پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 152 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 5,630 |
| تعداد مقالات | 62,001 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 102,207,736 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 80,648,176 |
توسعۀ روش بولزای ـ بولزای برای تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره با اعداد خاکستری بهمنظور انتخاب تأمینکنندۀ تجهیزات (مطالعۀ موردی: انتخاب و خرید تجهیزات بیمارستانی) | ||
| مدیریت صنعتی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 8، شماره 4، اسفند 1395، صفحه 601-624 اصل مقاله (401.24 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2017.62697 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
جلال رضایی نور  1؛ مهدی غضنفری نصرآباد2؛ علی درودی2
| ||
| 1دانشیار گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکدۀ فنی مهندسی دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| انتخاب تأمین‌کننده بهعنوان یکی از مسائل مهم در حوزۀ تصمیم‌گیری، همواره یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی مدیران ارشد در این حوزه بوده است. ماهیت چنین تصمیم‌گیری‌هایی معمولاً پیچیده است. این پژوهش در نظر دارد در شرایط عدم قطعیت با استفاده از تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره و تئوری اعداد خاکستری رویکرد جدیدی برای انتخاب تجهیزات مناسب با معیارهای تعریف شده ارائه دهد. روش پیشنهادی در این تحقیق، استفاده از روش بولزای برای وزن‌دهی و رتبه‌بندی است. در روش پیشنهاد شده، پس از تعیین وزن معیارها و تشکیل ماتریس تصمیم‌گیری خاکستری، در مرحلۀ رتبه‌بندی گزینه‌ها سه روش حل ارائه می‌شود. این روش با توجه به یکپارچگی و به دلیل در اختیار قرار دادن سه شاخص برای راستی آزمایی نتایج، میتواند در رویکرد تصمیمگیریهای چند معیاره در شرایط عدم اطمینان مفید واقع شود. نتایج این پژوهش نیز نشان می‌دهد این رویکرد توانایی و کارایی مناسبی برای انتخاب دقیق‌تر تأمین‌کننده و همچنین کاهش قضاوت‌های انسانی برای وزن‌دهی به معیارها و انطباق نتایج حاصل از رویکرد پیشنهادی با بازخوردهای واقعی دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اعداد خاکستری؛ تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره؛ خرید تجهیزات بیمارستانی؛ روش بولزای ـ بولزای | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Bulls-eye -Bulls-eye,developed method for MCDM with gray numbers for selecting the equipment supplier (case study selection and purchase of hospital equipment | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Jalal Rezaeenour PhD1؛ Mahdi Gazanfarinasrabad2؛ Ali Doroudi2 | ||
| 1Associate Prof., Dep. of Industrial Engineering, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2M.Sc. Student in Industrial Engineering, University of Qom. Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The selection of suppliers, equipment and machinery in the industrial and services sectors has always been one of the main concerns of senior managers in the field. Such decisions are usually complex nature and has many models and methods for decision-making for the selection of equipment and suppliers have been proposed. This study intends in conditions of uncertainty using MCDM and gray number theory a new approach to the selection of equipment and machinery is suitable with criteria defined offer. For this purpose, the proposed method Bulls-eye , Bulls-eye based on gray numbers at the same time for weighting and ranking criteria to select options for buying the things (study of hospital equipment) used. This framework is based on the integrity and accuracy and most importantly Provides three index for the verification of the results of Multi-Criteria Decision Making under Uncertainty helpful. The results also show such an approach can be a good performance compared to reduce the complexity of computing And the applicability of the results of the proposed approach have real feedback | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Bulls-eye, Bulls-eye Mthod, buy hospital equipment, gray numbers, Multi-Criteria Decision Making | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amini, F. & Rezaeenour, J. (2016). Ranking Healthcare Centers Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS: Iranian Experience. International Journal of Applied Operational Research, 6(1), 25-39.
Bezuglov, A. & Comert, G. (2016). Short-term freeway traffic parameter prediction: Application of grey system theory models. Expert Systems with Applications 62 (2016): 284-292.
Bradley, M. F. (1977). Buying behavior in Ireland's public sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 6(4), 251-258.
Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D. & Martakos, D. (2010). Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 37(1), 490-498.
Chen, C.T., Lin, C.T. & Huang, S.F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International journal of production economics, 102(2), 289-301.
Chen, Z. & Yang, W. (2011). An MAGDM based on constrained FAHP and FTOPSIS and its application to supplier selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(11), 2802-2815.
Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M. & Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert systems with applications, 38(7), 8384-8391.
Dang, L. U. O. (2009). Decision-making methods with three-parameter interval grey number. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 29(1), 124-130
Golmohammadi, D. & Mellat-Parast, M. (2012). Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 191-200.
Gu, Z., Niu, D. & Wang, H. (2009). Multiple attribute grey target decision making model based on linear combination weights determining and entropy. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 106-111.
Hasanpoor, A., Mohammadpanah, M. & Yosefi Zenooz, R. (2016). A decision-making model for operational efficiency in the banking workflow process of housing facilities. Industrial Management, 8(1), 74-61. (in Persian)
Julong, D. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of grey system, 1(1), 1-24.
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87 (2), 171-184.
Kamfiroozi, M. H. & Naeini, A. B. (2012). Supplier Selection in Grey Environment: A Grey, AHP, Bulls-Eye and ELECTRE Approach. International Journal of Information, Security and Systems Management, 2(1), 110-116.
Kamfiroozi, M. H. & Naeini, A. B. (2013). Provide a robust model the supply chain providing an integrated approach to analyzing Hierarchy-Bulls-eye and Methods Rating puffs on the Gray numbers three parameterization. Modiriat-Farda Journal, 34, 37-54. (in Persian)
Kamfiroozi, M. H., Jafarieskandari, H. & Aliahmadi, A. (2015). Integrating multi-criteria decision making methods Bolzay and Vikor with gray numbers three, International journal industrial engineering and production management, 25(4), 432-437. (in Persian)
Kamfiroozi, M.H., Jafarieskandari, H., Aliahmadi, A. & Ferdosinir, A. (2012). Weighted companies in the balanced scorecard performance metrics using a combination of Shapley value of Bulls-eye Case study peg manufacturers in the country, Journal of Production and Operations Management, 5(1), 113-124. (in Persian)
Luo, D. & Wang, X. (2012). The multi-attribute grey target decision method for attribute value within three-parameter interval grey number. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(5), 1957-1963.
Luo, D. (2005). Analysis Method for Grey Decision-making Problems. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Water Conservation Press.
Mehregan, M.R., Dabaghi, A. (2014). The development of a comprehensive method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making uncertain Based on an analysis of the Grey Relational Analysis. Journal ofManagement Researches, 23, 5-26. (in Persian) Memon, M. S., Lee, Y. H., & Mari, S. I. (2015). Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7951-7959.
Mirghafoori, H., Morovatisharifabad, A. & Asadianardakani, F. (2012) .Analysis of the risks suppliers in the supply chain with Hybrid Model Gray relational analysis and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of industrial management, 2(4), 153-178. (in Persian)
Montazer, Gh., Ali, Qahri Saremi, H. & Ramezani, M. (2009). Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (8): 10837-10847.
Reyhani, A. & et al .(2014). Application of Gray Multi Criteria Decision Making In Purchasing Hospital Anesthesia Equipment. Journal of peyavarde salamat, 8(6), 492-505. (in Persian)
Roohi, F., Ebrahimi, S.B. & Ketabian, H. (2015). Development of International facility location model applying the combination of MCDM and location covering techniques under uncertainty. Industrial Management, 7(4), 743-766. (in Persian)
Shahanaghi, K. & Yazdian, S.A. (2009). Vendor selection using a new fuzzy group TOPSIS approach. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3 (3), 221-231.
Wang, T.Y. & Yang, W.H. (2009). A fuzzy model for supplier selection in quantity discount environments. Expert Systems with Applications 36(10), 12179-12187.
Xu, J. & Yan, F. (2011). A multi-objective decision making model for the vendor selection problem in a bifuzzy environment. Expert systems with applications, 38(8), 9684-9695.
Yang, J.L., Chiu, H.N., Tzeng, G.H., Yeh, R.H. (2008). Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships. Information Sciences, 178(21), 4166-4183.
Zhu, J. & Hipel, K. W. (2012). Multiple stages grey target decision making method with incomplete weight based on multi-granularity linguistic label. Information Sciences,212, 15-32.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 962 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,003 |
||
