تحلیل محتوای پژوهش‌های فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه تهران

پورعزت، علی اصغر؛ هاشمی کاسوایی (1394). بازشناسی هویت مدیریت دولتی و دانش اداره. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 8 (30)، 5- 31.

حافظ نیا، محمدرضا (1386). مقدمه‎ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

خاکی، غلامرضا (1393). روش تحقیق (با رویکرد پایان‎نامه‎نویسی). تهران: انتشارات فوژان.

دانایی فرد، حسن؛ الوانی، سید مهدی (1390). گفتارهایی در فلسفه تئوری‌های سازمان دولتی. تهران، انتشارات صفار.

دنهارت، رابرت بی (1395). نظریه‌های سازمان دولتی، ترجمه سید مهدی الوانی و حسن دانایی فرد. تهران: انتشارات صفار.

رهنورد، فرج اله؛ محبی دلیگانی، مرضیه (1395). آثار جهانی شدن بر مدیریت دولتی در ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 8 (3)، 415- 436.

سالارزهی، حبیب اله.؛ ابراهیم‎پور، حبیب (1391). بررسی سیر تحول در پارادایم‌های مدیریت دولتی: از پارادایم مدیریت دولتی سنتی تا پارادایم حکمرانی خوب. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 4 (9)، 43- 62.

سکاران، اوما (1390). روش‌های تحقیق در مدیریت. ترجمه محمد صائبی و محمود شیرازی. تهران: انتشارات مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی.

سلیمی، جلیل؛ مکنون، رضا (1397). فراتحلیل کیفی پژوهش‎های علمی ناظر بر مسئله حکمرانی در ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 10 (1)، 1-30.

قائدی، محمدرضا؛ گلشنی، علیرضا (1395). روش تحلیل محتوا، از کمی گرایی تا کیفی گرایی. روش‎ها و مدل‎های روان‎شناختی، 7 (23)، 57 – 82.

محمدی، حامد؛ الوانی، سید مهدی؛ معمارزاده طهران، غلامرضا؛ حمیدی، ناصر (1395). طراحی و تبیین الگوی اثربخش نظام اداری ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 8 (4)، 591 – 616.

نریمانی، امیررضا؛ واعظی، رضا (1396). شناسایی عوامل تسهیل‎گر تجاری‎سازی پژوهش‎های دانش مدیریت دولتی. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 9 (2)، 235- 262.

 

References

Bailey, S. K. (1968). Objectives of the theory of public administration. Theory and practice of public administration: Scope, objectives, and methods. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.

Bingham, R. D., & Bowen, W. M. (1994). "Mainstream" public administration over time: a topical content analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 204-208.

Carley, K. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, SI, 533–558.

Danaeifard, H. & Alvani, S. M. (2011). Discussions in philosophy of public organization theories. Tehran, Saffar Press. (in Persian)

Denhardt, R. B. (1984). Theories of Public Administration. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Denhardt, R. B. (2016). Theories of public organization (Trans. by Seyyed Mehdi Alvani and Hassan Danaeifard. Tehran, Saffar Press. (in Persian)

Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational research methods, 10(1), 5-34.

Farazmand, A. (2012). The future of public administration challenges and opportunities—a critical perspective. Administration & Society, 44(4), 487–517.

Fry, B.R., & Raadschelders, C.N.J. (2008). Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Ghaedi, M. & Golshani, A. (2016). Content analysis method; quantitative approach to qualitative approach. Journal of psychological Methods and models, 7(23), 57-82. (in Persian)

Gill, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 157-199.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.

Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: today's research and tomorrow's agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78-86.

Hafer, J.A. (2016). Public administration’s identity crisis and the emerging approach that may alleviate it. Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs, 1(1), 1–12.

Hafeznia, M. R. (2007). An introduction to research method in human science. Tehran, SAMT press. (in Persian)

Henry, N. (1975). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35(4), 378-386.

Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. Chichester, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

Kabanoff, B. (1996). Computers can read as well as count: How computer-aided text analysis can benefit organizational research. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–21.

Kettl, D. F. (1990). The Perils-and Prospects-of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 50(4), 411.

Kettl, D. F. (1995). Building lasting reforms: Enduring questions, missing answers. Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Khaki, Gh. (2014). Research method. Tehran, Foozhan press. (in Persian)

Lowe, K. & Gardner, W. (2001). Ten years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4):459-514.

Mainzer, L.C. (1994). Public administration in search of a theory. Administration and Theory, 26(3), 359–394.

McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can't we resolve the research issue in public administration? Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49-55.

Mohammadi, H., Alvani, S. M., Memarzadeh Tehran., Gh., Hamidi, N. (2017). Designing and Developing Iran Administrative system Effectiveness Model. Journal of Public Administration, 8(4), 591-616. (in Persian)

Narimani, A. R., Vaezi, R. (2017). Identify factors to the commercialization of research in Knowledge of public administration. Journal of Public Administration, 9(2), 235-262.
(in Persian)

Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R., & Robbin, A. (2017). Examining the evolution of the field of public administration through a bibliometric analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496-509.

Onder, M., & Brower, R. S. (2013). Public Administration Theory, Research, and Teaching: How Does Turkish Public Administration Differ? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(1), 117-139.

Overman, E. S. (1984). Public Management: What's New and Different? Public Administration Review, 44(3), 275-278.

Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research Methodology in the "Public Administration Review", 1975-1984. Public administration review, 46(3), 215-226.

Pitts, D. W. (2007). How effective is public management research? An analysis of scope and methodology. In Ninth Public Management Research Conference, Tucson, Arizona, October, 25-27.

Pourezzat, A. A. & Hashemi Kasvaei, M. S. (2016). Recognizing public administration identity. Public management researches, 8(30), 5-31. (in Persian)

Raadschelders, J. C. (1999). A coherent framework for the study of public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(2), 281-304.

Raadschelders, J. C., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration. Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19-33.

Rabin, W., Hildreth & Miller, G. J. (2007). Handbook of public administration, 3^rd edition, Jack CRC press.

Rahnavard, F., & Mohebi Delighani, M. (2016). The Effects of Globalization on Public Administration in Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 8(3), 415-436. (in Persian)

Roberts, C. W. (1989). Other than counting words: A linguistic approach to content analysis. Social Forces, 68, 147–177.

Rodgers, R., & Rodgers, N. (2000). Defining the Boundaries of Public Administration: Undisciplined Mongrels versus Disciplined Purists. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 435–445.

Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. University Press of Kansas.

Rutgers, M. (2010). Theory and scope of public administration: An introduction to the study’s epistemology. Public Administration Review, 1-45.

Salarzehi, H. & Ebrahimpour, H. (2012). Paradigms of Public Administration: From Traditional Public Administration to Good Governance. Journal of public administration, 4(9), 43-62. (in Persian)

Salimi, J., & Maknoon, R. (2018). Qualitative Meta-analysis of Scientific Researches Concerning the Issue of Governance in Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 10(1), 1-30. (in Persian)

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research Methods for Business Students, np: Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Saylan, G., & Sezen, S. (2000). The paradigmatic crises of public administration and teaching curriculum: Turkish case. Turkish Public Administration Annual, 24 & 26, 59-76.

Sekaran, U. (2011). Research methods in management (Trans. by Mohammad Saebi & Mahmoud Shirazi). Tehran, Institute of Public Administration Education. (in Persian)

Sigelman, L. (1976). In Search of Comparative Administration. Public Administration Review 36(6), 612–621.

Slagle, D. R., & Williams, A. (2018). Redefining the boundaries of Public Administration. Teaching Public Administration, 1-17. DOI: 0144739418775789.

Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 7(17), 137-146.

Streib G, Slotkin BJ and Rivera M (2001) Public administration research from a practitioner perspective. Public Administration Review 61(5): 515–523.

Sugimoto, C. R., & Weingart, S. (2015). The kaleidoscope of disciplinarity. Journal of Documentation, 71(4), 775-794.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: The Palmer Press.

Van de Walle, S., & Van Delft, R. (2015). Publishing in public administration: Issues with defining, comparing, and ranking the output of universities. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 87-107.

Van Wart, M. & Cayer, N.J. (1990). Comparative Public Administration: Defunct, Dispersed, or Redefined? Public Administration Review, 50(2), 238–48.

Waldo, D. (1968). Scope and theory of public administration. In: Charlesworth JC (ed.) Theory and Practice of Public Administration. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Waldo, D. (1975). Political science: Tradition, discipline, profession, science, enterprise. Handbook of political science, 1, 1-130.

Weber, R. (1990). Basis content analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55(1), 22-45.

Woodrum, E. (1984). “Mainstreaming” content analysis in the social science: Methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Social Science Research, 13, 1–19.