تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,095,830 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,202,392 |
The Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Parasites in Buffalo Calves in Sylhet District of Bangladesh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
دوره 14، شماره 3، آبان 2020، صفحه 221-229 اصل مقاله (407.02 K) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: Infectious agents- Diseases | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijvm.2020.300008.1005074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sabbir Ahmad1؛ Md Shahidur Rahman Chowdhury1؛ Md Mukter Hossain1؛ Md Masudur Rahman2؛ Md Mahfujur Rahman* 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet – 3100, Bangladesh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet – 3100, Bangladesh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet – 3100, Bangladesh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BACKGROUND: Buffalo is one of the most important animals for the source of milk and meat, and it is also used for draught purposes in Bangladesh. Gastrointestinal parasites in the buffalo calves lead to reduced growth and hinder the development of buffalo industry in Bangladesh. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to identify the gastrointestinal parasitic load in the buffalo calves at Sylhet district, Bangladesh. METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from one hundred seventy (170) buffalo calves from different areas of Sylhet district and samples were examined using sedimentation, and floatation techniques. A morphological examination of parasitic eggs was performed to identify the parasitic species. RESULTS: Among the 170 calves examined in the present study, 62 (36.47%) were found positive with different parasites. Two species of gastro-intestinal parasites were identified, among them 26.47% positive with Neoascarisvitulorum, 5.88% with Strongyloides sp .and 4.12% with Strongyle type. The prevalence of gastro-intestinal (GI) parasites in males (44.12%) was lower than in female (55.88%) calves. A relatively higher worm load was observed in summer (58.82%) than rainy (41.18%) season. The prevalence of Gastrointestinal parasitic infections was significantly higher (p ≤0.05) in calves aged 6 months of age (44.12%) than calves of 6-12 months of age (32.35%) followed by 13-18 months of age (23.53%). EPG (egg per gr of feces) ranged from 50-1950. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the prevalence of GI parasites in buffalo calves in Sylhet is relatively higher regardless of age, sex, and seasons. Data generated through this study will help to adopt necessary measures to control the GI parasitic infections in buffalo calves in developing countries like Bangladesh. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buffalo calves؛ Fecal examination؛ Gastrointestinal parasites؛ Morphology؛ Prevalence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IntroductionBuffalo is one of the most important ani- mals as a source of milk and meat and it is also used for draught purposes in Bangla- desh. They are one of the major sources of animal proteins along with providing milk, meat, and good quality hides (Liu et al., 2009). Buffalo is the ‘Black gold’ of Ban- gladesh next to cattle. They are widely used for plowing and laddering, racking, thresh- ing, and crushing of sugarcane and oil seeds carting and transportation of goods in rural areas of Bangladesh, and due to its excel- lent draft and pulling capacity, buffaloes are called the living tractor of the East (Ra- haman and Islam, 1992; Cockrill, 1968). The working life of buffalo is ranged up to 25 years of age which is higher than cattle (Cockrill, 1974). The livestock sub-sector contributes 1.54% to the GDP and in finan- cial year 2017-2018, the livestock popula- tion is 551.39 lakh (ruminant) whereas the buffalo is 14.85 lakh (Islam et al., 2017). It is a well-known fact that parasitism is a far greater threat to the livestock than any other visible outbreaks of the diseas- es. Gastrointestinal parasitism is a major cause of the reduced buffalo production and economic losses in Bangladesh and is of- ten ignored due to its chronic and deceptive nature (Jabber and Green, 1983; Sanyal, 1998; Chowdhury and Tada 1994). It causes significant losses in different parameters of health and production (Lebbie et al., 1994). Moreover, some parasites of buffaloes such as schistosomiasis and fascioliasis can transmit to humans where they cause signif- icant clinical diseases in several countries (Wang et al., 2006; Tum et al., 2007). Gas- trointestinal parasites in buffalo calves lead to reduced growth and constantly hinder the development of buffalo industry in Bangla-
desh. Epidemiological data regarding the parasites of buffalos are not abundant. No study was conducted regarding parasitic in- fection of the buffalo calves in the Sylhet district which is a suitable place for buffalo rearing in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the parasitic load found in the gastrointestinal tract in buffalo calves at the Sylhet district, Bangladesh. Materials and methodsStudy area and animalsThe study was conducted in Sylhet Sadar, Jaintapur and Zakiganj Upazila of Sylhet district which is located in between 24°36' and 25°11' north latitudes and inbetween 91°38' and 92°30' east longitudes and where the majority of buffalo calves are reared as free – range (Figure 1). One hundred sev- enty buffalo calves ranging from 1 day old to 18 months of age of either sex were ran- domly selected from villages of the Sylhet district of Bangladesh for collection of fe- cal samples (Gunathilaka et al., 2018). The study was conducted from January to Sep- tember in 2018, considering March to June as summer and June to October as rainy season according to the seasonal clarifica- tion of Bangladesh. Collection and preservation of fecal samplesQuestionnaires were prepared and in- terviews with the farmers were conducted during the collection of the sample to ob- tain specific information regarding buffalo calves (age, sex, type of maintenance, the treatment that has been given, the other reared buffalo calves, type or material of the enclosure, environmental condition, or livestock care). Samples were collected di- rectly from the rectum and brought to the
Figure 1. Map of Sylhet district illustrating the study location (Sylhet Sadar, Zakigonj and Jaintapur)
laboratory in mini zip-locked polythene bags. Samples were dispatched in a cool box to prevent the eggs from developing and hatching. Finally, samples were stored in the laboratory in the refrigerator (4 °C) until further processed. Examination techniquesFecal samples were examined by fecal floatation using the saturated salt solution, sedimentation techniques for the presence of eggs/oocysts of parasites, and finally, positive cases were counted through the McMaster technique (Storey, 2015; Mo- hammed et al., 2017). Flotation technique3 gr of faeces were placed into a contain- er and mixed with 50 ml flotation fluid. The faeces were mixed thoroughly with satu- rated salt (NaCl) solution using a tongue blade and the resulting faecal suspension was poured through a tea strainer into an- other container. Taking the faecal suspen- sion from the container the test tube with the suspension was topped off, leaving a convex meniscus at the top of the tube and a coverslip was carefully placed on top of the test tube. After 20 min, the coverslip was carefully lifted off of the tube, togeth- er with the drop of fluid adhering to it, and the coverslip was immediately placed on a microscope slide and examined under the microscope (Kandasamy et al., 2013). Sedimentation techniqueThree gr of faeces was weighed or mea- sured in a container and mixed with 45 ml tap water with a tongue blade. The faecal suspension was filtered through a tea strain- er into another container and poured into another test tube. The mixture was allowed to sediment for 5 min and (pipette, decant) the supernatant was removed very careful- ly. The sediment was resuspended in 5 ml of water and allowed to sediment for 5 min. The supernatant (pipette, decant) was dis- carded and the sediment stained by adding one drop of methylene blue and transferring the sediment to a micro-slide covered with a coverslip (Marco et al., 2019). McMaster egg countTwo gr of faeces was weighed,and added to 60 ml of ZnSO4 flotation solution (Sp. Gr. 1.18-1.20*) in a flask or beaker. The
contents were swirled vigorously to break down and homogenize the faecal sample. The contents were poured through a sieve or a cheesecloth-lined funnel into a second container. A tongue depressor or spatula was used to squeeze as much fluid as possi- ble from the material left in the sieve or fun- nel. While swirling vigorously to keep the material in suspension, a sample of the mix- ture was aspirated with a pipette and care- fully transferred to one of the chambers of the McMaster slide. The procedure was re- peated to fill the adjacent chamber. for a pe- riod of 1-3 minutes was given to allow eggs to float to the top and debris to fall to the bottom of the chamber. Eggs that fell within the gridded area of both sides of the cham- ber were counted under the microscope. The total number of eggs in the 2 chambers were multiplied by 100; this is the eggs per gr of faeces (EPG) (Mohammed et al., 2017). Statistical analysisData were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 20, USA.) using the F test. For comparative analysis, data were analyzed by using paired sample t-test (Mostafa, 1989). P≤0.05 was consid- ered as significant. ResultsDuring this study one hundred seventy (170) buffalo calves were examined through fecal sample examination, of which 62 (36.47%), were found infected with gas- tro-intestinal (GI) parasites (Table 1). Two species of GI parasites were identified as 26.47% positive with Neoascaris vitulorum, 5.88% with Strongyloides sp. and 4.12% Strongyle type. EPG (Egg per gram of fe- ces) was also determined in the study and the range of EPG varied among the parasites. The highest EPG count was detected in N. vitulorum (50-1950) followed by Strongy- loides sp. (50-150) and Strongyle type (50- 150). Mean EPG count was also higher in N.vitulorum (252.22±60.86) followed by Strongyloides sp. (80±13.33) and Strongyle type (64.29±14.29).
Table 1. Overall prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in buffalo calves in Sylhet district
Name of parasite
No. of animal affected
Prevalence (%)
EPG (Egg per gram of Feces)
The prevalence of GI parasites in males and females was not significant (P≤0.05). Females (55.88%) were more vulnerable to parasitic GI infection than males (44.12%). In both the sexes, the prev- alence was the highest in the case of N.vi- tulorum. In the male highest prevalence was observed in N.vitulorum (22.67%) followed by Strongyloides sp. (5.33%) and Trichostrongylus sp. (2.67%), whereas in the female the prevalence was 29.47% in N.vitulorum followed by 6.32% in Stron- gyloide sp. and 5.26% in Strongyle type (Table 2).
Table 2. Sex related prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in buffalo calves in Sylhet district
Categories Name of parasite (Sex)
No. of animal affected
EPG (Egg per gram of feces) Prevalence (%)
** P≤0.05, N = Total number of samples collected
In the present study, Table 3 showed that the seasonal effect of gastro intestinal parasitism in buffalo calves was not significant (P≤0.05). The prevalence of GI parasites was relatively higher in the summer season (58.82%) than in the rainy season (41.18%). Our study revealed that buffalo calves were more susceptible to GI parasitic infection in the summer season than the rainy season. In the summer season, prevalence was somewhat higher in the case of N.vitulorum (27%) followed by Strongyloi- des sp. (4%) and strongyle type (2%) and in the rainy season, the prevalence was relative- ly higher in the case of N.vitulorum (25.71%), followed by Strongyloides sp.(8.57%) and strongyle type (7.14%).
Categories No. of ani- EPG (Egg per gram of feces)
(Season) Name of parasite mal affected Prevalence (%)
** P≤0.05, N = Total number of samples collected
Table 4 showed that the prevalence of GI parasites was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in calves aged > 1-day to 6 months than in calves of aged > 7-12 months. In calves (1-day to 6 months), the prevalence was relatively high- er in the case of N.vitulorum (36%) followed by Strongyloides sp. (2.67%) and strongyle type (2.67%). In calves of 7 to 12 months age, N.vitulorum was the main gastrointesti- nal parasite recorded (23.64%) followed by Strongyloides sp. (5.45%) and strongyle type (3.64%). In calves of 13 to 18 months of age, the higher prevalence was also recorded in the case of N.vitulorum (12.50%), followed by Strongyloides sp.(12.50%) and strongyle type (7.50%).
Categories
No. of ani- EPG (Egg per gram of feces)
(Age) Name of parasite mal affected Prevalence (%)
** P≤0.05, N = Total number of samples collected
DiscussionIn the present study, 34.47% buffalo calves were found to be infected with GI parasites. Other studies reported that 47%, 75% and 73.58% buffalo calves were pos- itive for GI parasites in Sindh of Pakistan, Toba Tek Singh in Pakistan and Punjab state of India respectively (Bachal et al., 2002; Bilal et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012). Jyoti et al. (2011) reported that N. vitulo-
rumin buffaloes were 8.47% which is low- er than the present finding (26.47%), but the present finding is lower than the other study where it was recorded that N. vitulo- rum in buffaloes was 33% (Bachal et al., 2002). Azam et al. (2002) observed that the overall prevalence of strongyle type was 21.19% in Khadagzai. This finding is also higher than the current findings (4.12%). Jyoti et al. (2012) observed that the prev-
alence of Strongyloides sp. was 28.45%, which was much higher than the present study (5.88%). In the present study, infec- tion of Strongyloides sp. (5.88%) is higher than strongyle type (4.12%). There was no significant (P≤0.05) difference in the rate of infection between the male and female buf- falo calves. It was observed that, the prev- alence of GI parasite was slightly lower in male (44.12%) than in female (55.88%) an- imals which agrees with the previous report of higher prevalence (48.30%) of helminths in female than in male (45.12%) in buffalo calves (Bachal et al., 2002). However, the findings of the present study disagree with other studies Jyoti et al. (2012) and Bilal et al. (2002) that recorded the prevalence of helminths in the male (74.49% and 88.38%) which was higher than the prevalence of the female (72.95% and 59.46%) respectively. There was no sex variation in GI parasitic infection reported by Azhar et al. (2002). He observed that buffaloes of either sex were equally affected. This difference be- tween the findings cannot be explained precisely. The alteration in the physiologi- cal condition of the female animals during pregnancy and lactation (production activi- ty) may be the cause of the higher percent- age of infection in the females. The individ- uals (female) are more susceptible to any infection due to the secretion of the higher levels of prolactin and progesterone hor- mones (Lioyd, 1983). Seasonal variation of the year had no significant (P≤0.05) effect on the prevalence of GI parasitic infection in buffalo calves. There was significant dif- ference in the prevalence of GI parasites in buffalo calves in different seasons of the year. In this study, relatively higher infec- tion with GI parasites was observed in the summer season (58.82%) than the rainy season (41.18%) but Jyoti et al. (2012) re- ported that in the rainy season, the preva- lence was (74.67%) that was slightly high- er than the summer season (73.59%). The present findings showed that the highest prevalence N. vitulorum was 27% in summer and 25.71% in winter season respectively. The present findings are higher than Singh et al. (2012), who reported that the highest prevalence of N. vitulorum was (12.85%) in the rainy season. The contrast between the earlier and present findings may be due to the methods used in the study and also variation in the geographical locations of the studies. Moreover, in the present study, the study period was divided into two sea- sons for which different seasons had made some overlapping seasons of months that might have formed some contradictions. The age of the buffalo calves had no sig- nificant (P≤0.05) effect on GI parasitic in- fection in our study. The prevalence of GI parasitic infections was significantly higher (P≤0.05) in calves of 1-6 months (41.18%) than calves of 7-12 months (32.35%) and calves of 13-18 months of age (23.53%), re- spectively. The present findings were con- sistent with the earlier report of Bilal et al. (2011), who reported that the higher prev- alence of helminths infection was found in calves of 1-6 months of age (86.67%) com- pared to 7-12 months of age (60%). On the other hand, the present findings disagreed with Jyoti et al. (2012), who reported that calves of > 3 months of age were more sus- ceptible to parasitic infection than calves of < 3 months of age. They recorded that parasitic infection in >3 months of age was 68.62%, and< 3months of age was 79.12%. The higher infection rate was recorded in older buffaloes than the young buffaloes (Azhar et al., 2002), which is not in agree-
ment with the present findings. Age-wise variation might be due to an exhausted im- mune system. ConclusionsOur study revealed that the prevalence of GI parasites in buffalo calves is wide- spread in the study area regardless of age, sex, and seasons of the year. Data generated through this study will help to adopt neces- sary measures to control these GI parasitic infections in buffalo calves in Sylhet, Ban- gladesh. Farmer’s training is necessary for the construction of proper feeding strategy to reduce the parasitic load. AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank all those who helped them writing this article. Conflicts of interestThe authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Azam, M., Siddiqui, M.M., Habib, G. (2002). Prev- alence of parasitic infection in buffalo calves in Khadagzai, district Dir. Pak Vet J., 22: 87-90.
Azhar, M., Chaudhry, S. H., Tanveer, A., Haji, A. H. (2002). Epidemiology of fasciolosis in buffaloes under different managemental conditions.Vet Arh., 72: 221–28.
Bachal, B., Sharif, P., Rahamatullah, R., Aijaz, H.S. (2002). Prevalence of Gastrointestinal helminths in Buffalo calves. J Biol Sci., 2: 43-45.https:// doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2002.43.45
Bilal, M.Q., Hameed, A., Ahmad, T. (2009). Preva- lence of gastrointestinal parasites in buffalo and cow calves in rural areas of Toba Tek Singh, Pa- kistan. J Anim Plant Sci., 19: 67-70.
Cockrill, W.R. (1968). Key animals in Asia's economy. Span. 9: 12-15.
Cockrill, W.R. (1974). The working buffalo. In: The
Husbandry and Health of the Domestic Buffalo, edited by W.R. Cockrill. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Page.73-120.
Gunathilaka, N., Niroshana, D., Amarasinghe, D., Udayanga, L. (2018). Prevalence of gas- trointestinal parasitic infections and assess- ment of deworming program among cattle and buffaloes in Gampaha district, Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int., 2018(1): 1-10. https://doi. org/10.1155/2018/3048373
Islam, S., Nahar, T.N., Begum, J., Deb, G.K., Kha- tun, M., Mustafa, A. (2017).Economic evalua- tion of buffalo production in selected regions of Bangladesh. J Stock Forex Trad., 6: 1-8.
Jabbar, M., Green, D.A.G. (1983).The status and potential of livestock within the context of Ag- ricultural Development Policy in Bangladesh. The University of Wales. Aberystwyth, United Kingdom. p.113.
Jyoti, Haque, M., Singh, N.K., Juyal, P.D., Kaur, A., Rath, S.S. (2011).Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in organized dairy farms. Indian Vet J., 88:77–78.
Jyoti, Singh, N.K., Juyal, P.D., Haque, M. (2012). Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasite in buf- falo calves of Punjab state. J Vet Parasitol., 26 (1):19-22.
Lebbie, S.H.B., Rey, B., Irungu, E.K. (1994). Small ruminant research and development in Africa, Proceedings of the second biennial conference of the African small ruminant research network p. 1–5.
Lioyd, S. (1983).Effect of pregnancy and lac- tation up on infection. Vet Immunol Immuno- pathol, 4: 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165- 2427(83)90057-0
Marco, G., Idzi, P., Rina, G.K., Anotnio, M., Sim- one, M. (2019). Bench Aids for the Diagno- sis of Intestinal Parasites, A. Montresor.(ed). (2nd Ed), World Health Organisation, Geneva,.
ISBN: 9789241515344
Mohammed, A., Sampson, E., Bridgemohan, P., Khan, A., Stewart, H. (2017). A comparison of egg per gram (epg) from wet faecal smears, benchtop floatation and centrifugal tech- niques in determining the maximum number of GIN eggs in calf faeces – A case study.Int J Vet Sci Anim Husb., 2(3): 18-21.https://doi. org/10.29011/2637-9988/100021.
Mostafa, M.G. 1989. Methods of statistics, (4 ed), Karim Press and Publications, Dhaka,Ban- gladesh, p. 296-298.
Rahman, S.M., Islam, M.R. (1992). Draught an- imal power in Bangladesh.Asian Livestock. Vol. XVII, No. 2. p. 15-16.
Sanyal, P.K. (1998). Integrated gastrointestinal parasite management in dairy animals in Gujarat by self-medication.J Vet Parasitol., 12: 17-20.
Singh, N.K., Singh, H., Jyoti, Haque, M., Rath,
S.S. (2012b). Prevalence of parasitic infec- tions in buffaloes in and around Ludhiana District, Punjab, India: a preliminary study. J Buffalo Sci., 1:1–3.https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-
Storey, B.E. (2015). Fecal egg counts: uses and lim- itations. What works with worms at: Pretoria, South Africa.,p. 1-9.
Tum, S., Puotinen, M.L., Skerratt, L.F., Chan, B., Sothoeun, S. (2007). Validation of a geograph- ic information system model for mapping the risk of fasciolosis in cattle and buffaloes in Cambodia. Vet Parasitol., 143: 364–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.033. PMID: 17045401
Wang, T., Zhang, S., Wu, W., Zhang, G., Lu, D., Ornbjerg, N., Johansen, M.V. (2006). Treatment and reinfection of water buffaloes and cattle in- fected with Schistosomajaponicum in Yangtze River Valley, Anhui province, China. J Parasi- tol, 92: 1088–1091. https://doi.org10.1645/GE-
Kandasamy, G., Rajapakse,R.P.V.J., Rajakaruna,
R.S. (2013). Gastrointestinal and blood parasites of a free grazing fock of sheep in Kaithady farm in the Jafna District. J Natl Sci Found ., 41 (3): 195– 201. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v41i3.6059
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 789 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 642 |