پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,759 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,132,186 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,897,601 |
بررسی امکان کشت پاییزه چغندرقند با استفاده از سایکوسل در شرایط اقلیمی پاکدشت | ||
| به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 23، شماره 4، دی 1400، صفحه 822-809 اصل مقاله (1.81 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jci.2021.312514.2468 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| دلیر فیاضی پور* 1؛ غلام علی اکبری2؛ ایرج اله دادی3؛ فاطمه امینی4؛ مرجان السادات حسینی فرد1 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم زراعی و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه علوم زراعی و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه علوم زراعی و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران. | ||
| 4استادیار، گروه علوم زراعی و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر به‌منظور بررسی امکان کشت و کاربرد سایکوسل بر برخی ویژگی‌های بیوشیمیایی و عملکرد کیفی و کمی دو رقم چغندرقند (9597 و سوپریما)، انجام گرفت. به همین منظور، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 95-1394 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی پردیس ابوریحان دانشگاه تهران به‌صورت کرت خردشده فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. در این آزمایش تاریخ کاشت به‌عنوان فاکتور اصلی (10 مهرماه و 30 مهرماه) و ترکیب تصادفی ارقام چغندرقند (9597 و سوپریما) و محلولپاشی سایکوسل (1000 میلیگرم بر لیتر و شاهد (عدم مصرف)) به‌عنوان فاکتورهای فرعی در نظر گرفته شدند. نتایج نشان داد که در بین تاریخهای کاشت، بیش‌ترین درصد بولتینگ (58/54 درصد) و محتوای سدیم (معادل 16/9 میلی‌اکی‌والان در 100 گرم خمیر چغندرقند) تحت تاریخ کاشت 10 مهرماه و بیش‌ترین مقادیر در صفات عملکرد ریشه 15/26 تن در هکتار و عملکرد قند خالص معادل 44/1 تن بر هکتار، تحت تاریخ کاشت 30 مهرماه به‌دست آمد. هم‌چنین، بیش‌ترین مقادیر در صفات موردبررسی (به‌غیر از درصد ساقه‌روی (بولتینگ) و محتوای سدیم خمیر چغندرقند)، با کشت رقم سوپریما و تحت محلولپاشی سایکوسل به‌دست آمد. به‌طورکلی، بهترین شرایط جهت به‌دست‌آوردن مناسبترین عملکرد ریشه و قند در منطقه مورد پژوهش، تاریخ کاشت 30 مهر، رقم سوپریما و محلولپاشی 1000 میلیگرم بر لیتر سایکوسل انتخاب شدند و به‌منظور کشت چغندرقند در منطقه پاکدشت توصیه میشود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تاریخ کاشت؛ رقم سوپریما؛ رقم 9597؛ ساقه روی؛ عملکرد شکر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigation of the Possibility of Planting Autumn of Sugar Beet by Using the Cycosel in Pakdasht Climatic Conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| dalir fayazipour1؛ Gholam Ali Akbari2؛ Iraj Allah dadi3؛ fatemeh amini4؛ Marjan Alsadat Hoseinifard1 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, College of Aboureihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, College of Aboureihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, College of Aboureihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran. | ||
| 4Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, College of Aboureihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study attempts to evaluate the effects of planting date and spraying CCC on some biochemical characteristics and qualitative and quantitative yield of sugar beet. It has conducted an experiment, using a Split factorial based on randomized complete block design with three replications in 2015-2016 growth season in field experiment of university of Abourayhan, Tehran University. The treatments include planting date (2nd of October and 22nd of October) as the main factor and cultivars (Suprima and 9597) and foliar spraying (1000 ppm) / non-application of CCC as sub plots. The results show that the highest percentage of bolting (54.58%) and sodium content (equivalent to 9.16 mEq / 100 g of sugar beet pulp) take place on October 2, while the highest root yield (26.15 ton per hectare) and white sugar yield (equal to 1.44 tons per hectare) happen on October 22. Also, it has been observed that most values of the studied traits (except bolting percentage and sodium content of sugar beet pulp) have occurred through the cultivation of Suprema with CCC spraying. Overall, it can be concluded that the best conditions to determine the best root and sugar yield in the area of research, on 22nd of October, the Suprima and application of 1000 ppm are recommended in order to cultivate sugar beet in the Pakdasht area. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Bolting, Sowing Date, Sugar yield, Suprima cultivar, 9597 Cultivar | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., & Sadeghian, S. Y. (2002). Change in the concentrations of glycinebetaine, glutamine and sugars in sugar beet subjected to soil moisture deficit. Pp. 375-382. In: Proceedings of the 65th IIIRB Congress, February 2002, Brussels, Belgium Alimirzaee, M., Mirzaie-asl, A., Abdollahi, M.R., & Ebrahimi Kollaei, H. (2016). Identification of frigida and vernalization insensitive3 genes related to vernalization pathway flowering in sugar beet. Journal of Genetic Novin, 11(3), 449-457. Amaral, A. S., Anghinoni, I., & Deschamps, F. C. (2004). Resíduo de plantas de coberturae mobilidade dos produtos da dissolução do calcário aplicado na superfície do solo. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, 28(1), 115-123. Anar, M.J., Lin, Z., Hoogenboom, G., Shelia, V., Batchelor, W.D., Teboh, J.M., Ostlie, M., Schatz, B.G., & Khan, M., (2019). Modeling growth, development and yield of Sugar beet using DSSAT. Agric. Syst. 169, 58-70. Bahadorkhah, F., & Kazemayni, S. A. R. (2014). The effect of salinity and sowing methods, on yield, yield components, and seed oil content of two cultivars of safflower. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(2), 264-272. (In Persian). Biondo, P. B. F., Boeing, J. Sh., & Barizao, E. O. (2014). Evaluation of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves during its developmental stages: a chemical composition study. Food Science and Technology, 34(1), 94-101. Bor, M., Ozdemir, F., & Turkan, I. (2003). The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Science, 164, 77-84. Brian, P. J., David, L., Holshuser, B., Marcus, M. A., Roygardc, J. K. F., & Anderson-Cookd, C. M. (2003). Double-crop soybean leaf area and yield responses to mid-Atlantic soils and cropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 95, 436-445. Deihimfard, R., Rahimi-Moghaddam, S., & Chenu, K. (2019). Risk assessment of frost damage to sugar beet simulated under cold and semi-arid environments. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63, 511-521. Farahmand, Kh. M., & Moharamzadeh, M. (2014). Evaluation of the effective parameters in planting of the winter sugar beet at Moghan region. 1th National Conference on Sustainable Agriculture Using Crop Model. Hamadan. 13 Feb. (In Persian). Haghayeghi, S., Alizadeh, A., Ahmadi, M., Bannayan, M., & Ansari, H. (2015). Effect of irrigation regimes on crop water use efficiency of autumn sugar beets grown on theMashhad plain. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 16(3), 15-30. 2015.102987. (In Persian with English Abstract). Hamzaei, J., Shayanfard, R., & Fotohi, K. (2013). The effect of priming on some qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two sugar beet varieties. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(6), 155-164. (In Persian). Hosseinian, S. H., Abdollahian Noghabi, M., & Majnoon Hosseini, N. (2014). Effect of bolting on the yield and quality of two sugarbeet varieties in autumn sowing areain Dezful region of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(4), 265-277. (In Persian). Jahanbakhsh Pour, M. H., Paknejad, F., Habibi, D., Aghaee Zadeh, M., & Shahsavan Baghdadi, M. (2016). Effect of cycocel on decreasing of bolting in autumn planting of sugar beet in Karaj region. Iranian Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(2), 138-146. (In Persian). Jaume, A.R., & Oleniowski. Tizio, R. (1985). Interaction of CCC [(2- chloroethyl) trimethyl amonium chloride] with a foliar nutrient solution on sucrose content in leaves and roots of red beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Plant Physiolog, 124, 171-175. Javaheri, M. A., Zinaldini, A., & Najafinejad, H. (2006). Evaluation of possibility of the autumn sowing of sugar beet in Erzooeiyeh area (Kerman province). Pagohesh and Sazandegi, 71, 85-93. (In Persian). Khayyamim, S., Mazaheri, D., Banayan Aval, M., Gohari, J., & Jahansooz, M. R. (2003). Evaluation of physiologic and technologic characteristics of the sugar beet in different levels of density and nitrogen fertilizer. Pagohesh and Sazandegi, 60, 21-29. (In Persian). Mello, D. F., Franzolini, R., Fernandes, L. B., Franco, A. V. M., & Alves, T. C. (2008). Avaliacao do resíduo de nabo forrageiro extraído da producao de biodiesel como suplemento para bovinos de corte em pastagens. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 9(1), 45-56. Mirvat, E., Gobarah, M., Hussein, M., Tawfik, M., Amal, M., Aahmed, G., Manal, F., & Mohamed, F. (2019). Effect of Different Sowing Dates on Quantity and Quality of Some Promising Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Varieties under North Delta, Condition. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 41(3), 343-354. Mohammadi-Ahmadmahmoudi, E., Deihimfard, R., & Noori, O. (2019). Yield gap analysis simulated for sugar beet-growing areas in water-limited environments. European Journal of Agronomy, 125988, 1-15. Orojnia, S., Habibi, D., Fathollah Taleghani, D., Safari Dolatabadi, S., Paazoki, A. R., Moaveni, P., Rahmani, M., & Farshidi, M. (2013). Evaluation of yield and yield components of different sugar beet genotypes under drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(1), 127-144. (In Persian). Passam, H. C., koutri A. C., & Karapanos, I. C. (2008). The effect of chlomequant chloride (CCC) application at the bolting stage on the flowering and seed production of lettuce plants previously treated with water or gibberellic acid (GA3). Elsevier, 116, 117-121. Petrus-Vancea, A., Palcut, N., & Baciu, A. (2009). Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. accharifera) vitroculture initiation from encapsulated seeds. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula Biologie, 16(1), 91-93. Ranji, Z.A., Sharifi, H., & Kazemaynkhah, K. (2001). Effects of seed production environmental conditions on bolting of sugar beet. Sugar Beat, 17(1), 59-65. Ranjzad, L., Alimohammadi, R., & Ajali, J. (2011). The effect of different amounts of nitrogenous fertilizers on yield and quality of sugar beet. 1st National Conference on New Concepts in Agriculture, 8-10 November., University of Islamic Azad, Saveh, p.4. (In Persian). Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M.H. Aghaeizadeh, M. Fathollah Taleghani, D. Javaheri, M.A., & Aliasgari, A. (2012). Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal of Sugar Beet, 28(1), 25-42. (In Persian). Seyed Sharifi, R., & Khalilzadeh, R. (2018). Effects of cycocel on growth, some physiological traits and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 8(1), 11-23. Smit, A. L. (1983). Influence of external factors on growth and development of sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wa geningen. Taleghani, D., Alimoradi, I., Sadeghian Motaher, Y., Mohammadin, R., Mahmoudi, B., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Rajabi, A., Khayammim, S., Touhidlo, Gh., Hosainpour, M., Rezaee, V. A., Aghaeezadeh, M., Noshad, H., Yosefabadi, V.A., Babaee, B., Sharifi, H., Matlobi, F., Orazizadeh, M. R., &Vahedi, S. (2013). Standards setting of the determine potential and damage assessment to separation of management and enforcement in different stages of growth in sugar beet fields. (1st ed). Sugar Beet Seed provide and breeding Institute. (In Persian). Taleghani, D., Moharamzadeh, M., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, M., Mohammadian, R., & Farahmand, R. (2011). Effect of sowing and harvest time on yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in moghan region in iran. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 2-27(3), 355-371. (In Persian). Trankner, C., Lemnian, L. M., Emrani, N., Pfeiffer, N., Tiwari, S. P., Kopisch-Obuch, F. J., Vogt, S. H., Müller, A. E., Schilhabel, M., Jung, Ch., & Grosse, I. (2016). A detailed analysis of the br1 locus suggests a new mechanism for bolting after winter in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1-12. Vafadar, L., Ebadi, A., & Sajed, K. (2008). Effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and some traits of Sugar beet genotypes. Electronic Journal of Crop Protection, 1(2), 103-120. (In Persian). Vahedi, S., Amiri, R., Mesbah, M., & Ghanadha, M. R. (2009). The introduction of selection criteria for monogerm sugar beet germplasm. 9th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress, 27-29 August. Tehran, Abourayhan University. pp. 128-133. (In Persian). Vakalounakis, D. J., & Kavroulakis, N. (2017). Occurrence of powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe betae on chard [Beta vulgaris L. subsp. cicla (L.) Koch] in Greece. Crop Protection, 99, 128-131. Vico, G., Hurry, V., & Weih, M. (2014). Snowed in for survival: quantifying the risk of winter damage to overwintering field crops in northern temperate latitudes. Agric For Meteorol, 197, 65-75. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 457 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 358 |
||