پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,174,048 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,923,335 |
بازسازی تاب‌آور از دیدگاه طراحی شهری، پس از زلزله 1382 بم | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 18، شماره 3، مهر 1392، صفحه 5-16 اصل مقاله (1.15 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfaup.2013.51313 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی‌رضا فلاحی1؛ تارا جلالی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه پژوهشی بازساری پس از سانحه، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد بازسازی پس از سانحه، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| چکیده در پی زمین لرزه سال 1382 شهر بم، برنامه بازسازی این شهر براساس"منشور توسعه پایدار" در راستای نیل به اهداف سه گانه هویت، مشارکت و پایداری بم تدوین شد. اما به نظر میرسد، برنامه مزبور در مرحله اجرا، به موفقیت اندکی دست یافته است. مقاله حاضر تاثیر هویت شهری و پایداری را در افزایش تابآوری بازسازی پس از زلزله، با توجه به کمبود فضاهای ایمن چندعملکردی، فقدان نفوذپذیری و دسترسیهای مناسب همهشمول در بافت شهر، همچنین ناخوانایی برخی نشانههای شهری و وجود اغتشاش در مناظر عینی و ذهنی شهروندان در بم مورد بررسی قرار میدهد. در راستای دستیابی به هدف شناخت عوامل و فرایندهای تاثیرگذار بر تاب آوری بازسازی بم از دیدگاه طراحی شهری، روش تحقیق، مبتنی بر استفاده از رویکردهای کیفی و روش تحلیل محتوا بوده و از ابزارهای مصاحبه عمیق، مشاهده میدانی و بررسی اسناد استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل نشان میدهد که توجه به برخی مختصات طراحی پایدار شهری مانند هویت شهری، خوانایی و نشانههای شهری و همچنین توسعه فضاهای چند منظوره ایمن در برابر زمین لرزههای آتی در درون بافت مسکونی علاوه بر تقلیل آسیب پذیری و مقاومسازی کالبدی جدارهها، میتوانند به بازسازی تاب آور از دیدگاه طراحی شهری بم کمک نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| واژه های کلیدی بازسازی؛ تاب آوری؛ طراحی شهری؛ زلزله بم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Resilient Reconstruction from the Urban Design Point of View, After 2003 Bam Earthquake* | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Alireza Fallahi1؛ Tara Jalali2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Terhan, Iran | ||
| 2M.S. , Department of Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Terhan, Iran. (Received 18 Jul 2013, Accepted 24 Nov 2013) | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| abstract Earthquakes have been affected the human life since the dawn of time; however, the complexities of human societies and communications in the cities, intensify the deleterious effects of the earthquakes, that affect urban areas. Hence, in emergency phase and reconstruction, attention to the basic needs and shelter provision are the most important activities but urban design also play an important role in restoration and improving the condition of damaged city, and also prepare for the future probable earthquakes by mitigating the vulnerabilities. Iran is an earthquake-prone country and has experienced a number of devastating earthquakes; however, reconstruction in urban areas were less experienced. After the Bam catastrophic earthquake (2003), the reconstruction program of the city was developed based on “Bam Sustainable Manifesto”. Three major criteria where considered in the program as “identity, participation and sustainability”. However little attention was given to these criteria in implementation of the reconstruction activities in Bam, after the catastrophe. In this paper, the correlation between the concepts of resilience, resilience urban design and resilience urban disaster reconstruction, are drawn. Field study particularly focuses on Bam city and selected areas, considering urban identity and legibility also eliminate city scape and image disturbances, examining development of green multi-functional open spaces in residential neighborhoods; Likewise physical retrofitting and vulnerability of streetscape against probable seismic disorders. The methodology is based on a qualitative approach associated with analytic methods and in-depth interviews with Bam citizens and authorities. Based on the “Bam reconstruction program”, the paper examines the effectiveness of urban identity and sustainability through resiliency in the post earthquake reconstruction. In this regards, to obtain information for qualitative analysis and examinations, considering the situation of Bam, the following methods are used: 1- A review of bibliographical sources and documents, consonant with Bam condition as an ancient city and extensive destruction happened after 2003 earthquake. 2- The undertaking of in-depth interviews with authorities whom involved in the reconstruction process and also Bam citizens. 3- Conduct of a field survey, and 4- Direct personal observations. It should be born in mind that in the case of resiliency, reconstruction and urban design have shared qualities that result in a framework for resilient reconstruction after disaster in urban areas. The findings show that, those qualities have differentiated due to the condition of the survey locations. In the case of Bam, the main and important criteria that must consider are: 1) preparedness and steps toward means of increasing resilient in reconstruction; also 2) to consider some qualities in the reconstruction phase from the urban design point of view, in order to reach resiliency, such as developing green multi-functional open spaces in residential neighborhoods, considering diversity and variability of urban spaces and also accessibility in the city; 3) trying to achieve objectives of resilient reconstruction approach by applying methods for rapid recovery, coping capacity, mitigating physical vulnerability by retrofitting, remarking urban identity and above all, turning the threats of earthquake into opportunities in order to increase urban resilience against future disasters and improving the living conditions of residents. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Key words: Resilience, urban design, Reconstruction, Bam earthquake | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
دولت‌آبادی، فریبرز و اسکندرافشار، بهزاد (1384)، اقدامات طراحی شهری در بم پس از زمین‌لرزه، فصل‌نامه آبادی، شماره 49، صص 108-98.
فلاحی، علی‌رضا (1387)، آماده سازی مناطق تاریخی و مناظر فرهنگی بم، این میراث جهانی در خطر، برای مقابله با زلزله، صفه، شماره 46، سال هفدهم، صص 135- 154.
گلکار، کورش (1390)، آفرینش مکان پایدار، تاملاتی در باب نظریه طراحی شهری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.
گلکار، کورش (1390)، طراحی شهری، فرایند یا فرایندها، نشریه علمی- پژوهشی صفه، شماره 52، صص 99- 134.
لینچ، کوین (1381)، بازنگری در سیمای شهر، مترجم کورش گلکار، نشریه علمی پژوهشی صفه، شماره 34، صص 75- 83.
Allan. P and Bryant. M (2010), The Critical Role of Open Space in Earthquake Recovery: A Case Study, NZSEE Conference, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington New Zealand.
Amaratunga. D, and Haigh. R (2011), Post-Disaster Reconstruction of The Built Environment – Building for Resilience, Wiley-Blackwell, ????????.
Arefi. M (2011), Design for resilient cities-Reflection from a studio, Companion to Urban Design, edited by Tridib Banerjee and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Routledge.
Taylor&Francis Group.
Berke. P and Campanella. T. J (2006), planning for post disaster resiliency, Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 192-207.
Berke. P, et.al (2003), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Colten. C. E. et al. (2008), Community resilience: lessons from New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina, CARRI Research Report 3, Community and Regional Resilience Initiative, pp. 1-5.
Cutter. S. L (2008), A Framework for Measuring Coastal Hazard Resilience in New Jersey Communities, white paper for urban coast institute, pp 1-10.
Utter. S. L (1996), vulnerability to environmental Hazards, Progress in Human Geography 20, pp. 529-539.
Cutter. S. L, et al. (2008), Community and regional resilience: perspectives from hazards, disasters and emergency management, Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute, Department of Geography University of south Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Cutter. S. L, et al. (2008), A Place-Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters, Global Environmental Change, 18, pp. 598-606
Godschalk. D. R (2003), Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities, Natural Hazard Review, ASCE, pp. 136-143. Hein. C (2005), Resilient Tokyo, Disaster and Transformation in The Japanese city, The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster, Oxford University Press.
Holling. C (1973), Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 4, pp. 1-24. Olshansky. R. B, et al. (2007), Rebuilding Communities Following Disaster: Lessons from Kobe and Los Aneles, Built Environment, Vol, 32. No.4, pp. 354-374.
Palliyaguru. R and Amaratunga. D (2011), Linking Reconstruction to Sustainable Socio-Economic Development, Post-Disaster Reconstruction of the Built Environment – Building for Resilience, First Edition, Wiley-Blackwell.
Tilio. L. et al. (2011), Resilient City and Seismic Risk: A Spatial Multi criteria Approach, ICCSA, Part I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Heidelberg, pp. 410-422.
Vale. L. J and Campanella. T. J (2005), The Resilient City: How Modern Cites Recover from Disaster- Axioms of resilience, Oxford University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,069 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 9,381 |
||