پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,743 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,073,161 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,802,986 |
The Effect of Innovation on International Trade: Selected Medium-High-Technology Industries, Evidence on Iran+3 | ||
| Iranian Economic Review | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 21، شماره 1، خرداد 2017، صفحه 21-44 اصل مقاله (809.38 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2017.60861 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdollah Ghanbari* ؛ Marzieh Ahmadi | ||
| Department of Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The relationship between technology and international competitiveness dates back to the neo-technological trade theories of the 1960s. This approach considers difference in technology as the primary motive for difference among nations in terms of trade performance. The technology gap approach emphasizes inter-country differences in innovativeness as the basis for international trade flows. The gravity equation is the most successful and celebrated empirical model in international Trade. The empirical gravity literature does not include any form of multilateral resistance in the analysis. The importance of using fixed effects to control for country-specific characteristics has been emphasized in an influential paper by Anderson & Van Wincoop (2003). This paper investigates the effect of innovation on international trade. It examines the impact of R&D as a proxy of innovation on three medium high-tech industries exports in Iran, Japan, Korea and Australia using panel data method over a period of 10 years. We incorporate an industry-specific intercept into the model for estimating the role of innovation in explaining industry-level trade across selected countries. Our findings show that innovation has a positive and economically large effect on export performance of all industries. This suggests innovation is a central driver of trade. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Keywords: R&D؛ Innovation؛ International Trade؛ Gravity Equation. JEL Classifications: F10؛ O31؛ F4؛ L6 | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acs, Z., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069-1085.
Anderson, J. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 69, 106-116.
Anderson, J., & Van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691-751.
---------- (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 170-192.
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47-82.
Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo). World Development, 32, 629-654.
Biggs, P. (2003). Information and Telecommunication Technology (ICT) Development Indices (Document: WICT-40E). 3rd World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Meeting, UNCTAD, Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/WICT02/doc/pdf/Doc40_E.pdf.
Bergstrand, J. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 474-481.
CEPII (2014). Retrieved from http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm.
Davis, D. (1995). Intra-Industry Trade: A Hecksher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach. Journal of International Economics, 39, 201-226.
Deardoff, A. (1998).Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?In Frankel, J. (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Doing Business (2014). Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org.
Ebersberger, B., Marsili, O., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2010). Into Thin Air: Using a Quantile Regression Approach to Explore the Relationship Between R&D and Innovation. International Review of Applied Economics, 24, 95-102.
Eaton, J. & Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70, 1741-1779.
Edwards, K., & Gordon, T. (1984). Characterization of Innovations Introduced on the U.S. Market in 1982, Prepared for the US Small Business Administration. The Futures Group, Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?isbn=3642585248.
Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (1998). The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows.InFrankel,J. A. (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Estrada, S., Heijs, J., & Buesa, M. (2006). Innovación y Comercio Internacional: Una Relación No Lineal. ICE, 69, Retrieved from
https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1135055904. Fagerberg, J. (1997). Competitiveness, Scale and R&D. In Fagerberg, J., Hansson, P., Lundberg, L., & Melchior, A. (Eds.), Technology and International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Feenstra, R. (2004). Advanced International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Funk, M., Elder, E., Yao, V., & Vibhakar, A. (2006). Intra-NAFTA Trade in Mid-South Industries: A Gravity Model. The Review of Regional Studies, 36, 205-220.
Gomez, E., & Milgram, J. (2010). Are Estimation Techniques Neutral to Estimate Gravity Equations? An Application to the Impact of EMU on Third Countries’ Exports. Mimeo, Retrieved from http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2009/papers/gomez.pdf.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
---------- (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
Grossman, G. M. (1989). Explaining Japan's Innovation and Trade: A Model of Quality Competition and Dynamic Comparative Advantage. NBER Working Paper, 3194, Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/3194.html.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovations and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citations Data file: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. National Bureau of Economic Research, WP8498, Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8498.
Helliwell, J. F. (1999). Language and Trade, In Exploring the Economics of Language. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge:MIT Press.
ITR (Internet Traffic Report) (2004). Retrieved from http://www.internettrafficreport.com/.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program) (2001). Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jacques, M., & Mohnen, P. (2004). The Importance of R&D for Innovation: a Reassessment Using French Survey Data. NBER Working Paper, 10897, Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w10897.
Kuznets, S. (1962). Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement.In Richard, R. N. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marquez, R. L. (2007). New Determinants of Bilateral Trade: An Empirical Analysis for Developed and Developing Countries (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón), Retrieved from www.tesisenred.net/bitstream/handle/10803/10361/marquez.pdf.
Márquez, R., L., & Zarzoso, I. M. (2010). The Effect of Technological Innovation on International Trade. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/30327/1/623280515.pdf.
Montobbio, F., & Rampa, F. (2005). The Impact of Technology and Structural Change on Export Performance in Nine Developing Countries. World Development, 33, 527-547.
Moreno, R., & Usai, S. (2005). Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions, Environment and planning, 37, 1793-1812.
OECD (2011). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003. OECD Publishing, Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/.
Olivero, M. P., & Yotov, Y. V. (2012). Dynamic Gravity: Endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economic, 45, 64-92.
Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1980). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report. Economics Letters, 5, 377-381.
Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1984. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55, 291-316.
Posner, M. V. (1961). International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Economic Papers, 13, 323-341.
Ramos, M., & Zarzoso, M. (2010). The Effect of Technological Innovation on International Trade. Open Assessment E-Journal, 4, 1-30.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.
Santos, S. J., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641-58.
Statistical National Center of Iran (2013). Retrieved from http://www.amar.org.ir/ .
Tinbergen, J. (1962). The World Economy, Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
Torstensson, J. (1996). Technical Differences and Inter-industry Trade in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98, 93-110.
UN Comtrade: International Trade Statistics (2014). Retrieved from http://www.comtrade.un.org/data/.
Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
Verspagen, B., & Wakelin, K. (1997). Technology, Employment and Trade: Perspectives on European Integration. In Fagerberg, J., Hansson, P., Lundberg, L., & Melchior, A. (Eds.), Technology and International Trade (56-74). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
World Bank (2014). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,668 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,887 |
||