1. باقرزاده، حمید؛ ایوب منصوری رضی (1399). «تفسیر مضیق اختیار دادگاه در اجرای آرای داوری خارجی؛ هماهنگی با مشی حمایتی کنوانسیون شناسایی و اجرای داوری خارجی نیویورک»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، ش 30، ص 67-39.در: https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_11591_9521e70c3c8b06cb86a06b5210bd3b74.pdf  (23 مهر1401).
2. جنیدی، لعیا (1378). نقد و بررسی تطبیقی قانون داوری تجاری بین‌المللی مصوب 26/6/1376، تهران: دانشگاه تهران: دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی.
3. ------------- (1390). «کنوانسیون نیویورک و رژیم اجرایی آن»، مجلۀ مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 2، ش 1، ص 87-52. DOI: 20.1001.1.1735496.1390.2.1.3.4
4. داوید، رنه (1375). نظام‌های بزرگ حقوقی معاصر، ترجمۀ صفایی، آشوری، عراقی، چ سوم، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
5. زائو تائو، جینگ (1377). حقوق چین معاصر، ترجمۀ علیرضا محمدزاده وادقانی، تهران: دادگستر.
6. شمس، عبدالله (1384). آیین دادرسی مدنی، ج 3، چ چهارم، تهران: میزان.
7. شیروی، عبدالحسین (1398). داوری تجاری بین‌المللی، چ نهم، تهران: سمت.
8. مافی، همایون (1397). شرحی بر قانون داوری تجاری بین‌المللی ایران، چ دوم، تهران: دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری.
9. نیکبخت، حمیدرضا (1393). داوری تجاری بین‌المللی، تهران: مؤسسۀ مطالعات و پژوهش‌های بازرگانی.

10. Collier, John & Vaughan, Lowe (1999). The Settlement of Disputes in
International Law Institution and Procedures, Oxford University Press. https://www.cambridge.org. (Accessed 15 October 2022)

11. Chen, Hua (1991). " China and It's Arbitration System in foreing Treade", university of Detroit Law Review, Vol. 68, pp. 459-47. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage/?

   handle=hein.journals/udetmr68&div=29&id=&page= (Accessed 15 October 2022).

12. Chua Eu jin ) 2005). "Arbitration in China", Asian International Arbitration journal, Vol.1, No.1, pp.83-94. https://doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2005005 (Accessed 15 October 2022)

13. Cohen Stephanie (2008). 'The New York Convention at Age 50: A Primer on the International Regime for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Vol.1, No.1, pp.47-50. https://www.studymode.com/essays/The-New-York-Convention-At-Age-69163447.html (Accessed 15 October 2022)

14. Contini Paolo (1959). " International Commercial Arbitration: The United Nations Convention on The Recognition and for Enforcementof Foreign Arbitral Awards", The American journal Of Comparative Law, Vol.8, No.3, pp.283-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/837713(Accessed 16 October 2022)

15. Gray, Whitmore & Henry R., Zheng (1989). "Opinion of the Supreme People's Court on Questions Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China", University of Michigan Law School Scholar Ship Repository, Vol. 52, No.2, pp.59-87 available at https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1542/ (Accessed 16 October 2022).

16. Lin, Mark (2007). "Beijing Court Upholds CIETAC Award in favour of Foreign Party", Asian Dispute Review, Vol.9, No.4, pp.137–138. available at https://kluwerlawonline.com

   /journalarticle/Asian+Dispute+Review/9.4/ADR2007043 (Accessed 16 October 2022).

17. Liu Jiong (John); Minli Tang & Li Cao (2018). "Arbitral Award from CIETAC Got Recognized and Enforced by US Court", All Bright law offices. available at https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8ed9266a-5742-42fc-9516-7211db42581a. (Accessed 16 October 2022)

18. L. Karlin, Jeffrey & Jaeger Jiri, (2019). '“Ich Bin Ein Arbitrator!”: Unique Issues in Arbitrating International Cases", Inter Available at National Franchise Association 52nd Annual Legal Symposium May 5-7, Washington, DC. https://www.franchise.org/sites/default/files/201905/UniqueIssuesinArbitratingInternationalCases.pdf (Accessed 16 October 2022).

19. Miller, Jeff (2013). "International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors", Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 22, pp.76-100. https://digitalcommons. schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1301&context=djls (Accessed 16 October 2022).

20. Nyombi Christas & Konstantinos, Siliafis (2017). "Rationalizing the Defences to Enforcement under the New York Convention 1958", Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, Vol.17, No.1, pp.110–129. http://asperchair.bryan-schwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/articles/Rationalizing-the-Defences-to-Enforcement-under-the-New-York--Convention-1958.pdf. (Accessed 15 October 2022)

21. O. Kostrzewa, Benjamin (2006). "China International Economic Trade Arbitration Commission in 2006: New Rules, Same Results", Washington International Law Journal Washington International Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.518-541. available at https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol15/iss2/6// (Accessed 16 October 2022).

22. Rossi, Pierfrancesco (2017). " Public Policy and Enforcement of Foreign Awards: An Appraisal of China's Judicial Practice", pp. 299-329. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/328289135 (Accessed 16 October 2022).

23. Wallace, I. N. Duncan (1990). "Control by the Courts: A Plea for More, Not Less", Arbitration International, Vol.6, No.3, pp.253-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration  /6.3.253. (Accessed 16 October 2022).

24. Pisacane, Giovanni; Murphy, Lea & Calvin, Zhang (2016). Arbitration in China (Rules & Perspectives), Springer, Singapore, Edition Number 1. https://link.springer.com (Accessed 15 October 2022).

25. van den Berg, Albert Jan (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958, Kluwer Law International.

26. Zhang, Li (2002). "The Enforcement of CIETAC Arbitration Awards", Asion Disput Review (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre HKIAC), Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 157-159. https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/journal?title=Asian%20Dispute%20Review. (Accessed 18 December 2021).

27. Zhang, Xiaoyang (1999). "Arbitration in China: A Legal Over View", MurdochUniversity Electronic journal of law, Vol. 6, No. 3, article. 1-59.     http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurdochUeJlLaw/toc-Z.html (Accessed 18  December 2021).

Documents

28. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 1958.

Website

29. www.cietac.org(Accessed 18 December 2021).

30. http://www.cietac.org.cn/english/rules/rules.htm(Accessed 18 December 2021).

31.http://www.cietac.org/index.php?m=Article&a=show&id=2408&l=en(Accessed 18   December 2021).

32. http://www.lexadin.nl/wlg/legis/nofr/oeur/lxwechi.htm(Accessed 18 December 2021).

33.http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.htm (Accessed 18 December 2021).