China", University of Michigan Law School Scholar Ship Repository, Vol. 52, No.2, pp.59-87 available at https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1542/ (Accessed 16 October 2022). 16. Lin, Mark (2007). "Beijing Court Upholds CIETAC Award in favour of Foreign Party", Asian Dispute Review, Vol.9, No.4, pp.137–138. available at https://kluwerlawonline.com /journalarticle/Asian+Dispute+Review/9.4/ADR2007043 (Accessed 16 October 2022). 17. Liu Jiong (John); Minli Tang & Li Cao (2018). "Arbitral Award from CIETAC Got Recognized and Enforced by US Court", All Bright law offices. available at https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8ed9266a-5742-42fc-9516-7211db42581a. (Accessed 16 October 2022)18. L. Karlin, Jeffrey & Jaeger Jiri, (2019). '“Ich Bin Ein Arbitrator!”: Unique Issues in Arbitrating International Cases", Inter Available at National Franchise Association 52nd Annual Legal Symposium May 5-7, Washington, DC. https://www.franchise.org/sites/default/files/201905/UniqueIssuesinArbitratingInternationalCases.pdf (Accessed 16 October 2022). 19. Miller, Jeff (2013). "International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors", Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 22, pp.76-100. https://digitalcommons. schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1301&context=djls (Accessed 16 October 2022). 20. Nyombi Christas & Konstantinos, Siliafis (2017). "Rationalizing the Defences to Enforcement under the New York Convention 1958", Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, Vol.17, No.1, pp.110–129. http://asperchair.bryan-schwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/articles/Rationalizing-the-Defences-to-Enforcement-under-the-New-York--Convention-1958.pdf. (Accessed 15 October 2022) 21. O. Kostrzewa, Benjamin (2006). "China International Economic Trade Arbitration Commission in 2006: New Rules, Same Results", Washington International Law Journal Washington International Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.518-541. available at https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol15/iss2/6// (Accessed 16 October 2022). 22. Rossi, Pierfrancesco (2017). " Public Policy and Enforcement of Foreign Awards: An Appraisal of China's Judicial Practice", pp. 299-329. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/328289135 (Accessed 16 October 2022). 23. Wallace, I. N. Duncan (1990). "Control by the Courts: A Plea for More, Not Less", Arbitration International, Vol.6, No.3, pp.253-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration /6.3.253. (Accessed 16 October 2022). 24. Pisacane, Giovanni; Murphy, Lea & Calvin, Zhang (2016). Arbitration in China (Rules & Perspectives), Springer, Singapore, Edition Number 1. https://link.springer.com (Accessed 15 October 2022). 25. van den Berg, Albert Jan (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958, Kluwer Law International. 26. Zhang, Li (2002). "The Enforcement of CIETAC Arbitration Awards", Asion Disput Review (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre HKIAC), Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 157-159. https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/journal?title=Asian%20Dispute%20Review. (Accessed 18 December 2021). 27. Zhang, Xiaoyang (1999). "Arbitration in China: A Legal Over View", MurdochUniversity Electronic journal of law, Vol. 6, No. 3, article. 1-59. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurdochUeJlLaw/toc-Z.html (Accessed 18 December 2021). Documents28. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 1958. Website 29. www.cietac.org(Accessed 18 December 2021). 30. http://www.cietac.org.cn/english/rules/rules.htm(Accessed 18 December 2021). 31.http://www.cietac.org/index.php?m=Article&a=show&id=2408&l=en(Accessed 18 December 2021). 32. http://www.lexadin.nl/wlg/legis/nofr/oeur/lxwechi.htm(Accessed 18 December 2021). 33.http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.htm (Accessed 18 December 2021). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 366 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 952 |
||