پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,223 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,680 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,877,179 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,549,157 |
مطالعۀ مقدماتی و معرفی مجموعه سکه‌های هخامنشی مکشوفه از بندر عسلویه (؟) گنجینۀ اداره کل میراث فرهنگی مازندران | ||
| مطالعات باستان شناسی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25، خرداد 1400، صفحه 91-116 اصل مقاله (1.77 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jarcs.2020.276508.142684 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سامان سورتیجی1؛ کمال الدین نیکنامی* 2؛ هایده خمسه3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای باستان شناسی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه باستان شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران،ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این مقاله، محصول مطالعۀ نظری و بررسی‌های اولیۀ تعداد240 عدد سکۀ شِکِل شاهنشاهی دورۀ هخامنشی است. این مجموعۀ با ارزش، به‌واسطۀ اقدام به‌موقع ضابطین انتظامی و قضایی مازندران، در سال 1389 در شهر آمل و از قاچاقچیان آثار تاریخی که در حین خریدوفروش بودند به دست آمده است. در حال حاضر از این مجموعۀ بسیار متنوع و با ارزش که تماماً از یک مکان از جنوب ایران و در حوالی بندر عسلویه کشف شده است، در مخزن گنجینۀ استان مازندران و در شهر ساری نگهداری می شود. از آنجایی که مستندسازی این مسکوکات تا این زمان تنها به ثبت و ضبط های ابتدایی محدود بوده که توسط امین اموال موزه انجام پذیرفت، لذا نظر به اهمیت موضوع، این فرصت مهیا شد تا با انجام مراحل مختلف مطالعات کتابخانه ای شامل توزین، طراحی دقیق دستی و رایانه ای و نیز عکاسی و اسکن، زمینۀ مستندسازی مجموعه و طرح سؤالات اصلی و اهداف این پژوهش فراهم بشود. مطالعات اولیه و مقایسه‌های انجام‌گرفته بر روی سکه‌های این مجموعه، انتساب آنها به دورۀ هخامنشی را تأیید و نتایج اولیۀ مستندسازی، جزئیات نقوش سکه‌ها شامل تاج، پوشش و لباس، سلاح، حالت بدن و اجزای چهره و همچنین تفاوت در ضرب آنها را نمایان و امکان مقایسه با نمونه های قابل ارجاع را فراهم ساخت. اگرچه در این پژوهش مطالبی در تأیید اصالت و تاریخگذاری و شناسایی محدودۀ زمانی سکه‌های مورد مطالعه پیشنهاد و ارائه شده است با این وجود، تعیین دقیق اصالت و گاهنگاری علمی آنها پس از انجام آزمایش‌های دقیق‌تر امکان‌پذیر خواهد شد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سکه‌های شِکِل هخامنشی؛ طبقه‌بندی؛ تاریخگذاری؛ گنجینۀ مازندران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Preliminary study and Introduction of Achaemenid Coins Discovered from Assaluyeh Port (?) In Mazandaran Cultural Heritage Museum | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saman Soortiji1؛ kamal aldin niknami2؛ hayedeh khamseh3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Archeology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Archeology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This article is the result of theoretical and preliminary studies of 240 Shekel (Siglo) coins of the Achaemenid Empire. This valuable collection was obtained by the police of Mazandaran province in 2010 from antique smugglers in Amol city. Currently, these very diverse and valuable coins, which were discovered from a place in the south of Iran and near the port of Assaluyeh, are kept in the Museum in Sari city. Because documenting coins in museums was limited to basic recordings, we had the opportunity to document all the coins in the collection for library studies and comparisons. Documentary of coins was done by measuring, weighing, hand drawing, computer drawing, photography and scanning. After this stage, the main questions and objectives of research were posed. Preliminary studies and comparisons confirmed the attribution of coins to the Achaemenid period. Also, the initial results of the documentation, that's mean examining the details of the image of the coins, including the crown, clothes, weapons, body shape and face details, showed differences in their minting and made it possible to compare them with referable samples. Although in this study, some materials have been proposed to confirm the authenticity and dating and identify the time range of the studied coins, nevertheless, accurate determination of their authenticity and scientific chronology will be possible after more accurate experiments.Coins were invented as a result of the development of societies and the economic needs of human beings. The first coins were minted by the Lydia government. Cyrus the Great, recognized the need to use it, but Darius I minted gold and silver coins for the first time in Iran. The gold coins were called "Darik" and the silver coins were called "Shekel" ) Siglo (. Shekel is a silver coin weighing 5.60 grams. During the Achaemenid period, four types of coinage were minted: 1- Imperial coin 2- Satrap coinage 3- State coins with the image of the emperor 4- Local coins or non-Iranian lands that were under Persian rule. Imperial coinage have no writing; Therefore, their classification needs to be carefully studied and compared with similar samples. The collection studied (Shekel), are under the group of Achaemenid imperial coins. Since the preliminary studies of this collection were very necessary to introduce it to the scientific community, so an attempt was made to make a comparative study of the coins of the Mazandaran Museum with the most important coins found from the Achaemenid period. Coins were studied and documented by referring to reliable sources. In this regard, for comparative studies based on comparison, the characteristics of coins including the appearance of persons on the coin, decorative motifs, Type of clothing and individual symptoms, with similar cases were considered. This almost tedious process eventually led to the creation of a framework for classifying the coins in question. Since the method of documenting these coins in the museum was limited to the initial recordings, due to the importance of the subject, we had the opportunity to conduct detailed studies to address the main questions and objectives of this study. The comparisons made on the coins of this collection confirmed their authenticity and attribution to the Achaemenid period, and the work of documenting showed the difference in their minting.At first, all the study documents, including the history and economic system of the Achaemenid kings, as well as sources about their cultural works, such as reliefs and seals, were collected. The oxide-coated sample was then purged. The oxide layer was then removed from the surface of a number of coins. After this step, the weight of the coins was measured with a digital scale and their diameter and thickness were measured with a caliper. In the next step, the back and front of the coins were photographed with a digital camera and scanner, and then they were technically drawn manually with the help of a computer. If the coin shapes were not obvious due to wear and tear, clear images were created with the help of Photoshop and inverter software for more accurate design. (Figure1). These coins are very simple and the main focus is on the image of the king. The king is armed with a bow, spear or dagger in these coins. With the exception of rare cases, there are depressions on the back of the coins. Sometimes signs and symbols are engraved on the back and on the coins (Figure 8).Achaemenid coins, while simple and similar, have a great variety. Different sources have dealt with their different types and forms as much as possible, but considering that a number of coins in the collection of the Mazandaran Museum in the city of Sari did not have known and completely similar examples, Therefore, they were studied, separated and compared with samples that had the least details in common. From the studies and comparisons made with the samples of other Achaemenid coins, results were obtained that created suitable grounds for identifying and classifying the coins of the Mazandaran Museum. Summary table attached, Comparison of Achaemenid coins of the collection with other coins discovered (Table 1). According to this research, 240 coins belonging to Achaemenid kings have been identified. Recognition of the amount and purity of coins, which is a good criterion for determining the authenticity of coins, was not tested in this study, but the weight of coins, which is usually the standard for mints, was tested. The weight of coins of Mazandaran collection is determined with an average of about 5.60 grams, which is the standard weight of Achaemenid coins. The results of studies have shown that among this collection, there are coins that are similar to known examples. Also, there are coins that do not have similar patterns. This study provided an opportunity to examine the details of the image of coins and compare them with other samples, to classify them and attribute them to one of the kings who owned the coin. shekel coins have a great variety in terms of the image. In other words, the coin of a king has been in different details, which has created different types. The reason for this diversity may have been the existence of multiple mints or the lack of oversight of coin makers. A number of these different species have been identified and introduced in the study collection in Mazandaran Museum One of the reasons for the value of the silver coins studied is that they are a collection. This collection, as a time capsule, introduces a time range with a specific beginning and end. In total, the coins of the seven kings have been identified from the coin-owning kings in this period. In this collection, from Darius I, which basically has three species, one species (Figure 8), from Xerxes, which has two different species, one species (Figure 11), from Artaxerxes I (Figure 14), Darius II (Figure 16) and Young Cyrus, one species (Figure 18), from Artaxerxes II, three species (Figure 22, 23, 24) and in Finally, two types of coins have been identified from Artaxerxes III (Figure 25, 26). According to the information obtained, the period of the study complex was related to the years 522 to 338 BC, which covers about 184 years of the Achaemenid Empire. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Achaemenid’ Shekel ) Siglo ( coins, classification, dating, Mazandaran museum | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اعظمی سنگسری، چراغعلی، (1349)، «تحول سکه در ایران از دوره هخامنشی تا اوایل دوره اسلامی»، هنر و مردم- شماره 100، صص9 تا14.
افتخاری، یوسف، (1393)، سکه شناسی شاهان هخامنشی، تهران، پازینه.
اومستد، آلبرت تن آیک، (1357)، تاریخ شاهنشاهی هخامنشی، ترجمه محمد مقدم، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
ایوانف، م س. و دیگران، (1359)، تاریخ ایران، ترجمه سیروس ایزدی و حسین تحویلی، جلد اول، تهران، دنیا.
بابلون، ارنست، (1388)، سکه های ایران در دوره هخامنشی، ترجمه ملک زاده بیانی و خانبابا بیانی، تهران، پازینه.
بریان، پییر، (1385)، وحدت سیاسی و تعامل فرهنگی در شاهنشاهی هخامنشی، ترجمه ناهید فروغان، تهران، اختران.
بیات، عزیزالله، (1365)، کلیات تاریخ و تمدن ایران پیش از اسلام، تهران، دانشگاه ملی ایران.
بیانی، ملکزاده، (1370)، تاریخ سکه از قدیمی ترین ازمنه تا دوره ساسانیان، جلد اول، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
پورداوود، ابراهیم، (1382)، زین ابزار، جنگ افزارهای باستانی ایران، تهران، اساطیر.
پوپ، آرتور اپهام، (1380)، شاهکارهای هنر ایران، ترجمه پرویز ناتل خانلری، چاپ دوم، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
پیرنیا، حسن، (1389)، تاریخ ایران باستان، جلد یک، تهران، نگاه.
داندامایف، محمد، (۱۳۸۶)، ایران در دوران نخستین پادشاهان هخامنشی، ترجمه روحی ارباب، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
ذکاء، یحیی، (1350)، ارتش شاهنشاهی ایران از کوروش تا پهلوی، تهران، نگارش.
شریعت زاده، علی اصغر، (1393)، سکه های ایران زمین، مجموعه سکه های کتابخانه و موزه ملی ملک، از دوره هخامنشی تا پایان دوره پهلوی، تهران، پازینه.
قدیانی، عباس، (1389)، داریوش بزرگ پادشاه هخامنشی، تهران، فرهنگ مکتوب.
گیرشمن، رومن، (1386)، ایران از آغاز تا اسلام، ترجمه دکتر محمد معین، تهران، نگاه.
محمود آبادی، اصغر و هراتیان، احمد، (1388)، «شِکِل یا سیکل، نظریه ای جدید درباره وزن سکّه نقره دوران هخامنشی»، فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی تاریخ اسلام و ایران، سال نوزدهم، شماره 3، پیاپی 79، صص 146 تا 159.
مصطفوی، محمد تقی، (1329)، ترجمه الواح گلی تخت جمشید، گزارش های باستان شناسی، جلد اول.
هرودوت (1380)، تواریخ، ترجمه وحید مازندرانی، چاپ اول، تهران، افراسیاب.
Azami Sangsari. Ch. 1970. “The evolution of coins in Iran from the Achaemenid period to the early Islamic period”. Art and People. No. 100: 9 -14. [In Persian] Babylon. E. 2009. Coins of Iran in the Achaemenid Period. translated by Malekzadeh Bayani and Khanbaba Bayani. Tehran. Pazineh. [In Persian] Bayat. A. 1986. Generalities of Pre-Islamic History and Civilization of Iran. Tehran. National University of Iran. [In Persian] Bayani. M. 1991. The history of coins from the oldest period to the Sassanid period. Volume 1. Tehran. University of Tehran. [In Persian] Brian. P. 2006. Political Unity and Cultural Interaction in the Achaemenid Empire. translated by Nahid Foroughan. Tehran. Akhtaran. [In Persian] Carradice. I. 1987. Coinage and administration in the Athenian and Persian Empires. Oxford . British Archaeological Reports. Carradice. I. 1998a. The Dinar Hoard of Persian Sigloi. in Studies in Greek Numismatics in Memory of Martin Jessop Price. London. Carradice. I. 1998b. Tow Achaemenid Hoards,in Numismatic chronicle. London. Dandamayev. M. 2007. Iran during the First Achaemenid Kings. translated by roohi Arbab. Tehran. Scientific and Cultural. [In Persian] De Morgan. J. 1923. Manuel de numismatique orientale. Paris. Geuthner. Eftekhari. Y. 2014. Numismatics of Achaemenid kings. Tehran. Pazineh.[In Persian] Gershman. R. 2007. Iran from the beginning to Islam. translated by Mohammad Moin. Tehran. Negah. [In Persian] Ghadyani. A. 2010. Darius the Great Achaemenid King. Tehran. written culture.[In Persian] Ghirshman. R. 1964. Persia, from the Origins to Alexander The Great. London. Thames & Hudson. Herodotus. 2001. Chronicles. translated by Vahid Mazandarani. first edition. Tehran. Afrasiab. [In Persian] Head. B. V. 1887. Electrum coins and their specific gravity, dans Num. Chronicle. Oxford. London. Hill. G. F. 1922. Catalogue of the Greek coins in the British Museum. Arabia, Mesopetamia and Persia, London. British Museum. Ivanov. M.S. and others. 1980. History of Iran, translated by Sirus Izadi and Hossein Tahvili. Volume One. Tehran. Donya. [In Persian] Kayhan. M. 2015. Sylloge nummorum graecorum.1 collection. Part2. Turkey. Istanbul. Lenormant. F. 1873. Monnaies royales de la Lydie. dans l'annuaire de la Société francaise de Numismatique. t. IV. [In Persian] Mahmoud Abadi. A. Haratian. A. 2009. “Shekel or Sikel, a new theory about the weight of silver coins of the Achaemenid period”. Scientific-Research Quarterly of the History of Islam and Iran. Nineteenth Year. No. 3, 79: 146- 159. [In Persian] Milan. Klein. D. 1999. Sammlung von Griechischen kleinsilbermünzen und bonzen nomismata. Modi. J. J. 1937. The religious ceremonies and customs of the Parsees. Bombay British India Press. Mostafavi. M. 1950. “translation of Persepolis clay tablets”. Archaeological Reports. Volume One. [In Persian] Nelson. B. R. (ed.). 2011. Numismatic art of Persia. The Sunrise Collection. Part I: Ancient – 650 BC to AD 650. London. Published by Classical Numismatic Group. Olmsted. A. 1978. History of the Achaemenid Empire. translated by Mohammad Moghadam. Tehran. scientific and cultural. [In Persian] Purdavood. E. 2003. Saddle tool. ancient weapons of Iran. Tehran. Asatir. [In Persian] Pope. A. 2001. Masterpieces of Iranian Art. translated by Parviz Natel Khanlari. second edition. Tehran. scientific and cultural. [In Persian] Pirnia. H. 2010. History of Ancient Iran. Volume One. Tehran. Negah. [In Persian] Price. M. Waggoner. N. 1975. Archaic Greek coinage. The Asyut Hoard. London. V.C. Vecchi. Shariatzadeh. A. 2014. Coins of Iran Zamin, Collection of Coins of Malek National Library and Museum, from the Achaemenid Period to the End of the Pahlavi Period. Tehran. Pazineh. [In Persian] Shapour Shahbazi. A. 2012. The Achaemeind Persian empire. Oxford handbook of Iranian History. chapter 4. Walser. G. 1965. Audienz beim Persischen Grosskoenig. Zuerich. Artemis. Zoka. Y. 1350. Imperial Army of Iran from Cyrus to Pahlavi. Tehran. Negaresh. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 513 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 385 |
||