تحلیل روابط میان‌رشته‌ای فناوری‌های نانو، زیستی، اطلاعات و شناختی با تکنیک هم‌استنادی

منابع

 پایا، علی و کلانتری نژاد، رضا (1389). ارزیابی فلسفی و دلالت‌های سیاست‌گذارانه تأثیرات چهارمین موج توسعه علمی و فناورانه بر فرهنگ و جامعه. سیاست علم و فن آوری، 4(8)، 25-33.

روکو، میهال‌سی و بین‌بریج، ویلیام سیمز (1391). نقش فناوری‌های همگرا در بهبود عملکرد انسانی. مترجمان علیرضا فرشچی، مصطفی مهرورزی، تهران: مؤسسه آموزشی و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی.

گریمالدی، رالف (۱۳۷۹). ریاضیات گسسته و ترکیبیاتی. جلد سوم، ترجمه دکتر محمدعلی رضوانی و دکتر بیژن شمس. تهران: انتشارات فاطمی.

References

Ba, Z., Cao, Y., Mao, J. et al. (2019). A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields—a case study on medical informatics and computer science. Scientometrics, 119, 1455–1486.

Chen, S., Arsenault, C., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2015). Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: The case of biochemistry and molecular biology.  Scientometrics, 102(2), 1307-1323.

Diestel, R. (2005). Graph Theory. Electronic Edition. www.esi2.us.es/~mbilbao/pdffiles/DiestelGT.pdf

Goldstone, R. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Import and Export of Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 30, 983-993.

Hernández, I (2019). Big and small techno-scientific worlds. The USA vis-a-vis Latin American countries (LAC) and the transition towards NBIC technological convergence. Scientometrics.

Karunan, K., Lathabai, H.H. & Prabhakaran, T. (2017). Discovering interdisciplinary interactions between two research fields using citation networks. Scientometrics, 113, 335–367.

Nordmann, A. (2004). Converging Technologies–Shaping the Future of European Societies [Report]. Fore sighting the New Technology Wave; European Commission.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). Challenges and Opportunities for Innovation through Technology: The Convergence of Technologies. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/STP(2013)15/FINAL&docLanguage=En

Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

Porter, A.L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.

Qin, J. (2000). Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database: An investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 51(2), 166-180.

Rafols, I., Park, J-H., & Meyer, M. (2010). Hybrid Nanomaterials Research: Is it Really Interdisciplinary?In: Rurack, Knut & Martinez-Máñez, Ramon, Eds. The Supramolecular Chemistry of Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, US, pp. 673-688.

Roco, M.C., & Bainbridge, W.S. (2013). The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal of nanoparticle research, 15(9): 1-17.

Wang, L., & Notten, A. (2011). Mapping the interdisciplinary nature and co-evolutionary patterns in five nano-industrial sectors. Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference, 6-8 April, Maastricht.

Yan, E. (2014). Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 65(11), 2331-2347.