مطالعه فرآیندهای ویراست و بازبینی هنگام نگارش گونه‌های مختلف متن

Allal, L., & Chanquoy, L. (2004). Revision revisited. In Allal, A., Chanquoy, L,. & Largy, P (Eds.), Revision cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 1-7). New York: Springer

American Psychological Associations. (2010) Publication manual of the American psychological association (6^th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Bawarshi, A. S., &  Reiff, M. J. (2010).  Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and Pedagogy. USA: WAC Clearinghouse.

Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. New York: Continuum.

Cook, V. (2002). Background to the L2 users. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portrait of L2 learners (pp.1-28). UK: Multilingual Matters.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis. (pp.219-228). London: Routledge.

Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.

Elbow, P. (2000). Everyone can write: Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. London: Cambridge.

Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College composition and communication, 32: 400-414.

Ferguson, G. (2007). The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: Questions of equity, access and domain loss. Ibérica, 13: 7-38.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication, 32: 365-387.

Fulwiler, T. (2002). College writing: A personal approach to academic writing. USA: Heinemann.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. London: Routledge.

Huckin, T. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: implications and applications (pp. 93-103). University of Birmingham Press.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. UK: Pearson Education.

Hasrati, M., & Gheitury, A. (2010). A genre analysis of Persian research article abstracts: communicative moves and author identity. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2: 47-74.

Janssen, D., van Waes, L., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.). The science of writing: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 233-250). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2010). A comparative study of introduction and discussion sections of sub-disciplines of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of applied language studies, 1: 97-122

Koro-Ljungberg, M., Douglas, E., McNeill, N., Therriault, D., & Malcolm, Z. (2012). Re-conceptualizing and de-centering think-aloud methodology in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1468794112455040

Marefat, H., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Applied Research on English Language, 2: 37-50.

Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2007). More than just error correction: Students’ perspectives on their revision processes during writing. Written Communication. 43, 323-343, doi: 10.1177/0741088307305976

Myskow, G., & Gordon, K. (2009). A focus on purpose: Using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT journal, 64: 283-292. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp057

Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 697-8). USA: Sage.

Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3): 407-430

Richards, J. C., & Miller, S. K. (2005). Doing academic writing in education: Connecting the personal and the professional. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & Van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 50-77). UK: Multilingual Matters.

Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In J. C. Richard, & W.A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). UK: Cambridge University Press

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. USA: Sage.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. USA: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission Letter. In L. J. Mey, H. Parret, & J. Verschueren (Eds.) Practicing and beyond new series (pp. 45-58). The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Swales, J. (2009). Worlds of genre—Metaphors of genre. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D.  Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 3-16). USA: WAC Clearinghouse

Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2010). From text to task: Putting research on abstracts to work. In M. F. Ruiz-Garrido, J. C. Palmer-Silveira, & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), English for professional and academic purpose (pp. 167-180).

Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1958). A Methodology for Translation. [An excerpt from Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation, trans. and eds. J. C. Sager & M.-J. Hamel, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995, first published in 1958 as Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Méthode de traduction] In L. Venuti (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 84–93). London: Routledge.

White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process Writing. Essex: Longman.