بهره‌گیری از نظریۀ چیدمان فضا در کاهش انزوای اجتماعی-فضایی محله‌های شهری

1. حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین، ایوب منوچهری میاندوآب، ایمان بهارلو، احمد ابراهیم‌پور، و حجت حاتمی‌نژاد. (1391). «شهر و عدالت اجتماعی: تحلیلی بر نابرابری‌های محله‌ای (مطالعة موردی: محله‌های قدیمی شهر میاندوآب)». فصلنامة پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. شمارة 80. ص 63-41.
2. موسوی، میرنجف. (1391). «شکل پایدار شهر و عدالت اجتماعی (مطالعة موردی: شهر میاندوآب)». فصلنامة پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. شمارة 80. ص 192-177.
3. نوروزی، فیض‌الله، علی‌اصغر عباسی اسفجیر و معصومه بسمل. (1391). «پیوندهای اجتماعی: مطالعة تطبیقی بررسی انواع ساختار شبکة زنان با شوهرانشان در شهر بابل». فصلنامة مطالعات جامعه‌شناختی جوانان. سال 3. شمارة 8. ص 164-145.
   1. Alper, S. (2009). “Quantitative Analysis of Urban Morphology: Exploring Ethnic Urban Formations and Structure in the City of Izmir”. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of Izmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City Planning.
   2. Asselin, O., F. Dureau, L. Fonseca, M. Giroud, A. Hamadi, J. Kohlbacher, F. Lindo, J. Malheiros, Y. Marcadet & U. Reeger. (2006). “Social Integration of Immigrants with Special Reference to the Local and Spatial Dimension”. the Dynamics of International Migration and Settlement in Europe, a State of the Art. Amesterdam: Amesterdam University Press. PP. 134-170.
   3. Charalambous, N. (2012). “Understanding segregation: the Relation Between Urban Form and Social Exclusion”. Department of Architecture. University of Cyprus.
   4. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Penguin Group. England. London.
   5. Hatami-Nezhad , H., A. Manouchehri Miandoab, I. Baharlo, A. Ebrahimpoor,& H. Hatami-Nezhad. (2012). “City and Social Justice: an Analysis on Local Unequalities (Case Study: Old Neighbourhoods of Miandoab)”. Human Geography Research Quarterly. No. 80 . PP. 41-63 (in Persian).
   6. Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10. Hillier, B. (2001). “A Theory of the City as Object or, How Spatial Laws Mediate the Social Construction of Urban Space”. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium. Atlanta.

11. Hillier, B. & L. Vaughan. (2007). “the City as One Thing”. the Spatial Syntax of Urban Segregation. Progress in Planning. 67 (3). PP. 205–294

12. http://www.journalofspacesyntax.org.

13. Kilroy, A. (2008). “How does the Spatial Configuration of a Rapidly-growing City Impact on Urban Insecurity? a Case Study of Bamako, Mali”. Department of Urban Studies and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge. MA.

14. Kwan, M. & J. Lee. (2010). “Geovisualisation of Human Activity Patterns Using 3D GIS: a Timegeographic Approach”. in Michael F. Goodchild & Donald G. Janelle. Eds. 2003. Spatially Integrated Social Science: Examples in Best Practice. Chapter 3. , Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15. Legeby, A.( 2008). “What Knowledge Can a Spatial Approach Add to the Understanding of Segregation”. School of Architecture, Stockholm, Sweden, Conference Architectural Inquiries. Göteborg.

16. Legeby, A. (2009). “From Housing Segregation to Integration in Public Space”. 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, KTH. School of Architecture. Stockholm. Sweden.

17. Legeby, A. (2013a). “Configuration and Co-presence: the Underpinnings of Job Opportunities”. Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium. Sejong University. Seoul.

18. Legeby, A. (2013b). “Patterns of Co-presence: Spatial Configuration and Social Segregation”. KTH Architecture and the Built Environment School of Architecture Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm. Sweden.

19. Marcus, L. & A. Legeby. (2012). “the Need for Co-present in Urban Complexity Measuring Social Capital Using Space Syntax”. Eight International Space Syntax Symposium, School of Architecture. The Royal Institution of Technology. Sweden.

20. Marcus, L. (2007). “Spatial Capital and How to Measure it - an Outline of an Analytical Theory of the Social Performativity of Urban Form”. in A. S. Kubat, Ö. Ertekin, Y. I. Güney, E. Eyüboglou (eds.) Proceedings to the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. ITU Faculty of Architecture. Istanbul.

21. Mosavi, M. (2012). “Sustainable Shape of City and Social Justice (case study: City of Miandoab) ”. Human Geography Research Quarterly. No. 80. PP. 177-192. (in Persian).

22. Nabil, N. & G. Eldayem. (2015). “Influence of Mixed land-use on Realizing the Social Capital, Housing and Building National Research Center”. HBRC Journal, Architecture Helwan University. Egypt. No. 11. PP. 285-298.

23. Narvaez, L.,A. Penn & S. Griffiths. (2012). “Configurational Economies: the Value of Accessibility in Urban Development”. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. Vol 3. No. 3. PP. 293-309.

24. Norouzi , F., A. Abasi Asfajir& M. Besmel. (2013). “ Social Ties: the Comparative Study of Surveying the kinds of Women or Their Husbands Network Structure in the City of Babul”. Sociological Studies of Youth Journal Third Year. No. 8. PP. 145-164. (in Persian).

25. Tasan-kok, T., R. Kempen, M. Raco & G. Bolt. (2013). “Toward Hyper-Diversified European Cities: a Central Literature Review”. Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences. Utrecht.