پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,937,415 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,607,489 |
شرق‌شناسی و اکتشاف جغرافیایی در خدمت راهبرد استعماری: بررسی پیوند اکتشاف‌های علمی با سیاست استعماری روسیۀ تزاری در برابر قفقاز | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 11، شماره 2، مهر 1397، صفحه 491-512 اصل مقاله (657.79 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2019.258293.449771 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| جواد مرشدلو* | ||
| استادیار تاریخ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تسلط روسیۀ تزاری بر قفقاز در نیمۀ نخست سدۀ نوزدهم، بیشتر از دیدگاه نظامی بررسی شده است. از جنبه‌های غفلت‌شدۀ این موضوع، ذهنیت روس‌ها از جنوب قفقاز و شناختی است که آنان از این سرزمین و مردم آن به‌دست آوردند؛ شناختی که راه تسلط بر آن را هموار کرد. به‌نظر می‌رسد قفقازی که امروزه می‌شناسیم خود نتیجۀ چنین شناختی بوده است و درونمایه‌ای شرق‌شناختی دارد. به بیان دیگر، مفهوم پسااستعماری قفقاز به‌مثابۀ یک کل جغرافیایی و فرهنگی با درک تاریخی ایرانیان و ساکنان بومی این سرزمین از آن تفاوت دارد. در نوشتار پیش‌رو تلاش شده است بر این زاویۀ غفلت‌شده از موضوع پرتوافکنی و روند تکوین شناخت روس‌ها از جنوب قفقاز و مردم آن و شکل‌گیری ذهنیت استعماری از این سرزمین بررسی شود. روش نوشتار، توصیفی- تحلیلی بر مبنای تحلیل اطلاعات استخراج‌شده از منابع دست اول به زبان‌های مختلف است و در سه بخش سازماندهی شده است: در بخش نخست زمینه و منابع شناخت اولیۀ روس‌ها از جنوب قفقاز ارزیابی می‌شود؛ در بخش دوم، اقدام‌های اکتشافی روس‌ها در سدۀ هجدهم با هدف دستیابی به شناختی علمی از این حوزه و در بخش سوم، نقش نخبگان بومی در شکل‌گیری و توسعۀ ذهنیت استعماری روس‌ها از تاریخ، فرهنگ و جغرافیای قفقاز بررسی می‌شود. نتیجۀ نوشتار نشان می‌دهد که روس‌ها به موازات اقدام‌های نظامی برای تسلط بر قفقاز برنامۀ مشخصی را برای کشف و شناخت این سرزمین و مردم آن پیش بردند. شکل‌گیری قفقاز به‌مثابۀ سازه‌ای مفهومی با درون‌مایة ژئوپلیتیک از دستاوردهای این برنامۀ اکتشافی بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استعمار روسی؛ اکتشافات جغرافیایی؛ راهبرد استعماری؛ روسیه؛ قفقاز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Oriental Studies and Geographical Discoveries in Favor of Colonial Strategy: The Case of Russian Colonial Policy in the Southern Caucasus | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Javad Morshedloo | ||
| Assistant Professor of History, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Tsarist Russia's dominance over the Caucasus in the 19th century was a turning point in the history of this region. It was a consequential change that determined the future destiny of the Caucasian people within the colonial strategy of the Russian empire. The birth of “Caucasus” as a modern phenomenon with its multidimensional and geopolitical connotations was the result of this process. This process most often viewed and surveyed from European or Russian perspective and the resulted studies naturally reflect a Russo-Orientalist/Euro-Centrist narrative. The present paper aims to propose a rather different perspective; keeping in mind the pre-colonial history of the so-called Caucasus region, it will trace the process during which Tsarist Russia's colonial strategy toward the Caucasus was developed and try to explain how this strategy led to creation of “Caucasus” as a colonial-geopolitical conceptual structure. The central question of this study is that how Tsarist Russia discovered the Caucasus. As a time-tested rule, discovering and reconnoiter of any region is an essential requisite of its colonization. The region that the present study focuses on - namely the Caucasus - has not been a “terra incognita” with an uncivilized indigenous people. Its extensions were wide enough to be home to a great population with different and multicultural backgrounds who developed advanced civilizations and historical relations with their western and eastern neighbors. While the northern Caucasus was mostly home to tribal peoples with Turkic origins, parts of Southern Caucasus welcomed Christianity in an ancient time. The first appearance of Christianity could be traced back to the very earliest day of the religion and long before Russian themselves converted to it. Moreover, Armenian and Georgian people along with their Iranian and Turkic neighbors have their own culture and civilizations with a prosperous history. From an Iranian point of view, there was not any historical region called as the Caucasus. The voluminous literature in Persian language dealing with the historical geography of the lands between Caspian and the black seas do not mention to this word. Authors of these works mostly have called the Caucasus Mountains as “Alborz Küh” and treated the peripheral lands as provinces of Iran. Except for Arabic, this is the case of indigenous texts in other languages. In some Arabic texts, there are references to the word "Kabk" (قبق) whose origin is questionable. Yet, there are clear references to the word “Caucasus” in the Greek and roman geographic and historical literature. This latter seems to be the main source of western travelers to revive the denomination in the modern period. Hence, we can ask that did Russian themselves reproduce this toponym or European visitors intermediated it? This paper tries to prepare an answer for this question. As the documentary base of this study shows, European orientalist discourse played a crucial role in paving the way for the Russian dominance over Caucasus. From 16th century on, many Europeans as diplomats, tradesmen and adventurous travelers passed the Caucasus lands in order to develop relations with the Safavid Iran. A wealth of travelogue literature produced by these Europeans among whom there were scientists and artists who certainly contributed to the Russian discovery of the region. We can mention to a few names among the Russian tradesmen who also contributed to their countrymen's familiarity with the region and its people. Yet, the main work was fulfilled by a group of German scholars who were in service of Tsarist colonial policy. Peter Simon Pallas and his savant students, Y. G. Güldenstaadt and S. G. Gmelin were among the most influential figures who provided the Russians a wealth of scientific and experimental material in different fields of history, geography, ethnography, commerce, fauna and flora and the like about the region. No doubt this group of the Europeans played a central role in formation of Caucasus as a part of the Tsarist colonial empire. A third group also played an essential role in formation of the orientalist-geopolitical concept of Caucasus within the Russian colonial strategy; Among this last group who came from the indigenous elite, Armenians have allocated an exclusive contribution to themselves. This unique role had been so important that led some scholars to introduce the Armenian people as the inviters of Russians into the region. Yet, as the results of this study show, they were not alone and their Georgian neighbors played an influential role as well. Among the Georgian elite who from late 16th century on, began to migrate into the Russian lands, Sulkhan Saba Orbeliani played an important role. As a famous figure who belonged to the Georgian landowning elite, Orbeliani provided the Russian government with important data on the geographic situation of the region, its ethnographic composition and political conditions. As Allen has shown, Orbeliani's geographical Atlas of Caucasus was an invaluable source to be used by the famous German geographers, G. Deslisle to produce his invaluable 1721 map of Caucasus by request of Peter the great. Comparing with those of Armenians and Georgians, the contribution of Muslim elite was not so much to be accounted. Yet, there were some indigenous figures with an Iranian cultural lineage, who also played an influential role in the process. A. Q. Bakikhanov was a typical figure among this group who appeared as the consulters of the colonial rule in the Caucasus. This study is based on a volume of literary materials that are gleaned from first-hand sources in different languages including Persian, Arabic, Russian, French, English and German. With a critical and analytical approach, these materials were employed in order to prepare an answer for the main question of the study. Its results show that between 16th to 19th centuries, Tsarist Russia advanced an expansionist policy toward the Caucasus region. Parallel to this expansionist policy and as an essential part of it was a discovering strategy to acquire an experimental-scientific reconnoiter of the occupied region and its people. Here, the pre-modern European mentality which was a legacy of the classic period along with the scientific attempts of the German scientist who were in service of the Tsarist regime and worked within the discourse of European orientalism, played a crucial role. Figures among the indigenous elite came to help their European colleagues. Formation of the “Caucasus” as an orentalistic/geopolitical concept with certain colonial connotations was the result of this process. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Caucasus, geographical discovery, orientalism, Russia, Russian colonial policy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
A) Arabic
1. Ibn Asir, Abul-Hasan (1966), The History in Total, Vol. 8, Bairut: Dar Sader. 2. Mas’udi, Ali B. Hossein (1970), Fountains of Gold and Mines of Jewerlies, Vol. 2, Tehran: Offset Reprints. 3. Miskawayh, Ahmad B. Mohammad (2001), The Experiences of Nations and Tracing the Deeds, Vol. 6, Edited by A. Imami, Tehran: Sorush. 4. Ramzi, M. M. (1908), A Compendium of Narratives on the History of Tatars and Bulgars, Vol. 2, Tehran: Offset Reprints. B) English
1. Aivazian, Armen (2001), “The Secret Meeting of Armenians on Lim Land in 1722: Concerning Armenian Liberation Movement”, Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 5, pp. 85-92.
2. Allen, W. E. D. (1942), “The Caucasian Borderland”, Geographical Journal, Vol. 99, Nos. 5-6, pp. 225-237.
3. Allen, W. E. D. (1956), “The Sources for G. Delisle’s “Carte des Pays Voisins de la Mer Caspiene” of 1723”, Imago Mundi, Vol. 13, pp. 137-150. 4. Allen, W. E. D. (1970), Russian Embassies to the Georgian Kings, 1589-1605, Vol. 1, London: Hakluyt Society. 5. Andreeva, Elena (2005), “Russia IV: Travelers in Persia to 1917”, Encyclopedia Iranica, Available at: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/russia-iii-travelers-in-persia, (Accessed on: 5/4/2018). 6. Atkin, Muriel (1980), Russia and Iran, 1780-1828, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. 7. Atkin, Muriel (1988), “Russian Expansion in the Caucasus to 1813”, in: M. Rywkin (ed.), Russian Colonial Expansion to 1917, London and New York: Mancell, pp. 139-187. 8. Baddeley, John F. (1908), The Russia’s Conquest of the Caucasus, London and New York: Longmans. 9. Bassin, Mark (1991), “Russia between Europe and Asia: the Ideological Construction of Geographical Space”, Slavic Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 1-17.
10. Bell, John (1762), Travels from St. Petersburg in Russia to Diverse Parts of Asia, Vol. 2, Glascow: Gale, ECCO.
11. Bournoutian, George A. (1992), The Khanate of Erevan under Qajar Rule 1795-1828, Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers.
12. Bournoutian, George A. (1998), Russia and the Armenians of Transcaucasia, 1797-1889, a Documentary Record, Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers. 13. Bournoutian, George A. (2001), Armenians and Russia, 1626-1796, a Documentary Record, Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers. 14. Bournoutian, George, A. (2004), Two Chronicles on the History of Karabagh, Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers.
15. Dickinson, Sara (2002), “Russia’s First “Orient”: Characterizing the Crimea in 1787”, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 3-25. 16. Duran, James A. (1969), “Catherine II, Potemkin, and Colonization Policy in Southern Russia”, Russian Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 23-36. 17. Gmelin, S. Gottlieb (2007), Travels through Northern Persia, 1770-1774, Translated and Annotated by Willem Floor, Costa Mesa: Mage Publishers.
18. Gvosdev, Nikolas K. (2000), Imperial Policies and Perspectives toward Georgia, 1760-1819, Macmillan Press LTD. 19. Halperin, Charles J. (1985), Russia and the Golden Horde, the Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History, Indiana University Press. 20. Herodotus (1975), Histories, Vol. 2, Translated into English by A. D. Godley, London: Loeb Classical Library. 21. Jalaleants’, Esayi Hasan (2009), A Brief History of the Aghuank’ Region, a History of Karabagh and Genje from 1702-1723, Annotated Translation by George A. Bournoutian, Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers. 22. Khodarkowsky, Michel (2002), Russia’s Steppe Frontier: the Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500-1800, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 23. King, Charles (2008), The Ghost of Freedom, a History of the Caucasus, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 24. Kochan, L. and R. Abrahams (1989), The Making of Modern Russia, London: Macmillan. 25. Kotilaine, J. T. (2005), Russia’s Foreign Trade and Economic Expansion in Seventeenth Century, Windows on the World, Leiden: Brill. 26. Laruelle, Marlene (2007), “The Orient in Russian Thought at the Turn of the Century”, in: D. Shlapentokh, Russia between East and West, Scholarly Debates on Eurasianism, Brill, pp. 9-36.
27. Layton, Susan (1986), “The Creation of an Imaginative Caucasian Geography”, Slavic Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 470-485.
28. Mostashari, Firouzeh (2006), On the Religious Frontier: Tsarist Russia and Islam in the Caucasus, London: I. B. Tauris.
29. Pliny (1855), Natural History of Pliny, with an English Translation by John Bostock and H. T. Riley, Vol. 2, London: Henry G. Bohn. 30. Polyevktov, M. (1930), “The Ways of Communication between Russia and Georgia in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries”, Journal of Modern History, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 367-377.
31. Procopius (1928), History of the Wars, Vol. 1, Leob Classical Library. 32. Resis, Albert (1985), “Russophobia and the “Testament” of Peter the Great, 1812-1980”, Slavic Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 681-693. 33. Scotto, Peter (1992), “Prisoners of the Caucasus: Ideologies of Imperialism in Lermontov’s Bela”, PMLA, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 246-260.
34. Shimmelpennick Van Der Oye, D. (2010), Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration, New York: Yale University Press.
35. Strabo (1969), The Geography of Strabo, with an English Translation, Vol. 5, London: Leob Classical Library. 36. Subtelny, Orest (1974), “Peter I’s Testament: a Reassessment”, Slavic Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 663-678. 37 .UNESCO (2012), ““Description of Georgian Kingdom” and the Geographical Atlas of Vakhushti Bagrationi”, Available at: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/ communication-and-information/flagship-project-activities/memory-of-the-world/register/full-list-of-registered-heritage/registered-heritage-page-2/description-of-georgian-kingdom-and-the-geographical-atlas-of-vakhushti-bagrationi/, (Accessed on: 14/02/2018).
C) French 1. De Bruyn, Cornelis (1725), Voyage de Corneille Le Brun par la Moscovie, en Persia, et aux Indes Orientales, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: N.P. 2. Olearius, Adam (1726), Voyages Tres-Curious et Tres-Renomme Fait en Moscovie, Tartarie et en Perse par le Sr. Adam Olearious, tr. par le Sir. De Wicquefort, Amesterdam. 3. Pallas, P. S. and Others (1779-1787), Histoire des Decouvertes Faites par Divers Savans Voyageurs…, 6 Vols., Russian Academi of Sciences, S. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences. 4. Struys, Jan Janszoon (1681), Les Voyages de Jean Struys: en Moscovie, en Tartarie, en Perse, Aux Indes and en Plusieurs Autres Païs Etrangers…, Vol. 2, Paris: M. Galinius.
D) German 1. Reinnegs, Jacob (1797), Allgemeine Historische-Topographische Beschreibung des Kaukasus, Vol. 2, St. Petersburg: bei Gerstenberg und Dittmar.
E) Persian 1. Ahmadi, H. (2008), Documents on Iran-Russia’s Diplomatic Relations, Safavids to Qajars, Translated by R. Mosalmainan Qubadiani and B. Mosalmanian Qubadiani, Tehran: Markaz-e Asnad va Tarikh-e Diplomacy. 2. Bakikhanov, A. (2004), The Heavenly Rose-Garden, Edited by A. Alizadeh, Tehran: Qoqnus. 3. Grousset, Rene (2000), L’Empire des Steppes, Translated by A. Meikadeh, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. 4. Ibn Isfandyar, Ali (1941), A History of Tabaristan, Edited by Abbas Igbal, Tehran: Asatir. 5. Jamalzadeh, M. A. (1993), History of Iran-Russian Relations, Tehran: Dr. M. Afshar Yazdi Foundation. 6. Kasravi, A. (1998), Ananymous Princes, Tehran: Jami. 7. Khaqani Shirwani, Afzal od-Din (1999), Compendium of Poems, Edited by Z. Sajadi, Tehran: Zawar. 8. Kostenko L. F. (2004), The Description of Central Asia and the Development of Russian Civilizations There, Translated by M. Davud Khanov, Edited by Gh. Zargarinajhad, Tehran: Moassese-ye Tahqiqat va Towse’e Olum-e Ensani. 9. Mar’ashi, Zahir al-Din (1850), History of Tabarestan, Ruyan and Mazandaran, Edited by Bernhard Dörn, Tehran: Offset Reprint. 10. Minorski, V. (1999), A History of Sharwan and Darband in the 10th -11th Centuries, Translated by M. Khadem, Tehran: Ketab-e Marja’. 11. Morshedloo, Javad (2016), “Historical Background and the Strategic Logic of Tsarist Russia’s Expansionist Policy toward the Caucasus, 1550-1800”, Tarikh-e Ravabet-e Khareji, Vol. 16, No. 64, pp. 45-72.
12. Rashtiani, Goodarz (2017), “Caucasian Armenians and Russian Colonial Policy toward the Caucasus”, Studies in Historical Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 54-70. 13. Zarrini, Hosein (2016), Historical Roots of Caucasus Desintegration from Iran, Tehran: the Institute for the History of Islam.
F) Russian
1. Абдуллаев, Г. В. (1965), Азербайджан в XVIII Веке и Взаимоотношения его с Россией, Баку: Изд-во Академии Наук Азербайджанской ССР. 2. Аранов и Другие (2007), Северный Кавказ в Составе Российской Империи, Москва: Новое Литературное Обозрение. 3. Багратиони, Вахушти (1976), История Царства Грузинского, Перевод, Предисловие, Словарь и Указатель: Н. Т. Накашидзе, Тб.: Мецниереба. 4. Бакиханов, А. К.(1983), Сочинения, Записки, Письма, Баку: Элм. 5. Бутков, П. Г. (1869), Материалы для Новой Истории Кавказа с 1722 по 1803, Т. 1, Санкт-Петербург: Тип. Имп. Акад. Наук. 6. Вернадский, Георгий (2015), Киевская Русь, Москва: Изд-во Ломоносов. 7. Вeселовский, Н. И. (1898), Памяатники Дипломатических и Торговых Сношение Московской Русь с Персией, Санкт-Петербург: Товарищество Паровой Скоропечатни Яблонский и Перотт. 8. Гарданова, В. К. (1974),Адыги, Балкарцы, Карачаевцы в Известиях Европейских Авторов XIII-XIX вв., Нальчик: Эльбрус. 9. Гербер, Иоанн Густав (1760), Описание Стран и Народов вдоль Западного Берега Каспийского Моря 1728, История, География, Этнография Дагестана в XVIII—XIX вв., Санкт-Петербург: Учебники для Школы. 10. Гильденштедт, Ю. А. (1809), Географическое и Статистическое Описание Грузии и Кавказа, Санкт-Петербург: при Императорской Академии Наук. 11. Гильденштедт, Ю. А. (2002) Путешествие по Кавказу в 1770-1773 гг.,Санкт-Петербург: Рос. Акад. Наук. 12. Котов, Федов (1958), Хожение Купца Федота Котова в Персии, Москва: Изд-во Вос. Литературы. 13. Левиатов, В. Н. (1948), Очерки из Истории Азербайджана в XVIII веке, Баку: Элм. 14. Мустафаев, Ж. М. (1989), Северные Ханства Азербайджана и Россия: Конец XVIII-Начало XIX в., Баку: Элм. 15. Никитин, Афанасий (1958), Хожение за Три Моря Афанасия Никитина: 1466-1472 гг., Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР. 16. Российский Государственный Архив Древних Актов (РГАДА) [Russian State Archive of Early Acts], «Отношения с Персией», Fond 110, Folder 15, ff.: 485-486. 17. Штедер, Л. Л. (2016), Дневник Путешествия из Пограничной Крепости Моздок во Внутренние Местности Кавказа, Предпринятого в 1781 году, Санкт-Петербург - Лейпциг. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 762 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 429 |
||