پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 163 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,878 |
| تعداد مقالات | 74,135 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 137,878,668 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 107,237,398 |
Digital Transformation in Financial Reporting: Institutional Pressures Shaping eXtensible Business Reporting Language Implementation in Malaysia | ||
| Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 3، 2025، صفحه 217-235 اصل مقاله (1.11 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2025.104047 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Nur Jannah Mohaidin* 1؛ Aini Aman2؛ Azleen Ilias3 | ||
| 1Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia, and Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business School, Malaysia. | ||
| 2Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. | ||
| 3Department of Accounting and Finance, UNITEN Business School, Institute of Energy, Policy, and Research, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Pahang, 26700, Malaysia. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Digital transformation has redefined financial reporting worldwide, with eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) serving as a global standard for structured, transparent, and automated data exchange. While many advanced economies have mandated XBRL, Malaysia remains in a voluntary phase through the Malaysian Business Reporting System (MBRS). This study investigates how institutional pressures shape XBRL implementation in Malaysia as part of the country’s broader digital transformation agenda, focusing on regulators, preparers, software developers, professional bodies, and service providers' perspectives. Guided by institutional theory, the research explores coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures through a qualitative interpretive approach using semi-structured interviews and supporting documents. Findings reveal that weak regulatory enforcement reduces the effectiveness of coercive pressures, while mimetic pressures emerge as stakeholders adapt practices from more mature jurisdictions and innovate with AI-enabled audit tools. Normative pressures remain underdeveloped due to limited technical skills, training, and assurance mechanisms, leading to inconsistent adoption. These dynamics illustrate how institutional and operational factors interact in shaping digital transformation within financial reporting. Theoretically, the study extends institutional theory to voluntary IT management contexts by showing how external pressures influence system implementation without full regulatory mandates. Practically, it offers guidance for regulators, policymakers, and practitioners to strengthen digital reporting ecosystems and provides insights for other developing countries pursuing technology-driven transformation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| XBRL؛ Institutional Theory؛ Digital Reporting؛ Qualitative؛ Voluntary Implementation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abhishek, N. (2018). A conceptual study on XBRL implementation in India: Issues and challenges. Open Journal of Economics and Commerce, 1(4), 70–76.
Alkayed, H., Zighan, S., Qabajeh, M., & Almaharmeh, M. I. (2023). The role of XBRL adoption on enhancing transparency of information disclosure: A case study of Jordanian financial companies. Cogent Business and Management, 10(3).
Alkhatib, S. M., & Alkhatib, E. S. (2022). The evolution and diffusion of the Standard Business Reporting (SBR) initiatives: Evidence from UK small businesses. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 22.
Aman, A. (2021). Sustainability of impact sourcing initiatives in higher education for graduates’ employability. Sustainability, 13(1), 1–11.
Aman, A., Hamzah, N., Amiruddin, R., & Maelah, R. (2012). Transaction costs in finance and accounting offshore outsourcing: A case of Malaysia. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5(1), 72–88.
Amirul, S. M. (2023). XBRL: Interactive data visualisation and decision making process in internet financial reporting.
Amirul, S. M., Jaafar, N. I., & Azmi, A. A. C. (2021). Two decades of XBRL: A science mapping of research trends and future research agenda. Quality and Quantity.
Azhar, S. A. A., & Subramanian, U. (2019). Impact of XBRL in emerging countries. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A., & Fradeani, A. (2020). Twenty years of XBRL: What we know and where we are going. Meditari Accountancy Research.
Bergeron, B. (2003). Essentials of XBRL: Financial reporting in the 21st century.
Borgi, H., & Tawiah, V. (2022). Determinants of eXtensible business reporting language adoption: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 30(3), 352–371.
Debreceny, R., & Gray, G. L. (2001). The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. 2, 47–74.
Debreceny, R., Scarlata, A. N., & Stone, D. N. (2020). Knowledge and skills in complex assurance engagements: The case of XBRL. 34(1), 21–45.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. JSTOR, 48(2), 147–160.
Fitri, A. (2021). Implementation of XBRL in the Indonesian capital market: An institutional logics perspective. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/213154/
Fitri, A., Yigitbasioglu, O., & Tooley, S. (2024). The institutionalisation of XBRL in a developing capital market: The Indonesian regulators’ and filers’ perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management.
Geijtenbeek, W. (2017). How about assurance? 18th XBRL Europe Day.
Helfaya, A., & Amin, E. (2020). Exploring the Egyptian accountants’ awareness and understanding of XBRL. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 7(1), 1.
Hinnings, B. (2018). The use of institutional theory in technology implementation.
Ilias, A., Ghani, E. K., & Azhar, Z. (2019). Understanding XBRL adoption process and adoption type among regulators: A Malaysian evidence (December).
Ilias, A., Ghani, E. K., & Azhar, Z. (2020). Early evidence on the XBRL adoption process in Malaysia: Drivers and challenges on the technological. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 957–968.
Ilias, A., Ghani, E. K., & Azhar, Z. (2021a). XBRL adoption in Malaysia: A way forward for SMPs. Accountants Today, MIA, 1–4.
Ilias, A., Ghani, E. K., & Azhar, Z. (2021b). XBRL adoption process in Malaysia using diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 263–271.
Ilias, A., Ghani, E. K., Baidi, N., & Rahman, R. A. (2020). XBRL adoption: An examination on the Malaysian Business Reporting System (MBRS). Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 8(2), 202–214.
Khalil, M. (2021). Responsiveness to quality assurance implementation: An institutional theory perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(1), 41–52.
Mohaidin, N. J., Aman, A., Ilias, A., Keliwon, K. B., & Hassan, H. (2024). eXtensible business reporting language data assurance challenges and strategic approaches: A study in the Malaysian Business Reporting System context. Journal of Information Technology Management, 16(3), 173–191.
Mousa, R. (2013). E-government adoption in the U.K.: XBRL project. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 9(2), 101–119.
Mousa, R., & Ozili, P. K. (2023). A futuristic view of using XBRL technology in non-financial sustainability reporting: The case of the FDIC. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1).
Mousa, R., & Pinsker, R. (2020). A case study of XBRL implementation and development at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management (January).
Myers, M., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26.
Perdana, A. (2016). Current XBRL state and future research agenda.
Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2019). Textual and contextual analysis of professionals’ discourses on XBRL data and information quality. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(3).
Rezaee, Z., Sharbatoghlie, A., & Elam, R. (2018). Continuous auditing: Building automated.
Saragih, A. H., Andini, S., & Hendrawan, A. (2021). A decade of XBRL research in accounting in Indonesia: A literature study. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2).
Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442.
Shan, Y. G., & Troshani, I. (2020). Digital corporate reporting and value relevance: Evidence from the US and Japan. International Journal of Managerial Finance.
Srivastava, R. P., & Liu, Q. (2012). Special issue of JIS on XBRL. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 97–101.
Teo, H. H., Wei, K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.
Uyob, R. Bin. (2024). The usage behavior of the Malaysian Business Reporting System among financial reporting preparers. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Vasarhelyi, M. A., Chan, D. Y., & Krahel, J. P. (2012). Consequences of XBRL standardization on financial statement data. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 155–167.
Wahab, Z. Abd. (2019). Integrating XBRL and blockchain to improve corporate transparency, integrity, and availability in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 1194–1201.
Wahid, F., & Sein, M. K. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs: The driving force in institutionalization of public systems in developing countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 76–92.
Wulandari, S. S., & Ali, S. (2019). Incorporating XBRL topics into the accounting curriculum: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Accounting Education, 28(6), 597–620.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 12 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب