|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||104,987,844|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||82,068,857|
ارزیابی آثار طرح ویژة بهسازی مسکن در تغییر ساختار کالبدی و عملکرد اقتصادی مساکن روستایی (مورد مطالعه: دهستان ئیلاق جنوبی، شهرستان دهگلان)
|پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی|
|مقاله 4، دوره 53، شماره 1، فروردین 1400، صفحه 47-63 اصل مقاله (853.44 K)|
|نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2019.272204.1007835|
|مجتبی قدیری معصوم1؛ افشین بهمنی 2؛ حامد قادرمرزی3؛ محمد رضا رضوانی4|
|1استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران|
|2دکترای جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران|
|3دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران|
|4استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران|
|مسکن روستایی با معماری ویژه و ساختار کارکردی خاص خود نیازمند بهسازی و مقاومسازی است. در این راستا، دولتها با اعمال سیاستهای حمایتی نقش بسزایی در ارتقای سطح استانداردهای کمی و کیفی مسکن دارند. اما برخی مداخلات آنها در حوز توسعة مسکن روستایی ممکن است به تحولاتی منجر شود که جنبههای کالبدی و کارکردی مسکن روستایی را تحت تأثیر قرار دهد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی اثرهای طرح بهسازی مسکن روستایی بر ابعاد اقتصادی و کالبدی مسکن روستایی انجام گرفته است. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی و ماهیت آن کاربردی است. شیوة گردآوری دادهها به روش اسنادی و مشاهدة میدانی بوده که در مطالعة میدانی از پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. جامعة آماری پژوهش شامل روستاهای دهستان ئیلاق جنوبی است که به طور نمونه سه روستای قادرمرز، باشماق، و بکرآباد ارزیابی شدهاند. با استفاده از فرمول اصلاحشدة کوکران، 60 واحد مسکونی بهعنوان نمونه انتخاب شد و شاخصهای اقتصادی و کالبدی مسکن روستایی در قالب 29 گویه ارزیابی شد. برای آزمون فرضیات از روشهای آماری T تکنمونهای، کای اسکوئر، و ضریب همبستگی اسپیرمن استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان میدهد نوسازی مسکن موجب افزایش سطح رضایتمندی ساکنان از ابعاد کالبدی مسکن از جمله افزایش استحکام بنا و نوع مصالح مورد استفاده شده است؛ اما از بُعد اقتصادی بهدلیل حذف فضاهای معیشتی و کاهش سطح زیربنای واحد مسکونی اقتصاد خانوار تحت تأثیر قرار گرفته و سطح رضایتمندی ساکنان را کاهش داده است.|
|دهستان ئیلاق جنوبی؛ طرح ویژة بهسازی مسکن؛ عملکرد کالبدی و اقتصادی؛ مسکن؛ مسکن روستایی|
|عنوان مقاله [English]|
|Evaluation of the Effects of Housing Improvment Special Plan on the Physical Structure and Economic Performance of Rural Housings (Case Study: Eilagh-E- Jonobi District, Dehgolan County)|
|Mojtaba Ghadiri Masoum1؛ Afshin Bahmani2؛ Hamed Ghadermarzi3؛ Mohammadreza Rezvani4|
|1Professor of Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran|
|2PhD in Geography and Rural Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran|
|3Associate Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran|
|4Professor of Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran|
The house is a residential place, which is both relaxing and soothing. It serves as a shelter between the family and the surrounding environment that meets one’s biological, livelihood, economic, social, cultural, and psychological needs. Hence it plays quite an important role. Non-resilience of rural housing to the occurrence of various natural disasters, along with the deteriorated texture of these houses, has made governments to seek improving the quality of rural housing through implementing various policies. The Rural Housing Improvement Plan was started by the Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation in 1995 with the aim of improving the quality of housing and rural texture and promoting the level of safety, health, welfare, and comfort of rural houses. The project brought some kind of face to face and urban housing into the traditional Rural structure and became operational in Dehgolan. The County of Dehgolan, an area in Kurdistan Province, takes in a high portion of rural population in the province, having five rural regions in terms of country division. This study assesses the rural housing situation of the Eilagh-e-Jonobi, seeking to find the effects of housing renovation project on physical and economic dimensions of rural housing in the study area.
This research was an applied library survey, being descriptive-analytical. The statistical population of the study lived in rural areas of Eilagh-e-Jonobi, Dehgolan County, and the sample was consisted of three villages of Qadarmarz, Bashmaq, and Bakrabad. The main data collection method involved observing the field, using questionnaires, and considering the wide area of the study from a total of 606 residential units in the studied villages. In this way, by means of the modified Cochran Method, sixty residential units got selected as the sample. Through randomized stratified sampling method, both the percentage and share of sample size in each village were chosen. A questionnaire was used to collect field data. Experts' opinions and Cronbach's Alpha Method helped assessing its validity and reliability, respectively. For the questionnaire’s economic indicators, consisted of 15 items, the coefficient turned out to be 0/744, whereas for the physical index, with 14 components, it was 0/897. To analyze the data, the research utilized descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution, mean, and standard deviation along with inferential statistics methods such as chi-square test, one-sample t-test, and Spearman correlation coefficient.
Results and Discussion
Evaluation of three important components, with regard to quality measurement of physical dimension of housing, suggests that housing renovation has a positive impact on improving the quality indices such as building strength, increasing level of satisfaction based on materials type and structural strength, and observing the principles and technical standards. Thus, with a significance level of 0/000, the coefficient of chi-square for the component of increasing the building strength is equal to 133/300; for overall satisfaction of the physical dimension, to 24/933; and for assessing the effect on observance of technical principles, to 40/933. Results from the t-test on the hypothesis indicate its significance as well as the negative impact of housing renovation on women's participation in economic activities. Thus, with a significance level of 0/30, the coefficient of t-test is 9/452, confirming the hypothesis. The impact of housing renovation and changing rural housing functions emphasizes the level of women's participation in economic activity. Part of the economic activities, including production of handicrafts like carpet weaving as well as some activities related to keeping the livestock and dairy products, is the result of activities by rural women, which by removing the relevant spaces and reducing the number of livestock and, consequently, rural houses, these activities have also dropped significantly.
Despite the prevalence of non-rigorous residential units in the rural districts under study, over the past two decades many of worn-out buildings have been renovated in the framework of this plan. A study of 15 economic categories indicates that due to the type of rural livelihood, often farmed, housing renovation does not have a favorable impact on household economic status, somehow undermining diverse economic activities of rural households. Surveying the level of satisfaction from physical aspects of rural housing has shown a relatively favorable situation, in which the owners are pleased with the improvement of safety level, building’s resistance degree, and the type of materials used in the manufacturing process. Thanks to the benefit of spaces such as toilets, baths, and kitchens, they consider the quality and sanitary level of the renovated houses as desirable. But they are not satisfied with the limited level of infrastructure as well as the lack of attention paid to the design of interior plans of rural houses. Respondents have been of the opinion that the way of constructing new homes has changed the traditional landscape of villages. By blindly following the designs and architectures of urban houses, this minimizes the environmental and climatic factors in the construction of new houses. One criticism of the residents from a physical point of view to new rural houses concerns the removal of many livelihood spaces in rural houses, not to mention the reduction of housing infrastructure.
|Housing, Rural Housing, Housing Improvement Special Plan, Physical and Economic Performance|
38. Ahmadi, A.; Mojaradi, Q. and Badsar, M., 2017, The effects of designing and removing rural housing on the quality of life of residents of rural area of Urmia, Journal of Environmental studies, No. 2, PP. 433-445. (In Persian)
39. Azami, M.; Samian, M. and Ansari, E., 2017, Analysis of the Effects of Implementation of the Improvement Plan, Case Study: Verkaneh Village, Hamedan, Journal of Human Settlement Planning Studies, No. 39, PP. 315-337. (In Persian)
40. Bakhshi, Z., 2010, Investigating the Problems of Rural Residential Reliance Supporters Using Factor Analysis Method, Sabzevar, Master's Thesis, Supervisor: Motie Langroudi, University of Tehran, Faculty of Geography. (In Persian)
41. Rostamalezadeh, V. and Ghasemi Ardehayee, A., 2012, Effects of Rural Mortgage Lending on Rural Life, Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, No. 139, PP. 67-84. (In Persian)
42. Romiani, A.; Sojasy Qeidari, H. and Mansouri, K., 2018, Structural-Functional Analysis of Rural Housing with Sustainable Development Approach, Case Study: East Romshgan Village, Kohdasht Township, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 162, PP. 55-70. (In Persian)
43. Riahi, V.; Parizadi, T. and Sangin Ostadi, Ali., 2017, Analysis of housing supply patterns in rural areas, Case: Taibad Bakhrz Town, Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, No. 20, PP. 137-154. (In Persian)
44. Zargar, Akbar, 2007, An Introduction to the Recognition of Rural Architecture in Iran, Shahid Beheshti University Press, Fourth Edition, Tehran. (In Persian)
45. Zargar, A. and Hatami Khanaghahi, T., 2014, Effective Factors on the Design of Rural Housing, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 148, PP. 45-62. (In Persian)
46. Zargar, A.; Sartipipoor, M.; Miri, S.H. and Sheikh Taheri, H., 2015, Designing and Formation of a Rural House Based on Older Architects, A Case Study: Garmsar County Villages, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 158, PP. 1-20. (In Persian)
47. Ziari, S.; Farhoudi, R.; Pourahmad, A. and Hataminejad, H., 2017, Housing Supply Model for Low-income Groups, Case Study: Karaj City, Human Geography Research, No. 49, PP. 869-883. (In Persian)
48. Sajjadi Ghaemmaghami, P.; Pourdihimi, Sh. and Zarghami, I., 2010, Principles of Social Stability in Residential Complexes from the Viewpoint of Iranian Experts and Experts, Sufeh Magazine, No. 51, PP. 76-88. (In Persian)
49. Sirtipipour, M., 2011, Phenomenology of Rural Housing, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 133, PP. 3-14. (In Persian)
50. Sanaei Moghadam, S. and Mohammadi Yeganeh, B., 2017, Analysis of Factors Affecting Rural Housing Sustainability, Case Study: Rural Settlements in Charosa District, Kohgiluyeh, Geospatial Thought Journal, No. 16, PP. 119-132. (In Persian)
51. Shateri, M.; Hajipour, M. and Aghajanpour, P., 2016, Examining the Physical and Functional Transformations of Iranian Rural Homes, Case Study: Shaskoh District, Ghaenat City, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 153, PP. 57-72. (In Persian)
52. Sadeghloo, T. and Azizi, S., 2017, Evaluation of the Effects of Housing Renovation and Housing Improvement on the Quality of the Rural Environment, Case Study: Rural District of Shirvān, Geography and Planning Magazine, No. 61, PP. 223-240. (In Persian)
53. Salahi Isfahani, G.; Mirza Ali, M. and Saadin, H., 2017, Study and Analysis of the Effects of Housing Design on the Pattern of Rural Housing, Case Study: Sultanali Village of Gonbad Kavous County, Journal of Psychology and Environment, No. 157, PP. 102 -116. (In Persian)
54. Sidayi, S. E. and Ghasemian, Z., 2012, Investigating the process of functional changes in rural houses, Case study: Gorji Mahalla village, Behshahr city, Mazandaran province, Journal of Spatial Planning, No. 5, PP. 87-106. (In Persian)
55. Abdollahi, S.; BozarjoMhori, Kh. and Soltani, R., 2015, Investigating the Efficiency of Government Facilities in Strengthening and Architecture, Rural Housing, Case Study: Sarjam Village, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 149, PP. 67-78. (In Persian)
56. Anabestani, A., 2017, Planning of Rural Homes in Iran, First Edition, Tehran: Simaye danesh Publication. (In Persian)
57. Annabestani, A.; Behzadi, S. and Anzaei, E., 2018, Investigating the Impact of Rural Housing Pattern on the Lifestyle of Villagers in Neka City, Journal of Geographic Space, No. 27, PP. 35-52. (In Persian)
58. Einali, J.; Mohammadi Yeganeh, B. and Khaledinia, M.T., 2015, Effects of Housing Improvement in Economic Development Effects of Rural Homes, Case Study: shamshir Village in Paveh, Journal of Rural Space Economics, No. 4, PP. 191-209. (In Persian)
59. Einifar, A. and Fallah, E., 2018, Territory in Iran's desert margin housing, Case study: The scope of the realms of housing in the three districts of Agda, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 161, PP. 45-60. (In Persian)
60. Ghaffari, S.R. and Miri, A., 2017, Spatial Processes in Typology of Rural Housing, Case Study: Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province, qarbi Kiar village, Journal of Physical Development Planning, Vol. 2, No. 3, PP. 117-128. (In Persian)
61. Faezi, S.F.; Elyasi, M.R. and Rafieyan Behabadi, M., 2017, The Effect of Rural Housing Reform on the Quality of Sima and the View of the Village, A Case Study: Ahmadabad Village, Bahabad, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 21, PP. 57-79. (In Persian)
62. Fateh, Mohammad, 2009, Rural Architecture 1 and 2, Noavaran Publications, First Edition, Tehran.
63. Farasati, F.; Mozaffar, F.; Nasrollahi, F. and Molaee Heshjin, N., 2018, Environmental quality analysis of indigenous dwellings in the mountainous areas of Gilan with an emphasis on thermal comfort, Case study: Dosaldeh Roodbar Village, Journal of Planning Human Settlements, No. 42, PP. 1-17. (In Persian)
64. Fazlali, Z.; Poor Taheri, M. and Roknaddin Eftekhari, A.R., 2018, Study of rural housing changes in Mazandaran province, Human Geography Research, No. 2, PP. 339-354. (In Persian)
65. Ghasemi Siani, M.; Afrakhteh, H.; Riahi, V. and Azizpour, F., 2018, Explaining Structural-Functional Reforms of Housing and Rural Housing, A Case Study: bon Rood and jolgeh District of Isfahan, Journal of Physical Development Planning, No. 6, PP. 47-64. (In Persian)
66. Ghadiri Masoum, M.; Rezvani, M. R.; Ghadermarzi, H. and Bahmani, A., 2018, Comparative Analysis of Rural Housing Indices Using Vikor Technique, Case Study: Dehgolan villages, Geography and Human Relations, No. 2, PP. 890-908. (In Persian)
67. Karimzadeh, H.; Zaheri, M. and Khaleghi, A., 2018, An Analysis of the Spatial Reflection of Rural Housing Rehabilitation after Earthquake, Case Study: Sina Village, city Varzaghan, Journal of Rural Research and Planning, No. 21, PP. 123-140. (In Persian)
68. Kochakian, M.; Ivazian, S.; Diba, D. and Nowruz Borazjani, V., 2017, Redefining the concept of housing and housing based on economic and social components, Journal of Urban Management, No. 49, PP. 263-286. (In Persian)
69. Lotfi, A. Q.; Ahmadi, M. and Hassanzadeh, F., 2009, Indicators and Indicators of Rural Housing Planning and Policy in Iran, Journal of Environmental Regulation, No. 7, PP. 89-109. (In Persian)
70. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B.; Cheraghi, M. and Islami, L., 2017, Analysis of the effects of housing rehabilitation credits on the sense of security of rural households, case study: mojezat village, Zanjan city, Journal of physical development planner,Vol. 7, PP. 81-98. (In Persian)
71. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B.; Cheraghi, M. and Islami, L., 2017, An Analysis of the Effects of Rural Housing Renewal Credit on its Production Function, Case Study: mojezat Village, Zanjan City, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 158, PP. 51- 62. (In Persian)
72. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B.; Cheraghi, M.; Jamshidi, M. K. and Emami, M., 2017, An Analysis of Economic Indicators Effective in the Development of Rural Housing Function, Case Study: Ghani Biglou Rural District, Zanjan Town, Housing and Rural Environment, No. 160, PP. 35-44. (In Persian)
73. Mosapour, M.Y., 2018, Reflection of the concept of decorating in rural housing in Iran, Case study: Housing decorations in Evan village, Qazvin province, Housing and rural environment, No. 162, PP. 3-20. (In Persian)
74. Frimpong, A., 2011, Sheltering and housing recovery after disasters: Dissecting the problems of policy implementation and possible solutions, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 1, No. 20, PP. 1-12.
75. Li, T.; Long, H.; Liu, Y. and Tu, Sh., 2015, Multiscale analysis of rural housing land transition under China'srapid urbanization: The case of Bohai Rim, Habitat International, Vol. 48, PP. 227-238.
76. Liu, W.; Spaargaren, G.; Mol, A.; Heerink, N. and Wang, C., 2014, Low carbon rural housing provision in China: Participation and decision making, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 35, PP. 80-90.
77. Manoj, P.K., 2010, Prospects and Problems of Housing Microfinance in India: Evidence from “Bhavanashree” Project in Kerala State, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Issue 19.
78. Meia, G.C., 2011, Rural structures in the tropics: design and development.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 618
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 240