دیدگاه انتقادی نویسندگان ایرانی و بین المللی در مقالات چاپ شده در حوزه زبانشناسی کاربردی

بابایی عصمت, هاشمی محمدرضا, امینی فارسانی محمد (1395)، بررسی دیدگاه های استادان رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی ایران نسبت به پژوهش: مطالعه ترکیبی، مجله پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی (پژوهش زبان های خارجی) پاییز و زمستان 1395 , دوره  6 , شماره  2 ; از صفحه 501 تا صفحه 533 .،

علیرضا نبی لو، فرشته دادخواه (1398) تحلیل مدیر مدرسه آلاحمد بر مبنای سبک شناسی انتقادی، مجله پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی، دورة 9 ،شمارة 3 ،پاییز 1398 ،از صفحه 991 تا 103

Biber, D. (1988). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 97-116.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4-18.

Bondi, M. (2012). Voice in textbooks: Between exposition and argument. In Gross & Chesley’s Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 101-115). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Bowden, D. (1999). The mythology of voice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207-224.

Flowerdew, J. (2001). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation and the nonnative English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127-150.

de Magalhãesa, S. Cotterallb, N. & Miderosc, E. R. (2018). Ethnography as method, methodology, and deep theorizing: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388.

Gross, A. G., & Chesley, P. (2012). Hedging, stance and voice in medical research articles. In Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 85-100). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming Back to Voice: The Multiple Voices and Identities of Mature Multilingual Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 83-106.

Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Sydney, Australia: University of Technology, Sydney.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226.

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.

Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22.

Hyland, K. & Guinda, R. (2012). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 156-177.

Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language learning, 16(1), 1-20.

Kwan, B. S. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for specific purposes, 25(1), 30-55.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(2), 35-53.

Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(4), 545-586.

Moreno, A. I., & Suárez, L. (2008). A framework for comparing evaluation resources across academic texts. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(6), 749-769.

Morton, J & Storch, N. (2018). Developing an authorial voice in PhD multilingual student writing: The reader’s perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 45-67.

O'Donnell, M. (2011). UAM Corpus Tool (Version 3.2). Retrieved from http://www.wagsoft.com/CorpusTool/download.html

Ramanathan, V.,& Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75.

Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Audience and voice in current L1 composition texts: Some implications for ESL student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 21-34.

Scollon, R., (1994). The post-Confucian confusion: Including a bibliography on post-Confucian cultural learning and traditional Chinese influences on teaching and learning. City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, Department of English.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004).Research Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, W. & Cheung, Y. L. (2018). The construction of authorial voice in writing research articles: A corpus-based study from an APPRAISAL theory perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 53–75.

Williams, P. (1999). Result sections of medical research articles; analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.