تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,098,248 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,205,906 |
Conception Rate of Pre-synchronization and Two Short Term Heat-synch Programs using Two Doses of PGF2α in Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مقاله 7، دوره 15، شماره 4، دی 2021، صفحه 423-431 اصل مقاله (467.5 K) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: Theriogenology and Reproduction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijvm.2021.319206.1005162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamid Ghasemzadeh-nava* 1؛ Mirmoein Bahrami1؛ Vahid Akbarinejad1؛ Seyed Alireza Alavi Tabatabaee2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran-Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2Theriogenologist and Private Practitioner, Tehran-Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BACKGROUND: Improving the reproductive performance of dairy cows requires estrus manipulation using estrus synchronization protocols. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to assess the effect of reducing the length of estrus synchronization pro-tocol by two doses of prostaglandin injection on the reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. METHODS: At first, all cows received GnRH (day 0) followed by PGF2α on day 7 and GnRH on day 17. Next, cows were assigned randomly to one of the three groups: Group 1) PGF2α injection on days 22 and 23, estradiol benzoate injection on day 24, Group 2) PGF2α injection on days 23 and 24, estradiol benzoate injection on day 25, and Group 3) Control group; injection of PGF2α on day 24, injection of estradiol benzoate on day 25. Estrus detec-tion was performed twice a day up to 48 h (AM/PM) based on the signs of estrus, and fixed time AI protocol was used after 48 h if not previously inseminated. RESULTS: The conception rate in group 2 was significantly higher than the control group (P≤0.05) and tended to be higher than group 1 (P=0.079). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the hypothesis that a decline in the period of follicle dominance by re-ducing the interval between GnRH and PGF2α through two PGF2α injections improved the fertility of lactating dairy cows. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conception rate؛ Dairy cows؛ Heat-synch؛ Short-term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IntroductionThe use of fertility programs for synchronizing ovulation and timed artificial insemination (TAI) has increased service rate and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in high-producing lactating dairy cows at first service (Fricke, 2015). Recent research on fertility to TAI after an Ovsynch protocol has focused on incomplete luteal regression after PGF2α treatment during the protocol (Barletta et al., 2018). Administration of a double dose of PGF2α (either clopros=tenol sodium or dinoprost tromethamine) during a 5-day Ovsynch protocol resulted in fewer P/AI and failed to achieve similar rates of luteal regression, compared to cows receiving 2 doses of PGF2α with 24 h interval (Ribeiro et al., 2012). A meta-analysis evaluated the Presynch and Ovsynch protocols reporting that the double Ovsynch protocol benefited primiparous cows but not necessarily multiparous cows (Borchardt, Haimerl, Pohl, & Heuwieser, 2017). There are several estrus synchronizations programs appropriate for TAI in cows, but most of them need several days to sort the cows to be prescribed regularly and it is difficult to diminish the interval bet-ween the beginning of treatment and AI to <9 days (F. López-Gatius, 2000). The development of short-term synchronization methods led to an acceptable pregnancy rate because TAI provides special benefits for breeders. This relieves breeders of the burden of determining estrus as all the cows that were treated during the voluntary waiting period are inseminated, and the initial completion of the treatment saves time for breeders (F. López-Gatius, 1989; F. López-Gatius & Vega-Prieto, 1990). Recent research on fertility by TAI after an Ovsynch protocol focused on incomplete luteal regression following PGF2α treatment during the protocol based on progesterone (P4) concentrations at the second GnRH treatment (G2) of the protocol. In these experiments, a subset of cows had slightly elevated P4 (≥0.4 ng/mL) at second GnRH, which is associated with a dramatic decrease in pregnancies per AI (Carvalho, Wiltbank, & Fricke, 2015; Milo C. Wiltbank et al., 2015; M. C. Wiltbank et al., 2014). This observation has led to a modified Ovsynch protocol in which a second PGF2α is administered 24 h after the first one during an Ovsynch protocol to increase luteolysis and P/AI (Archbald et al., 1994; Carvalho, Fuenzalida, et al., 2015; Heidari, Dirandeh, Ansari Pirsaraei, & Colazo, 2017; V. G. Santos et al., 2016; Milo C. Wiltbank et al., 2015). Synchronizing the estrous cycle of dairy cows with two PGF2α injections or a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and PGF2α augments the proportion of cows that start the AI protocol in early diestrus. Cows at the stage of early diestrus of the estrous cycle in response to exogenous GnRH would have a greater likelihood of ovulation and lower occurrence of spontaneous luteolysis before the timely completion of the AI protocol (Moreira et al., 2001). Reducing the timeframe from primary GnRH to the induction of luteolysis from 7 to 5 days elevates pregnancy in AI (P/AI). However, for adequate corpus luteum (CL) regression, two injections of PGF2α were required on days 5 and 6 after the first GnRH. The second PGF2α injection may be of particular importance in pre-synchronized cows due to an increase in ovulation by the first GnRH injection and consequently occurrence of newly formed CL, which may not consistently regress after a single PGF2α injection on day 5 (J. E. Santos, Narciso, Rivera, Thatcher, & Chebel, 2010). The objective of the present study was to compare the conception rate of lactating dairy cows subjected to a 5-day TAI protocol in the Heat-synch program performed for the first time. We aimed to define a better protocol for luteolysis and shorten the dominance time of follicles and subsequently examine the effects on fertility. The impact of these interventions on luteolysis, shortening of the dominance time of follicles, and pregnancy rate was investigated. The alternative hypothesis is that the conception rate would be better if the 5-day TAI protocol is used along with two injections of the luteolytic dose of PGF2α at 24 h intervals. Materials and MethodsThe present experiment was conducted in a commercial dairy farm located around Tehran province, Iran. The average milk production per cow was approximately 12000 kg/lactation. Cows were fed a total mixed ration twice a day with ad libitum access to feed and water. The diet was formulated to meet or exceed the requirements. A total of 300 lactating dairy cows were enrolled in this study. The experimental design was completely randomized with a parity block. Within each block, primiparous and multiparous cows were entered into each of the three groups (100 cows in each group) in a completely random proportion. Milk production, days in milk (DIM), body condition score (BCS), and season were considered as covariates. The included cows did not have any postpartum disorders, such as dystocia, retained placenta, metritis, clinical mastitis, clinical ketosis, abomasal displacement, and lameness. Selected cows had follicles smaller than 25 mm, and did not have endometritis or inactive ovaries in clean test (Ferguson, Galligan, & Thomsen, 1994). For clean test (around day 30 postpartum), the following resynchronization program was performed for the three groups: GnRH injection (Vetaroline, Aburaihan Pharmaceutical Co., Iran) on day 0, cloprostenol injection (Vetaprost, Aburaihan Pharmaceutical Co., Iran) on days 7 (500 μg), and GnRH injection on day 17. Next, each of the three groups was entered into one of the programs. ExperimentsGroup 1 received 500 μg Cloprostenol injection on days 22 and 23 and 1 mg estradiol benzoate injection (Vetastrol, Aburaihan Pharmaceutical Co., Iran) on day 24. Group 2 was treated with 500 μg Cloprostenol injection on days 23 and 24 and 1 mg estradiol benzoate injection on day 25. Group 3 as the control group received 500 μg cloprostenol on day 24 and 1 mg estradiol benzoate on day 25. Following the injection of estradiol benzoate, estrus detection was performed twice a day up to 48 h (AM/PM) by the visual observation of estrus behavioral signs, and TAI protocol was performed after 48 h (if not previously inseminated). The total duration of the program was 27 days in groups 2 and 3 (control group), but 26 days in group 1. Pregnancy diagnosis was carried out by transrectal ultrasonography (Easi-Scan, BCF Technology Ltd., Livingston, UK) 31±3 days after AI. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture of the caudal vein into tubes containing EDTA on the day of the clean test. Sera were harvested, frozen, and stored at -20°C until laboratory analysis. Serum progesterone (P4) concentrations were measured in all samples using radioimmunoassay (Monobind Inc., California, USA). A concentration higher than 1 ng/mL was considered to indicate the presence of a functional CL. Statistical AnalysisThe success of different PG injection methods in CL analysis and fertility rates was analyzed using the GENMOD guideline and the inclusion of a logit link in the statistical model. Analyzes were carried out using SAS statistical software version 9.4. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. ResultsParity, milk production, DIM, the presence of CL at the beginning of the protocol, BCS, and season did not influence conception rate as covariates in this trial (P>0.05; Table 1). Conception rate in group 2 was significantly (P≤0.05) higher than the control group (AOR=2.486, 95% CI=1.219-5.07; P=0.012) and tended to be higher than group 1 (AOR=1.873, 95% CI=0.930-3.771; P= 0.079; Figure 1).
Figure 1. First service conception rate in 3 groups. The conception rate in group 2 was significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher than the control group and tended to be higher than group 1 (P= 0.079).
The conception rates of cows in each group based on progesterone profiles with or without an active CL at the time of clean test were not significantly different (P>0.05; Figure 2). Moreover, the level of serum P4 at the beginning of the protocol did not affect the conception rate (P>0.05; Figure 3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for pregnancy prediction based on serum P4 concentration were 86.4%, 86.27%, 92.86%, and 86.36%, respectively.
Table 1. First service conception rate considering estrus synchronization protocol, parity, milk production, DIM at the beginning of protocol, BCS and season.
Discussion
The results of the current study demonstrated that the conception rate in group 2 had an acceptable rate, compared to the previous studies on the synchronization of ovulation programs (Fricke, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2012; Milo C. Wiltbank et al., 2015). Furthermore, it was significantly higher than the other two groups. The odds of conception for cows receiving a short Heat-synch program with two injections of PGF2α on days 23 and 24 (days 6 and 7 of the Heat-synch program) were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.21-5.07) times greater than the odds of conception rate in cows receiving the Heat-synch program with one PGF2α injection. Our findings were in line with some other investigations on the short Ovsynch program using 2 doses of PGF2α (Kasimanickam, Day, Rudolph, Hall, & Whittier, 2009). In addition, based on serum P4 concentration, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the prediction of pregnancy were similar to another study (J. E. Santos et al., 2010). It was previously hypothesized that the injection of PGF2α on day 8 and 24 h after day 7 in the Ovsynch program would increase the likelihood of complete CL regression and a decrease in P4 concentration before day 9 of GnRH injection (Brusveen, Souza, & Wiltbank, 2009). The half-life of PGF2α is very short, and once absorbed into the bloodstream, it is rapidly inactivated by oxidation after passing through the lungs, and thus, returns to plasma concentrations 90 min after injection. The new CL induced by the first GnRH treatment of the ovulation synchronization program may be difficult to regress with a single treatment of PGF2α, particularly important if a shortened protocol is used. Therefore, PGF2α injection 24 h later, providing complete CL regression increased pregnancies per AI (Milo C. Wiltbank et al., 2015). Ovulation following the first GnRH protocol results in the recruitment of new follicles (4-5 mm in size) 24 h later, and these follicles would have 6 and 9 days of development since the day of AI in 5-day Co-Synch with 2 PG and Co-Synch 72 h, respectively. Such follicles are expected to be highly responsive to ovulation induction with GnRH on days 6-9 (Bello, Steibel, & Pursley, 2006; Cerri, Rutigliano, Chebel, & Santos, 2009). Santos et al. (2010) showed that cows under short Co-synch with 2 doses of PGF2α had greater P/AI compared with those receiving routine Co-synch protocol, while Rabaglino et al. (2010) observed no significant differe-nces in luteolysis 24 h after the first injection. Others demonstrated that in cows that ovulated at the time of the first GnRH, AI protocol augmented ovulation by the final GnRH (Rutigliano et al., 2008). Similarly, cows without a CL on the day of the first GnRH injection in the Ovsynch protocol had reduced ovulation by the final GnRH, compared to cyclic cows (Galvão & Santos, 2010). The estrous response (Archbald et al., 1994) and luteal regression (Brusveen et al., 2009) were improved in dairy cows with an additional PGF2α treatment 8-24 h apart. It was reported that 2 PGF2α injections with 24 h interval in the Ovsynch protocol increased luteal regression from 84.6% to 95.6% in comparison with one injection; however, P/AI did not improve (Brusveen et al., 2009; Fernando LÓPez-Gatius, 2021). The limiting factor to reduce the period of follicle dominance in TAI programs is the regression of the newly formed CL resultant from ovulation by the first GnRH injection of the protocol. The newly formed CL responds less to the luteolytic functions of PGF2α on the first 5 days of growth (Miyamoto, Shirasuna, & Sasahara, 2009). Primary CL was suggested to have distinct molecular responses to PGF2α compared to the mid-cycle CL, which is usually sensitive to PGF2α (Miyamoto et al., 2009). Because luteolysis rate elevates with CL age, a second dose of PGF2α is expected to coincide with the response time of CL to PGF2α in the PGF2α state 24 h after the first (Xu, Burton, & Macmillan, 1996). Previous studies have indicated that the standard luteolytic dose of PGF2α is not sufficient to optimize luteal regression and P/AI in the 5-day timed AI (Kasimanickam et al., 2009; J. E. Santos et al., 2010). To solve this problem, the second dose of luteolytic PGF2α is administration 7-24 h after the first dose leading to improved luteolysis and fertility in dairy cattle (Santos et al., 2010), heifers (Rabaglino et al., 2010), and beef cows (Kasimanickam et al., 2009). Therefore, the higher dose of PGF2α administered as a single injection did not overcome the refractory response of the early CL to luteolysis observed in previous studies that used the conventional luteolytic dose (Santos et al., 2010). Some researchers reported that the addition of a second PGF treatment on day 8 during a 7-day Ovsynch protocol increased P/AI, compared to the traditional 7-day Ovsynch, including a single PGF dose on day 7 and a double PGF dose on day 7 (Borchardt, Pohl, Carvalho, Fricke, & Heuwieser, 2018; Rheinberger et al., 2020; Tippenhauer et al., 2021). Treatment with a second PGF increased the percentage of cows with complete CL regression at the end of the Double-Ovsynch protocols (Barletta et al., 2018; Borchardt et al., 2018; Milo C. Wiltbank et al., 2015). Progesterone status at the onset of the synchronization program is critical for pregnancy out-comes in primiparous but not multiparous cows (Stevenson, Hill, Bridges, Larson, & Lamb, 2015). According to our study, the higher conception rate in group 2 compared to the control group is probably due to the shorter exposure of follicles in group 2 to progesterone after the dominance phase resulting in enhanced quality. Furthermore, the lower conception rate in group 1 in comparison with group 2 can be attributed to an immature follicle at the time of fixed AI, because fixed AI was performed 1 day earlier (day 26 of the protocol) in group 1, while this duration was 27 days in groups 2 and 3. ConclusionThe results of the present study confirmed a decline in the period of follicle dominance by diminishing the interval between GnRH and PGF2α using two injections of PGF2α that improved the fertility of lactating dairy cows. Cows that were treated with a short Heat-synch protocol and received a second injection of PGF2α on day 7 of Heat-synch had significantly higher conception rates than the other 2 groups. Economic analyses to determine the cost-benefit of the short Heat-synch protocol with two injections of PGF2α would be a useful area of future research. AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Conflict of InterestThe authors declared no conflict of interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archbald, L. F., Constant, S., Tran, T., Risco, C., Klapstein, E., & Elliott, J. (1994). Effect of sequential treatment with prostaglandin F2 alpha and/or oxytocin on estrus and pregnancy rate of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology, 42(5), 773-780. [DOI:10.1016/0093-691X(94)90445-O]
Barletta, R. V., Carvalho, P. D., Santos, V. G., Melo, L. F., Consentini, C. E., Netto, A. S., & Fricke, P. M. (2018). Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(2), 1730-1736. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-13628]
Bello, N. M., Steibel, J. P., & Pursley, J. R. (2006). Optimizing Ovulation to First GnRH Improved Outcomes to Each Hormonal Injection of Ovsynch in Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(9), 3413-3424. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72378-5]
Borchardt, S., Haimerl, P., Pohl, A., & Heuwieser, W. (2017). Evaluation of prostaglandin F2&3b1 versus prostaglandin F2&3b1 plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone as Presynch methods preceding an Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(5), 4065-4077. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2016-11956]
Borchardt, S., Pohl, A., Carvalho, P. D., Fricke, P. M., & Heuwieser, W. (2018). Effect of adding a second prostaglandin F23b1 injection during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(9), 8566-8571. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-14191]
Brusveen, D. J., Souza, A. H., & Wiltbank, M. C. (2009). Effects of additional prostaglandin F2&3b1 and estradiol-173b2; during Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(4), 1412-1422. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2008-1289]
Carvalho, P. D., Fuenzalida, M. J., Ricci, A., Souza, A. H., Barletta, R. V., Wiltbank, M. C., & Fricke, P. M. (2015). Modifications to Ovsynch improve fertility during resynchronization: Evaluation of presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone 6 d before initiation of Ovsynch and addition of a second prostaglandin F2&3b1; treatment. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(12), 8741-8752. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9719]
Carvalho, P. D., Wiltbank, M. C., & Fricke, P. M. (2015). Manipulation of progesterone to increase ovulatory response to the first GnRH treatment of an Ovsynch protocol in lactating dairy cows receiving first timed artificial insemination. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(12), 8800-8813. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9968]
Cerri, R. L. A., Rutigliano, H. M., Chebel, R. C., & Santos, J. E. P. (2009). Period of dominance of the ovulatory follicle influences embryo quality in lactating dairy cows. Reproduction, 137(5), 813-823. [DOI:10.1530/REP-08-0242]
Ferguson, J. D., Galligan, D. T., & Thomsen, N. (1994). Principal Descriptors of Body Condition Score in Holstein Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 77(9), 2695-2703. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X]
Fricke, P. M., Wiltbank, M.C., Carvalho, P.D., Giordano, J.O. (2015). Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council (DCRC) Proceedings. Paper presented at the DCRC Annual Meeting, Buffalo, N.Y.
Galvão, K., & Santos, J. (2010). Factors Affecting Synchronization and Conception Rate after the Ovsynch Protocol in Lactating Holstein Cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 45(3), 439-446. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01220.x]
Heidari, F., Dirandeh, E., Ansari Pirsaraei, Z., & Colazo, M. G. (2017). Modifications of the G6G timed-AI protocol improved pregnancy per AI and reduced pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. Animal, 11(11), 2002-2009. [DOI:10.1017/S1751731117000520]
Kasimanickam, R., Day, M. L., Rudolph, J. S., Hall, J. B., & Whittier, W. D. (2009). Two doses of prostaglandin improve pregnancy rates to timed-AI in a 5-day progesterone-based synchronization protocol in beef cows. Theriogenology, 71(5), 762-767. [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.049]
López-Gatius, F. (1989). Effects of cloprostenol, human chorionic gonadotropin and estradiol benzoate treatment on estrus synchronization in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 32(2), 185-195. [DOI:10.1016/0093-691X(89)90309-9]
López-Gatius, F. (2000). Short synchronization system for estrus cycles in dairy heifers: a preliminary report. Theriogenology, 54(8), 1185-1190. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00425-8]
LÓPez-Gatius, F. (2021). Clinical prospects proposing an increase in the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α in dairy cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 67(1), 1-3. [DOI:10.1262/jrd.2020-101]
López-Gatius, F., & Vega-Prieto, B. (1990). Pregnancy Rate of Dairy Cows Following Synchronization of Estrus with Cloprostenol, hCG and Estradiol Benzoate. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 37(1-10), 452-454. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0442.1990.tb00928.x]
Miyamoto, A., Shirasuna, K., & Sasahara, K. (2009). Local regulation of corpus luteum development and regression in the cow: Impact of angiogenic and vasoactive factors. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 37(3), 159-169. [DOI:10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.04.005]
Moreira, F., Orlandi, C., Risco, C. A., Mattos, R., Lopes, F., & Thatcher, W. W. (2001). Effects of Presynchronization and Bovine Somatotropin on Pregnancy Rates to a Timed Artificial Insemination Protocol in Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(7), 1646-1659. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74600-0]
Rheinberger, J., Colson, D., Beggs, D., Mansell, P., Stevenson, M., Rheinberger, R., & Pyman, M. (2020). Effect of a second treatment of prostaglandin F2α during the Ovsynch program on fixed-time artificial insemination conception rates and luteolysis in split-calving, pasture-fed dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal, 98(5), 190-196. [DOI:10.1111/avj.12918]
Ribeiro, E. S., Monteiro, A. P. A., Lima, F. S., Ayres, H., Bisinotto, R. S., Favoreto, M., . . . Santos, J. E. P. (2012). Effects of presynchronization and length of proestrus on fertility of grazing dairy cows subjected to a 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(5), 2513-2522. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2011-4921]
Rutigliano, H. M., Lima, F. S., Cerri, R. L. A., Greco, L. F., Vilela, J. M., Magalhães, V., . . . Santos, J. E. P. (2008). Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(9), 3323-3336. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2008-1005]
Santos, J. E., Narciso, C. D., Rivera, F., Thatcher, W. W., & Chebel, R. C. (2010). Effect of reducing the period of follicle dominance in a timed artificial insemination protocol on reproduction of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(7), 2976-2988. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-2870]
Santos, V. G., Carvalho, P. D., Maia, C., Carneiro, B., Valenza, A., Crump, P. M., & Fricke, P. M. (2016). Adding a second prostaglandin F2alpha treatment to but not reducing the duration of a PRID-Synch protocol increases fertility after resynchronization of ovulation in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5), 3869-3879. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-10557]
Stevenson, J. S., Hill, S. L., Bridges, G. A., Larson, J. E., & Lamb, G. C. (2015). Progesterone status, parity, body condition, and days postpartum before estrus or ovulation synchronization in suckled beef cattle influence artificial insemination pregnancy outcomes1. Journal of Animal Science, 93(5), 2111-2123. [DOI:10.2527/jas.2014-8391]
Tippenhauer, C. M., Steinmetz, I., Heuwieser, W., Fricke, P. M., Lauber, M. R., Cabrera, E. M., & Borchardt, S. (2021). Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on progesterone concentration at the end of the protocol and pregnancy outcomes in lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 162, 49-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.12.020]
Wiltbank, M. C., Baez, G. M., Cochrane, F., Barletta, R. V., Trayford, C. R., & Joseph, R. T. (2015). Effect of a second treatment with prostaglandin F2&3b1 during the Ovsynch protocol on luteolysis and pregnancy in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(12), 8644-8654. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9353]
Wiltbank, M. C., Souza, A. H., Carvalho, P. D., Cunha, A. P., Giordano, J. O., Fricke, P. M., . . . Diskin, M. G. (2014). Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal, 8, 70-81. [DOI:10.1017/S1751731114000585]
Xu, Z. Z., Burton, L. J., & Macmillan, K. L. (1996). Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following oestrus synchronisation with progesterone, oestradiol and prostaglandin. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 44(3), 99-104. [DOI:10.1080/00480169.1996.35944]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 993 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 436 |