|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||106,333,494|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||83,217,236|
A review on the relationship between university and industry and the effect of significant parameters
|Journal of Food and Bioprocess Engineering|
|مقاله 12، دوره 2، شماره 2، اسفند 2019، صفحه 163-170 اصل مقاله (327.36 K)|
|نوع مقاله: Review article|
|Mir-Michael Mousavi1؛ Maryam Azizi-lalabadi2؛ Parvin Dehghan* 3|
|1Student Research Committee, Department of Food Science and Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|
|2Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran|
|3Department of Food Sciences and Technology, Faculty of food science, Tabriz University Medical of Sciences, Tabriz, Iran|
|There has been no systematic research of the characteristics of the universities and academic researchers that seem to have contributed most to industrial innovation. This article assesses the emerging 'technology transfer' in academic goals as a factor which could affect the economic problem. Transferring of science, technology and graduated student from university to industry have studied as an essential goal to academics-industry. The most considerable effect by companies is enhancing the access to new research, inventions and the project. The most important advantage of faculty members has finished their academic research by protecting results for graduate students and lab equipment. This condition corrects by increasing of disciplines, declining participation of students in their own educational curriculum, and award structures which emphasize on the promotion process. The results show that, the industry concerns with technological change and to policy makers attempting to increase the economic payoff from the nation's academic research.|
|University؛ Academic research؛ Innovation؛ Technology transfer؛ Industry|
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107–136.
Andersen, T. M., & Herbertsson, T. T. (2003). Measuring globalization. IZA, No. 817.
Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions. The OECD Observer, No. 9.
Bagchi‐Sen, S., & Smith, H. L. (2012). The role of the university as an agent of regional economic development. Geography Compass, 6(7), 439–453.
Baumeister, H. (2002). Customer relationship management for SMEs. The Proceedings, 1–7.
Bell, E. R. J. (1993). Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations: a review: Practitioners’ forum. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(3), 307–322.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.
Bloedon, R. V, & Stokes, D. R. (1994). Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. Research-Technology Management, 37(2), 44–48.
Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K. S., Stoto, M. A., & Wise, D. (1986). University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science, 232(4756), 1361–1366.
Bok, D. C., & Bok, D. C. (2009). Beyond the ivory tower: Social responsibilities of the modern university. Harvard University Press.
Boucher, G., Conway, C., & Van Der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37(9), 887–897.
Brimble, R. D. S. (2007). Specific approaches to university-industry links of selected companies in thailand and their relative effectiveness. How Universities Promote Economic Growth, 265.
Brundenius, C., Lundvall, B.-Å., & Sutz, J. (2011). 11 The role of universities in innovation systems in developing countries: developmental university systems–empirical, analytical and normative perspectives. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, 311.
Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.
Carroll, M. C., & Smith, B. W. (2006). Estimating the economic impact of universities: the case of bowling green state university. Industrial Geographer, 3(2).
Chew Hernández, M. L., Romero, V. V., Rosas, L. V., & Téllez, R. D. (2014). A decision analytic-value-based methodology for analysing university-industry collaborations. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 7(1), 44–65.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
Correa, P., & Zuniga, P. (2013). Public Policies to Foster Knowledge Transfer from Public Research Organization.” Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship Global Practice. Public Policy Brief, World Bank, Washington DC.
D’Este, P., Nesta, L., & Patel, P. (2005). Analysis of University-Industry research collaborations in the UK: preliminary results of a survey of university researchers.
Dewan, S., & Kraemer, K. L. (2000). Information technology and productivity: evidence from country-level data. Management Science, 46(4), 548–562.
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.
Du Boff, R. B. (1993). Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 27(4), 1309–1311.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48(1), 105–121.
Feller, I. (1990). Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19(4), 335–348.
Feller, I. (1992). American state governments as models for national science policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(2), 288–309.
Feller, I., & Geiger, R. (1993). The dispersion of academic research during the 1980s. Institute for Policy Research and Evaluation, Pennsylvania State. University.
Flint, D. J., Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial, S. F. (2002). Exploring the phenomenon of customers’ desired value change in a business-to-business context. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 102–117.
Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 127–141.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Gilpin, R. (2016). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
Guimón, J. (2013). Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries. World Bank, 3, 12–48.
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586.
Ham, R. M., & Mowery, D. C. (1998). Improving the effectiveness of public–private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory. Research Policy, 26(6), 661–675.
Kaiser, F. M. (2007). GAO: Government accountability office and general accounting office. Library of congress washington dc congressional research service.
Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 691–707.
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Research Policy, 38(9), 1407–1422.
Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2009). New forms of strategic research collaboration between firms and universities in the German research system. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(1–2), 94–110.
Lam, M. J. (1986). Restrictions on Technology Transfer among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference. JC & UL, 13, 311.
Lawson-Body, A., & Limayem, M. (2004). The impact of customer relationship management on customer loyalty: The moderating role of web site characteristics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4), JCMC944.
Lawton-Smith, H. (2006). Universities, innovation and the economy.
Lee, S. M., Chang, D., & Lim, S.-B. (2005). Impact of entrepreneurship education: A comparative study of the US and Korea. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(1), 27–43.
Lendel, I. (2010). The impact of research universities on regional economies: The concept of university products. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(3), 210–230.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.
Mai, K. L. (2007). University and Industry—A Productive Relationship. Higher Education And Employment, 248.
Mowery, D. C. (1983). The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations in Economic History, 20(4), 351–374.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 115–127.
Mowery, D. C. (1982). The emergence and growth of industrial research in american manufacturing, 1899-1945.
Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1467–1479.
Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 13.
OECD, T. E. P. (1992). Technology and the economy: the key relationships. Technology/Economy Programme. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris.
Özgener, Ş., & İraz, R. (2006). Customer relationship management in small–medium enterprises: The case of Turkish tourism industry. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1356–1363.
Ponds, R., Oort, F. van, & Frenken, K. (2009). Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231–255.
Popp Berman, E. (2008). Why did universities start patenting? Institution-building and the road to the Bayh-Dole Act. Social Studies of Science, 38(6), 835–871.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.
Salomon, J. J. (1981). Technical change and economic-policy. Materials and Society, 5(4), 471–479.
Schmandt, J., & Wilson, R. (2018). Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology (Vol. 46). Routledge.
Smith, H. L. (2007). Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(1), 98–114.
Smith, H. L., Romeo, S., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2008). Oxfordshire biomedical university spin-offs: An evolving system. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 303–319.
Stephan, P. E. (2001). Educational implications of university–industry technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 199–205.
Walden, B. (1991). New technologies in the 1990’s: A socioeconomic strategy, by organisation for economic co-operation and development. Paris, Author, 1988. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 110–111.
Washburn, J. (2000). The kept university. Atlantic Monthly, 285(3), 39–54.
Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2012). Accounting for Science-Industry Collaboration in Innovation: Existing Metrics and Related Challenges. The Global Innovation Index 2012, 97–107.
Zuniga, M. P. (2011). The state of patenting at research institutions in developing countries: policy approaches and practices (Vol. 4). WIPO.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 414
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 326