پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,919,924 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,597,671 |
دشواری پیش‌بینی ضربات پای چپ حریف در برابر پای راست در تکواندو | ||
| نشریه رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 12، شماره 3، آذر 1399، صفحه 271-292 اصل مقاله (386.98 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jmlm.2019.282536.1451 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| شقایق محمدی1؛ حمید صالحی* 2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش بررسی قدرت پیش‌بینی تکواندوکاران در زمان رویارویی با ضربات پای راست و چپ بود. بدین‌منظور، برای تکواندوکاران برتر (تعداد= 40؛ سن = 12/5± 93/20 سال، سابقة مبارزة کیوروگی در تکواندو = 49/4 ± 58/7 سال) شبیه‌سازی‌های ویدئویی کاملاً همسانی از ضربات پای چپ و راست نمایش داده شد. پخش این ویدئوها در چند نقطة مختلف-از آغاز تا تکمیل ضربات- متوقف شد. از شرکت‌کنندگان خواسته شد نوع ضربه (حمله‌هایی با پای جلو و پشت به‌سوی سر یا تنه) را پیش‌بینی کنند. نتایج نشان داد پیش‌بینی ضربه‌های پای راست به میزان معناداری دقیق‌تر از ضربات پای چپ بوده است. آشکارترین زمان برای مشاهدة اثر برتری پا هنگامی بود که فیلم ضربات 120 هزارم‌ثانیه پیش از تکمیل ضربات متوقف شده بود. بنابراین، به‌نظر می‌رسد برتری پای حریف بر پیش‌بینی بینایی نوع عمل اثرگذار بوده است. درصد پیش‌بینی‌های درست بیانگر این است که شاید تکواندوکارهای کیورگی هنگامی‌که با ضربات پای چپ روبه‌رو شده‌اند، یک راهبرد جست‌وجوی بینایی بهینه اتخاذ نکرده‌اند و این وضعیت سبب شده است بیشتر موارد در شناسایی نشانه‌های سینماتیکی معتبر و مربوط به حرکت، پیش از تکمیل ضربات پای چپ (نزدیک 120 هزارم‌ثانیه یا بیشتر پیش از پایان ضربه) ناتوان باشند. به‌نظر می‌رسد ضعف توانایی بازشناسی نوع ضربات پای چپ در برابر پای راست حریف به آشنایی کمتر مشاهده‌گر با حرکات چپ برترها مربوط باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انسداد زمانی؛ پیش‌بینی بینایی؛ برتری جانبی؛ ورزش‌های تعاملی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Difficulty of Anticipating Left- vs. Right-footed Opponents' Kicks in Taekwondo | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Shaghayegh Mohammadi1؛ Hamid Salehi2 | ||
| 1MSc, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this investigation was to examine the anticipation of taekwondo athletes when facing right- and left-footed kicks. Expert taekwondo athletes (n = 40; age = 20.935.12 years; Taekwondo Kyorugi competition experience = 7.584.49years) were shown identical video simulations of right-footed and left-footed chagi kicks. The videos were temporally paused at five different time occlusion points from the start to the end of the kicks. The participants were required to make prediction of kick types (front vs. back leg to head or trunk of opponent in kick attacks). The results indicated that anticipation of right-footed kicks was significantly more accurate than that of left-footed kicks. The footedness effect was found to be most pronounced when kicks videos were paused at 120 ms prior to the kick completion. Thus, the opponent’s footedness seems to affect visual anticipation of the type of an action. Mean percentages of correct predictions suggest that kyorugi taekwondo players may not adopt an optimal visual search strategy when facing left-footed kicks, resulting in fails in the detection of anticipation-relevant kinematic cues before the end of left-footed kicks in most instances (i.e., about 120 ms and more before the kick completion). It seems that the lower ability of recognizing the type of left- vs. right-footed opponents' kicks were due to the observers’ reduced perceptual awareness with left-footed actions | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| "temporal occlusion", "visual anticipation", "laterality", "interactive sports", "Taekwondo" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Holtzen DW. Handedness and professional tennis. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;105(1-4):101-19. 2. Aggleton JP, Wood CJ. Is there a left-handed advantage in" ballistic" sports? International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1990;21(1):57. 3. Grouios G. Motoric dominance and sporting excellence: Training versus heredity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2004;98(1):53-66. 4. Grouios G, Tsorbatzoudis H, Alexandris K, Barkoukis V. Do left-handed competitors have an innate superiority in sports? Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2000;90(3 suppl):1273-82. 5. Loffing F, Sölter F, Hagemann N. Left preference for sport tasks does not necessarily indicate left-handedness: Sport-specific lateral preferences, relationship with handedness and implications for laterality research in behavioural sciences. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e105800. 6. Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ. Hand preference and age in the united states. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30(7):601-8. 7. Raymond M, Pontier D, Dufour A-B, Møller AP. Frequency-dependent maintenance of left handedness in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences (London). 1996;263(1377):1627-33. 8. Llaurens V, Raymond M, Faurie C. Why are some people left-handed? An evolutionary perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1519):881-94. 9. Loffing F, Hagemann N, Strauss B. Automated processes in tennis: Do left-handed players benefit from the tactical preferences of their opponents? Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010;28(4):435-43. 10. Wood C, Aggleton J. Handedness in ‘fast ball’sports: Do lefthanders have an innate advantage? British Journal of Psychology. 1989;80(2):227-40. 11. Davids K, Williams JG, Williams AM. Visual perception and action in sport. London: Routledge; 2005. 12. Müller S, Abernethy B. Expert anticipatory skill in striking sports: A review and a model. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2012;83(2):175-87. 13. Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. 11 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2016. 14. McMorris T. Acquisition and performance of sports skills. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. 15. Williams AM, Causer J. Improving anticipation and decision making in sport In: O’Donoghue P, J S, T M, editors. Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 21-31. 16. Loffing F, Hagemann N, Schorer J, Baker J. Skilled players' and novices' difficulty anticipating left- vs. Right-handed opponents' action intentions varies across different points in time. Human movement science. 2015;40:410-21. 17. Loffing F, Hagemann N. Skill differences in visual anticipation of type of throw in team-handball penalties. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2014;15(3):260-7. 18. Abernethy B, Russell DG. The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Human movement science. 1987;6(4):283-319. 19. Hagemann N. The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2009;71(7):1641-8. 20. Loffing F, Schorer J, Hagemann N, Baker J. On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: Further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2012;74(2):446-53. 21. Peters M. Footedness: Asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103(2):179-92. 22. McMorris T, Colenso S. Anticipation of professional soccer goalkeepers when facing right-and left-footed penalty kicks. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1996;82(3):931-4. 23. World Taekwondo Federation. The book of teaching & learning taekwondo - official publication of the world taekwondo federation. 1 ed: The World Taekwondo Federation; 2007. 24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988. 25. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and anovas. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;4:[Article 863]. 26. Hick WE. On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1952;4(1):11-26. 27. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1953;45(3):188-96. 28. Loffing F, Sölter F, Hagemann N, Strauss B. Accuracy of outcome anticipation, but not gaze behavior, differs against left- and right-handed penalties in team-handball goalkeeping. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:1820. 29. Müller S, Fadde PJ, Harbaugh AG. Adaptability of expert visual anticipation in baseball batting. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2016;35(17):1682-90. 30. Stöckel T, Weigelt M. Plasticity of human handedness: Decreased one-hand bias and inter-manual performance asymmetry in expert basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2012;30(10):1037-45. 31. Falco C, Alvarez O, Estevan I, Molina-Garcia J, Mugarra F, Iradi A, editors. Kinetic and kinematic analysis of the dominant and non-dominant kicking leg in the taekwondo roundhouse kick. ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive; 2009. 32. Harun H, Xiong SJ. The symmetry in kinematics between the dominant and non-dominant legs in taekwondo turning kick. Skudai, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; 2010. 33. Voyer D, Voyer SD, Tramonte L. Free-viewing laterality tasks: A multilevel meta-analysis. Neuropsychology. 2012;26(5):551-67. 34. Nuthmann A, Matthias E. Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2014;52:113-9. 35. Nicholls ME, Loftus A, Mayer K, Mattingley JB. Things that go bump in the right: The effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(5):1122-6. 36. Loffing F, Hagemann N, Strauss B, MacMahon C. Laterality in sports: Theories and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier (Academic Press); 2016. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 561 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 350 |
||