پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,750 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,083,268 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,822,054 |
کشف یک حقیقت مهم تاریخی: حضور ایزد بهرام در نقش برجستۀ تاق بزرگ بستان | ||
| مطالعات باستان شناسی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25، خرداد 1400، صفحه 41-64 اصل مقاله (1.22 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jarcs.2020.301912.142874 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ایمان خسروی* 1؛ رضا مهرآفرین2؛ سید رسول موسوی حاجی2 | ||
| 1دانش‌آموخته دکتری باستان شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران. مازندران، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه باستان شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نقش برجسته های صخرهای همواره در طول تاریخ، یکی از مهم‌ترین رسانه های تبلیغاتی برای عموم بوده است. استفاده از این رسانۀ مهم، در دوران هخامنشیان از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار بود که نقش برجسته ها و کتیبه های بیستون، مصداق عینی آن است. این روند در دوران پارت نیز همچنان ادامه یافت تا آنکه در دوران ساسانی چه از نظر پرداختن به جزئیات هنری و چه از نظر محتوا و همچنین از نظر کمی، به دوام و قوام کامل رسید؛ اما شخصیت شناسی در نقش برجسته های ساسانی به دلیل استفاده از الگوهای مشابه موضوعی در بین پادشاهان مختلف این سلسله و نیز عدم وجود کتیبه در اکثر این نقوش، همواره دچار نقصان فراوان و محل مناقشه بین پژوهشگران بوده است. در این پژوهش که بر اساس هدف از نوع تحقیقات بنیادی و بر اساس ماهیت و روش از نوع تحقیقات تاریخی است، سعی گردید تا به مددِ قرائن تاریخی، شواهد چهره شناسی و مطالعات نشانه شناسی، هویت واقعی یکی از شخصیت های حاضر در نقش برجستۀ تاق بزرگ بستان-که به غلط «اهورامزدا» معرفی شده است- روشن گردد. بر این اساس، مهم‌ترین پرسشی که مقاله حاضر درصدد پاسخ گفتن به آن است این است که «شخصیت مورد نظر در نقش برجستۀ تاق بزرگ بستان کیست؟». فرضیۀ متناظر با این پرسش نیز چنین است: شخصیت مورد نظر در نقش برجستۀ تاق بزرگ بستان، با استناد به قرائن تاریخی و متون مذهبی، شواهد چهرهشناسی و نشانه شناسی، «ایزد بهرام» است و نه اهورامزدا. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| نقش برجسته‌های ساسانی؛ تاق بزرگ بستان؛ اهورامزدا؛ ایزد بهرام؛ چهره شناسی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Discovering an Important Historical Truth: The Presence of the God Bahram in the Rock Relief of the Large Grotto of Taq-i Bustan | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Iman Khosravi1؛ Reza Mehrafarin2؛ Seyyed Rasool Mousavi Haji2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Graduated Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Mazandaran. .Mazandaran , Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The Sasanian rock reliefs reliefs has been repeatedly, seriously, expertly and completely studied by Iranian and non-Iranian archaeologists and researchers, however, there are remarkable different point of views in expressing the historical content of some of the rock reliefs, especially the identification of some of the characters. The reliefs of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan known as Taq-i Bustan III (TB III) (Figures 1 and 2) are considered as the most controversial and challenging Sasanian rock relief, and the identity of its characters are not known with certainty and are still unclear. Some scholars attributed all of the rock reliefs of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan to Piruz I. They believed that he wanted to show divine gifts given to him and his country. Some of the researchers and archaeologists attributed the king in the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan as Khusrow Parviz. The other researchers and archaeologists known the king in the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan as Ardashir III (For more studies see Mousavi Haji and Sarfaraz, 2017). By attributing all the rock reliefs of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan to Piruz I, the authors of this article try to make clear the real identity of one of the characters present in the investiture relief of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan. The character in question is situated at the right of the scene and to the left of Piruz I, and it appears he invested the royal ring to the Sassanid king (Figure 3). Although, most of the Iranian and non-Iranian scholars and archaeologists introduced him as the god Ahura Mazda, but according to historical sources, facial characteristics and symbol studies, the authors have no any doubt that he was the god Bahram, not the god Ahura Mazda. The most important aim of this article is to clarify the real identity of the character in question in the investiture scene of the Piruz I in the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan. Except Nosratallah Bokhtortash (1998) and overlaet (2011) that attributed the character in question in the investiture scene of Sasanian king in the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan as Mobadan Mobad, other scholars such as Herzfeld (2002), Sheppard (2008), Ghirshman (1975), Vanden Berghe (1984), Meshkati (1970), Scratto (2004), Sami (2010), Shahbazi (1389), Canepa (2013), Haerinck (1999), Azarpay (2000), Hermann (1977), Schmidt (1970), Mackintosh (1978), Tanabe (2003) believed that the Sasanian king in the investiture relief of Large grotto of Taq-i Bustan receiving the royal ring from the great god Ahura Mazda. However, these scholars do not provide a clear and convincing reason in justifying their attribution, and they introduced him as the god Ahura Mazda just on the basis of the fact that the act of investing the royal ring as the symbol of Farrah is performed only from the great god, and therefore he should be the god Ahura Mazda. On the contrary, Bokhtortash and overlaet criticized the archaeologists and orientalists who attributed the character of the investor person as the god Ahura Mazda, and instead they mentioned that the god Ahura Mazda has not appearance and can’t be seen. On the basis of this fact they believed that the person who invested the royal ring in this relief is Mobadan Mobad and not the god Ahura Mazda. The results of this study which are basic research in the view of the purpose and historical research in the view of the method, clearly show that the character in this rock relief should be the god Bahram and not the god Ahura Mazda. To prove this claim, the first the physical appearance and iconography characteristics of the god Ahura Mazda in all of the Sasanian rock reliefs were studied. The results of the study show that the character in question in this article could not be the god Ahura Mazda because in all of the rock reliefs, the god Ahura Mazda wear crenellated crown that the hair appeared above it. But in the rock relief of the Taq-i Bustan, the character in question did not wear crenellated crown. So this character did not have the most characteristic of the god Ahura Mazda i.e. the crenellated crown. In addition, the dress, mantle and trouser of the character in question in the rock relief of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan have complete differences with the clothes of the god Ahura Mazda. In none of the images, the god Ahura Mazda wear a long mantle that covers the ankle. Therefore, from the point of view of clothing, it is completely different from the images of the god Ahura Mazda in all of the other rock reliefs. The other important point is the beard of this person. The god Ahura Mazda has a folded and open beard in all of the rock reliefs, but this person has a ring at the end of his beard that gathers his beard and makes it like a triangular. This feature is not only unprecedented in any of the surviving images of the god Ahura Mazda, but only seen in the images of the kings. In addition, the trouser of the god Ahura Mazda are not placed in long boots in any of the rock reliefs. In the Park Museum of Taq-i Bustan twelve Sasanian capitals were exhibited which have been collected from different parts of Kermanshah province and transferred to this historical site to preserve (Moradi, 2004). On these capitals, the images of the Sasanian king, various vegetal motifs and the image of several Zoroastrian gods are depicted, which among the Zoroastrian gods, the god Bahram depicted more than the other gods. On one of the capitals, the god Bahram is depicted with a three quarter face and frontal body with big eyes, wavy face moustache and curly beard (Figure 10). He wears a helmet that covers his head and neck completely. On the bottom of the helmet and in the forehead position, a strip consisting of two rows of circular beads is wrapped around the helmet. On top of the helmet, the curly strands of the hair appear, which was wrapped with an ornamental ribbon. On his shoulders, there are big circular globes. He wears a tight, pearl-embroidered dress with a cloak that covers the chest and arms and is fastened at the front by a circular button. He puts his left hand on his chest and puts his thumbs and index fingers on top of each other, and with his right hand, he holds up the royal ring, which symbolizes the Farrah of God (Ibid.). It is interesting to know that in many cases the iconographic characteristics of the god Bahram in this capital are comparable to the physical characteristics of the character in question in the rock relief of the large grotto of Taq-i Bustan. Both characters wear the same helmet, from which curly strands of hair appeared and are adorned with a wavy ribbon. Both characters have necklaces adorned with two strings of pearls around their necks and both of them wear a cloak that fastened with a button on the front of their chests. Both characters have large eyes and are placed circular globes on their shoulders (compare the Figure 10 with Figure 2). In addition to the physical characteristics and iconographical sources, there are other credible and reliable reasons that testify to the correct attribution of the character discussed in this article as the god Bahram. The main reasons are: - Historical sources and religious texts emphasize the close relationship between the god Bahram and its relationship with water and rain. The presence of the god Bahram in this rock relief testifies the companionship and cooperation of this god and the water goddess Anahita in overcoming the drought of Piruz I. The cooperation of the god Bahram and the goddess Anahita is so unprecedented that it has found its way into literature and has remained in the minds in the following years. -The main function of the god Bahram is victory in war. Therefore, his connection with water and rain, as well as his victory in the war, is completely in line with the two prominent events of Piruz I, i.e. the war and the drought, and makes his presence necessary. - The most important characteristic of the crown of Piruz I is the two wings of the eagle which is opened and it is regarded as the symbol of the god Bahram and shows the interest and belief of Piruz I. Even the name of this king is in complete harmony with the meaning of victory –which is the main function of the god Bahram | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sasanian Rock Reliefs, The Large Grotto of Taq-i Bustan, God Ahura Mazda, God Bahram, Iconography | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اکبرزاده، داریوش، (1385)، سنگنبشته های کرتیر موبدان موبد، تهران، پازینه.
اورشیدی، جهانگیر، (1371)، دانشنامه مزدیسنا، تهران، مرکز.
اوستا، (1381)، گزارش و پژوهش جلیل دوستخواه، جلد اول، چاپ شانزدهم، تهران، مروارید.
بختورتاش، نصرتالله، (1377)، «سخنی پیرامون نقش فروهر که به غلط اهورامزدایش می گویند»، فروهر، سال سی و سوم.
بیرونی، ابوریحان، (1318)، التفهیم لاوائل صناعة التنجیم، تصحیح و مقدمه و شرح و حواشی جلال همایی، تهران، همایی.
جلیلیان، شهرام، (1396)، تاریخ تحولات سیاسی ساسانیان، تهران، سمت.
خسروی، ایمان و سیدرسول موسوی حاجی، (1398)، «کشف یک حقیقت مهم تاریخی: حضور «تنسر» در نقش برجسته‌های اردشیر بابکان»، مطالعات باستان شناسی پارسه، سال سوم، شمارۀ 8، صص 88- 73.
خورنی، موسی، (1331)، تاریخ ارمنستان، ترجمه ابراهام آواساپیان، به اهتمام ابراهیم دهگان، اراک، کتاب‌فروشی داوودی.
روشنینژاد، محمدعلی، (1391)، «تثبیت جایگاه ایزد بهرام اسطوره جنگ پیشزردشتی ایرانیان باستان در معارف زردشتی»، عرفانیات در ادب فارسی، دورۀ 3، بهار 1391، شمارۀ 10، صص 50- 34.
سامی، علی، (1389)، تمدن ساسانی، ج 2، تهران، سمت.
سودآور، ابوالعلا، (1383)، فرّه ایزدی در آیین پادشاهی ایران باستان، امریکا، تامسون-شور.
شپرد، دوروتی، (1387)، «هنر ساسانی»، در: تاریخ ایران کمبریج، ج 3، بخش دوم: از سلوکیان تا فروپاشی دولت ساسانیان، گردآورنده: احسان یارشاطر، ترجمۀ حسن انوشه، چ چهارم، تهران، امیرکبیر.
شراتو، امبرتو، (1383)، هنر پارتی و ساسانی، ترجمۀ یعقوب آژند، تهران، مولی.
شهبازی، علیرضاشاپور، (1389)، تاریخ ساسانیان (ترجمۀ کتاب تاریخ طبری و مقایسۀ آن با تاریخ بلعمی)، تهران، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
فرهادی، علی، (1384)، «دگردیسی اسطوره ورهرام در حکایت های بهرام»، فصلنامه تخصصی زبان و ادبیات فارسی، سال اول، شمارۀ 3، صص 179- 149.
گدار، آندره، (1377)، هنر ایران، ترجمۀ بهروز حبیبی، تهران، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
گیرشمن، رومن، (1370)، هنر ایران در دوران پارت و ساسانی، ترجمۀ بهرام فرهوشی، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
مرادی، یوسف، (1381)، «نگاهی دیگر به یک سرستون ساسانی در عمارت چهل ستون اصفهان»، باستان شناسی و تاریخ، سال هفدهم، پاییز و زمستان 1381، شمارۀ1، پیاپی 33، صص44- 38.
مرادی، یوسف، (1383)، «سرستونهای نگارهدار دورۀ ساسانی در طاق بستان»، مجموعۀ مقالات دومین همایش ملی ایرانشناسی، تهران، 30 آذر لغایت 3 دیماه 1383.
مشکوتی، نصرتالله، (1349)، فهرست بناهای تاریخی و اماکن باستانی ایران، چ اول، تهران، سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی.
معین، محمد، (1355)، مزدیسنا و ادب پارسی، جلد1، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
موسوی حاجی، سیدرسول و علی‌اکبر سرفراز، (1396)، نقش برجسته های ساسانی، تهران، سمت.
هرتسفلد، ارنست، (1381)، ایران در شرق باستان، ترجمۀ همایون صنعتی زاده، تهران، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
یاحقی، محمدجعفر، (1357)، «در قلمرو ایزد بهرام»، مطالعات اسلامی، بهار و تابستان 1357، شمارۀ 26 و 27، صص 239- 212.
یارشاطر، احسان، (1330)، «افسانه خلقت در آثار مانوی»، یغما، مرداد 1330، شمارۀ 5، صص 199- 193.
Akbarzadeh. Daryosh. 2006. Kartir Inscription. Tehran. Pazineh Publication [in Persian]. Azarpay. G. 2000. “Sasanian Art byond the Persian World”. in: Mesopotamia and Iran in the Partian and Sasanian Periods. Rejection and Revival C. 238 BC- 642 AD. Proceedings of a Seminar in Memory of Vlademir G. Lukonin. Edited by J. Curtis. British Museum Press. pp. 67-75. Avesta. 2002. Report and Research by Jalil Dostkhah. Vol. 1. 16th ed. Tehran. Morvarid Publication [in Persian]. Bakhtortash. N. 1998. "A Word about the Figur of Faravahar which is Wrongly Called Ahura Mazda". Journal of Faravahar. No. 33: 12-23 [in Persian]. Benveniste and Renou. 1928. Denkard. Paris. Sanjana. Bironi. A. 1939. Al-Tafhim. Correction. Introduction. Explanation and Margins of Jalal Homaei. Tehran. Homaei Publication [in Persian]. Canepa. M. 2013. “Sasanian Rock Reliefs”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Edited by D.T.Potts. Oxford University Press. pp. 201-207. Godard. Andre. 1998. Iranian Art. Translated by Behrouz Habibi. Tehran. Shahid Beheshti University Press [in Persian]. Grishman. R. 1962. Persian Art: Parthian and Sassanian Dynasties. Translated by B. Farahvashi.Tehran: Elmi Va Farhangi Publication [in Persian]. Ghirshman. R. 1975. Les Scenes d,investiture Royale dans L,art Rupestredes Sassanides et Leur Origine Syria. tome 52. Fascicule 1-2. pp. 119-129. Haerinck. E. 1999. “Une Tradition iranienne L,art des Bas-reliefs Rupestres”. Dossiers d,Archaeologie 243. pp. 54-60. Herrmann. G. 1977. The Iranian Revival. Elsiver. Phaidon. Hertzfeld. E. 2002. Iran in the Ancient East. Translated by Homayoun Sanatizadeh. Tehran. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies Publication. [in Persian]. Jalilian. S. 2017. History of Sassanian Political Developments. Tehran. Samat Publication [in Persian]. Khorni. M. 1952. History of Armenia. Translated by Ibrahim Avasapian. Arak. Davoodi Bookstore [in Persian]. Khousravi. I. Mousavi Haji S. R. 2019. Discovering an Important Historical Truth: The Presence of Tansar in Ardeshir Babakan’s Rock Releifs. Journal of Motaleate Bastanshenasi parseh. 3 (8): 73-88 [in Persian]. Mackintosh. M. C. 1978. “Taq- I Bustan and Byzantine Art. A Case for Early Byzantine Influence on the Reliefs of Taq- I Bustan”. Iranica Antiqua. vol. XIII. pp. 149-177. Meshkati. N. 1970. List of Historical Monuments and Ancient Sites of Iran. 1th ed. Tehran. National Organization for the Protection of Antiquities Publication. [in Persian]. Moein. M. 1976. Mazdyasna and Persian Literature. Vol. 1. 1th ed. Tehran. University of Tehran Publication. [in Persian]. Moradi. Y. 2002. "Another look at a Sassanian Capital in the Chehelston Mansion of Isfahan". Journal of Bastanshenasi va tarikh. 17 (1): 44-38. [in Persian]. Moradi. Y. 2004. "Painted Capitals of the Sassanian period in Taq-i Bostan". Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Iranology. Tehran. December 20 to December 24. [in Persian]. Mousavi Haji. R. and Sarfaraz. A. 2017. Sassanian Rock Reliefs. Tehran. Samat Publication. [in Persian]. Orshidi. J. 1992. Zoroastrian Encyclopedia. Tehran. Markaz Publication [in Persian]. Overlaet. B. 2011. “Ardashir II or Shapur III? Reflections on the identity of a king in the smaller grotto at Taq-I Bustan”. Iranica Antiqua. vol. XLVI.pp. 235-250. Roshani Nezhad. M. 2012. Fixing the Position of the Zoroastrian God of War Mars mythical Ancient Persian Zoroastrian Studies. Journal of Erfaniat Dar Adabe Farsi. 3 (10): 34-50 [in Persian]. Sami. A. 2010. Sassanian Civilization. Vol. II. 2th ed. Tehran. Samat Publication [in Persian]. Scratto. U.2004. Parthian and Sassanian Art. Translated by Yaghoub. A. 1th ed. Tehran. Moula Publication [in Persian]. Schmidt. E. 1970. Persepolis II. the Royal Tombs and other Monuments. University of Chicago Press. Shapourshahbazi. A. 2010. Sassanian History (Translation of the History of Tabari and Its Comparison with the History of Balami). 1th ed. Tehran. University Publication Center [in Persian]. Shepherd. D. 2008. "Sassanid Art". in: Cambridge History of Iran. Vol. III. Part II: From the Seleucids to the Collapse of the Sassanid Government. Compiled by: Ehsan Yarshater. Translated by H. Anousheh. 4th ed. Tehran. Amirkabir Publication [in Persian]. Soudavar. A. 2004. The Divine Glory or farr-e izadi in the Kingdom of Ancient Iran. USA. Thomson-Shoor. [in Persian]. Tanabe. K. 2003. “The Identification of the King of Kings in the Upper Register of the Larger Grotte Taq- I Bustan: Ardashir Rastated”. Eran and Aneran Webfestschrift Marshak. pp. 1-32. Vanden Berge. L. 1984. Reliefs Rupestres de l,Iran Ancient. Bruxelles. Yahaghi. M. 1978. In the Realm of God Bahram. Journal of Islamic Studies. No.26 and 27: 239-212. [in Persian]. Yarshater. E. 1951. "The Myth of Creation in Manichaean Works". Journal of Yaghma, No. 5: 199-193. [in Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 651 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 423 |
||