پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,116,600 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,221,273 |
The Depiction of Disagreements by the Qur’ān: A Linguistic Perspective | ||
| Classical and Contemporary Islamic Studies (formerly known as Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies) | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 2، مهر 2022، صفحه 189-206 اصل مقاله (680.37 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Scholary | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hossein Rahmani* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| To disagree, the addressee – in his/her relative turn (T2) – needs to rebut the speaker turn’s (T1) statement. Thus, disagreement initiates with T2. This article aims at investigating T2 disagreements in God’s messengers’ talks to disbelievers. The data, driven from Qur’ān and composed of 150 cases, were collected and categorized based on Muntigl and Turnbull’s taxonomy of disagreement, namely, Irrelevancy Claim (IC), Challenges (CH), Contradiction (CT), Counterclaim (CC) and Act Combinations (ACs), to (1) determine the most frequent T2 type disagreement and the dominant Act Combination Type disagreement form and (2) specify the relative disagreement types used by people against God’s and His Prophets’ claims and vice versa and (3) justify their differences. The findings indicate that Challenges are the most frequent T2-type-disagreement and the Combination of Contradiction and Counter Claim is the most frequent AC and that people use challenges more while God and His prophets use more ACs. Comparatively, it was found that people’s disagreements take the forms of Challenges and Counter Claims while God and His Prophets use more of Contradiction and Act combination. People were afraid of using Contradictions as they dared not to directly threaten the face of God’s messengers. Instead, they showed more inclination towards challenges through which they cast doubts on the messengers’ claims. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Holy Qur’ān؛ Disagreement؛ Disagreement types؛ Turn 2؛ Act combination؛ Muntigl and Turnbull | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Angouri, J., & M. A. Locher (2012), “Theorising disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, no. 12, 1549–1553.
Angouri, J., & T. Tseliga (2010), “‘You have no idea what you are talking about’: From e-disagreement to e impoliteness in two online fora.” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 57-82.
Antaki, C. (1994), Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Antaki, C. (1996), Arguing in interaction: Participants’ orientation to disputability. Submitted to Human Communication Research.
Arberry, A. J. (1995), The Koran Interpreted: A Translation. New York: Touchstone.
Bousfield, D., & M. A. Locher (2008), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brenneis, D. (1988), “Language and disputing.” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 17, 221-237.
Brewer, N., Mitchell, P., & N. Weber (2002), “Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles.” The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 13, no. 1, 78-94.
Brown, P., & S. Levinson (1987), Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chi, Y-F. (2014), Multilingual couples’ disagreement – Taiwanese partners and their foreign spouses (unpublished PhD dissertation), Birkbeck College, University of London, London.
Coulter, J. (1990), “Elementary properties of argument sequences.” In G. Psathas (Ed.), Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (vol. 1: Interaction competence, pp. 181-203). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Culpeper, J. (1996), “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25, 349–367.
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & A. Wichman (2003), “Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, no. 10-11, 1545-1579.
De Dreu, C., Van Dierendonck, D., & M. Dijkstra (2004), “Conflict at work and individual well-being.” International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 15, no. 1, 6-26.
Dobs, A., & P. G-C. Blitvich (2013), “Impoliteness in interaction: accounting for face-threat witness’s responses.” J. Pragmat., vol. 53, 112--130.
Dynel, M. (2015), “The landscape of impoliteness research.” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 11, no. 2, 329–354.
Eisenberg, A. R., & C. Garvey (2009), “Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts.” Discourse Processes, vol. 4, 149-170.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2001), “Arguing about the future : On indirect disagreements in conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 33, 1881-1900.
Goodwin M. H., & J. Heritage (1990), “Conversation analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 19, 283-307.
Goodwin, C., & M. H. Goodwin (1990), “Interstitial argument.” In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp. 85-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (1983), “Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 7, 657-77.
Grimshaw, A. D. (1990), “Introduction.” In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp: 1-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gruber, H. (1996), Streitgespräche: Zur pragmatik einer diskursform. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Haggith, M. (1993), “Disagreement in creative problem solving.” AAAI Technical Report SS-93-01. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/ Symposia/Spring/1993/SS-93-01/SS93-01-005.pdf.
Hample, D. (2008), Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. London: Taylor and Francis.
Harb, M. (2019), “Disagreement among Arabic speakers in faceless computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research, ahead of print.
Hardaker, C. (2010), “Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 6, 215–242.
Hutchby, I. (1996), Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ilie, C. (1999), “Question-response argumentation in talk shows.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 31, 975–999.
Jackson, S., & S. Jacobs (1980), “Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 66, 251–265.
Kakava, C. (2002), “Opposition in modern Greek discourse: cultural and contextual constraints.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, 1537-1568.
Kleinke, S. (2010), “Interactive aspects of computer-mediated communication: ‘Disagreement’ in an English and a German public news group.” In S-K. Tanskanen, M-L. Helasvuo, Ma. Johansson, & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in interaction (pp. 195–222). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Koczogh, H. (2013), “Scrutinizing the concept of (verbal) disagreement.” Argumentum, vol. 9, 211–222.
Kotthoff, H. (1993), “Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures.” Language in society, vol. 22, 193–216.
Kuo, S. (1992), “Formulaic opposition markers in Chinese conflict talk.” In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Language, communication, and social meaning (pp. 388-402). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Landone, E. (2012), “Discourse markers and politeness in a digital forum in Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, no. 13, 1799–1820.
Langlotz, A., & M. A. Locher (2012), “Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, 1591-1606.
Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leung, S. (2002), “Conflict talk: A discourse analytical perspective.” Teachers College, Columbia University working papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, vol. 2, no. 3. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Conflict-Talk%3A-A-Discourse-Analytical-Perspective-Leung/63fbcf1c2f0b85fe893aa6da3fb8af6614e7d6a0.
Levinson, S. C. (1983), Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locher, M. A. (2004), Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Locher, M. A. (2006), Advice online: Advice-giving in an American Internet health column. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Locher, M. A., & S. L. Graham (2006), “Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics.” In M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 1–13). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Locher, M. A., & R. J. Watts (2005), “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 9–33.
Locher, M. A., & R. J. Watts (2008), “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 77–99). Berlin/ Boston: de Gruyter.
Lustig, M. W., & J. Koetser (2006), Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures. London: Pearson.
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2014), “Expressing disagreement in English as a lingua franca: Whose pragmatic rules?” Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 11, no. 2, 199 – 224.
Maynard, D. W. (1985), “How children start arguments.” Language in Society, vol. 14, 1-30.
Mehregan, M., Eslamirasekh, A., Dabaghi, A., & D. Jafari Seresht (2013), “Disagreement expressions in the discourse of young Persian speakers.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 70, 598 – 604.
Mulkay, M. (1985), “Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters.” Text, vol. 5, 201–227.
Mulkay, M. (1986), “Conversations and texts.” Human Studies, vol. 9, 303-321.
Muntigl, P., & W. Turnbull, (1996), “Argument structure in conversation.” In W. Oliver & N. Schapansky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Northwest Linguistics Conference (pp. 103-110). Burnaby, British Columbia: Simon Fraser Uniwxsity Press.
Muntigl, P., & W. Turnbull (1998), “Conversational structure and facework in arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 29, no. 3, 225–256.
Norrick, N. R., & A. Spitz (2008), “Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 40, no. 10, 1661-1686.
Paramasivam, S. (2007), “Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree: Polite disagreement in negotiation discourse.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, vol. 36, no. 2, 91–116.
Parvaresh, V., & A. Eslami Rasekh (2009), “Speech Act disagreement among young women in Iran.” Comparative Literature and Culture, vol. 11, no. 4, (online article). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1565
Perelmutter, R. (2010), “Impoliteness recycled: Subject ellipsis in modern Russian complaint discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 42, no. 12, 3214–3231.
Pomerantz, A. (1984), “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes.” In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp: 57–101), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahim, A. (1983), “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 26, 368-376.
Rahim, A. (2011), Managing in conflict organizations. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Rees-Miller, J. (2000), “Power, severity, and context in disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 32, no. 8, 1087–1111.
Sacks, H. (1987), “On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences of conversation.” In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Schiffrin, D. (1984), “Jewish argument as sociability.” Language in Society, vol. 13, 311-335.
Schiffrin, D. (1985), “Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk.” In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (vol. 3: Discourse and dialogue, pp. 35-46). London: Academic Press.
Sheldon, A. (1992), “Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 95-117.
Shum, W. & C. Lee (2013), “(Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 50, no. 1, 52–83.
Sifianou, M. (2012), “Disagreements, face and politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, no. 12, 1554-1564.
Tannen, D. (1981), “New York Jewish conversational style.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 30, 133–149.
Tannen, D. & C. Kakavá (1992), “Power and solidarity in modern Greek conversation: Disagreeing to agree.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 11–34.
Tannen, D. (1999), The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. New York: Ballantine Books.
Thomas, K. (1992), “Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 13, no. 3, 265-274.
Tjosvold, D. (2008), “The conflict-positive organization: It depends upon us.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 29, 19-28.
Tjosvold, D., Yu, Z., & P. Wu (2009), “Empowering individuals for team innovation in China: conflict management and problem solving.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, vol. 2, no. 2, 185-205.
Toulmin, S. (1958), The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1995), New directions in social psychology: Individualism & collectivism. …: Westview Press.
Upadhyay, S. R. (2010), “Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research.” Language, Behaviour, Culture, vol. 6, no. 1, 105-127.
Vuchinich, S. (1990), “The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict.” In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp. 118-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walkinshaw, I. (2015), “Agreement and disagreement.” In K. Tracy & T. Sandel (Eds.). The International encyclopedia of language and social interaction (1st ed., pp. 1-6). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wierzbicka, A. (1987), English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. New York: Academic.
Zhang, W. & C. Kramarae (2014), “‘SlutWalk’ on connected screens: Multiple framings of a social media discussion.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 73, 66–81.
Zhu, W. (2014), “Managing relationships in everyday practice: The case of strong disagreement in mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 64, 85-87 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 585 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 237 |
||