پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,500 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,086,428 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,189,738 |
Comparison of Different Hydraulic Fracture Growth Models Based on a Carbonate Reservoir in Iran | ||
| Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 51، شماره 2، اسفند 2017، صفحه 95-104 اصل مقاله (777.22 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jchpe.2017.232270.1191 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohamadali Chamanzad1؛ Ahmad Ramezanzadeh* 1؛ Behzad Tokhmechi1؛ Hojat Norouzi2 | ||
| 1Department of mining, petroleum and geophysics engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 2Head of research and development at petroleum engineering and development company | ||
| چکیده | ||
| There has been little interest in the application of hydraulic fracture treatment in Iranian oil fields, thanks to the primarily suitable production rates of the vast oil fields. In this paper, hydraulic fracturing treatment was simulated by different models for a carbonate reservoir in the southwest of Iran. Suitable pay zones were nominated based on the lithology, water-oil saturation, geomechanical properties, and finally in-situ stress conditions – with the optimum option chosen based on a pseudo three-dimensional (P3D) model. In this work, modeling with P3D, finite different method (FDM), and the methods proposed by Perkins, Kern, and Nordgren (PKN) and Khristianovic, Geertsma, and de Klerk (KGD) were performed in order to determine and compare fracture growth geometrical aspects and the required pressure. Comparison of the above-mentioned models confirmed that P3D and FDM provides more reasonable results, while neither of PKN and KGD models was suitable for such a complex condition. Eventually, sensitivity analysis of input data, such as in-situ stress, injection rates, and reservoir geomechanical properties, was performed to evaluate the variation influence of these factors on fracture growth aspects, such as required pressures and geometrical specifications. The results showed that successful hydraulic fracturing treatment not only depended on the controllable parameters like fluid and proppant specifications, but also uncontrollable parameters such as reservoir properties and in-situ stress had to be taken into account. This study can help to select the optimum model in future hydraulic fracture design and implement it in carbonate reservoirs with similar conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Hydraulic fracturing؛ Fracture growth؛ Fracture geometrical aspects؛ Cracking pressure؛ Reservoir geomechanical properties | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] King, G.E. (2012). “Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What Every Representative, Environmentalist, Regulator, Reporter, Investor, University Researcher, Neighbor and Engineer Should Know About Estimating Frac Risk and Improving Frac Performance in Unconventional Gas and Oil Wells.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. 10.2118/152596-MS.
[2] Rodrigues, V.F., Neumann, L.F. and Torres, D. (2007). “Horizontal Well Completion and Stimulation Techniques - A Review with Emphasis on Low-Permeability Carbonates.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/108075-MS.
[3] Zoveidavianpoor, M., Samsuri, A. and Shadizadeh, S.R. (2012). “Development of a Fuzzy System Model for Candidate-well Selection for Hydraulic Fracturing in a Carbonate Reservoir.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/153200-MS.
[4] Weng, X. (2014). “Modeling of complex hydraulic fractures in naturally fractured formation.” Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, Vol. 9, pp. 114-135.
[5] Warpinski, N.R., Moschovidis, Z.A., Parker, C.D. and Abou-Sayed, I.S. (1994). “Discussion of Comparison Study of Hydraulic Fracturing Models -- Test Case: GRI Staged Field Experiment No. 3.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/25890-PA.
[6] Adachi, J., Siebrits, E., Peirce, A. and Desroches, J. (2007). “Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 44 (5), pp. 739-757.
[7] Aguilar-Razo, R. (2000). “Propped Fracturing in Gas Carbonate Formations in Mexico.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/58987-MS.
[8] Azeemuddin, M., Ghori, S.G., Saner, S. and Khan, M.N. (2002). “Injection-Induced Hydraulic Fracturing in a Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoir : A Case Study from Saudi Arabia.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/73784-MS.
[9] Nagy, Z., Pacheco, F., Rosa, M., Ribeiro, M., Jouti, I., Pastor, J.A. and Gigena, L. (2011). “Use of Geomechanics for Optimizing Reservoir Completion and Stimulation Strategies for Carbonates in the Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil.” Offshore Technology Conference. 10.4043/22364-MS.
[10] Hashemi, A., Shadizadeh, S.R. and Zoveidavianpoor, M. (2013). “Selection of Hydraulic Fracturing Candidates in Iranian Carbonate Oil Fields: A Local Computerised Screening of Zone and Well Data.” International Petroleum Technology Conference. 10.2523/IPTC-17192-MS.
[11] Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, P. and Wei, G. (2016). “Numerical simulation by hydraulic fracturing engineering based on fractal theory of fracture extending in the coal seam.” Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, Vol. 1 (4), pp. 319-325.
[12] Zhao, X., Ju, Y., Yang, Y., Su, S. and Gong, W. (2016). “Impact of hydraulic perforation on fracture initiation and propagation in shale rocks.” Journal of Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 59 (5), pp. 756-762.
[13] Hamidi, F. and Mortazavi, A. (2014). “A New Three Dimensional Approach to Numerically Model Hydraulic Fracturing Process.” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, Vol. 21 (12), pp. 451-467.
[14] Rahman, M.M. and Rahman, M.K. (2010). “A Review of Hydraulic Fracture Models and Development of an Improved Pseudo-3D Model for Stimulating Tight Oil/Gas Sand.” Journal of Energy Sources, Vol. 32 (15), pp. 1416–1436.
[15] Geertsma, J. and De Klerk, F. (1969). “A Rapid Method of Predicting Width and Extent of Hydraulically Induced Fractures.” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 21 (12), pp. 1571-1581.
[16] Hagel, M.W. and Meyer, B.R. (1992). “Utilizing Mini-frac Data to Improve Design and Production.” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol. 33 (03), pp. 44-56.
[17] Society of Petroleum Engineers. Fracture propagation models. (2012). Accessed on Jan 15 2013; http://petrowiki.org/-Fracture_propagation_models.
[18] Mack, M.G. and Warpinski, N.R. (2000). Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing, In: Economides, Nolte, editors. Reservoir stimulation, 3rd ed. Chichester; Wiley, chapter 6.
[19] Barree & Assocites, Gohfer user manual for use with version 8.2.3.
[20] Iran National Logging Corporattion. (2011). Mud Logging Report.
[21] Kalfayan, L.J. (2007). “Fracture acidizing: history, present state, and future.” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 10.2118/106371-MS.
[22] Hwang, Y.S. (2011). Candidate Well Selection for the Test of Degradable,PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University.
[23] Roshanai Heydarabadi, F., Moghadasi, J. and Safian, G.A. (2010). “Hydraulic Fracturing in Iran-Lessons from Four Case Histories.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/136103-MS.
[24] Cook, C.C. and Brekke, K. (2002). “Productivity Preservation through Hydraulic Propped Fractures in the Eldfisk.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/88031-PA.
[25] Cleary, J.M. (1958). Hydraulic fracture theory: Part I. Mechanics of materials, Circular, No. 251.
[26] Hubbert, M.K. and Willis, D.G. (1957). “Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing.” Petroleum transactions, AIME, Vol. 210, pp. 153-163.
[27] Barree, R.D. (1983). “A practical numerical simulator for three-dimensional fracture propagation in heterogeneous media.” Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/12273-MS.
[28] Zhang, G.M., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Wu, H. and Wang, X.X. (2010). “Three-dimensional finite element simulation and parametric study for horizontal well hydraulic fracture.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 72, pp. 310-317.
[29] Veatch, R.W. (1983). “Overview of Current Hydraulic Fracturing Design and Treatment Technology-Part 1.” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 35 (4), pp. 677-687. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 953 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,030 |
||